Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of rules and procedures with regard to the introduction of noise-related operating restrictions at Community airports
Date: 2001-11-28
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European standard, aircraft, airport, noise, noise level, proposal (EU)

C 75 E/318

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

26.3.2002

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of
rules and procedures with regard to the introduction of noise-related operating restrictions at
Community airports

(2002/C 75 E/21)

(Text with EEA relevance)

COM(2001) 695 final (cid:151) 2001/0282(COD)

(Submitted by the Commission on 3 December 2001)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF
THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community, and in particular Article 80(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of
Committee,

the Economic and Social

Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions,

Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article
251 of the Treaty,

Whereas:

(1) A key objective of

the common transport policy is
sustainable development. This
requires an integrated
approach aimed at ensuring both the effective functioning
of the Community’s transport systems and the protection
of the environment,

(2) Sustainable development of air transport necessitates the
introduction of measures aimed at reducing the noise
nuisance from aeroplanes at airports with particular
noise problems,

(3) A new, more stringent noise certification standard, defined
in Chapter 4 of Volume 1, Part II of Annex 16 to the
Convention on International Civil Aviation, has been
established within the framework of
the International
Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) and will contribute
to an improvement in the noise climate around airports
in the longer term,

(4) The Chapter 4 standard has been established for certifi-
cation of aeroplanes and not as a basis for the intro-
duction of operating restrictions,

(5) The gradual

removal of Chapter 2 aeroplanes

in
application of Directive 92/14/EEC (1)will be completed
on 1 April 2002 and new measures will be required to
prevent a deterioration in the noise climate after 2002,
assuming continued growth of air transport in Europe,

(6) The use of aeroplanes with a better environmental
performance can contribute to a more effective use of
infra-
available airport capacity and facilitate airport
structure development in line with market requirements,

help

safeguard

(7) A common framework of rules and procedures for the
introduction of operating restrictions at Community
airports, as part of a balanced approach on noise
internal market
management, will
requirements by introducing similar operating restrictions
at airports with broadly comparable noise problems. This
includes assessment of the noise impact at an airport and
the measures available to alleviate that
evaluation of
impact, and selection of
the appropriate mitigation
measures with the goal of achieving the maximum
environmental benefit most cost effectively,

(8) Regulation 2408/92 (2) provides in Articles 8 and 9 for,
inter alia, publication and examination of operating
restrictions:
those provisions with
the relationship of
this Directive should be set out.

(9) The legitimate interest of

the air

applying
management goals should be recognised,

cost-effective

solutions

transport sector in
for meeting noise

(10) The 33rd ICAO Assembly has adopted Resolution A33/7
introducing the concept of a (cid:145)balanced approach(cid:146) to noise
management, thereby establishing a policy approach to
address aeroplane noise, including international guidance
for
the introduction of operating restrictions on an
airport-by-airport basis. The (cid:145)balanced approach(cid:146) concept
of aeroplane noise management comprises four principle
elements and requires careful assessment of all different
options to mitigate noise, including reduction of aeroplane
noise at
land-use planning and management
measures, noise abatement operational procedures and
operating restrictions, without prejudice to relevant legal
obligations, existing agreements, current laws and estab-
lished policies,

source,

transport has

(11) Directive 2002/. . ./EC which is a horizontal measure
covering all modes of
introduced a
common approach for the assessment and management
of environmental noise. It aims at monitoring the environ-
mental problem caused by noise in major agglomerations
and in the vicinity of main transport
infrastructures,
including airports, at making information on environ-
mental noise and its effects available to the public, and
at requesting competent authorities to draw up action
plans with a view to preventing and reducing environ-
mental noise where necessary and to preserving environ-
mental noise quality where it is good,

(1) OJ L 76, 23.3.1992, p. 21 as amended by Council Directive

98/20/EC (OJ L 107, 7.4.1998, p. 4).

(2) OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 8.

