do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.2614 — ThyssenKrupp/Camom/Eurig) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2001-11-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, restrictive-practice authorisation

22.11.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 327/17

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.2614 (cid:151) ThyssenKrupp/Camom/Eurig)

(2001/C 327/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 7 November 2001 the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to
declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council
Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be
made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

(cid:151) as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

(cid:151) in electronic form in the (cid:145)CEN(cid:146) version of the CELEX database, under document No 301M2614. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.2387 (cid:151) Heineken/Bayerische Brauholding/JV)

(2001/C 327/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 12 July 2001 the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it
compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC)
No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be made public after it is
cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

(cid:151) as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

(cid:151) in electronic form in the (cid:145)CEN(cid:146) version of the CELEX database, under document No 301M2387. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2278/2001 of 22 November 2001 providing for the rejection of applications for export licences in relation to certain processed products and cereal-based compound feedingstuffs
Date: 2001-11-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: cereal product, export licence

L 306/24

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

23.11.2001

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2278/2001

of 22 November 2001

providing for the rejection of applications for export licences in relation to certain processed
products and cereal-based compound feedingstuffs

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30
June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in
cereals (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1666/
2000 (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1162/95 of
23 May 1995 laying down special detailed rules for the
application of the system of import and export licences for
cereals and rice (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No
409/2001 (4), and in particular Article 7(3) thereof,

Whereas:

been decided to reject all applications for export licences of
such products made on 20, 21 and 22 November 2001,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In accordance with Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1162/
95, applications for export licences with advance fixing of
refunds for products falling within CN codes 1102 20 10,
1104 23 10,
1102 20 90,
1702 30 91,
1108 12 00,
1702 90 79,
1702 30 99,
2309 10 33,
2309 10 11,
2309 10 51,
2309 90 33,
2309 90 41, 2309 90 43, 2309 90 51 and 2309 90 53 made
on 20, 21 and 22 November 2001 shall be rejected.

1103 13 90,
1702 30 51,
1702 90 50,
2309 10 31,
2309 90 31,

1103 13 10,
1108 13 00,
1702 40 90,
2309 10 13,
2309 10 53,

The quantity covered by applications for advance fixing of
refunds on potato starch and maize-based products is of great
importance and could give rise to speculation. It has therefore

This Regulation shall enter into force on 23 November 2001.

Article 2

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 November 2001.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 181, 1.7.1992, p. 21.
(2) OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 1.
(3) OJ L 117, 24.5.1995, p. 2.
(4) OJ L 60, 1.3.2001, p. 27.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2265/2001 of 22 November 2001 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2001-11-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, import price, pip fruit

23.11.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

L 306/1

I

(Acts whose publication is obligatory)

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2265/2001

of 22 November 2001

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and
vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

(2)

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

In compliance with the above criteria,
the standard
import values must be fixed at the levels set out in the
Annex to this Regulation,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of
21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the
last
import arrangements
amended by Regulation (EC) No 1498/98 (2), and in particular
Article 4(1) thereof,

fruit and vegetables (1), as

for

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Whereas:

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 lays down, pursuant to the
outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade nego-
tiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the
standard values for imports from third countries,
in
respect of the products and periods stipulated in the
Annex thereto.

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regula-
tion (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex
hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 23 November 2001.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 November 2001.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66.
(2) OJ L 198, 15.7.1998, p. 4.

L 306/2

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

23.11.2001

to the Commission Regulation of 22 November 2001 establishing the standard import values for determining
the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

ANNEX

CN code

0702 00 00

0707 00 05

0709 90 70

0805 20 10

0805 20 30, 0805 20 50, 0805 20 70,
0805 20 90

0805 30 10

0808 10 20, 0808 10 50, 0808 10 90

0808 20 50

Third country
code (1)

Standard import
value

(EUR/100 kg)

052
204
999
052
999
052
999
052
204
999

052
204
464
999
052
388
524
528
600
999
052
060
096
400
404
720
999
052
400
720
999

46,4
53,1
49,8
92,8
92,8
107,6
107,6
60,8
74,3
67,5

59,9
79,0
170,9
103,3
42,6
64,2
12,5
52,9
56,4
45,7
29,6
36,6
10,2
90,5
79,8
127,3
62,3
102,4
125,7
98,9
109,0

(1) Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2032/2000 (OJ L 243, 28.9.2000, p. 14). Code ‘999’ stands for ‘of

other origin’.
WRITTEN QUESTION P-3319/01 by Nirj Deva (PPE-DE) to the Commission. Ian Stillman.
Date: 2001-11-22
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU national, India, international law, legal hearing, right to justice

18.7.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 172 E/37

authorities, on various occasions this year, that there is no terrorist or paramilitary activity on its territory.
Moreover, following the tragic events of 11 September 2001, Albania has shown full commitment in the
fight against terrorism, and has supported the United States and Union positions.

