Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 8 May 2001 in Case T-95/01 R: Gérard Coget and Others v Court of Auditors of the European Communities (Applications for interim measures — Officials — Internal competition — Admissibility)
Date: 2001-09-15
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Court of Auditors, Secretary General of an Institution, action for annulment (EU), administrator, appointment of staff, professional experience

C 259/12

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

15.9.2001

D. Lo´ pez Garido,
lawyer, with an address for service in
Luxembourg against the Council of the European Union
(Agents: F. Anton and G. Ramos Ruano) and the European
Parliament (Agents: M. Go´ mez Leal and F. de Wachter) —
application for annulment of the guide for candidates and the
notice of competition aimed at drawing up reserve lists for
Spanish-language adminstrators and Spanish-language assist-
ant administrators (EUR/A/159/2000 and PE/90/A — the
Court of First
Instance (Second Chamber), composed of
A.W.H. Meij (President), A. Potocki and J. Pirrung, Judges;
H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 2 May 2001, the operative
part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible;

The parties shall bear their own costs, including costs relating
to proceedings on the application for interim measures.

(1) OJ C 316 of 4.11.00.

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST
INSTANCE

of 21 May 2001

in Case T-52/01 R: Jürgen Schaefer v the Commission of
the European Communities

(Applications for interim measures — Officials — Reassign-
ment — Admissibility — Prima facie case — Urgency)

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST
INSTANCE

of 8 May 2001

in Case T-95/01 R: Gérard Coget and Others v Court of
Auditors of the European Communities

(Applications for interim measures — Officials — Internal
competition — Admissibility)

(2001/C 259/21)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-95/01 R: Gérard Coget, an official of the Court of
Auditors of the European Communities, Hettange-Grande,
France, Pierre Hugé, an official of the Court of Auditors of the
European Communities, residing in Bonnevoie, Grand Duchy
of Luxembourg, and Emmanuel Gabolde, an official of the
Court of Auditors of the European Communities, residing in
Metz, France, represented by André Soulier, lawyer, against
Court of Auditors of the European Communities — application
for suspension of operation of the decision of the Court of
Auditors of 22 February 2001 filling, with effect from 1 July
2001, the post of Secretary General — the President of the
Court of First Instance made an order on 8 May 2001, the
operative part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

The application for interim measures is dismissed as inadmis-
sible.

The costs are reserved.

(2001/C 259/20)

(Language of the case: Spanish)

Action brought on 12 June 2001 by Jörg Riedemann,
Rechtsanwalt, as liquidator of ZEMAG GmbH, against the
Commission of the European Communities

the European Communities,

In Case T-52/01 R: Jürgen Schaefer, an official of the Com-
represented by
mission of
J. R. Iturriagagoitia, lawyer, against Commission of the Euro-
pean Communities (Agents: J. Currall and E. Gippini-Fournier)
— application for first, suspension of operation of the decision
of the Commission of 12 February 2001 transferring the
applicant to Brussels and, secondly, suspension of any pro-
cedure initiated with a view to filling the vacancy arising from
the order transferring the applicant — the President of the
Court of First Instance made an order on 21 May 2001, the
operative part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

The costs are reserved.

(Case T-133/01)

(2001/C 259/22)

(Language of the case: German)

An action against the Commission of the European Communi-
ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
European Communities on 12 June 2001 by Jörg Riedemann,
Rechtsanwalt, as liquidator of ZEMAG GmbH, Zeitz, Germany,
represented by Ulrich Vahlhaus, Rechtsanwalt.

The applicant claims that the Court should annul Commission
decision K(2201)1028 of 28 March 2001 on state aid granted
by Germany to EFBE Verwaltungs GmbH & Co Management
KG (now Lintra Beteiligungs Holdings GmbH, together with