WRITTEN QUESTION P-2908/01 by Thierry de La Perriere (NI) to the Commission. Freedom to provide services in agriculture — artificial insemination.
Date: 2001-10-17
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU law - national law, France, State monopoly, artificial insemination, freedom to provide services

C 81 E/212

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

4.4.2002

(2002/C 81 E/252)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2908/01

by Thierry de La Perriere (NI) to the Commission

(17 October 2001)

Subject: Freedom to provide services in agriculture (cid:129) artificial insemination

A number of my French compatriots have informed me about the problems they encounter when trying
to exercise freely their profession in the field of artificial insemination.

France has actually established a virtual state monopoly by restricting that activity solely to agricultural
cooperatives. It seems to me that that situation puts at producers of semen (cid:129) particularly bovine semen (cid:129)
at a disadvantage and breaches Community law.

Pursuant to Law No 66-1005 of 28 December 1966 on cattle-breeding (published in the French Official
Gazette (cid:129) ORJF (cid:129) on 29 December 1966, p. 11619) and a series of implementing decrees, the collection,
market preparation and placement of semen (cid:129) especially bovine semen (cid:129) are the sole province of
insemination centres, constituted as agricultural cooperatives, which have to cover a specific
artificial
geographical area in France allocated to them. That constitutes a monopoly in the provision of services
which precludes the placement of semen by third parties. Anyone violating those provisions is liable to
penalties laid down in the aforementioned laws. Furthermore, the parentage of calves born from such
insemination operations cannot be validated, with the result that the owners thereof are sure to suffer a
financial loss.

Articles 43 and 49 et seq. of the Treaty establishing the European Community guarantee freedom of
establishment and freedom to provide services. Since the end of the transitional period, those articles
prohibit the abolition of any restriction, save in the case of activities connected with the exercise of official
authority (Article 45 with respect to freedom of establishment) or where imperative requirements in the
general interest justify a prohibition on freedom to provide services (see the relevant case-law of the Court
of Justice of the European Communities in Case C-55/94, Gebhard, ECR 1995, I-4165).

Is the Commission aware that French legislation which allocates sole rights to practise artificial
insemination (cid:129) especially of bovines (cid:129) to service monopolies constituted by artificial
insemination
centres prevents that activity from being carried out in France by specialist undertakings established in
other Member States who wish to invoke their rights of establishment and of freedom to provide services
granted to them by the Treaty of Rome?

Does not the Commission feel that imperative requirements in the general interest should not in any way
prevent that activity from being covered by freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services, as
is, moreover, the case in the other Member States?

What will the Commission do to require France to comply with relevant Community law without delay?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(20 November 2001)

According to the French law referred to by the Honourable Member, it would appear that only those
persons who hold a licence to be a (cid:145)head of an insemination centre(cid:146) or (cid:145)inseminator(cid:146) in France may provide
the service of artificial
the ability of a person to set up an artificial
insemination centre is subject to prior authorisation by the Ministry of Agriculture.

insemination. Furthermore,

It is not clear, however, how the provisions of the French law are applied to service providers offering
such services who are established in another Member State and who may seek to provide their services in
France. If the French law in question is applied to the latter, that legislation could give rise to a restriction
to the freedom to provide services (Article 49 (ex Article 59) of the EC Treaty) and the Commission would
then assess whether that restriction could be justified according to the case law of the Court.

The Commission will request further information from the French authorities in this regard.