Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 April 2001 in Case T-37/99: Ugo Miranda v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Resettlement allowance — Meaning of residence)
Date: 2001-08-11
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, European official, action for annulment (EU), indemnification, single-family housing

C 227/16

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

11.8.2001

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 24 April 2001

of 24 April 2001

in Case T-37/99: Ugo Miranda v Commission of the
European Communities (1)

in Case T-159/98: Ivan Torre and Others v Commission
of the European Communities (1)

(Officials — Resettlement allowance — Meaning of resi-
dence)

(Officials — Competition — Irregularity in the manner in
which the tests were conducted, such as to distort the results
— Legal interest in bringing proceedings)

(2001/C 227/30)

(Language of the case: Italian)

(2001/C 227/29)

(Language of the case: French)

first, of

In Case T-159/98: Ivan Torre, residing in Brussels, Donatella
Ineichen, residing in Brussels, Allessandro Cavallaro, residing
in Rome, represented by M.-A. Lucas, avocat, with an address
for service in Luxembourg, v Commission of the European
Communities (Agents: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser) —
application for annulment,
the
selection board in competition EUR/A/123 awarding the
applicants a mark eliminating them from the initial pre-
selection test and, second, of the subsequent steps taken in
that competition, in so far as may be necessary in order to
restore the applicants’ rights — the Court of First Instance
(Fourth Chamber), composed of: P. Mengozzi, President,
and V. Tiili and R.M. Moura Ramos,
Judges; G. Herzig,
Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on
24 April 2001, in which it:

the decisions of

1. Declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the
present action in so far as concerns Mr Torre and Mr Cavallaro;

2. Dismisses the action in so far as concerns Ms Ineichen;

3. Orders the Commission to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 378 of 5.12.1998.

In Case T-37/99: Ugo Miranda, an official of the Commission
of the European Communities, residing in Brussels, represented
by L. Radicati di Brozolo, lawyer, with an address for service
in Luxembourg, against Commission of the European Commu-
nities (Agents: G. Valsesia and A. Dal Ferro) — application for
annulment of the decision of the Commission of 7 May 1998,
relating to the recovery of the resettlement allowance paid to
the applicant by virtue of Article 6 of Annex VII to the Staff
Regulations — the Court of First Instance (Single Judge:
P. Mengozzi);
for the
Registrar, gave a judgment on 24 April 2001, in which it:

J. Palacio Gonza´lez, Administrator,

1.

2.

dismisses the application;

orders each of the parties to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 121 of 1.5.99.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 28 March 2001

in Case T-144/99 Institute of Professional Representatives
before the European Patent Office v Commission of the
European Communities (1)

the EC Treaty (now
(Competition — Article 85 of
Article 81 EC) — Professional code of conduct — Ban on
comparative advertising — Supply of services)

(2001/C 227/31)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-144/99, Institute of Professional Representatives
before the European Patent Office, established in Munich