26.3.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 75 E/319

(12) Directive 85/337/EEC (1) already provides for a compre-
hensive assessment of airport projects including noise
mitigation. This can be considered as meeting,
in part,
the assessment requirements of this Directive in the case
of airport infrastructure extension projects,

(13) Such an assessment may demonstrate that the objectives
can only be achieved by a restriction on new services and
the
the gradual withdrawal of aeroplanes
Chapter 3 noise certification standard by a small margin,

that meet

(14) The particular noise problems of airports which are
located in the centre of large conurbations ((cid:145)city airports(cid:146))
should be recognised by allowing for the introduction of
more stringent rules,

(15) It is necessary to finalise the indicative list of city airports
on the basis of information to be provided by Member
States,

(16) The

extension of

should be
facilitated with a view to safeguarding the sustainable
development of air transport activities,

infrastructure

airport

(17) It is necessary to allow for the continuation of existing
airport-specific noise management measures and for
certain technical changes to operating restrictions of a
partial nature,

(18) Undue economic hardship for operators from developing
nations should be avoided by allowing for the granting of
exemptions where appropriate, and such provision should
include safeguards to avoid abuse,

(19) It is necessary to ensure transparency and consultation of
all parties involved in conjunction with proposals on
noise related measures,
including the introduction of
new operating restrictions,

(20) Operators should be given a reasonable period of advance
to be

notice when new operating restrictions
introduced,

are

is

there

a possibility of

introducing
airports, but
distortions of competition. The objective can therefore,
be more effectively achieved by the Community by
means of harmonised rules on the introduction of
operating restrictions as part of the noise management
process. The Directive confines itself
to the minimum
required in order to achieve this objective and does not
go beyond what is necessary for that purpose,

(23) In accordance with Article 2 of Decision 1999/468/EC of
28 June 1999 (2)
laying down the procedures for the
exercise of
conferred on the
Commission, certain measures for the implementation of
this Directive should be adopted by use of the advisory
procedure provided for in Article 3 of that Decision,

implementing powers

(24) Since certain measures necessary for the implementation
of this Directive are measures of general scope within the
meaning of Article 2 of Council Decision 1999/468/EC of
28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercice
of implementing powers conferred on the Commission,
they should be adopted by use of
regulatory
procedure provided for in Article 5 of that Decision,

the

(25) The measures provided for by the present Directive
supersede those provided by Regulation (EC) 925/1999
of 29 April (3) on the registration and operation within
the Community of certain types of civil subsonic jet aero-
planes which have been modified and recertificated as
meeting the standards of volume I, Part II, Chapter 3 of
Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil
Aviation,
third edition (July 1993). That Regulation
should therefore be repealed,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

Objectives

The objectives of this Directive are

(21) Provisions should be made to ensure the right of appeal

against the introduction of operating restrictions,

(22) The Directive is in accordance with the principles of
subsidiarity and proportionality as set out in Article 5
of the Treaty. The introduction of operating restrictions
at Community airports can contribute to the objective
the noise climate around
ofpreventing a worsening of

(a) to lay down rules for the Community to facilitate the intro-
duction of operating restrictions in a consistent manner at
the airport level so as to help prevent a worsening of the
noise climate and to limit or reduce the number of people
significantly affected by the harmful effects of aircraft noise

(b) to provide a framework which safeguards internal market
requirements by ensuring that similar solutions are applied
if similar noise problems are identified at airports

(1) OJ L 175, 5.7.1985, p. 40 as amended by Council Directive

97/11/EC (OJ L 73, 14.3.1997, p. 5).

(2) OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.
(3) OJ L 120, 8.5.99, p. 47.

C 75 E/320

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

26.3.2002

(c)

to facilitate a sustainable development of airport capacity

(f)

(d) to facilitate the achievement of specific noise abatement

objectives at the level of individual airports

(cid:145)Interested parties(cid:146) shall mean natural or legal persons
affected or likely to be affected by, or having an interest
in the introduction of noise reduction measures, including
operating restrictions.

(e)

to enable the selection of available measures with the goal
to achieve maximum environmental benefit in the most
cost effective manner.

Article 3

Competent authority

Article 2

Definitions

Member States shall designate the independent competent auth-
orities responsible for matters falling within the scope of this
Directive.

For the purpose of this Directive:

Article 4

(a)

(cid:145)Airport(cid:146) shall mean a civil airport which has more than
50 000 movements per year (a movement being a take-off
or landing), excluding those purely for training purposes on
light aircraft

(b) (cid:145)City airport(cid:146) shall mean an airport in the centre of a large
conurbation, providing predominantly point-to-point intra-
European service, where a significant number of people are
objectively affected by aircraft noise and where any incre-
mental
a
particularly high annoyance in light of the extreme noise
situation. An airport may qualify as a city airport only if
there is an alternative airport also serving that city. These
airports are listed in Annex 1.

in aircraft movements

represents

increase

General rules on aircraft noise management

1. Member States shall ensure that the competent authorities
adopt a balanced approach by considering the available
measures to address the noise problem at an airport in their
territory, namely the foreseeable effect of a reduction of
aeroplane noise at source, land-use planning and management,
noise abatement operational procedures and other possible
noise management measures, such as economic incentives
and operating restrictions.

