do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.2831 — DSV/TNT Logistics/DSV Logistics) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2002-06-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European Commission, economic concentration, merger control, restrictive-practice authorisation

C 133/8

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

5.6.2002

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.2831 — DSV/TNT Logistics/DSV Logistics)

(2002/C 133/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

1.
On 24 May 2002 the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to
Article 4 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1310/97 (2),
by which the undertaking TNT Logistics, belonging to the TPG Group, (Netherlands) acquires, within the
meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Regulation, joint control of the two existing companies DSV Logistic
Holding A/S (Denmark) and DFDS Transport Logistics OY (Finland), currently wholly-owned subsidiaries of
De Sammensluttende Vognmæ A/S, ‘DSV’ (Denmark) by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

— TNT Logistics: general contract logistics services,

— DSV: transport, general contract logistics services and environmental activities,

— DVS: Logistics Holdings A/S: general contract logistics services,

— DFDS Transport Logistics: general contract logistics services.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified concentration could fall within

3.
the scope of Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit

4.
proposed operation.

their possible observations on the

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication.
Observations can be sent by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference
COMP/M.2831 — DSV/TNT Logistics/DSV Logistics, to:

European Commission,
Directorate-General for Competition,
Directorate B — Merger Task Force,
J-70,
B-1049 Brussels.

(1) OJ L 395, 30.12.1989, p. 1; corrigendum: OJ L 257, 21.9.1990, p. 13.
(2) OJ L 180, 9.7.1997, p. 1; corrigendum: OJ L 40, 13.2.1998, p. 17.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.2740 — Scottish & Newcastle/Hartwall) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2002-06-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Publications Office of the European Union, database, dissemination of EU information, economic concentration, merger control, restrictive-practice authorisation

5.6.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 133/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.2712 — Electrabel/TotalFinaElf/Photovoltech)

(2002/C 133/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 18 April 2002 the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare
it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation
(EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be made public after it
is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

— in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document No 302M2712. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.2740 — Scottish & Newcastle/Hartwall)

(2002/C 133/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 4 April 2002 the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it
compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC)
No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be made public after it is
cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

— in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document No 302M2740. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.2712 — Electrabel/TotalFinaElf/Photovoltech) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2002-06-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Publications Office of the European Union, database, dissemination of EU information, economic concentration, merger control, restrictive-practice authorisation

5.6.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 133/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.2712 — Electrabel/TotalFinaElf/Photovoltech)

(2002/C 133/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 18 April 2002 the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare
it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation
(EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be made public after it
is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

— in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document No 302M2712. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.2740 — Scottish & Newcastle/Hartwall)

(2002/C 133/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 4 April 2002 the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it
compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC)
No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be made public after it is
cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

— in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document No 302M2740. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1590/02 by Glyn Ford (PSE) to the Commission. Carriers' liability.
Date: 2002-06-05
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU migration policy, illegal migration, liability, migration control, taxi, transport company

9.10.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242 E/3

amount to violations of the European Convention on Human Rights, in particular its Article 6 on the right
to a fair trial and Article 1 of Protocol No 1 on the protection of property (since a driver risks having his
vehicle confiscated if he cannot pay the fine immediately).

(1) OJ C 301 E, 5.12.2002, p. 45.

(2003/C 242 E/005)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1590/02

by Glyn Ford (PSE) to the Commission

(5 June 2002)

Subject: Carriers’ liability

Further to my questions on carriers’ liability (E-0488/02 (cid:1) 0493/02) (1) and the Commission’s reply of
4 April 2002, could the Commission comment on the following point:

Since the Commission continues to share the view that carriers’ liability legislation ‘may be an efficient tool
in fighting illegal immigration’ and the Commission is apparently also of the view that such legislation
should be fully harmonised and applied to all means of transport, does the European Commission also feel
it necessary, for the sake of consistency and of wanting to avoid double standards, to impose carriers’
liability legislation on taxi drivers as well as owners of private vehicles in regions close to the EU external
borders? It may interest the Commission to know that this is already the case in at least two Member
States, Greece and Spain.

(1) OJ C 301 E, 5.12.2002, p. 45.

(2003/C 242 E/006)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1591/02

by Glyn Ford (PSE) to the Commission

(5 June 2002)

Subject: Carriers’ liability

Further to my questions on carriers’ liability (E-0488/02 (cid:1) 0493/02) (1) and the Commission’s reply of
4 April 2002, could the Commission comment on the following point:

The Commission’s comment on the ruling of the Austrian Constitutional Court that it did not challenge
the principle of carriers’ liability as a means of restricting illegal immigration is indeed correct. However, as
the Commission is aware, courts do not have the habit of responding to questions which are not raised
and the Austrian Constitutional Court was not asked for an opinion on whether carriers’ liability is a
means of restricting illegal immigration.

(1) OJ C 301 E, 5.12.2002, p. 45.

(2003/C 242 E/007)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1592/02

by Glyn Ford (PSE) to the Commission

(5 June 2002)

Subject: Carriers’ liability

Further to my questions on carriers’ liability (E-0488/02 (cid:1) 0493/02) (1) and the Commission’s reply of
4 April 2002, could the Commission comment on the following point:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 956/2002 of 5 June 2002 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2002-06-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, import price, pip fruit, stone fruit

6.6.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

L 148/3

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 956/2002

of 5 June 2002

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and
vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

(2)

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

In compliance with the above criteria,
the standard
import values must be fixed at the levels set out in the
Annex to this Regulation,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of
21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the
import arrangements
last
amended by Regulation (EC) No 1498/98 (2), and in particular
Article 4(1) thereof,

fruit and vegetables (1), as

for

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Whereas:

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 lays down, pursuant to the
outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade nego-
tiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the
standard values for imports from third countries,
in
respect of the products and periods stipulated in the
Annex thereto.

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regula-
tion (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex
hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 6 June 2002.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 June 2002.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

(1) OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66.
(2) OJ L 198, 15.7.1998, p. 4.

L 148/4

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

6.6.2002

to the Commission Regulation of 5 June 2002 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry
price of certain fruit and vegetables

ANNEX

CN code

0702 00 00

0707 00 05

0709 90 70

0805 50 10

0808 10 20, 0808 10 50, 0808 10 90

0809 10 00

0809 20 95

Third country
code (1)

Standard import
value

(EUR/100 kg)

052
999
052
220
999
052
999
052
388
528
999
388
400
404
508
512
524
528
720
804
999
052
999
052
400
999

42,4
42,4
93,3
143,3
118,3
82,5
82,5
71,2
79,0
66,3
72,2
100,6
90,0
103,3
84,8
80,8
70,3
77,9
157,8
115,9
97,9
166,4
166,4
367,7
283,0
325,4

(1) Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2020/2001 (OJ L 273, 16.10.2001, p. 6). Code ‘999’ stands for ‘of

other origin’.