WRITTEN QUESTION E-1757/01 by Ilda Figueiredo (GUE/NGL) to the Commission. Support for olive-growers affected by inclement weather in Portugal.
Date: 2001-06-15
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Portugal, bad weather, common agricultural policy, indemnification, olive-growing, production aid

C 364 E/198

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

20.12.2001

6. What will the Commission do in the near future to protect mussel beds?

7. What is the Commission(cid:146)s assessment of the German Government(cid:146)s plans to quarry sand close to
a number of islands used by birds and to construct a container port in the Ems-Dollard area?

Answer given by Mrs Wallstr(cid:246)m on behalf of the Commission

(3 September 2001)

The Commission has already launched an investigation in order to assess the compatibility of the shellfish
fisheries in the Wadden Sea and in the wide mouth of the river Ems with Council Directive 92/43/EEC of
21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (1). The granting of
a licence to harvest mussels close to Delfzijl in the Netherlands is one of the subjects of that investigation.

As far as the German Government(cid:146)s plans to quarry sand and to construct a port in the Ems-Dollard
area are concerned, the Commission so far has no detailed knowledge of this matter and has no indications
that an infringement of Community law is at issue.

(1) OJ L 206, 22.7.1992.

(2001/C 364 E/215)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1757/01

by Ilda Figueiredo (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(15 June 2001)

Subject: Support for olive-growers affected by inclement weather in Portugal

The inclement weather which has affected Portugal has had serious consequences for certain forms of
agricultural production, especially in the olive sector. In that sector production for the last marketing year
fell by 60-70 %, above all in the TrÆs-os-Montes and Alto Douro region, which was declared a disaster
zone by the Portuguese government.

In the meantime, the farmers, the majority of whom are small producers, have received no support in the
form of subsidies. The government has merely opened a special credit facility, despite the enormous
damage caused by the fall in production in an area highly dependent on olive-growing.

This means that the farmers have received neither the income from their lost production nor the
production subsidies which had been promised in the budget. Their plight is such that some may be
obliged to abandon cultivation in order to survive.

It is therefore essential that compensation be paid to olive growers in this region, on the basis of at least
50 % of average annual production over the last three years as declared to the INGA (the National Institute
for Agricultural Intervention and Guarantees).

Can the Commission provide information on its position concerning compensation for the Portuguese
olive-growers affected by the inclement weather, given the prior existence of budget lines for the payment
of production subsidies which were not actually granted and the fact that Portugal is a net contributor to
the CAP?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(31 July 2001)

The Commission has no financial instrument that allows it to grant compensatory aid to farmers suffering
production losses as a result of bad weather.

20.12.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 364 E/199

The Commission is, however, willing to consider national aid, provided it complies with the Community
Guidelines for State aid in the agriculture sector (1).

(1) OJ C 28, 1.2.2000.

(2001/C 364 E/216)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1758/01

by Ilda Figueiredo (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

Subject: Discrimination in access to civil service posts

(15 June 2001)

On 3 November 1999 the Portuguese government published Decree-Law No 444/99 adopting the
professional statute for the personnel of the external services of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (embassies
and consulates).

This statute gives employees of those services the right to opt for national civil servant status. However, it
denies that option to employees who are not Portuguese nationals, even where they are citizens of other
EU Member States. This creates situations of unequal treatment.

Can the Commission state whether this situation is in breach of ECJ case-law and of the EC Treaty, notably
its Article 13?

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(25 July 2001)

According to Article 39 (ex Article 48) of the EC Treaty, Community nationals have a right to freedom of
movement for workers within the territory of the Union. Article 39(4) of the EC Treaty provides that the
provisions of this Article shall not apply to employment in the public service. However, the Court of
Justice (CJ) has interpreted this reservation very strictly. In its constant interpretation the CJ has clarified
that Member States are authorised to reserve public service posts for their nationals only if they are directly
related to the specific activities of the public service, namely those involving the exercise of public
authority and the responsibility for safeguarding the general interest of the Member State including those
of public bodies such as local authorities. According to the (cid:145)Commission action in respect of
the
application of Article 48(4) (now 39(4)) of the EC-Treaty(cid:146) (1) the staff of the diplomatic service may fall
under this reservation.

The authorities of the Member States (including the courts), under the control of the CJ, have to decide in
each individual case if the criteria for applying Article 39(4) are really fulfilled; this has to be done
according to the specific tasks and responsibilities of the post in question.

If the Portuguese authorities decide that a specific post in the diplomatic corps does not fulfil the criteria of
Article 39(4) and therefore open this post to Union nationals who have exercised their right to free
movement they may not deny them the right to opt for national civil servant status. This denial would be
a discrimination based on nationality as regards any conditions of employment and work which is
prohibited according to Article 39(2) and Article 7(1) of Regulation (EEC) 1612/68 of the Council on
freedom of movement for workers within the Community (2). The CJ has ruled that Article 39(4) of the
EC Treaty cannot justify discriminatory measures with regard to remuneration or other conditions of
employment against workers once they have been admitted to the public service (see judgment of the CJ of
12 February 1974 in Case 152/73 (Giovanni Maria Sotgiu v. Deutsche Bundespost)) (3).

it should be noted that discrimination on grounds of nationality is not covered by Article 13

Finally,
(ex Article 6a) of the EC Treaty.

(1) OJ C 72, 18.3.1988.
(2) OJ L 257, 19.10.1968.
(3) ECR 1974, p. 153.