Case C-472/01 P: Appeal brought on 6 December 2001 by Procter & Gamble Company against the judgment delivered on 19 September 2001 by the Second Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in case T-121/00 between Procter & Gamble Company and Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Date: 2002-03-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Union Intellectual Property Office, General Court (EU), action for annulment (EU), household electrical appliance, polishing and scouring preparations, trade mark

16.3.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 68/3

Appeal brought on 6 December 2001 by Procter &
Gamble Company against the judgment delivered on
19 September 2001 by the Second Chamber of the Court
of First Instance of the European Communities in case
T-119/00 (1) between Procter & Gamble Company and
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade
Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case C-470/01 P)

(2002/C 68/05)

An appeal against the judgment delivered on 19 September
2001 by the Second Chamber of the Court of First Instance
of the European Communities in case T-119/00 between
Procter & Gamble Company and Office for Harmonisation in
the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) was
brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communi-
ties on 6 December 2001 by Procter & Gamble Company,
established in Cincinnati, Ohio (United States of America),
represented by C.J.J.C. van Nispen and G. Kuipers, lawyers.

The Appellant claims that the Court should:

— annul the judgment

— order the OHIM to pay the costs both at first instance

and on appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

See case C-468/01 P.

(1) OJ C 192, 8.7.2000, p. 21.

Appeal brought on 6 December 2001 by Procter &
Gamble Company against the judgment delivered on
19 september 2001 by the Second Chamber of the Court
of First Instance of the European Communities in case
T-120/00 (1) between Procter & Gamble Company and
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade
Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

established in Cincinnati, Ohio (United States of America),
represented by C.J.J.C. van Nispen and G. Kuipers, lawyers.

The Appellant claims that the Court should:

— annul the judgment

— order the OHIM to pay the costs both at first instance

and on appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

See case C-468/01 P.

(1) OJ C 192, 8.7.2000, p. 22.

Appeal brought on 6 December 2001 by Procter &
Gamble Company against the judgment delivered on
19 September 2001 by the Second Chamber of the Court
of First Instance of the European Communities in case
T-121/00 (1) between Procter & Gamble Company and
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade
Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case C-472/01 P)

(2002/C 68/07)

An appeal against the judgment delivered on 19 September
2001 by the Second Chamber of the Court of First Instance of
the European Communities in case T-121/00 between Procter
& Gamble Company and Office for Harmonisation in the
Internal Market
(OHIM) was
brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communi-
ties on 6 December 2001 by Procter & Gamble Company,
established in Cincinnati, Ohio (United States of America),
represented by C.J.J.C. van Nispen and G. Kuipers, lawyers.

(Trade Marks and Designs)

The Appellant claims that the Court should:

— annul the judgment

(Case C-471/01 P)

— order the OHIM to pay the costs both at first instance

(2002/C 68/06)

An appeal against the judgment delivered on 19 September
2001 by the Second Chamber of the Court of First Instance of
the European Communities in case T-120/00 between Procter
& Gamble Company and Office for Harmonisation in the
(OHIM) was
Internal Market
brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communi-
ties on 6 December 2001 by Procter & Gamble Company,

(Trade Marks and Designs)

and on appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

See case C-468/01 P.

(1) OJ C 192, 8.7.2000, p. 22.