Communication from the Commission A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development (Commission's proposal to the Gothenburg European Council)
Date: 2001-05-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: UN Conference, energy policy, environmental protection, management of resources, meteorology, natural resources, public health, sustainable development, town and country planning

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Brussels, 15.5.2001
COM(2001)264 final

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

A Sustainable Europe for a Better World:
A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development

(Commission's proposal to the Gothenburg European Council)

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

A Sustainable Europe for a Better World:
A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development
(Commission's proposal to the Gothenburg European Council)

I

TOWARDS A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE

“Sustainable development
the
present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their
own needs.” - World Commission on Environment and Development (the
“Brundtland Commission”), 1987

that meets the needs of

is development

At its meeting in Helsinki in December 1999 the European Council invited the European
Commission “to prepare a proposal for a long-term strategy dovetailing policies for
economically, socially and ecologically sustainable development to be presented to the
European Council in June 2001.” This paper responds to that invitation. It builds on the
Commission services’ consultation paper issued in March, and on the many responses to
it.

Sustainable development is a global objective. The European Union has a key role in
bringing about sustainable development, within Europe and also on the wider global
stage, where widespread international action is required. To meet this responsibility, the
EU and other signatories of the 1992 United Nations’ “Rio declaration” committed
themselves, at the 19th Special Session of the United Nations’ General Assembly in
1997, to draw up strategies for sustainable development in time for the 2002 World
Summit on Sustainable Development. This strategy forms part of the EU preparations for
that summit.

Sustainable development - a broader long-term vision

Just over one year ago at Lisbon, the European Council set a new strategic goal for the
Union: “to become the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the
world capable of sustainable economic growth with more and better jobs and greater
social cohesion”. The Stockholm European Council then decided that the EU sustainable
development strategy should complete and build on this political commitment by
including an environmental dimension. This recognises that in the long term, economic
growth, social cohesion and environmental protection must go hand in hand.

Sustainable development offers the European Union a positive long-term vision of a
society that is more prosperous and more just, and which promises a cleaner, safer,
healthier environment – a society which delivers a better quality of life for us, for our
children, and for our grandchildren. Achieving this in practice requires that economic
growth supports social progress and respects the environment,
that social policy
underpins economic performance, and that environmental policy is cost-effective.

Decoupling environmental degradation and resource consumption from economic and
social development requires a major reorientation of public and private investment
towards new, environmentally-friendly technologies. The sustainable development

2

“Sustainable
development
should be seen
as a global
objective” – the
Brundtland
Commission

Completing
and building
on the Lisbon
strategy

Providing a
positive vision
for the future

A strategy to
unleash
opportunities to
invest for the
long term

strategy should be a catalyst for policy-makers and public opinion in the coming years
and become a driving force for institutional reform, and for changes in corporate and
consumer behaviour. Clear, stable, long-term objectives will shape expectations and
create the conditions in which businesses have the confidence to invest in innovative
solutions, and to create new, high-quality jobs.

Focussing on
the most acute
threats

To bridge the gap between this ambitious vision and practical political action, the
Commission proposes that the strategy should focus on a small number of problems
which pose severe or irreversible threats to the future well-being of European society:

3

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

The main threats to sustainable development

Emissions of greenhouse gases from human activity are causing global warming.
Climate change is likely to cause more extreme weather events (hurricanes, floods)
with severe implications for infrastructure, property, health and nature.

Severe threats to public health are posed by new antibiotic-resistant strains of
some diseases and, potentially, the longer-term effects of the many hazardous
increasing
chemicals currently in everyday use;
concern.

threats to food safety are of

One in every six Europeans lives in poverty. Poverty and social exclusion have
enormous direct effects on individuals such as ill health, suicide, and persistent
unemployment. The burden of poverty is borne disproportionately by single mothers
and older women living alone. Poverty often remains within families for generations.

