Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 February 2001 in Case T-3/00: Athanasios N. Pitsiorlas v Council of the European Union and European Central Bank (Inadmissibility — Access to institution documents)
Date: 2001-05-19
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: Council of the European Union, European Central Bank, abuse of power, access to information, action for annulment (EU), right to information

19.5.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 150/27

— in Case T-74/94: J.J.H. van den Broek, G.J.E. van Laar,

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

J.T. Salden, J.A.M. Wouters

— in Case T-75/94: J.M.F.M. Flamand

of 14 February 2001

in Case T-3/00: Athanasios N. Pitsiorlas v Council of the
European Union and European Central Bank (1)

— in Case T-86/94: J. Bakker, E. Hardeman, G.J. Prins, G. van

Putten

(Inadmissibility — Access to institution documents)

— in Case T-87/94:Th. H. Clemens, N.J.G.M. Costongs,
W.A.J. Derks, R.P. Geertsema, W. Hermsen, P. Hogenk-
amp, J.H. Kelder, G.M. Kuijs, E.J. Liefting, J.H. Nieuwenhu-
izen, D.J. Preuter, A.J.M. Sturkenboom, J.J. de Wit

— in Case T-91/94: D. Vellema, J. and K. Visser

— in Case T-94/94: J.W. Esselink

— in Case T-96/94: J.P. Groot

— in Case T-101/94: A.J. Dubbelhuis, A. Harkema, W. Knol

— in Case T-104/94: H. Rozema, B.L. van der Wijk

— in Case T-105/94: W. Talsma

(2001/C 150/53)

(Language of the case: Greek)

In Case T-3/00: Athanasios Pitsiorlas, residing in Thessaloniki
(Greece), Dimitris Papafilippou, Barrister, against Council of
the European Union (Agents: M. Bauer, S. Kyriakopoulou and
D. Zachariou) and European Central Bank (Agents: C. Zilioli,
P. Vospernik and C. Kroppenstedt) — application for annul-
ment of the decision of the Council of 30 July 1999 and of the
decision of the European Central Bank of 8 November 1999,
refusing the applicant access to a document — the Court of
First Instance (First Chamber), composed of B. Vesterdorf,
President, M. Vilaras and N.J. Forwood,
Jung,
Registrar, made an order on 14 February 2001, the operative
part of which is as follows:

Judges; H.

1.

2.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible to the extent that it is
directed against the Council decision of 30 July 1999;

The applicant shall bear his own expenses corresponding to the
objection of inadmissibility as well as pay for the costs incurred
by the Council.

— in Case T-106/94: R. and F. Visser, L.H. Hiddema

(1) OJ C 122 29.4.00

— in Case T-118/94: J. Hoedjes, J.K. Veenstra

— in Case T-119/94: A.J.M. and F.J.M. Baack, A.B. ten
Broeke, O. Dallinga, L.A. Looman, J.H. Hoogendoorn

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

— in Case T-122/94: A.G.J. van Boxtel

— in Case T-124/94: K.A. Schutter

— in Case T-130/94: R. van Dijk, H.J. Hiermstra,

A.W.J. Reijers.

(1) OJ C 334 of 9.12.93, C 27 of 28.1.94, C 43 of 12.2.94, C 59 of
26.2.94, C 90 of 26.3.94, C 103 of 11.4.94, C 120 of 30.4.94,
C 132 of 14.5.94, C 233 of 20.8.94 and C 370 of 24.12.94

of 2 February 2001

in Case T-97/00: Anastassia Vakalopoulou v Commission
of the European Communities (1)

(Temporary agent — Fixed-term contract — Extension —
Action for annulment and damages — Decision adversely
affecting an official — Manifestly inadmissible)

(2001/C 150/54)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-97/00: Anastassia Vakalopoulou, member of the
temporary staff of the Commission of the European Communi-
ties, residing at Brussels, represented by Jean-Noël Louis and
Véronique Peere, of the Brussels Bar, with an address for
service in Luxembourg, against Commission of the European
Communities (Agents: G. Valsesia and J. Currall) — application
for annulment of the alleged decision of the Commission not