Order of the Court of First Instance of 2 February 2001 in Case T-97/00: Anastassia Vakalopoulou v Commission of the European Communities (Temporary agent — Fixed-term contract — Extension — Action for annulment and damages — Decision adversely affecting an official — Manifestly inadmissible)
Date: 2001-05-19
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), servant (EU), termination of employment, work contract

19.5.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 150/27

— in Case T-74/94: J.J.H. van den Broek, G.J.E. van Laar,

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

J.T. Salden, J.A.M. Wouters

— in Case T-75/94: J.M.F.M. Flamand

of 14 February 2001

in Case T-3/00: Athanasios N. Pitsiorlas v Council of the
European Union and European Central Bank (1)

— in Case T-86/94: J. Bakker, E. Hardeman, G.J. Prins, G. van

Putten

(Inadmissibility — Access to institution documents)

— in Case T-87/94:Th. H. Clemens, N.J.G.M. Costongs,
W.A.J. Derks, R.P. Geertsema, W. Hermsen, P. Hogenk-
amp, J.H. Kelder, G.M. Kuijs, E.J. Liefting, J.H. Nieuwenhu-
izen, D.J. Preuter, A.J.M. Sturkenboom, J.J. de Wit

— in Case T-91/94: D. Vellema, J. and K. Visser

— in Case T-94/94: J.W. Esselink

— in Case T-96/94: J.P. Groot

— in Case T-101/94: A.J. Dubbelhuis, A. Harkema, W. Knol

— in Case T-104/94: H. Rozema, B.L. van der Wijk

— in Case T-105/94: W. Talsma

(2001/C 150/53)

(Language of the case: Greek)

In Case T-3/00: Athanasios Pitsiorlas, residing in Thessaloniki
(Greece), Dimitris Papafilippou, Barrister, against Council of
the European Union (Agents: M. Bauer, S. Kyriakopoulou and
D. Zachariou) and European Central Bank (Agents: C. Zilioli,
P. Vospernik and C. Kroppenstedt) — application for annul-
ment of the decision of the Council of 30 July 1999 and of the
decision of the European Central Bank of 8 November 1999,
refusing the applicant access to a document — the Court of
First Instance (First Chamber), composed of B. Vesterdorf,
President, M. Vilaras and N.J. Forwood,
Jung,
Registrar, made an order on 14 February 2001, the operative
part of which is as follows:

Judges; H.

1.

2.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible to the extent that it is
directed against the Council decision of 30 July 1999;

The applicant shall bear his own expenses corresponding to the
objection of inadmissibility as well as pay for the costs incurred
by the Council.

— in Case T-106/94: R. and F. Visser, L.H. Hiddema

(1) OJ C 122 29.4.00

— in Case T-118/94: J. Hoedjes, J.K. Veenstra

— in Case T-119/94: A.J.M. and F.J.M. Baack, A.B. ten
Broeke, O. Dallinga, L.A. Looman, J.H. Hoogendoorn

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

— in Case T-122/94: A.G.J. van Boxtel

— in Case T-124/94: K.A. Schutter

— in Case T-130/94: R. van Dijk, H.J. Hiermstra,

A.W.J. Reijers.

(1) OJ C 334 of 9.12.93, C 27 of 28.1.94, C 43 of 12.2.94, C 59 of
26.2.94, C 90 of 26.3.94, C 103 of 11.4.94, C 120 of 30.4.94,
C 132 of 14.5.94, C 233 of 20.8.94 and C 370 of 24.12.94

of 2 February 2001

in Case T-97/00: Anastassia Vakalopoulou v Commission
of the European Communities (1)

(Temporary agent — Fixed-term contract — Extension —
Action for annulment and damages — Decision adversely
affecting an official — Manifestly inadmissible)

(2001/C 150/54)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-97/00: Anastassia Vakalopoulou, member of the
temporary staff of the Commission of the European Communi-
ties, residing at Brussels, represented by Jean-Noël Louis and
Véronique Peere, of the Brussels Bar, with an address for
service in Luxembourg, against Commission of the European
Communities (Agents: G. Valsesia and J. Currall) — application
for annulment of the alleged decision of the Commission not

C 150/28

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

19.5.2001

to extend the applicant’s contract as a member of
the
temporary staff and a claim for compensation for the non-
material damage alleged caused to her — the Court of
First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of P. Mengozzi,
President, V. Tiili and R.M. Moura Ramos, Judges; H. Jung,
Registrar, made an order on 2 February 2001, the operative
part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

3.