While increases in life expectancy are obviously welcome, combined with low birth
rates the resultant ageing of the population threatens a slowdown in the rate of
economic growth, as well as the quality and financial sustainability of pension
schemes and public health care. Spending could increase by up to 8% of gross
domestic product in many Member States between 2000 and 2040.

The loss of bio-diversity in Europe has accelerated dramatically in recent
decades. Fish stocks in European waters are near collapse. Waste volumes have
persistently grown faster than GDP. Soil loss and declining fertility are eroding the
viability of agricultural land.

Transport congestion has been rising rapidly and is approaching gridlock. This
mainly affects urban areas, which are also challenged by problems such as inner-
city decay, sprawling suburbs, and concentrations of acute poverty and social
exclusion. Regional imbalances in the EU remain a serious concern.

Solving these
problems calls
for a new
policy agenda

Very few of these unsustainable trends are new. Attempts have been made at many levels
of government and society to address them. Initiatives such as local Agenda 21 have
proved to be an effective means of building a consensus for change at local level.
However, these efforts have so far had only limited success due to the difficulty in
changing established policies and patterns of behaviour, and in bringing the responses
together in a co-ordinated way. Tackling these unsustainable trends and achieving the
vision offered by sustainable development requires urgent action; committed and far-
leadership; a new approach to policymaking; widespread
sighted political
participation; and international responsibility.

Doing nothing
may be much
more costly
than taking
early action

– Urgent action is needed: Now is the time to confront the challenges to sustainability.
Many of the trends that threaten sustainable development result from past choices in
production technology, patterns of land use and infrastructure investment, which are
difficult to reverse in a short timeframe. Although the major impacts of losses in bio-
diversity, increased resistance to antibiotics, or climate change may be felt only after
many years, by then they may be very costly or impossible to tackle.

Political
leadership is
needed to take
tough decisions

– Political leadership is essential: Strong political commitment will be needed to
sustainable development. While sustainable
make the changes
development will undoubtedly benefit society overall, difficult trade-offs between
conflicting interests will have to be made. We must face up to these trade-offs openly

required for

4

and honestly. Changes to policy must be made in a fair and balanced way, but
narrow sectional interests must not be allowed to prevail over the well-being of
society as a whole.

– A new approach to policymaking: Although the Union has a wide range of policies
to address the economic, environmental and social dimensions of sustainability, these
have developed without enough co-ordination. Too often, action to achieve
objectives in one policy area hinders progress in another, while solutions to
problems often lie in the hands of policy makers in other sectors or at other levels of
government. This is a major cause of many long-term unsustainable trends. In
addition, the absence of a coherent long-term perspective means that there is too
much focus on short-term costs and too little focus on the prospect of longer term
“win-win” situations.

– Action must be taken by all and at all levels: Many of the changes needed to secure
sustainable development can only successfully be undertaken at EU level. Clear
examples arise in policy areas where the Community has exclusive legal competence,
or where integrated European economies mean that uncoordinated action by Member
States is likely to be ineffective. In other cases, action by national, regional or local
governments will be more appropriate. However, while public authorities have a
key role in providing a clear long-term framework, it is ultimately individual
citizens and businesses who will deliver the changes in consumption and investment
patterns needed to achieve sustainable development.

– A responsible partner in a globalised world: Many of

the challenges to
sustainability require global action to solve them. Climate change and biodiversity
are obvious examples. The Commission believes that developed countries must take
the lead in pursuing sustainable development, and calls on other developed countries
to accept their responsibilities as well. The Commission believes that the EU should
start by putting its own house in order, to provide international leadership and as a
first step towards achieving global sustainability. As EU production and consumption
have impacts beyond our borders, we must also ensure that all our policies help
prospects for sustainable development at a global level.

To meet these challenges the Commission proposes an EU strategy in three parts:

1:

2:

3:

A set of cross-cutting proposals and recommendations to improve the
effectiveness of policy and make sustainable development happen. This means
making sure that different policies reinforce one another rather than pulling in
opposite directions.