2. When considering operating restrictions, the competent
authorities shall take into account the likely costs and benefits
of the various measures available as well as airport specific
characteristics.

(c)

(cid:145)civil subsonic jet aeroplanes(cid:146) shall mean aeroplanes with a
maximum certificated take-off mass of 34 000 kg or more,
or with a certified maximum internal accommodation for
the aeroplane type in question consisting of more than 19
passenger seats, excluding any seats for crew only

3. Measures or a combination of measures taken under this
Directive shall not be more restrictive than necessary in order
to achieve the environmental objective established for a specific
airport. They shall be non-discriminatory on grounds of
nationality or identity of air carrier.

(d) (cid:145)marginally compliant aeroplanes(cid:146) shall mean civil subsonic
jet aeroplanes, that meet the Chapter 3 certification limits
laid down in Volume 1, Part II, Chapter 3 of Annex 16 to
the Convention on International Civil Aviation by a cumu-
lative margin of not more than 5 EPNdB (Effective
Perceived Noise in decibels), whereby the cumulative
margin is the figure expressed in EPNdB obtained by
adding the individual margins (i.e. the differences between
the certificated noise level and the maximum permitted
reference noise
noise
measurement points as defined in Volume 1, Part
II,
Chapter 3 of Annex 16 to the Convention on International
Civil Aviation

each of

level)

three

the

at

Article 5

Rules on assessment

1. Member States shall ensure that the decision which is
requested by the managing body of an airport or by a public
authority to the competent authority for operating restrictions
is based on the information as specified in Annex 2, to be
provided in an appropriate form by the managing body of
the airport.

(e)

(cid:145)Operating restrictions(cid:146) shall mean noise related action that
limits or reduces access of civil subsonic aeroplanes to an
airport. It includes operating restrictions aimed at the with-
drawal from operations of marginally compliant aeroplanes
at specific airports as well as operating restrictions of a
partial nature, affecting the operation of civil subsonic
aeroplanes according to time period

2. Where airport projects are subject to an environmental
impact assessment in application of Directive 85/337/EEC as
amended by Directive 97/11/EC, the assessment carried out in
conformity with
of Council Directive
provisions
85/337/EEC shall be considered as equivalent to and meeting
the requirements of the provisions laid down in paragraph 1
provided that the assessment includes the elements in Annex 2
to this Directive.

the

26.3.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 75 E/321

Article 6

Rules on the introduction of operating restrictions aimed
at the withdrawal of marginally compliant aeroplanes

the objectives of

the achievement of

If the assessment of all available measures carried out in
1.
conformity with the requirements of Article 5 demonstrates
that
this Directive
requires, after consideration of operating restrictions of a
partial nature,the introduction of operating restrictions aimed
at
the
the withdrawal of marginally compliant aeroplanes,
following rules shall apply instead of the procedure foreseen
in Article 9 of Regulation 2408/92/EC at the airport under
consideration:

(a) 6 months after the completion of

the assessment and
decision by a competent authority to the introduction of
an operating restriction, no new services shall be allowed
with marginally compliant aeroplanes at that airport.

(b) not less than one year thereafter each operator may be
required by the competent authority to remove marginally
compliant aeroplanes from their fleet at an annual rate of
not more than 20 % of that operator’s fleet of marginally
compliant aeroplanes serving that airport. The rate of
removal shall take into account the age of the aeroplanes
and the composition of the total fleet.

Subject

in terms of

2.
to the rules on assessment of Article 5 city
airports listed in Annex 1 may introduce measures that are
the definition of marginally
more stringent,
these measures do not
compliant aeroplanes provided that
through
that comply,
subsonic jet aeroplanes
affect civil
either original certification or recertification, with the noise
standards in Volume I, Part II, Chapter 4 of Annex 16 to the
Convention on International Civil Aviation.

(3)
The Commission shall, at the request of a Member State
or on its own initiative, examine the application of paragraphs
1 and 2, and, within three months of receipt of a request and
after consulting the Committee referred to in Article 12(1) in
accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 12(3),
decide whether the Member State concerned may pursue the
introduction of the operating restriction. The Commission shall
communicate its decision to the Council and the Member
States.

