do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 485/2002 of 18 March 2002 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2002-03-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, import price, pip fruit

19.3.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

L 76/7

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 485/2002

of 18 March 2002

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and
vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

(2)

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

In compliance with the above criteria,
the standard
import values must be fixed at the levels set out in the
Annex to this Regulation,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of
21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the
last
import arrangements
amended by Regulation (EC) No 1498/98 (2), and in particular
Article 4(1) thereof,

fruit and vegetables (1), as

for

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Whereas:

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 lays down, pursuant to the
outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade nego-
tiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the
standard values for imports from third countries,
in
respect of the products and periods stipulated in the
Annex thereto.

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regula-
tion (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex
hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 March 2002.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 March 2002.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66.
(2) OJ L 198, 15.7.1998, p. 4.

L 76/8

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

19.3.2002

to the Commission Regulation of 18 March 2002 establishing the standard import values for determining the
entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

ANNEX

CN code

0702 00 00

0707 00 05

0709 90 70

0805 10 10, 0805 10 30, 0805 10 50

0805 50 10

0808 10 20, 0808 10 50, 0808 10 90

0808 20 50

Third country
code (1)

Standard import
value

(EUR/100 kg)

052
204
212
624
999
052
204
624
999
052
204
999
052
204
212
220
421
600
624
999
052
600
999
060
388
400
404
508
512
528
720
728
999
388
400
512
528
999

185,4
164,7
174,9
193,8
179,7
195,8
50,7
119,8
122,1
137,3
71,2
104,3
59,1
51,0
45,8
49,8
29,6
63,2
77,8
53,8
46,5
49,4
48,0
42,4
109,1
128,3
98,8
77,5
80,2
95,1
118,7
133,7
98,2
86,2
104,2
71,1
71,6
83,3

(1) Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2020/2001 (OJ L 273, 16.10.2001, p. 6). Code ‘999’ stands for ‘of

other origin’.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 486/2002 of 18 March 2002 amending Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 on the raw tobacco sector as regards the setting of certain time limits
Date: 2002-03-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agricultural guidance, derogation from EU law, production aid, production quota, tobacco

19.3.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

L 76/9

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 486/2002

of 18 March 2002

amending Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 on the raw tobacco sector as regards the setting of certain
time limits

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

(2)

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 of 30
June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in raw
tobacco (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1336/
2000 (2), and in particular Article 11 thereof,

Whereas:

(1)

intended to set

In the absence of a Council decision on the Commission
proposal (3)
the maximum guarantee
thresholds for the 2002, 2003 and 2004 harvests, for
the 2002 harvest the Member States cannot meet the
time limits for issuing quota statements to producers or
those for concluding cultivation contracts
fixed by
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 of 22
December 1998 laying down detailed rules for the
application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 as
regards the premium scheme, production quotas and the
specific aid to be granted to producer groups in the raw
tobacco sector (4), as last amended by Regulation (EC)
No 1441/2001 (5). Those time limits must therefore be
postponed.

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in
the Management
accordance with the opinion of
Committee for Tobacco,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 55 of Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 is replaced by the
following:

‘Article 55

For the 2002 harvest, notwithstanding Article 22(3),
1.
the Member States shall
issue quota statements to indi-
vidual producers who are not members of a group and to
producer groups by 30 April 2002.

2.
For the 2002 harvest, not withstanding Article 10(1),
cultivation contracts must be concluded, except in cases of
force majeure, by 30 June 2002.’