A set of headline objectives and specific measures at EU level to tackle the
issues which pose the biggest challenges to sustainable development in Europe.

Steps to implement the strategy and review its progress.

II

MAKING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT HAPPEN:

ACHIEVING OUR AMBITIONS

To achieve sustainable development requires changes in the way policy is made and
implemented, both at EU level and in Member States. This in turn requires clear

5

A coherent,
long-term view
should guide
policy

Everyone has a
contribution to
make. A strong
EU role is
essential

Acting at home
will provide
international
leadership

Current
policies need to
change

commitment at the highest level. This section makes a number of proposals aimed at
securing more effective responses to the challenges we face.

Improve policy coherence

All policies
should be
judged by how
they contribute
to sustainable
development

To do this, we
need better
information,
especially to
deal with risk
and uncertainty

Sustainable development should become the central objective of all sectors and policies.
This means that policy makers must identify likely spillovers – good and bad – onto
other policy areas and take them into account. Careful assessment of the full effects of
a policy proposal must include estimates of its economic, environmental and social
impacts inside and outside the EU. This should include, where relevant, the effects on
gender equality and equal opportunities. It is particularly important to identify clearly the
groups who bear the burden of change so that policy makers can judge the need for
measures to help these groups to adapt. Assessments should take a more consistent
approach and employ expertise available from a wide range of policy areas.

To assess proposals systematically better information is needed. For example, the
imperfectly understood, as are the
implications of an ageing population are still
implications for bio-diversity and public health of some types of environmental pollution
or of chemicals such as endocrine disrupters. However, in line with the precautionary
principle, lack of knowledge must not become an excuse for lack of action or for ill-
considered action. Risk and uncertainty are a part of life. The role of science and research
is to help identify the nature of the risks and uncertainties we face, so as to provide a
basis for solutions and political decisions. Policy makers have a responsibility to manage
risk effectively, and to explain its nature and extent clearly to the public.

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

Action

All policies must have sustainable development as their core concern. In particular,
forthcoming reviews of Common Policies must look at how they can contribute more
positively to sustainable development:

The mid-term review of the Common Agricultural Policy in 2002 should reward
quality rather than quantity by, for example, encouraging the organic sector and
other environmentally-friendly farming methods and a further shift of resources from
market support to rural development.

The Common Fisheries Policy should promote the sustainable management of fish
stocks in the EU and internationally, while securing the long-term viability of the EU
fishing industry and protecting marine ecosystems.

The Common Transport Policy should tackle rising levels of congestion and pollution
and encourage use of more environmentally-friendly modes of transport.

The Cohesion Policies need to improve their targeting of the least developed regions
and those with the most acute structural problems – such as urban decay and the
the rural economy – and the groups in society most vulnerable to
decline of
persistent social exclusion.

in December. This will

The Commission will submit an action plan to improve regulation to the Laeken
include mechanisms to ensure that all
European Council
major legislative proposals include an assessment of the potential economic,
environmental and social benefits and costs of action or lack of action, both
inside and outside the EU. The Council and Parliament should amend legislative
proposals in the same spirit.

6

Getting prices right to give signals to individuals and businesses

Getting prices
right will
encourage
changes in
behaviour and
technology

Market prices have a powerful influence on the behaviour of individuals and businesses.
Market reforms to get prices right can create new business opportunities to develop
services and products that ease pressure on the environment and fulfil social and
economic needs. Sometimes,
this means public money for services which would
otherwise not be supplied, such as essential public services in sparsely populated areas.
More often, the issue is one of removing subsidies that encourage wasteful use of
natural resources, and putting a price on pollution. Changing prices in this way
provides a permanent incentive for the development and use of safer, less polluting
technologies and equipment, and will often be all that is needed to tip the balance in their
favour.

(cid:1)

Action

The Commission will give priority in its policy and legislative proposals to market-
based approaches that provide price incentives, whenever these are likely to
achieve social and environmental objectives in a flexible and cost effective way.

