Order of the Court of First Instance of 3 October 2001 in Case T-60/01: Marie-Josée Bollendorff v European Parliament (Action for annulment — Withdrawal of the contested measure — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2002-01-19
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Parliament, European official, action for annulment (EU), incapacity for work, paid leave, sick leave

19.1.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 17/13

1.

2.

The Commission’s application is dismissed.

Costs are reserved.

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST
INSTANCE

of 29 March 2001

in Case T-302/00 R: Anthony Goldstein v Commission of
the European Communities

(Action for interim measures — Admissibility — Urgency)

(2002/C 17/22)

(Language of the case: English)

In Case T-302/00 R: Anthony Goldstein, residing at Harrow,
John
Middlesex (United Kingdom), represented by R. St.
Murphy, Solicitor, against the Commission of the European
Communities (Agents: P. Oliver and R. Lyal) — application
for interim measures in connection with an action under
Article 230 EC for annulment of the Commission’s decision of
7 July 2000 rejecting the applicant’s complaint concerning the
alleged infringement of Articles 81 and 82 EC by the General
Medical Council — the President of the Court of First Instance
made an order on 29 March 2001, the operative part of which
is as follows:

1.

2.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

The costs are reserved.

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST
INSTANCE

of 29 March 2001

in Case T-18/01 R: Anthony Goldstein v Commission of
the European Communities

(Application for interim measures — Admissibility —
Urgency)

(2002/C 17/23)

(Language of the case: English)

In Case T-18/01 R: Anthony Goldstein, residing at Harrow,
John
Middlesex (United Kingdom), represented by R. St.

Murphy, Solicitor, against the Commission of the European
Communities (Agents: P. Oliver) — application for interim
measures in connection with an action under Article 230 EC
for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 12 January
2001 rejecting the applicant’s complaint concerning the
alleged infringement of Articles 81 and 82 EC by the General
Council of the Bar of England and Wales, the President of the
Court of First Instance made an order on 29 March 2001, the
operative part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

The costs are reserved.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 3 October 2001

in Case T-60/01: Marie-Josée Bollendorff v European
Parliament (1)

(Action for annulment — Withdrawal of the contested
measure — No need to adjudicate)

(2002/C 17/24)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-60/01: Marie-Josée Bollendorff, residing in Luxem-
bourg, represented by L. Mosar, lawyer, with an address for
service in Luxembourg, against European Parliament (Agents:
Y. Pantalis and D. Moore) — application for annulment of the
decision of the Parliament to regard as irregular the absence of
the applicant from 21 March 2000 to 30 April 2000 and to
leave entitlement —
deduct that absence from her annual
the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), composed of
B. Vesterdorf, President, N.J. Forwood and H. Legal, Judges;
H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 3 October 2001, the
operative part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

There is no need to adjudicate in the present case.

The Parliament shall bear the entire costs.

(1) OJ 2001 C 173.