Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) 5 March 2002 in Cases C-515/99, C-519/99 to C-524/99 and C-526/99 to C-540/99 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat Salzburg): Hans Reisch e.a. v Bürgermeister der Landeshauptstadt Salzburg, Grundverkehrsbeauftragter des Landes Salzburg, Grundverkehrslandeskommission des Landes Salzburg (Free movement of capital — Article 56 EC — Prior notification and authorisation procedure for the acquisition of building plots — Absence of purely internal situation)
Date: 2002-05-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: acquisition of property, administrative procedure, fundamental rights, interpretation of the law

4.5.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 109/5

(Rapporteur), President of the Second Chamber, acting for the
President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann, R. Schintgen, V. Skou-
ris and J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer,
Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Administrator, for the Registrar,
has given a judgment on 7 March 1999, in which it:

1. Dismisses the application;

Salzburg, on the interpretation of Articles 56 EC to 60 EC, the
Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: N. Colneric, President of
the Second Chamber, acting for the President of the Sixth
Chamber, C. Gulmann,
(Rapporteur),
J.-P.
R. Schintgen and V. Skouris, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate
General; H.A. Rühl, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar,
has given a judgment on 5 March 2002, in which it has ruled:

Puissochet

2. Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Articles 56 EC to 60 EC:

(1) OJ C 299 of 16.10.1999.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

5 March 2002

in Cases C-515/99, C-519/99 to C-524/99 and C-526/99 to
C-540/99 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the
Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat Salzburg): Hans Reisch
e.a. v Bürgermeister der Landeshauptstadt Salzburg,
Grundverkehrsbeauftragter des Landes Salzburg, Grund-
verkehrslandeskommission des Landes Salzburg (1)

(Free movement of capital — Article 56 EC — Prior
notification and authorisation procedure for the acquisition
of building plots — Absence of purely internal situation)

(2002/C 109/07)

(Language of the case: German)

(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published
in the European Court Reports)

— do not preclude a prior notification procedure such as that laid
down by the scheme for the acquisition of land established by
the Salzburger Grundverkehrsgesetz 1997;

— preclude a prior authorisation procedure such as that laid down

by that scheme.

(1) OJ C 79 of 18.3.2000.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

27 February 2002

in Case C-6/00 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from
the Verwaltungsgerichtshof): Abfall Service AG (ASA) v
Bundesminister für Umwelt, Jugend und Familie (1)

(Environment — Waste — Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 on
shipments of waste — Competence of the authority of
dispatch to scrutinise the classification of the purpose of a
shipment (recovery or disposal) and to object to a shipment
on the ground of an incorrect classification — Directive
75/442/EEC on waste — Classification of deposit of waste
in a disused mine)

(2002/C 109/08)

(Language of the case: German)

In Joined Cases C-515/99, C-519/99 to C-524/99 and
C-526/99 to C-540/99: Reference to the Court under
Article 234 EC by the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat Salz-
burg (Austria) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings
pending before that court between Hans Reisch (C-515/99),
Walter Riedl
(C-528/99),
(C-527/99), Alexander Hacker
Gerhard Eckert (C-529/99), Franz Gstöttenbauer (C-530/99),
Helmut Hechwarter (C-531/99), Alois Bixner (C-532/99), Geza
Aumüller (C-533/99), Berthold Garstenauer (C-534/99 and
C-536/99), Robert Eder
(C-535/99), Hartmut Ramsauer
(C-537/99 and C-538/99), Harald Kronberger (C-539/99),
Erich Morianz (C-540/99) and Bürgermeister der Landes-
hauptstadt Salzburg, Grundverkehrsbeauftragter des Landes

(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published
in the European Court Reports)

In Case C-6/00: Reference to the Court under Article 234 EC
by the Verwaltungsgerichtshof
(Austria) for a preliminary
ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between
Abfall Service AG (ASA) and Bundesminister für Umwelt,
Jugend und Familie, on the interpretation of Council Regu-
lation (EEC) No 259/93 of 1 February 1993 on the supervision
and control of shipments of waste within, into and out of the