4.

Cases T-112/00 and T-122/00 are joined.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

The applicants are to pay the costs.

There is no need to adjudicate on the application of the
European Crop Protection Association (ECPA) for leave to
intervene.

1.

2.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible;

Each of the parties shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 163 of 10.6.00.

(1) OJ C 192 of 8.7.2000.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 24 January 2001

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 19 January 2001

in Cases T-112/00 and T-122/00: Iberotam SA and Others
v Commission of the European Communities (1)

in Case T-126/00: Confederazione Generale dell’Industria
Italiana (Confindustria) and Others v Commission of the
European Communities (1)

(Action for annulment — Directive 91/414/EEC — Placing
on the market of plant protection products — Regulation
(EC) No 451/2000 — Work programme for the evaluation
of existing active substances on the market (second and third
stages) — Inadmissibility)

(2001/C 150/55)

(Language of the case: French)

In Cases T-112/00 and T-122/00: Iberotam SA, established in
Barcelona (Spain), Probelete SA, established in Murcia (Spain),
Agripraza SA, established at Torres Vedras (Portugal), Protex
SA, established at Wijnegem (Belgium), Laboratoire d’Achat
pour l’Agriculture (LAPA), established at Omicourt (Belgium),
Jarro-Paterna (Spain),
Afrasa SA, established at Fuente del
Herbex SA, established at Sintra (Portugal), European Crop
Care Association (ECCA), established at Eghezee (Belgium),
represented by M. Roca Junyent and J, Roca Sagarra, of the
Barcelona Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg at
the Chambers of V. Gillen, 13 Rue Aldringen, applicants in
Case T-112/00, and K & N Efthymiadis SA, established in
Thessaloniki (Greece), represented by M. Roca Junyent and
J, Roca Sagarra, of the Barcelona Bar, with an address for
service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of V. Gillen, 13 Rue
Aldringen, applicant in Case T-122/00, v Commission of the
European Communities (Agents: G. Berscheid and A.-M. Alves
Vieira) — application for annulment of Commission Regu-
lation (EC) No 451/2000 of 28 February 2000 laying down
the detailed rules for the implementation of the second and
third stages of the work programme referred to in Article 8(2)
of Council Directive 91/414/EEC (OJ 2000 L 55, p. 25) — the
Court of First
Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of:
P. Mengozzi, President, and V. Tiili and R.M. Moura Ramos,
Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 24 January 2001,
the operative part of which is as follows:

(Time-limit for bringing an action — Manifest inadmissi-
bility)

(2001/C 150/56)

(Language of the case: Italian)

In Case T-126/00: Confederazione Generale dell’Industria
Italiana (Confindustria), Confederazione Generale Italiana del
Commercio, del Turismo, dei Servizi e delle PMI (Confcommer-
cio), Confartigianato, Associazione Bancaria Italiana (ABI),
established in Rome, Associazione Nazionale fra le Imprese
Assicuratrici (ANIA), established in Milan (Italy), and Banco di
Napoli SpA, established in Naples (Italy), represented by
A. Pappalardo, of the Trapani Bar, and M. Merola, of the Rome
Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg at
the
Chambers of A. Lorang, 51 Rue Albert 1er, v Commission of
the European Communities (Agents: G. Rozet and V. Di
Bucci) — application for annulment of Commission Decision
2000/128/CE of 11 May 1999 concerning aid granted by Italy
to promote employment (OJ 2000 L 42, p. 1) — the Court
of First Instance (Second Chamber, Extended Composition),
composed of: A.W.H. Meij, President, and K. Lenaerts,
A. Potocki, M. Jaeger and J. Pirrung, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar,
made an order on 19 January 2001, the operative part of
which is as follows:

1.

2.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

The applicant shall bear the costs.

(1) OJ C 192 of 8.7.2000.