(2002/C 172 E/040)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3319/01

by Nirj Deva (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(22 November 2001)

Subject: Ian Stillman

Given the ongoing concerns about the case of Ian Stillman, a British charity worker who has been facing
trial in Shilma, India, a trial that has been delayed on numerous occasions, what has the Commission done
to apply pressure to the Indian Government so as to ensure this case is heard fairly and quickly?
Particularly in the light of the fact that that Mr Stillman is profoundly deaf and is one-legged. He has
recently been moved into a cell that is too small to fit his wheelchair.

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(11 December 2001)

The Commission is aware of the case of Mr Ian Stillman, a disabled charity worker who has been
sentenced to ten years imprisonment in India. It fully shares the concerns of the honourable member over
the circumstances of his arrest and his detention conditions.

Before Mr Stillman’s appeal trial was due (on 24 September 2001), the Commission had, via its Delegation
in New Delhi, written to the Indian National Human Rights Commission for an update on his health and
detention conditions.

The Commission’s Delegation was informed that Mr Stillman’s case is being followed by M. S.C. Verma,
Registrar, who has contacted the District Magistrate of Nahan, the district where Mr Stillman is being
detained. A further update on his detention conditions is awaited.

The Commission has also discussed Mr Stillman’s case with representatives from the organisation ‘Fair
Trials Abroad’, who visited Brussels this September.

Now that the Indian authorities seem to have delayed the appeal, the Commission will contact the Indian
Human Rights Commission again and will continue to closely follow the developments in this case.

(2002/C 172 E/041)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3326/01

by Nelly Maes (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(30 November 2001)

Subject: European Commission proposals to downsize its Delegation in Trinidad and Tobago

The Government of Trinidad and Tobago has been informed that, following a review and reassessment of
external representation, the European Commission proposes to downsize its representation in Port of
Spain. The government is concerned and feels penalised.

The assessment carried out by the Commission severely underestimated the Delegation’s workload,
focussing as it did on the criterion of ‘expenditure on national programmes’ as a performance measure,
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2274/2001 of 22 November 2001 fixing the maximum export refund on oats in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1789/2001
Date: 2001-11-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: award of contract, export refund, oats

23.11.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

L 306/17

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2274/2001

of 22 November 2001

fixing the maximum export refund on oats in connection with the invitation to tender issued in
Regulation (EC) No 1789/2001

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30
June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in
cereals (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1666/
2000 (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of
29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the
application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the
granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be
taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3),
as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 602/2001 (4),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1789/2001
of 12 September 2001 on a special intervention measure for
cereals in Finland and Sweden (5), and in particular Article 8
thereof,

Whereas:

(1)

(2)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of
oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from
Finland or Sweden to all third countries was opened
pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1789/2001.

Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1789/2001 provides
that the Commission may, on the basis of the tenders
notified, in accordance with the procedure laid down in

Article 23 of Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92, decide to fix
a maximum export refund taking account of the criteria
referred to in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95.
In that case a contract is awarded to any tenderer whose
bid is equal to or lower than the maximum refund.

The application of the abovementioned criteria to the
current market situation for the cereal in question results
in the maximum export refund being fixed at
the
amount specified in Article 1.

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in
the Management
accordance with the opinion of
Committee for Cereals,

(3)

(4)

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified from 16 to 22 November 2001, pursuant
to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1789/
2001, the maximum refund on exportation of oats shall be
EUR 0,00/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 23 November 2001.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 November 2001.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 181, 1.7.1992, p. 21.
(2) OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 1.
(3) OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7.
(4) OJ L 89, 29.3.2001, p. 16.
(5) OJ L 243, 13.9.2001, p. 15.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3233/01 by Maurizio Turco (NI) to the Commission. Review of action taken in Afghanistan pursuant to Article 4(d) of the Council common position of 22 January 2001.
Date: 2001-11-22
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Afghanistan, EU action, anti-personnel weapon, the EU's international role

C 160 E/82

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

4.7.2002

(2002/C 160 E/098)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3233/01

by Maurizio Turco (NI) to the Commission

(22 November 2001)

Subject: Review of action taken in Afghanistan pursuant to Article 4(d) of the Council common position of

22 January 2001

Having regard to the Council common position of 22 January 2001 on Afghanistan (1);

having regard to Article 7 thereof, which states that the Commission intends to direct its action towards
achieving the objectives of the common position;

having regard to Article 4(d) thereof, under which, in order to help the suffering civilian population of
Afghanistan, the Union shall ‘urge the warring factions not to lay any more landmines, while at the same
time emphasising its standing policy not
to fund mine clearance in regions where mine-laying is
continued’;

what practical action did the Commission take prior to the events of 11 September with a view to meeting
the above objective?

(1) OJ L 21, 23.1.2001, p. 1.