Any Member State may refer the Commission’s decision to the
Council within one month. The Council, acting by a qualified
majority, may take a different decision within a period of one
month.

This
article
2408/92/EEC.

shall not

affect Article 8 of Regulation

Article 7

Existing operating restrictions

Article 5 shall not apply to:

(b) technical changes to operating restrictions of a partial
nature that do not have any significant cost implications
for the airline operators at any given Community airport
and that have been introduced after the entry into force of
this Directive.

Article 8

Developing nations

Non-compliant

1.
in developing
nations and listed in Annex 3 shall be exempted from the
provisions of Article 6 paragraphs 1 and 2 provided that

aeroplanes

registered

(a) such aeroplanes, granted noise certification to the standards
specified in Chapter 3, Volume 1 of Annex 16 to the
Convention on International Civil Aviation, were operated
into the Community between 1 January 1996 and 31
December 2001 ((cid:145)the reference period(cid:146)),

(b) these aeroplanes were,

in the reference period, on the
register of the developing nation concerned and that they
continue to be operated by a natural or legal person estab-
lished in that nation.

2.
Any Member State granting an exemption shall forthwith
inform the competent authorities of the other Member States
and the Commission of the exemptions it has granted including
such details as are specified in Annex 3.

Article 9

Consultation and transparency

interested parties

Member States shall ensure that a consultation procedure
relating to the application of Articles 5 and 6 and involving
all
is established. Competent authorities
should ensure openness and transparency as regards data and
computation methodology within the limits of commercial
confidentiality.

Article 10

Public notice

1. Member States shall ensure that, when competent auth-
orities decide the introduction of any new operating restriction,
public notice is given to all interested parties at least

(a) 6 months before the entry into force of the measures in

Article 6(1)(a).

(b) one year before the entry into force of the measures in

Article 6(1)b and 6(2).

(a) operating restrictions that were already in force on the date

of entry into force of this Directive.

Any Member State shall

2.
forthwith inform the other
Member States and the Commission of any new operating
restriction it intends to introduce at an airport in its territory.

C 75 E/322

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

26.3.2002

Article 11

Right of appeal

this
It shall contain an assessment of
Directive,
in particular the need to revise the definition of
marginally compliant aeroplanes as laid down in article 2(d).

the effectivness of

Member States shall ensure that any interested party has the
right to appeal against the measures taken pursuant to Articles
6 and 7, before a national court or an independent public
authority other than the one that has adopted the contested
measure.

Article 12

Committee

The Commission shall be assisted by the Committee

1.
instituted by Article 11 of Regulation 2408/92/EC.

The Committee may be consulted by the Commission on

2.
any matter concerning the application of this Directive.

3. When reference is made to this paragraph, the advisory
procedure laid down in Article 3 of Decision 1999/468/EC
shall apply,
in compliance with Article 7(3) and Article 8
thereof.

4. When reference is made to this paragraph, the regulatory
procedure laid down in Article 5 of Decision 1999/468/EC
shall apply,
in compliance with Article 7(3) and Article 8
thereof.

Article 13

Information and revision

Member States shall upon request submit information on the
application of this Directive to the Commission.

No later than 5 years after the entry into force of this Directive
the Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to
the Council on the application of this Directive.

report

shall be
The
proposals for revision of the Directive.

accompanied, where necessary, by

Article 14

Repeal

Regulation (EC) No 925/1999 is repealed as from the date of
entry into force of this Directive.

Article 15

Implementation

Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and
administrative provisions necessary to comply with this
Directive by 1 January 2003 at
the latest. They shall
forthwith inform the Commission thereof.

When Member States adopt those provisions, they shall contain
a reference to this Directive or be accompanied by such a
reference on the occasion of
their official publication.
Member States shall determine how such reference is to be
made.

Article 16

Entry into force

This Directive shall enter into force on the day following that
of
the European
Communities.

its publication in the Official

Journal of

Article 17

Addressees

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

ANNEX 1

LIST OF CITY AIRPORTS

Berlin-Tempelhof

Stockholm Bromma

London City

Belfast City

26.3.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 75 E/323

ANNEX 2

INFORMATION REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 5(1)

1. Current inventory

1.1. A description of the airport including information about its size, location, surroundings, air traffic volume and mix.

1.2. A description of the environmental objectives for the airport and the national context.

1.3. Details of noise contours for the current and previous years (cid:151) including an assessment of the number of people

affected by aircraft noise. Description of the computational method used to develop the contours.

