do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1344/2001 of 3 July 2001 determining the extent to which applications in the beef and veal sector for import rights lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1080/2001 may be accepted
Date: 2001-07-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: CCT duties, beef, import, quantitative restriction

4.7.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

L 181/17

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1344/2001

of 3 July 2001

determining the extent to which applications in the beef and veal sector for import rights lodged
pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1080/2001 may be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1080/2001
of 1 June 2001 opening and providing for the administration
of a tariff quota for meat of bovine animals, frozen, falling
within CN code 0202 and products falling within CN code
0206 29 91 (from 1 July 2001 to 30 June 2002) (1), and in
particular Article 5 thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1080/2001 provides in particular for the
quantities reserved for traditional importers to be allocated in
proportion to their imports during the period 1 July 1997 to
30 June 2000 under Regulation (EC) No 1042/97 (2), as
amended by Regulation (EC) No 260/98 (3), Regulation (EC) No
1142/98 (4) and Regulation (EC) No 995/1999 (5). In the other
cases the quantities applied for exceed the quantities available
under Article 2(2) of that Regulation. Therefore, the quantities

applied for should be reduced on a proportional basis in
accordance with Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1080/2001,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Every application for the right to import lodged in accordance
with Regulation (EC) No 1080/2001 shall be granted to the
following extent:

(a) 240,1355 kg/t imported during the period 1 July 1997 to
30 June 2000 under Regulations (EC) No 1042/97, (EC) No
1142/98 and (EC) No 995/1999 for importers as defined in
Article 2(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1080/2001;

(b) 472,9320 kg/t applied for in the case of operators as
defined in Article 2(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1080/
2001.

This Regulation shall enter into force on 4 July 2001.

Article 2

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 July 2001.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 149, 2.6.2001, p. 11.
(2) OJ L 152, 11.6.1997, p. 2.
(3) OJ L 25, 31.1.1998, p. 42.
(4) OJ L 159, 3.6.1998, p. 11.
(5) OJ L 122, 12.5.1999, p. 3.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1340/2001 of 3 July 2001 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2001-07-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, import price, pip fruit, stone fruit

L 181/12

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

4.7.2001

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1340/2001

of 3 July 2001

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and
vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

(2)

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

In compliance with the above criteria,
the standard
import values must be fixed at the levels set out in the
Annex to this Regulation,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of
21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the
last
import arrangements
amended by Regulation (EC) No 1498/98 (2), and in particular
Article 4(1) thereof,

fruit and vegetables (1), as

for

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Whereas:

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 lays down, pursuant to the
outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade nego-
tiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the
standard values for imports from third countries,
in
respect of the products and periods stipulated in the
Annex thereto.

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regula-
tion (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex
hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 4 July 2001.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 July 2001.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66.
(2) OJ L 198, 15.7.1998, p. 4.

4.7.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

L 181/13

to the Commission Regulation of 3 July 2001 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry
price of certain fruit and vegetables

ANNEX

CN code

0702 00 00

0707 00 05

0709 90 70

0805 30 10

0808 10 20, 0808 10 50, 0808 10 90

0808 20 50

0809 10 00

0809 20 95

0809 40 05

Third country
code (1)

Standard import
value

(EUR/100 kg)

052
091
092
999
052
999
052
999
388
528
999
388
400
508
512
524
528
720
804
999
388
512
528
800
804
999
052
999
052
064
066
068
400
616
999
052
624
999

72,0
39,6
39,6
50,4
81,2
81,2
81,7
81,7
69,3
66,9
68,1
93,1
104,9
101,5
90,1
61,7
69,6
146,9
99,7
95,9
101,4
80,9
71,1
74,3
111,7
87,9
191,5
191,5
342,5
209,5
151,9
143,5
308,4
289,0
240,8
102,0
238,5
170,3

(1) Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2032/2000 (OJ L 243, 28.9.2000, p. 14). Code ‘999’ stands for ‘of

other origin’.
Amended proposal for a European Parliament and Council directive on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (codified version) (COM(2000) 830 - C5-0763/2000 - 1999/0134(COD))
Date: 2001-07-03
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: approximation of laws, codification of EU law, medicinal product

14.3.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 65 E/33

TEXTS ADOPTED

Tuesday 3 July 2001

1. Medicinal products for human use (codified version) ***I (procedure without

report)

C5-0763/2000

Amended proposal for a European Parliament and Council directive on the Community code relat-
ing to medicinal products for human use (codified version) (COM(2000) 830 (cid:129) C5-0763/2000 (cid:129)
1999/0134(COD))

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The proposal was approved.

