Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2001 in Case T-337/99: Henkel KGaA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Shape of a product for washing machines or dishwashers — Three-dimensional mark — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
Date: 2002-01-05
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU law, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), polishing and scouring preparations, trade mark

C 3/24

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

5.1.2002

2. Orders that the sums referred to in paragraph (1) above shall
bear simple interest at the same rate from the date of the present
judgment until full and final payment;

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 19 September 2001

3. Dismisses the remainder of the application;

4. Orders the Commission to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 281 of 2.10.1999.

in Case T-337/99: Henkel KGaA v Office for Harmonis-
ation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
(OHIM) (1)

(Community trade mark — Shape of a product for washing
machines or dishwashers — Three-dimensional mark —
Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation
(EC) No 40/94)

(2002/C 3/39)

(Language of the case: German)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 20 June 2001

in Case T-188/99: Euroalliages v Commission of the
European Communities (1)

(Dumping — Decision terminating an expiry review —
Action for annulment)

(2002/C 3/38)

In Case T-337/99: Henkel KGaA, established in Düsseldorf
(Germany), represented by H.F. Wissel and C. Osterrieth,
lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks
and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: A. von Mühlendahl, D. Schen-
nen and S. Laitinen) — application brought against
the
decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for
Harmonisation in the Internal Market
(Trade Marks and
Designs) of 21 September 1999 (Case R 73/1999-3), which
was notified to the applicant on 28 September 1999 — the
Court of First
Instance (Second Chamber), composed of
A.W.H. Meij, President, A. Potocki and J. Pirrung, Judges;
D. Christensen, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a
judgment on 19 September 2001, in which it:

(Language of the case: French)

1. Dismisses the action;

for

annulment

the European Communities (Agents:

In Case T-188/99: Euroalliages, whose head office is in Brussels
(Belgium), represented by D. Voillemot and O. Prost, lawyers,
with an address for service in Luxembourg, against Com-
mission of
initially
N. Khan and, subsequently, V. Kreuschitz and A.P. Bentley) —
of Commission Decision
application
1999/426/EC of 4 June 1999 terminating the anti-dumping
proceeding concerning imports of ferro-silicon originating in
Egypt and Poland (OJ 1999 L 166, p. 91) — the Court of First
Instance (Second Chamber, Extended Composition), composed
of A.W.H. Meij, President, K. Lenaerts, A. Potocki, M. Jaeger
and J. Pirrung, Judges; J. Palacio Gonza´lez, Administrator, for
the Registrar, has given a judgment on 20 June 2001, in which
it:

1. Dismisses the application;

2. Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 314 of 30.10.1999.

2. Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 63 of 4.3.2000.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 20 September 2001

in Case T-344/99: Lucı´a Recalde Langarica v Commission
of the European Communities (1)

(Officials — Expatriation allowance — Article 4(1)(a) of
the Staff Regulations — Article 26 of the Staff Regulations
— Rights of defence)

(2002/C 3/40)

(Language of the case: Spanish)

In Case T-344/99: Lucı´a Recalde Langarica, an official of the
residing in
Commission of

the European Communities,