Invest in science and technology for the future

these

Our continued long-term prosperity depends critically on advances in knowledge and
technological progress. Without
sustainable
development will have to happen much more through changes in our consumption
patterns. By promoting innovation, new technologies may be developed that use fewer
natural resources, reduce pollution or risks to health and safety, and are cheaper than
their predecessors. The EU and Member States should ensure that legislation does not
hamper innovation or erect excessive non-market barriers to the dissemination and use
of new technology.

investments,

adjustment

to

Advances in
knowledge and
technology are
vital

Public funding to support technological change for sustainable development should focus
on basic and applied research into safe and environmentally-benign technologies, and on
benchmarking and demonstration projects to stimulate faster uptake of new, safer,
cleaner technologies. Public procurement policies – provided they are not a cover for
protectionism – are an additional means to accelerate the spread of new technology. A
“green purchasing initiative” from the private sector could similarly increase the use of
environmentally-benign products and services.

Action

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

The Community should fully exploit the potential of the next Community Framework
research activities related to sustainable
Programme for Research to support
development as a part of the European Research Area.

Drawing on the guidance document the Commission will
issue shortly, Member
States should consider how to make better use of public procurement to favour
environmentally-friendly products and services.

The Commission will encourage private sector
environmental factors in their purchasing specifications.

initiatives to incorporate

7

More open
policymaking
will improve
policy and
stimulate
citizens and
business to get
involved

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

The Commission invites industry to identify what it considers the major obstacles to
the development and wider use of new technologies in sectors such as energy,
transport and communications.

The Community should contribute to establishing by 2008 a European capacity for
global monitoring of environment and security (GMES)

Improve communication and mobilise citizens and business

Although science and scientific advice are a key input
to decision making, public
confidence in its objectivity has been shaken by events such as recent human and animal
health scares. There are concerns that the policy responses have been driven more by
narrow sectional interests than the wider interests of society. This perception is part of a
wider malaise. Many believe that policy has become too technocratic and remote, and is
too much under the influence of vested interests. To tackle this rising disaffection with
the political process, policy making must become more open.

An open policy process also allows any necessary trade-offs between competing interests
to be clearly identified, and decisions taken in a transparent way. Earlier and more
systematic dialogue – in particular with representatives of consumers, whose interests
are too often overlooked – may lengthen the time taken to prepare a policy proposal, but
should improve the quality of regulation and accelerate its implementation. The views of
those from outside the Union should also be sought.

Widespread popular “ownership” of the goal of sustainable development depends not
only on more openness in policy-making but also on the perception that individuals can,
through their own actions, make a real difference. For example, local Agenda 21 has
been effective at promoting sustainable development at the local level. The education
system also has a vital role to play in promoting better understanding of the aim of
sustainable development, fostering a sense of individual and collective responsibility,
and thereby encouraging changes in behaviour.

Public policy also has a key role in encouraging a greater sense of corporate social
responsibility and in establishing a framework to ensure that businesses integrate
environmental and social considerations in their activities. Some of the most far sighted
businesses have realised that sustainable development offers new opportunities and
have begun to adapt their investments accordingly. Business should be encouraged to
take a pro-active approach to sustainable development in their operations both within the
EU and elsewhere.

Action

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

The Commission’s forthcoming White Paper on Governance will include proposals
on wide-ranging consultation of stakeholders from within and outside the Union,
typically including a public hearing, before tabling any major policy proposal.
Reviews of major policies will similarly seek to obtain the views of stakeholders.

All publicly-quoted companies with at least 500 staff are invited to publish a “triple
bottom line” in their annual reports to shareholders that measures their
performance against economic, environmental and social criteria. EU businesses
are urged to demonstrate and publicise their world-wide adherence to the OECD
guidelines for multi-national enterprises, or other comparable guidelines.

8

(cid:1)

Member States should consider how their education systems can help develop
wider understanding of sustainable development.

