do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-142/02: Action brought on 16 April 2002 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
Date: 2002-06-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, Luxembourg, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, lawyer, member country, recognition of diplomas, recognition of vocational training qualifications

1.6.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 131/13

(2) order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition expired on 14 March 2000.

(1) OJ L 181 of 9.7.1997, p. 1.

The period for transposing the directive expired on 29 May
1999.

(1) OJ L 77 of 14.3.1998, p. 36.

Action brought on 16 April 2002 by the Commission of
the European Communities against the Grand Duchy of
Luxembourg

(Case C-142/02)

(2002/C 131/25)

An action against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg was
brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communi-
ties on 16 April 2002 by the Commission of the European
Communities, represented by M. Patakia, acting as Agent, with
an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that
the Court should:

(1) declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations
and administrative measures necessary in order to comply
with Directive 98/5/EC of the European Parliament and
of the Council of 16 February 1998 to facilitate practice
of the profession of lawyer on a permanent basis in a
Member State other than that in which the qualification
was obtained (1), the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has
failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

(2) order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition expired on 14 March 2000.

(1) OJ L 77 of 14.3.1998, p. 36.

Action brought on 11 April 2002 by the Commission of
the European Communities against the Federal Republic
of Germany

(Case C-135/02)

(2002/C 131/24)

An action against the Federal Republic of Germany was
brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communi-
ties on 11 April 2002 by the Commission of the European
Communities, represented by Josef Christian Schieferer, of the
Legal Service of the Commission of the European Communi-
ties, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of
Luis Escobar Guerrero, of its Legal Service, Wagner Centre
C 254, Kirchberg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

1. Declare that, by failing within the prescribed period to
notify to the Commission, or failing to adopt the laws,
regulations and administrative provisions necessary to
comply with Directive 97/23/EC (1) of
the European
Parliament and of the Council of 29 May 1997 on
the approximation of the laws of the Member States
concerning pressure equipment, the Federal Republic of
Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC
Treaty and that directive;

2. Order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.
Case C-135/02: Action brought on 11 April 2002 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Federal Republic of Germany
Date: 2002-06-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, Germany, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, approximation of laws, pressure equipment

1.6.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 131/13

(2) order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition expired on 14 March 2000.

(1) OJ L 181 of 9.7.1997, p. 1.

The period for transposing the directive expired on 29 May
1999.

(1) OJ L 77 of 14.3.1998, p. 36.

Action brought on 16 April 2002 by the Commission of
the European Communities against the Grand Duchy of
Luxembourg

(Case C-142/02)

(2002/C 131/25)

An action against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg was
brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communi-
ties on 16 April 2002 by the Commission of the European
Communities, represented by M. Patakia, acting as Agent, with
an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that
the Court should:

(1) declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations
and administrative measures necessary in order to comply
with Directive 98/5/EC of the European Parliament and
of the Council of 16 February 1998 to facilitate practice
of the profession of lawyer on a permanent basis in a
Member State other than that in which the qualification
was obtained (1), the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has
failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

(2) order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition expired on 14 March 2000.

(1) OJ L 77 of 14.3.1998, p. 36.

Action brought on 11 April 2002 by the Commission of
the European Communities against the Federal Republic
of Germany

(Case C-135/02)

(2002/C 131/24)

An action against the Federal Republic of Germany was
brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communi-
ties on 11 April 2002 by the Commission of the European
Communities, represented by Josef Christian Schieferer, of the
Legal Service of the Commission of the European Communi-
ties, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of
Luis Escobar Guerrero, of its Legal Service, Wagner Centre
C 254, Kirchberg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

1. Declare that, by failing within the prescribed period to
notify to the Commission, or failing to adopt the laws,
regulations and administrative provisions necessary to
comply with Directive 97/23/EC (1) of
the European
Parliament and of the Council of 29 May 1997 on
the approximation of the laws of the Member States
concerning pressure equipment, the Federal Republic of
Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC
Treaty and that directive;

2. Order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2002-06-01
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate

1.6.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 130/3

COMMISSION

Euro exchange rates (1)

31 May 2002

(2002/C 130/03)

1 euro =

USD

JPY

DKK

GBP

SEK

CHF

ISK

NOK

BGN

CYP

CZK

EEK

HUF

LTL

Currency

US dollar

Japanese yen

Danish krone

Pound sterling

Swedish krona

Swiss franc

Iceland króna

Norwegian krone

Bulgarian lev

Cyprus pound

Czech koruna

Estonian kroon

Hungarian forint

Lithuanian litas

Exchange
rate

0,9387

116,39

7,4323

LVL

MTL

PLN

Currency

Latvian lats

Maltese lira

Polish zloty

Exchange
rate

0,5815

0,4107

3,7783

0,64050

ROL

Romanian leu

31447

9,1070

1,4644

85,77

7,4780

1,9521

SIT

SKK

TRL

AUD

CAD

Slovenian tolar

Slovak koruna

Turkish lira

Australian dollar

Canadian dollar

0,57897

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

30,418

NZD

New Zealand dollar

15,6466

SGD

Singapore dollar

225,4898

43,670

1357000

1,6514

1,4382

7,3216

1,9441

1,6758

242,60

KRW

South Korean won

1139,96

3,4524

ZAR

South African rand

9,1903

___________
(1) Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Order of the Court of First Instance of 25 January 2002 in Case T-207/00: Nuno Antas de Campos v European Parliament (Officials — Mobility scheme of the European Parliament — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2002-06-01
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Parliament, European official, Portugal, action for annulment (EU), regulations for civil servants, workplace

1.6.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 131/17

2.