(2002/C 160 E/099)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3234/01

by Maurizio Turco (NI) to the Commission

(22 November 2001)

Subject: Review of action taken in Afghanistan pursuant to Article 4(e) of the Council common position of

22 January 2001

Having regard to the Council common position of 22 January 2001 on Afghanistan (1);

having regard to Article 7 thereof, which states that the Commission intends to direct its action towards
achieving the objectives of the common position;

having regard to Article 4(e) thereof, under which, in order to help the suffering civilian population of
Afghanistan, the Union shall ‘improve the effectiveness of aid by closer international donor coordination,
in particular by working through the Afghanistan Support Group and the Afghanistan Programming
Body’;

what practical action did the Commission take prior to the events of 11 September with a view to meeting
the above objective?

(1) OJ L 21, 23.1.2001, p. 1.

(2002/C 160 E/100)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3235/01

by Maurizio Turco (NI) to the Commission

(23 November 2001)

Subject: Outcome of the action in Afghanistan under Article 4(f) of the Council common position of

22 January 2001

On 22 January 2001 the Council adopted a common position on Afghanistan (1), Article 7 of which says
that the Commission intends to direct its action towards achieving the objectives and the priorities of the
common position; in Article 4(f) the Union says that, in order to help the suffering civilian population of
Afghanistan, it will ‘ensure close coordination and complementarity to between the UN peace efforts and
the aid effort, as envisaged in the strategic framework common to the international donor community and
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3234/01 by Maurizio Turco (NI) to the Commission. Review of action taken in Afghanistan pursuant to Article 4(e) of the Council common position of 22 January 2001.
Date: 2001-11-22
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Afghanistan, EU action, EU aid, coordination of aid, international affairs, the EU's international role

C 160 E/82

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

4.7.2002

(2002/C 160 E/098)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3233/01

by Maurizio Turco (NI) to the Commission

(22 November 2001)

Subject: Review of action taken in Afghanistan pursuant to Article 4(d) of the Council common position of

22 January 2001

Having regard to the Council common position of 22 January 2001 on Afghanistan (1);

having regard to Article 7 thereof, which states that the Commission intends to direct its action towards
achieving the objectives of the common position;

having regard to Article 4(d) thereof, under which, in order to help the suffering civilian population of
Afghanistan, the Union shall ‘urge the warring factions not to lay any more landmines, while at the same
time emphasising its standing policy not
to fund mine clearance in regions where mine-laying is
continued’;

what practical action did the Commission take prior to the events of 11 September with a view to meeting
the above objective?

(1) OJ L 21, 23.1.2001, p. 1.

(2002/C 160 E/099)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3234/01

by Maurizio Turco (NI) to the Commission

(22 November 2001)

Subject: Review of action taken in Afghanistan pursuant to Article 4(e) of the Council common position of

22 January 2001

Having regard to the Council common position of 22 January 2001 on Afghanistan (1);

having regard to Article 7 thereof, which states that the Commission intends to direct its action towards
achieving the objectives of the common position;

having regard to Article 4(e) thereof, under which, in order to help the suffering civilian population of
Afghanistan, the Union shall ‘improve the effectiveness of aid by closer international donor coordination,
in particular by working through the Afghanistan Support Group and the Afghanistan Programming
Body’;

what practical action did the Commission take prior to the events of 11 September with a view to meeting
the above objective?

(1) OJ L 21, 23.1.2001, p. 1.

(2002/C 160 E/100)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3235/01

by Maurizio Turco (NI) to the Commission

(23 November 2001)

Subject: Outcome of the action in Afghanistan under Article 4(f) of the Council common position of

22 January 2001

On 22 January 2001 the Council adopted a common position on Afghanistan (1), Article 7 of which says
that the Commission intends to direct its action towards achieving the objectives and the priorities of the
common position; in Article 4(f) the Union says that, in order to help the suffering civilian population of
Afghanistan, it will ‘ensure close coordination and complementarity to between the UN peace efforts and
the aid effort, as envisaged in the strategic framework common to the international donor community and
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.2471 — Accenture/Lagardère/JV) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2001-11-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, restrictive-practice authorisation

C 327/16

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

22.11.2001

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.2471 (cid:151) Accenture/LagardŁre/JV)

(2001/C 327/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 26 July 2001 the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it
compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC)
No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in French and will be made public after it is
cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

(cid:151) as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

(cid:151) in electronic form in the (cid:145)CFR(cid:146) version of the CELEX database, under document No 301M2471. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.2588 (cid:151) Rheinbraun Brennstoff/SSM Coal)

(2001/C 327/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 17 September 2001 the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to
declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council
Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be
made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

(cid:151) as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

(cid:151) in electronic form in the (cid:145)CEN(cid:146) version of the CELEX database, under document No 301M2588. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.