Take enlargement and the global dimension into account

The EU strategy should look beyond the Union’s present borders to be relevant for the
countries which will join the Union during the coming years. These future Member
States face many of the same problems, but also have a number of distinctive features.
they have much richer bio-diversity. However, economic and social
For example,
disparities will be wider in an enlarged Union. The new Member States will have much
larger agricultural populations on average, and a backlog of investment in infrastructure
and in production technology. Future reforms of Community policy will have to take
account of these differences. Candidate countries should be actively involved in
implementing this strategy.

Moreover, many EU policies influence prospects for sustainability far beyond the borders
of the Union, and EU production and consumption increase the pressure on shared global
environmental resources. It is therefore important to ensure that measures we take to
move towards sustainable development
in Europe contribute towards sustainable
development in the rest of the world. Our policies – internal and external – must
actively support efforts by other countries – particularly those in the developing world
– to achieve development that is more sustainable.

institutions,

To make an effective contribution to achieving global sustainable development the EU
and its Member States need to co-operate effectively with other countries and
international
the
International Labour Organisation, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank,
and the United Nations Environment Programme. The role of the EU in helping to
achieve
context will be dealt with
comprehensively by our preparations for the Rio + 10 Summit in South Africa in 2002.

the World Trade Organisation,

sustainable development

including the OECD,

in this wider

The EU
strategy must
look beyond
our current
borders

Sustainable
development in
the EU must
foster global
sustainability

Co-operation
with other
countries and
international
organisations
is important

(cid:1)

Action

The Commission will present a Communication in the first half of 2002 further setting
its views on how the Union should contribute to global sustainable
out
development,
the World Summit on Sustainable Development
(Rio+10) in Johannesburg. Among other issues, this Communication should address
in
the question of mobilising additional financial resources for development aid,
particular to reduce global poverty.

in advance of

III

SETTING LONG-TERM OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS:

IDENTIFYING PRIORITIES FOR ACTION

Action is needed across a wide range of policies

Concrete
actions are
needed

The main challenges to sustainable development
identified above cut across several
policy areas. Accordingly, a comprehensive, cross-sectoral approach is needed to
address these challenges. Concrete actions in specific policy areas should be built on the
policy principles set out in the previous section. Reforms to existing Community policies
must aim to maximise their contribution to the strategic objectives of the EU strategy for
sustainable development.

9

The EU
strategy must
fully integrate
the economic,
environmental
and social
pillars of
sustainable
development

Recent European Councils at Lisbon, Nice and Stockholm have already agreed objectives
and measures to tackle two of the six issues that pose the biggest challenges to
sustainable development
in Europe: combating poverty and social exclusion, and
dealing with the economic and social implications of an ageing society. This strategy
does not propose new actions in these areas. However, these objectives are an integral
part of the EU Strategy for Sustainable Development and are set out in Annex 1 below.

For the remaining four issues, the Commission proposes the following set of priority
objectives and measures at EU level. Meeting these objectives will also require action to
be taken by Member States, both in their domestic policies, and in the decisions taken by
the Council on changes to Community policies. The Commission will report on progress
in meeting all the goals of the strategy in its report to the annual Spring European
Council (the Synthesis Report).

Limit climate change and increase the use of clean energy

Headline objectives

• The EU will meet

its Kyoto commitment. However, Kyoto is but a first step.
Thereafter, the EU should aim to reduce atmospheric greenhouse gas emissions by an
average of 1% per year over 1990 levels up to 2020.

• The Union will insist that the other major industrialised countries comply with their
Kyoto targets. This is an indispensable step in ensuring the broader international effort
needed to limit global warming and adapt to its effects.

Measures at EU level

• Adoption of energy products tax directive by 2002. Within two years of this, the
Commission will propose more ambitious environmental targets for energy taxation
aiming at the full internalisation of external costs, as well as indexation of minimum
levels of excise duties to at least the inflation rate.