3.

The remainder of the application is dismissed.

2. Orders the Commission to pay the costs.

The Commission is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 227 of 11.8.2001.

In Cases T-357/00, T-361/00 and T-363/00:

1.

2.

The applications are dismissed.

The parties shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 61 of 24.2.2001.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 20 February 2002

in Case T-117/01: Marcos Roman Parra v Commission of
the European Communities (1)

(Officials — Promotion — Complaint through official
channels — Implied rejection — Reasons)

(2002/C 131/32)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-117/01: Marcos Roman Parra, an official of the
Commission of the European Communities, residing in Zaven-
tem (Belgium), represented by J.-N. Louis and V. Peere,
avocats, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against
Commission of the European Communities (Agents: C. Berar-
dis-Kayser) — application for annulment of the Commission’s
decision not to promote him to Grade A 6 in the course of the
2000 promotion procedure — the Court of First Instance
(Single Judge: Mr H. Legal); Blanca Pastor, Principal Adminis-
trator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 20 February
2002, in which it:

1. Annuls the decision of

the Commission not

to promote
Mr Roman Parra to Grade A 6 in the course of the 2000
promotion procedure, as evidenced by the publication in
Administrative Notices No 65-2000 of 14 August 2000 of
the list of officials promoted to that Grade.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 25 January 2002

in Case T-207/00: Nuno Antas de Campos v European
Parliament (1)

(Officials — Mobility scheme of the European Parliament
— Inadmissibility)

(2002/C 131/33)

(Language of the case: Portuguese)

In Case T-207/00: Nuno Antas de Campos, an official of
the European Parliament, residing in Lisbon, represented by
C. Botelho Moniz,
lawyer, with an address for service in
Luxembourg, against European Parliament (Agents: R. Da Silva
Passos and J.F. De Wachter) — application for annulment of
the decision communicated to him by a letter of 30 March
2000 by the Directorate General of Personnel, according to
which he is subject to the mobility scheme for 2000 — the
Court of First
Instance (Second Chamber), composed of
R.M. Moura Ramos, President, J. Pirrung and A.W.H. Meij,
Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 25 January 2002,
the operative part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

3.

The order is dismissed as inadmissible.

The European Parliament shall bear its own costs and pay one
half of those incurred by the applicant. The applicant shall bear
one half of his own costs.

The parties shall bear their own costs incurred in the interlocu-
tory proceedings.

(1) OJ C 302 21.10.2000.
Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 December 2001 in Case C-301/00 P: Karl L. Meyer v Commission of the European Communities (PTOM — Project financed by the EDF — Action for damages — Legitimate expectations — Commission duty to monitor)
Date: 2002-06-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: General Court (EU), appeal to the Court (EU), infringement of EU law, right to justice

1.6.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 131/1

I

(Information)

COURT OF JUSTICE

COURT OF JUSTICE

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 11 December 2001

(Fourth Chamber)

of 13 December 2001

in Case C-301/00 P: Karl L. Meyer v Commission of the
European Communities (1)

in Case C-61/01 P: Francis Panichelli v European Parlia-
ment (1)

(PTOM — Project financed by the EDF — Action for
damages — Legitimate expectations — Commission duty to
monitor)

(Officials — Temporary agent — Lack of promotion —
Reassessment of post — Drawing up of staff reports —
Termination of contract — Appeal manifestly inadmissible
and manifestly unfounded)

(2002/C 131/01)

(Language of the case: French)

(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published
in the European Court Reports)

In Case 301/00 P: Karl L. Meyer, residing at Uturoa (Island of
Raiatea, French Polynesia), represented by J.-D. des Arcis,
avocat, — appeal against the judgment of the Court of First
Instance of the European Communities, Third Chamber, of
27 June 2000 in Case T-72/99 Meyer v Commission [2000]
ECR II-2521, seeking to have that judgment set aside, the other
party to the proceedings being Commission of the European
Communities (Agent: X. Lewis) — the Court, composed of
N. Colneric (Rapporteur), President of Chamber, R. Schintgen
and V. Skouris, Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; R. Grass,
Registrar, made an order on 11 December 2001, the operative
part of which is as follows:

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Meyer shall bear the costs.

(1) OJ C 273 of 23.9.2000.

(2002/C 131/02)

(Language of the case: French)

(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published
in the European Court Reports)

In Case 61/01 P: Francis Panichelli, residing in Wezembeek-
Oppem (Belgium), represented by E. Boigelot, lawyer — appeal
against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the
European Communities, Second Chamber, of 13 December
2000 in Joined Cases T-130/98 and T-131/98 Panichelli v
Parliament [2000] ECR-SC I-A-287, II-1311, seeking to have
that judgment set aside, the other party to the proceedings
being European Parliament (Agents: J. F. de Wachter and
D. Moore) — the Court, composed of S. von Bahr (Rapporteur),
President of Chamber, D.A.O. Edward and A. La Pergola,
Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar,
made an order on 13 December 2001, the operative part of
which is as follows:

1.

The appeal brought by Mr Panichelli and the cross-appeal
brought by the European Parliament are dismissed.

2. Mr Panichelli and the European Parliament shall bear their

own costs.