EFTA Court - Advisory Opinion of the Court of 14 June 2001 in Case E-4/00 (Request for an Advisory Opinion from the Administrative Court for the Principality of Liechtenstein): Dr Johann Brändle (Right of establishment — Single practice rule — Justification by overriding reasons of general interest) (Pursuant to Article 27(5) of the Rules of Procedure only the English and German texts are authentic)
Date: 2001-06-14
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: EFTA countries, agreement (EU), interpretation of the law, physician, right of establishment

23.8.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 237/5

ADVISORY OPINION OF THE COURT

of 14 June 2001

in Case E-5/00 (Request for an Advisory Opinion from the Administrative Court for the Princi-
pality of Liechtenstein): Dr Josef Mangold

(Right of establishment (cid:151) Single practice rule (cid:151) Justification by overriding reasons of general interest)

(Pursuant to Article 27(5) of the Rules of Procedure only the English and German texts are authentic)

(2001/C 237/06)

In Case E-5/00: request to the Court pursuant to Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on
the establishment of a surveillance authority and a Court of Justice by Verwaltungsbeschwerdeinstanz des
F(cid:252)rstentums Liechtenstein (Administrative Court for the Principality of Liechtenstein), for an Advisory
Opinion in the case pending before it concerning Dr Josef Mangold, in the interpretation of Article 31
of the EEA Agreement, the Court, composed of: Th(cid:243)r VilhjÆlmsson, President, Carl Baudenbacher and Per
Tresselt (Judge-Rapporteur), Judges; and Gunnar Selvik, Registrar, gave an Advisory Opinion on 14 June
2001, the operative part of which is as follows:

A national provision of a contracting party to the EEA Agreement which provides that a dentist may
is incompatible with Article 31 EEA.
not operate more than one practice, regardless of location,

ADVISORY OPINION OF THE COURT

of 14 June 2001

in Case E-4/00 (Request for an Advisory Opinion from the Administrative Court for the Princi-
pality of Liechtenstein): Dr Johann Br(cid:228)ndle

(Right of establishment (cid:151) Single practice rule (cid:151) Justification by overriding reasons of general interest)

(Pursuant to Article 27(5) of the Rules of Procedure only the English and German texts are authentic)

(2001/C 237/07)

In Case E-4/00: request to the Court pursuant to Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on
the establishment of a surveillance authority and a Court of Justice by Verwaltungsbeschwerdeinstanz des
F(cid:252)rstentums Liechtenstein (Administrative Court for the Principality of Liechtenstein), for an Advisory
Opinion in the case pending before it concerning Dr Johann Br(cid:228)ndle, on the interpretation of Article
31 of the EEA Agreement, the Court, composed of: Th(cid:243)r VilhjÆlmsson, President, Carl Baudenbacher and
Per Tresselt (Judge-Rapporteur), Judges; and Gunnar Selvik, Registrar, gave an Advisory Opinion on 14 June
2001, the operative part of which is as follows:

A national provision of a contracting party to the EEA Agreement which provides that a phys may
is incompatible with Article 31 EEA.
not operate more than one practice, regardless of location,