1.4. A description of measures to ameliorate aircraft noise already implemented: for example, information on land-use
planning and management; noise insulation programmes; operating procedures such as PANS-OPS; operation
limits/curfew, noise charges; preferential runway use, noise preferred
restrictions such as noise limits, night
routes/ track-keeping; and noise monitoring.

2.

Forecast without new measures

2.1. Descriptions of airport developments (if any) already approved and in the programme, for example, increased

capacity, runway and/or terminal expansion, and the projected future traffic mix and estimated growth.

2.2. In case of airport capacity extension the benefits of making that additional capacity available.

2.3. A description of effect on noise climate without further measures, and of those measures already planned to

ameliorate that noise impact over the same period.

2.4. Forecast noise contours (cid:151) including an assessment of the number of people likely to be affected by aircraft noise

(cid:151) distinguish between established residential area and newly constructed residential areas.

2.5. Evaluation of the consequences and possible costs of not taking action to reduce the impact of increased noise (cid:151) if

it is expected to occur.

3. Assessment of additional measures

3.1. Outline of the additional measures available and an indication of the main reasons for their selection. Description of
those measures chosen for further analysis and information on the cost of introducing these measures; the number
of people expected to benefit and timeframe; and a ranking of the overall effectiveness of particular measures.

3.2. Assessment of the cost/effectiveness or cost/benefit of the introduction of specific measures, taking account of the
socio-economic effects of the measures on the users of the airport: operators (passenger and freight); travellers and
local communities.

3.3. An overview of the possible environmental and competitive effects of the proposed measures on other airports,

operators and other interested parties.

3.4. Reasons for selection of the preferred option.

3.5. A non-technical summary.

4. Relation with the (proposed) Directive relating to the Assessment and Management of Environmental

Noise [COM(2000) 468]

4.1. When and where noise maps or action plans have been prepared under the terms of the Environmental Noise

Directive these will be used for providing the information required in this Annex.

4.2. The assessment of noise exposure (i.e. noise contours and number of people affected) shall be carried out using at
least the common noise indicators Lden and Lnight as specified in the Environmental Noise Directive, where available.

C 75 E/324

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

26.3.2002

ANNEX 3

LIST OF MARGINALLY COMPLIANT AEROPLANES FROM DEVELOPING NATIONS (BY GEOGRAPHICAL
REGION)

Note: Exemptions for aeroplanes in this Annex are granted within the general framework of the United Nations policies
and decisions (e.g. sanctions, embargo, etc.)

Type

Registration

Cumulative margin
(in EPNdB)

Operator

ACAC and AFCAC

EGYPT

B707-300F Cargo

B747-300

B747-300

MORROCO

B747-200

ANGOLA

B747-300

B747-300

IL62M

GABON

B747-200

GHANA

DC8-62F Cargo

B747-200F Cargo

B747-200F Cargo

B747-200F Cargo

DC8-62F Cargo

DC8-62F Cargo

DC8-62F Cargo

SOUTH AFRICA

B747SP

B747SP

B747SP

B747-300

B747-300

B747-300

B747-300

B747-300

SU-AVZ

SU-GAL

SU-GAM

CN-RME

D2-TEA

D2-TEB

D2-TIF

F-ODJG

9G-BAN

9G-MKI

9G-MKJ

9G-MKL

9G-MKG

9G-MKH

9G-MKK

ZS-SPA

ZS-SPC

ZS-SPE

ZS-SAC

ZS-SAJ

ZS-SAT

ZS-SAU

ZS-SKA

2,5

3,4

3,4

0,6

3,4

3,4

0,1

3,4

1,1

2,3

2,6

?

1,4

1,4

1,2

4,9

4,9

4,9

3,4

3,4

3,4

3,4

3,4

Air Memphis

Egyptair

Egyptair

Royal Air Moroc

TAAG

TAAG

TAAG

Air Gabon

Continental

MK Airlines

MK Airlines

MK Airlines

MK Airlines

MK Airlines

MK Airlines

SAA

SAA

SAA

SAA

SAA

SAA

SAA

SAA

26.3.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 75 E/325

Type

Registration

Cumulative margin
(in EPNdB)

