Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 November 2001 in Case C-223/00 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo): Director-Geral do Departamento para os Assuntos do Fundo Social Europeu v Partex — Companhia Portuguesa de Serviços SA (Preliminary references — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2002-04-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Social Fund, European organisation, Portugal, administrative expenditure, interpretation of the law

C 84/32

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

6.4.2002

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 22 November 2001

(Third Chamber)

of 23 October 2001

in Case C-281/00 P: Una Film ‘City Revue’ GmbH v
European Parliament and Others (1)

in Case C-223/00 (reference for a preliminary ruling from
the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo): Director-Geral do
Departamento para os Assuntos do Fundo Social Europeu
v Partex — Companhia Portuguesa de Serviços SA (1)

(Directive 98/43/EC concerning the advertising and sponsor-
ship of tobacco products — Appeal — No need to adjudicate
— Costs)

(Preliminary references — Inadmissibility)

(2002/C 84/52)

(Language of the case: Portuguese)

(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published
in the European Court Reports)

In Case C-223/00: reference to the Court under Article 234
EC from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Supreme
Administrative Court) for a preliminary ruling in the proceed-
ings pending before that court between Director-Geral do
Departamento para os Assuntos do Fundo Social Europeu and
Partex- Companhia Portuguesa de Serviços SA — on the
interpretation of Council Decision 83/516/EEC of 17 October
1983 on the tasks of the European Social Fund (OJ 1983
L 289, p. 38) and of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2950/83 of
17 October 1983 on the implementation of Decision 83/516
— the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: F. Macken,
President of
the Chamber, N. Colneric, C. Gulmann,
J.-P. Puissochet and R. Schintgen, Judges; J. Mischo, Advocate
General; R. Grass, Registrar, has made an order on 22 Novem-
ber 2001, in which it has ruled:

The reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Supremo Tribunal
Administrativo, by decision of 10 May 1999, is inadmissible.

(1) OJ 2000 C 233.

(2002/C 84/53)

(Language of the case: German)

(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published
in the European Court Reports)

In Case C-281/00 P: appeal by Una Film ‘City Revue’ GmbH,
established in Vienna (Austria), represented by R. Borgelt,
Rechtsanwalt, assisted by Professor M. Dauses, against the
judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European
Communities (Third Chamber) of 27 June 2000 in Joined
Cases T-172/98 and T-175/98 to T-177/98 Salamander and
Others v Parliament and Council [2000] ECR II-2487, seeking
to have that judgment set aside and the claims made by the
applicant at first instance upheld, the other parties to the
proceedings being: European Parliament (Agents: C. Pennera
and M. Berger), Council of the European Union (Agents:
R. Gosalbo Bono and S. Marquardt), Commission of the
European Communities (Agents: U. Wölker and I. Martı´nez
del Peral), Markenverband eV, established in Wiesbaden (Germ-
any), Manifattura Lane Gaetano Marzotto & Figli SpA, estab-
lished in Valdagno (Italy), Lancaster BV, established in Amster-
dam (Netherlands), French Republic, Republic of Finland,
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland,
Salamander AG, established in Kornwestheim (Germany), Zino
Davidoff SA, established in Fribourg (Switzerland), Davidoff &
Cie SA, established in Geneva (Switzerland), Alma Media
Group Advertising SA & Co. Partnership, Panel Two and Four
Advertising SA, Rythmos Outdoor Advertising SA and Media
Center Advertising SA, established in Athens (Greece) — the
Court (Third Chamber), composed of: C. Gulmann, acting
J.-P. Puissochet
for the President of
(Rapporteur) and J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo
Colomer, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has made an
order on 23 October 2001, the operative part of which is as
follows:

the Third Chamber,

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the appeal brought by Una
Film ‘City Revue’ GmbH.

2. Una Film ‘City Revue’ GmbH, the European Parliament and
the Council of the European Union shall bear their own costs.