• Phase out subsidies to fossil fuel production and consumption by 2010. Where
necessary, put in place flanking measures to help develop alternative sources of
employment. Analyse whether there is a need to create a stockpile of coal reserves,
and whether or not we should maintain a minimum level of subsidised production for
security of supply reasons. Commission proposal in 2001 for adoption by Council
before the expiry of the ECSC Treaty in July 2002. Take account of the specific
situation of some candidate countries in the accession treaties.

• Greenhouse gas emission reduction measures based on the outcome of the European
Climate Change Programme. Specifically, the Commission will propose by end-2001
a proposal for the creation of a European CO2 tradable permits system by 2005.

• Alternative fuels,

fuel
consumption of cars and trucks by 2010, and at least 20% by 2020. The Commission
will make a proposal in 2001 for adoption in 2002.

including biofuels, should account

least 7% of

for at

10

• Clear action to reduce energy demand,

tighter minimum
standards and labelling requirements for buildings and appliances to improve energy
efficiency.

through, for example,

• More support to the research, development and dissemination of technology on:

–

–

clean and renewable energy resources

safer nuclear energy, namely the management of nuclear waste.

Address threats to public health

Headline objectives

• Make food safety and quality the objective of all players in the food chain.

• By 2020, ensure that chemicals are only produced and used in ways that do not pose

significant threats to human health and the environment.

• Tackle issues related to outbreaks of infectious diseases and resistance to antibiotics.

Measures at EU level

• Improve consumer information and awareness, including through education, and clear

labelling of food.

• Creation of a European Food Authority in 2002.

• Improve capacity to monitor and control health impacts of certain substances (for
example dioxins, toxins, pesticides) in food and the environment, especially their
effects on children.

• Reorient support from the Common Agricultural Policy to reward healthy, high-
quality products and practices rather than quantity; following on from the 2002
evaluation of the tobacco regime, adapt the regime so as to allow for a phasing out of
tobacco subsidies while putting in place measures to develop alternative sources of
income and economic activity for tobacco workers and growers and decide an early
date accordingly.

• Develop by 2003 a comprehensive Community strategy to promote health and safety
at work, to achieve a substantial reduction in work accidents and professional illness.

• All legislation to implement the new chemicals policy in place by 2004.

• The Commission will present by the end of 2001 a European action plan to slow
resistance to antibiotics, through improving information, phasing out their use as
growth promoters in agriculture, and better control of the use of antibiotics in human,
animal, and plant care.

• Create by 2005 a European capacity to monitor and control outbreaks of infectious

diseases.

11

Manage natural resources more responsibly

Headline objectives

• Break the links between economic growth, the use of resources and the generation of

waste.

• Protect and restore habitats and natural systems and halt the loss of biodiversity by

2010.

• Improve fisheries management to reverse the decline in stocks and ensure sustainable

fisheries and healthy marine ecosystems, both in the EU and globally.

Measures at EU level

• Develop an Integrated Product Policy in co-operation with business to reduce resource

use and the environmental impacts of waste.

• EU legislation on strict environmental liability in place by 2003.

• The Commission will establish a system of biodiversity indicators by 2003.

• The Commission will propose a system of resource productivity measurement to be

operational by 2003.

• In the mid-term review of the Common Agricultural Policy,

improve the agri-
environmental measures so that they provide a transparent system of direct payments
for environmental services.

• In the 2002 review of the Common Fisheries Policy, remove counter-productive
subsidies which encourage over-fishing, and reduce the size and activity of EU fishing
fleets to a level compatible with worldwide sustainability, while addressing the
consequent social problems.

Improve the transport system and land-use management

Headline Objectives

• Decouple transport growth significantly from growth in Gross Domestic Product in

order to reduce congestion and other negative side-effects of transport.

• Bring about a shift in transport use from road to rail, water and public passenger
transport so that the share of road transport in 2010 is no greater than in 1998 (the
most recent year for which data are available)

• Promote more balanced regional development by reducing disparities in economic
rural and urban communities, as

activity and maintaining the viability of
recommended by the European Spatial Development Perspective.