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter
into force on the third day
following its publication in the Official Journal of the European
Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 March 2002.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 215, 30.7.1992, p. 70.
(2) OJ L 154, 27.6.2000, p. 2.
(3) COM(2001) 684 final.
(4) OJ L 358, 31.12.1998, p. 17.
(5) OJ L 193, 17.7.2001, p. 5.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0772/02 by Nicholas Clegg (ELDR) to the Commission. Physical Agents (Noise) Directive.
Date: 2002-03-18
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: business administration, drafting of EU law, economic consequence, impact study, labour law, mechanical vibration, noise, occupational health, small and medium-sized enterprises, working conditions

12.12.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 309 E/45

(2002/C 309 E/050)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0772/02

by Nicholas Clegg (ELDR) to the Commission

(18 March 2002)

Subject: Physical Agents (Noise) Directive

Did the European Commission conduct a full Regulatory Impact Assessment, especially as the proposal
will affect SMEs, on the draft Physical Agents (Noise) Directive? If not, why not?

(2002/C 309 E/051)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0773/02

by Nicholas Clegg (ELDR) to the Commission

(18 March 2002)

Subject: Physical Agents (Vibrations) Directive

Did the European Commission conduct a full Regulatory Impact Assessment, especially as the proposal
will affect SMEs, on the draft Physical Agents (Vibrations) Directive? If not, why not?

Joint answer
to Written Questions E-0772/02 and E-0773/02
given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(25 April 2002)

The Honourable Member should refer to the Commission’s answers to Written Question E-3212/01 from
Mr Bowis and others (1) and Written Question E-0703/02 from Mr Bushill-Matthews and others (2).

(1) OJ C 147 E, 20.6.2002, p. 132.
(2) See page 38.

(2002/C 309 E/052)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0774/02

by Charles Tannock (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(18 March 2002)

Subject: The Return of Powers from the Commission to the Member States

At the opening of the Constitutional Convention on 28 February, Commission President Prodi said that the
Commission had to be prepared to return powers to the Member States. Which specific competences does
the Commission think should be returned, and will the Commission’s proposals in this area be relayed
through Commissioners Barnier and Vitorino at the Convention or by the Commission President or his
spokesman?

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(6 May 2002)

The Commission President gave his address at the inaugural meeting of the Convention and it should be
viewed in that political context. The members of the Convention are being asked to reflect together on the
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0773/02 by Nicholas Clegg (ELDR) to the Commission. Physical Agents (Vibrations) Directive.
Date: 2002-03-18
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: business administration, drafting of EU law, economic consequence, impact study, labour law, mechanical vibration, noise, occupational health, small and medium-sized enterprises, working conditions

12.12.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 309 E/45

(2002/C 309 E/050)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0772/02

by Nicholas Clegg (ELDR) to the Commission

(18 March 2002)

Subject: Physical Agents (Noise) Directive

Did the European Commission conduct a full Regulatory Impact Assessment, especially as the proposal
will affect SMEs, on the draft Physical Agents (Noise) Directive? If not, why not?

(2002/C 309 E/051)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0773/02

by Nicholas Clegg (ELDR) to the Commission

(18 March 2002)

Subject: Physical Agents (Vibrations) Directive

Did the European Commission conduct a full Regulatory Impact Assessment, especially as the proposal
will affect SMEs, on the draft Physical Agents (Vibrations) Directive? If not, why not?

Joint answer
to Written Questions E-0772/02 and E-0773/02
given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(25 April 2002)

The Honourable Member should refer to the Commission’s answers to Written Question E-3212/01 from
Mr Bowis and others (1) and Written Question E-0703/02 from Mr Bushill-Matthews and others (2).

(1) OJ C 147 E, 20.6.2002, p. 132.
(2) See page 38.

(2002/C 309 E/052)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0774/02

by Charles Tannock (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(18 March 2002)

Subject: The Return of Powers from the Commission to the Member States

At the opening of the Constitutional Convention on 28 February, Commission President Prodi said that the
Commission had to be prepared to return powers to the Member States. Which specific competences does
the Commission think should be returned, and will the Commission’s proposals in this area be relayed
through Commissioners Barnier and Vitorino at the Convention or by the Commission President or his
spokesman?

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(6 May 2002)

The Commission President gave his address at the inaugural meeting of the Convention and it should be
viewed in that political context. The members of the Convention are being asked to reflect together on the