2. Veterinary medicinal products (codified version) ***I

(procedure without

report)

C5-0550/2000

Amended proposal for a European Parliament and Council directive on the Community code relat-
ing to veterinary medicinal products (codified version) (COM(2000) 657 (cid:129) C5-0550/2000 (cid:129) 1999/
0180(COD))

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The proposal was approved.

3. Quarterly non-financial accounts for general government ***I (procedure with-

out debate)

A5-0242/2001

Proposal for a European Parliament and Council regulation on quarterly non-financial accounts for
general government (COM(2001) 100 (cid:129) C5-0079/2001 (cid:129) 2001/0056(COD))

The proposal was approved.

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council
(COM(2001) 100 (cid:129)
regulation on quarterly non-financial accounts for general government

C5-0079/2001 (cid:129) 2001/0056(COD))

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

(cid:129) having regard to the Commission proposal

to the European Parliament and the Council

(COM(2001) 100) (1),

(cid:129) having regard to Articles 251 and 285 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted

the proposal to Parliament (C5-0079/2001),

(1) OJ C 154 E, 29.5.2001, p. 300.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.2209 — EDF Group/Cottam Power Station) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2001-07-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: application of EU law, economic concentration, exchange of information, merger control

C 187/8

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

3.7.2001

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.2209 (cid:151) EDF Group/Cottam Power Station)

(2001/C 187/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 29 November 2000 the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to
declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council
Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be
made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

(cid:151) as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

(cid:151) in electronic form in the (cid:145)CEN(cid:146) version of the CELEX database, under document No 300M2209. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.2257 (cid:151) France Telecom/Equant)

(2001/C 187/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 21 March 2001 the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare
it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation
(EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be made public after it
is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

(cid:151) as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

(cid:151) in electronic form in the (cid:145)CEN(cid:146) version of the CELEX database, under document No 301M2257. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.
WRITTEN QUESTION P-1959/01 by Caroline Lucas (Verts/ALE) to the Commission. Participation in ASEM Meetings.
Date: 2001-07-03
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Asia, Europe, development aid, investment, summit meeting, the EU's international role, trade cooperation

20.12.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 364 E/231

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(20 July 2001)

As the Honourable Member will be aware, development co-operation of the Commission with African,
Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries is based on the rules and conditionalities defined in the LomØ
Convention and ratified by all the Member States. This Convention does not contain any legal link to
property rights of European citizens, nor does the Cotonou Agreement that was signed a year ago and is
presently in the process of ratification.

Although the Commission wholeheartedly subscribes to the principle of private property and fully
supports the application of this principle for European citizens all over the world, it cannot legitimately
use the instrument of development aid to pressurise a partner government into a certain behaviour in this
context. As already explained in the Commission(cid:146)s answer to Written Question E-0879/01 (1) by the
Honourable Member, the Commission will have to limit itself to making its point of view known with all
the necessary insistence.

(1) OJ C 318 E, 13.11.2001, p. 141.

(2001/C 364 E/254)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1959/01

by Caroline Lucas (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(3 July 2001)

Subject: Participation in ASEM Meetings

Working Group meetings of the Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM), such as the Investment Experts(cid:146) Group and
the Senior Officials(cid:146) Meeting on Trade and Development, involve the active participation of the business
community, notably the Asia Europe Business Forum (AEBF) comprising leading businessmen from the 25
ASEM partner countries. Indeed, the AEBF is described as being supported by ASEM Government agencies
and is actively encouraged to contribute to policy-making.

Will the Commission please state:

1. whether, and if so to what extent, Community funds are used directly or indirectly to facilitate the

participation of AEBF members in such meetings, and

2. why similar

facilities and access are not offered to other stakeholders, notably civil society

organisations and trades unions?

Answer given by Mr Lamy on behalf of the Commission

(23 July 2001)

The AEBF is a private sector. The Community supports the objectives of the AEBF and sends an

1.
observer to its meetings but does not give any financial support to it.

2.
The Commission is always ready to meet other stakeholders and has met civil society groups on
numerous occasions to discuss ASEM matters. Civil society has met in the margins of the various ASEM
summits, and in particular in a People(cid:146)s Forum at the last ASEM summit meeting in Seoul in October
2000.