Order of the Court of First Instance of 20 March 2001 in Case T-59/00: Compagnia Portuale Pietro Chiesa v Commission of the European Communities (Actions for annulment — Competition — Port services — Articles 82 EC and 86 EC — Preparatory act — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2001-08-11
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, Italy, action for annulment (EU), dominant position, harbour installation, restriction on competition

C 227/18

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

11.8.2001

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 2 May 2001

in Case T-104/00: Giovanni Cubeta v Commission of the
European Communities (1)

(Officials — Transfer to a new place of employment —
Installation allowance — Daily subsistence allowances —
Conditions of grant)

Genoese port authorities and the Compagnia Unica Lavoratori
Merci Varie — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber),
composed of P. Lindh, President, R. Garcı´a-Valdecasas and
J.D. Cooke, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on
20 March 2001, the operative part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

The applicant shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred
by the Commission.

(2001/C 227/34)

(1) OJ C 149 of 27.5.2000.

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-104/00: Giovanni Cubeta, an official of the Com-
mission of the European Communities, residing in Brussels,
represented by C. Moreau and P. Birden, avocats, with an
address for service in Luxembourg, v Commission of the
European Communities (Agent: J. Currall) — application for
annulment of the Commission’s decision refusing to grant the
applicant, first, an installation allowance in a sum equivalent
to two months’ basic salary and, second, daily subsistence
allowances — the Court of First
Instance (Single Judge:
A. Potocki); J. Palacio Gonza´lez, Administrator, for the Regis-
trar, has given a judgment on 2 May 2001, in which it:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 176 of 24.6.2000.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 20 March 2001

in Case T-59/00: Compagnia Portuale Pietro Chiesa v
Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Actions for annulment — Competition — Port services
— Articles 82 EC and 86 EC — Preparatory act —
Inadmissibility)

(2001/C 227/35)

(Language of the case: Italian)

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 24 April 2001

in Case T-172/00: Jean-Pierre Pierard v Commission of
the European Communities (1)

(Officials — Posting linked to membership of the Staff
Committee — Applicant not immediately re-assigned to his
original post on the expiry of his term of office — Action
partly manifestly inadmissible and partly manifestly
unfounded)

(2001/C 227/36)

(Language of the case: French)

the European Communities,

Jean-Pierre Pierard, an official of

the
In Case T-172/00:
Commission of
residing at
Woluwé-Saint-Lambert (Belgium), represented by J. Lombart
and E. Boigelot, avocats, with an address for service in
Luxembourg, v Commission of the European Communities
(Agents: C. Berardis-Kayser and D. Martin) — application, first,
for annulment of the implicit decision of the Commission
rejecting the applicant’s request that he be re-assigned to his
original service on the expiry of his term of office as a member
of the Staff Committee and, second, for compensation for the
non-material damage allegedly suffered — the Court of
First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of: P. Mengozzi,
President, and V. Tiili and R.M. Moura Ramos, Judges; H. Jung,
Registrar, made an order on 24 April 2001, the operative part
of which is as follows:

In Case T-59/00: Compagnia Portuale Pietro Chiesa, estab-
lished in Genoa (Italy), represented by Giuseppe Michele
Giacomini and Barbara Della Barile, lawyers, with an address
for service in Luxembourg, against Commission of the Euro-
pean Communities (Agents: R. Lyal and L. Pignataro) —
application for annulment of the alleged decision of the
Commission of 22 December 1999 rejecting the complaint
lodged by the applicant seeking a declaration that Articles 82
EC and 86(1) EC were infringed by the Italian Republic, the

1.

2.

The action is dismissed;

The parties are to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 259 of 9.9.2000.