Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 April 2002 in Case T-325/00: Elke Sada v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Temporary agent — Unemployment allowance — Refused)
Date: 2002-06-29
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), social-security benefit, unemployment insurance, work contract

29.6.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 156/21

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 17 April 2002

in Case T-325/00: Elke Sada v Commission of the Euro-
pean Communities (1)

(Officials — Temporary agent — Unemployment allowance
— Refused)

(2002/C 156/39)

(Language of the case: German)

In Case T-325/00: Elke Sada, former temporary agent at
the Commission of the European Communities, residing in
Besozzo (Italy), represented by H.-J. Rüber, Rechtsanwalt, with
an address for service in Luxembourg, against Commission of
the European Communities (Agents: C. Berardis-Kayser and
B. Wägenbaur) — application for annulment of the decision
of the Commission of 20 December 1999 refusing to grant
the applicant an unemployment allowance under Article 28a
of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the
European Communities — the Court of First Instance (Fourth
Chamber), composed of M. Vilaras, President, V. Tiili and
P. Mengozzi, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, gave a judgment on
17 April 2002, in which it:

1.

2.

dismisses the application;

orders the parties to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 372 of 23.12.2000.

of 20 March 2002

in Case T-355/00: DaimlerChrysler AG v Office for
Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and
Designs) (OHIM) (1)

(Community trade mark — ‘TELE AID’ — Absolute grounds
for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC)
No 40/94)

(2002/C 156/40)

(Language of the case: German)

In Case T-355/00: DaimlerChrysler AG, established in Stuttgart
lawyer, v Office for
(Germany), represented by S. Völker,
Harmonisation in the Internal Market
(Trade Marks and
Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: A. von Mühlendahl and D. Schen-
nen) — action brought against the decision of the Third Board
of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 September 2000
(Case R 142/2000-3) relating to registration of ‘TELE AID’ as
a Community trade mark — the Court of First Instance
(Second Chamber, Extended Composition), composed of:
R.M. Moura Ramos, President, V. Tiili, J. Pirrung, P. Mengozzi
and A.W.H. Meij,
Jung, Registrar, has given a
judgment on 20 March 2002, in which it:

Judges; H.

1. Annuls the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office
for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and
Designs) of 12 September 2000 (Case R 142/2000-3) as
regards the following categories of goods and services:

— ‘electrical and electronic devices for transferring speech and
data; stationary and mobile transmission, relay and audio
receivers and devices; data processing equipment and parts
therefor; navigation devices’ within Class 9;

— ‘operation of a communications network’ within Class 38;

— ‘collection, storage, processing and output of information’

within Class 42.

2. As to the remainder, dismisses the action;

3. Orders the applicant to pay its own costs and one half of the
defendant’s costs; the defendant is to pay the other half of its
own costs.

(1) OJ C 28 of 27.1.2001.