12

Measures at EU level

• The Commission will propose in 2002 a framework for transport charges to ensure
that by 2005, prices for different modes of transport, including air, reflect their costs
to society.

• Implement in 2003 a framework ensuring through the use of intelligent transport
systems the interoperability of payment systems for road transport; promote further
technological progress enabling the introduction of road pricing.

short

• Give priority to infrastructure investment for public transport and for railways, inland
waterways,
the
sea shipping and intermodal operations.
Commission will propose in 2001, for adoption in 2003, a revision of the guidelines
for the Transeuropean transport networks, and will promote, in the mid-term review of
the Structural Fund programmes, a marked reduction in the share of finance given to
road transport.

In particular,

• Improve transport systems by addressing missing transport links, developing open
markets and co-operation at EU level (e.g. railway liberalisation, air traffic systems).
European Single Sky to be operational by 2004.

• Promote teleworking by accelerating investments in next generation communications

infrastructure and services.

• In 2001, start the implementation of the European Spatial Planning Observatory
Network (ESPON) in order to define a set of territorial indicators to analyse the
regional impacts of Community policies.

• Assess the coherence of the zoning of different Community policies, taking account of
their objectives (e.g. NATURA 2000, less-favoured agricultural areas, areas eligible
under the Structural Funds or for State Aids).

• Diversify income sources in rural areas, including by increasing the proportion of

Common Agricultural Policy funds directed to rural development.

• Encourage local initiatives to tackle the problems faced by urban areas; produce
and

development

integrated

strategies

urban

for

recommendations
environmentally-sensitive areas.

for

IV

IMPLEMENTING THE STRATEGY AND REVIEWING PROGRESS:

STEPS AFTER GOTHENBURG

Annual stocktaking checks our progress

Regular
monitoring and
reporting of
progress,
based on
indicators

sustainable
The Stockholm European Council decided that all dimensions of
development should be reviewed at the annual Spring European Council. Measuring
progress will imply adding a number of indicators to those already agreed for monitoring
the Lisbon strategy. These indicators flow naturally from the long-term objectives and
targets the Commission is proposing in this document.

13

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

Action

The Commission will report to each Spring European Council in its Synthesis
Report on progress in implementing the Sustainable Development strategy.

The Commission will propose a small number of headline performance indicators
for this purpose to the Barcelona European Council in Spring 2002.

integration of environmental concerns in sectoral policies,
The process of
in Cardiff, must continue and provide an
launched by the European Council
environmental
input to the EU Sustainable Development strategy, similar to that
given for the economic and social dimensions by the Broad Economic Policy
Guidelines and the Employment Guidelines. The sectoral environmental integration
strategies should be consistent with the specific objectives of EU Sustainable
Development strategy.

Working methods need to change

At all stages of the Community legislative process, policy proposals in individual sectors
are developed and discussed without paying sufficient attention to the linkages between
different policy areas. The way the Commission, Council and Parliament are organised
reinforces this narrow, sectoral approach. All three institutions should consider what
steps they can take to overcome this weakness.

The Commission will improve its internal procedures to deliver more consistent policy
proposals. The Council of Ministers and the European Parliament should also review
their working methods. The Council should change its structures to improve the co-
ordination and consistency of the work of the sectoral Councils. The European
Parliament should consider creating a Sustainable Development committee to give a
view on the wider implications of sectoral policy proposals. This committee could
consist of representatives of other committees, as is the case with the financial control
committee.

(cid:1)

Action

The Commission will establish a sustainable development “Round Table” of
about 10 independent experts offering a broad range of views, who will report
directly to the Commission President in time for the preparation of the Commission’s
synthesis report to the Spring European Council and make recommendations to
improve the coherence of Community policies.