Operator

B747-300

B767-200

B767-200

CUBA

IL62M

IL62M

IL62M

IL62M

IL62M

IL62M

ARGENTINA

B747-200

B747-200

B747-200

B747-200

B747-200

B747-200

B747-200

ZS-SKB

ZS-SRB

ZS-SRC

CU-T-1217

CU-T-1225

CU-T-1280

CU-T-1282

CU-T-1283

CU-T-1284

LV-MLO

LV-MLP

LV-MLR

LV-OEP

LV-OEZ

LV-OPA

LV-YPC

3,4

4,2

4,2

LACAC

0,1

0,1

0,1

0,1

0,1

0,1

2,4

2,4

2,4

2,4

2,4

2,4

2,4

SAA

SAA

SAA

Cubana

Cubana

Cubana

Cubana

Cubana

Cubana

Aerolineas Argentinas

Aerolineas Argentinas

Aerolineas Argentinas

Aerolineas Argentinas

Aerolineas Argentinas

Aerolineas Argentinas

Aerolineas Argentinas

Eastern Europe (except members of ECAC or of the proposed European Common Aviation Area)

BOSNIA HERZEGOVINA

Yak42

Yak42

GEORGIA

IL62M

KAZAKSTAN

TU154M

TU154M

TU154M

Yak42

Yak42

Yak42

Yak42

Yak42

T9-ABD

T9-ABF

5,0

5,0

Air Bosnia

Air Bosnia

UK 86577

0,1

Airzena Georgian AL

UN 85719

UN 85780

UN 85781

UN 42338

UN 42342

UN 42407

UN 42447

UN 42448

1,6

1,6

1,6

5,0

5,0

5,0

5,0

5,0

Aero Eko

Aero Eko

Aero Eko

Irtysh Avia

Irtysh Avia

Irtysh Avia

Irtysh Avia

Irtysh Avia

C 75 E/326

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

26.3.2002

Type

Registration

Cumulative margin
(in EPNdB)

Operator

KYRGHYSTAN

TU154M

TU154M

IL62M

FYROM

DC9-32

DC9-32

TAJIKISTAN

TU154M

TU154M

TURMENISTAN

Yak42

Yak42

Yak42

UZBEKISTAN

IL62M

IL62M

IL62M

IL62M

IL62M

FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA

DC10-30

DC9-32

DC9-32

CHINA

B747-200 cargo

B747-200 cargo

B747-200 cargo

B747-200 cargo

IRAN

B747-200

B747-200

EX 85718

EX 85762

EX 62100

Z3-AAB

Z3-ARE

E 85651

E 85691

EZ-J672

EZ-J673

EZ-J674

UK 86573

UK 86578

UK 86579

UK 86932

UK 86933

YU-AMB

YU-AJI

YU-AJL

1,6

1,6

0,1

0,2

0,2

1,6

1,6

5,0

5,0

5,0

0,1

0,1

0,1

0,1

0,1

1,1

0,2

0,2

Rest of the World

B 2446

B 2448

B 2450

B 2462

EP-IAG

EP-IAH

3,4

3,4

3,4

3,4

0,6

0,6

Kyrghystan AL

Kyrghystan AL

Quadrotour Aero

MAT Macedonian AL

MAT Macedonian AL

Tajik Air

Tajik Air

Turkmenistan AL

Turkmenistan AL

Turkmenistan AL

Uzbekistan AL

Uzbekistan AL

Uzbekistan AL

Uzbekistan AL

Uzbekistan AL

JAT

JAT

JAT

Air China

Air China

Air China

Air China

Iran Air

Iran Air

26.3.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 75 E/327

Type

Registration

Cumulative margin
(in EPNdB)

Operator

INDIA

B747-200

B747-200

B747-200

B747-200

B747-200

KUWAIT

B747-200

MALAYSIA

VT-EDU

VT-EFU

VT-EGA

VT-EGB

VT-EGC

9K-ADB

0,8

0,8

0,8

0,8

0,8

0,7

Air India

Air India

Air India

Air India

Air India

Kuwait Airways

B747-300 Frachter

9M-MHK

4,4

Malaysia AL

PAKISTAN

B747-200

B747-200

B747-200

B747-200

B747-200

B747-200

B747-200

B747-200

B747-300

B747-300

B747-300

B747-300

AP-AYV

AP-AYW

AP-BAK

AP-BAT

AP-BCL

AP-BCM

AP-BCN

AP-BCO

AP-BFU

AP-BFV

AP-BFW

AP-BFY

?

?

2,3

2,3

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

PIA

PIA

PIA

PIA

PIA

PIA

PIA

PIA

PIA

PIA

PIA

PIA