Medium-term reviews allow us to adapt the strategy to changes in long-term
priorities

Sustainable development is by its nature a long-term objective. While annual stocktaking
is important to maintain momentum and give early warning of unforeseen difficulties,
too much focus on short-term developments and details may cause us to lose sight of the
bigger picture. For this reason,
the European Council’s annual exercise should be
periodically complemented by a more comprehensive review at the beginning of each
Commission’s term of office.

14

All Community
institutions
should review
their working
methods

Periodic far-
reaching
reviews will
keep the
strategy on
track

This should examine the strategy’s effectiveness in achieving sustainable development.
Over time, the severity of some problems – or the value of some measures – may change,
and new, more pressing problems may emerge. Regular medium-term reviews will
permit the Union to adapt the strategy to these changes and to changes in our long-term
policy objectives.

The voices of
stakeholders,
including those
from outside
the Union,
must be heard

Opening the review to stakeholders will increase its credibility and value. The Union’s
efforts to achieve sustainable development ultimately depend on widespread “ownership”
of the strategy by individuals and businesses, as well as civil society and local and
regional authorities. Prospects for public acceptance of the strategy will be greater, the
more it is based on comprehensive dialogue with representatives of society at large.

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

Action

The EU Strategy for Sustainable Development will be comprehensively reviewed
at the start of each Commission’s term of office.

Starting in 2002, the Commission will hold a two-yearly Stakeholder Forum to
assess the EU Strategy. The Commission invites the Economic and Social
Committee to join it in organising this conference.

15

Annex 1: The goals of the Lisbon strategy in the field of social policy

The commitments made at the Lisbon, Nice and Stockholm summits are summarised
below.

Combat poverty and social exclusion

Headline objective

• Make a decisive impact on the eradication of poverty.

• Raise the employment rate to 67% for January 2005 and to 70% by 2010; increase the
number of women in employment to 57% for January 2005 and to more than 60% by
2010.

• Halve by 2010 the number of 18 to 24 years olds with only lower secondary education

who are not in further education and training.

Measures at EU level

• Combat social exclusion by creating the economic conditions for greater prosperity
through higher levels of growth and employment, and by opening up new ways of
participating in society.

• Strengthen the implementation of

the European Employment Strategy. Define
common approaches to maintaining and improving the quality of work which should
be included as a general objective in the 2002 employment guidelines.

• Complete work by the end of 2001 on updating existing legislation on implementing
the principle of equal treatment of men and women as regards access to employment,
vocational training and promotion and working conditions.

• Agree in the course of 2001 the proposal for a social inclusion programme.

• Agree by the end of 2001 indicators on quality in work and for combating social
exclusion. Develop indicators on the provision of care facilities for children and other
dependants and on family benefit systems by 2002. Develop indicators to ensure that
there are no discriminatory pay differentials between men and women.

Deal with the economic and social implications of an ageing society

Headline objectives

• Ensure the adequacy of pension systems as well as of health care systems and care of
the elderly, while at the same time maintaining sustainability of public finances and
inter-generational solidarity.

• Address the demographic challenge by raising employment rates, reducing public debt

and adapting social protection systems, including pension systems

• Increase the average EU employment rate among older women and men (55-64) to

50% by 2010.

16

Measures at EU level

• Use the potential of the open method of co-ordination in the field of pensions and
prepare a report on the quality and sustainability of pensions in the light of
demographic change in view of the Spring European Council 2002.

• Identify coherent strategies and practical measures with a view to fostering lifelong

learning for all.

• The Council should regularly review the long-term sustainability of public finances,
including the expected changes caused by the demographic changes ahead, both under
the broad economic policy guidelines and in the context of stability and convergence
programmes.

• An in-depth discussion will take place at the Laeken European Council in 2001 on
immigration, migration and asylum within the framework of the Tampere follow-up.
In this connection, due attention should be given to the position of third-country
nationals legally residing in the Union.

• The Council and the Commission to report jointly, in time for the Spring European
Council in 2002, on how to increase labour force participation and promote active
ageing.

17