Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 December 2000 in Case T-213/99: Luc Verheyden v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Action for annulment — Measures and instructions falling within the ambit of discipline in the workplace — Measure adversely affecting an official — Action for damages — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2001-05-05
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, European official, Joint Research Centre, action for annulment (EU), regulations for civil servants, staff assessment

C 134/20

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

5.5.2001

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 14 December 2000

in Case T-213/99: Luc Verheyden v Commission of the
European Communities (1)

(Officials — Action for annulment — Measures and instruc-
tions falling within the ambit of discipline in the workplace
— Measure adversely affecting an official — Action for
damages — Inadmissibility)

(2001/C 134/42)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-213/99: Luc Verheyden, an official of the Com-
mission of the European Communities, residing at Angera
(Italy), represented by E. Boigelot, of the Brussels Bar, with an
the Chambers of
address for service in Luxembourg at
L. Schiltz, 2 Rue du Fort Rheinsheim, v Commission of the
European Communities (Agents: C. Berardis-Kayser and A. Dal
Ferro) — application, first, for annulment of the note dated
10 November 1998 from the head of the Logistics unit in
the Infrastructure Directorate for the Ispra site and of the
administration’s refusal dated 16 November 1998 to withdraw
that note, and, second, for compensation for the non-material
damage allegedly suffered — the Court of First Instance (Fifth
Chamber), composed of: P. Lindh, President, and R. Garcı´a-
Valdecasas and J.D. Cooke, Judges; B. Pastor, Principal Adminis-
trator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 14 December
2000, in which it:

1. Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

2. Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 333 of 20.11.1999.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 15 November 2000

in Case T-261/99: Jean Dehon v European Parliament (1)

(Officials — Promotion — Notice of vacancy — Examin-
ation of comparative merits — Equal opportunities)

(2001/C 134/43)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-261/99: Jean Dehon, an official of the European
Parliament, residing at Hagen (Luxembourg), represented by
J.-N. Louis, G.-F. Parmentier and V. Peere, of the Brussels Bar,
with an address for service in Luxembourg at the offices of
Société de Gestion Fiduciaire SARL, 13 Avenue du Bois,

v European Parliament (Agents: H. von Hertzen and J. Sant’An-
na) — application for annulment, first, of the decision of the
European Parliament rejecting the application by the applicant
for the post of Deputy Head of the French Translation Division,
as referred to in Vacancy Notice No 8503, and, second, of the
decision appointing Ms W. to that post — the Court of First
Instance (First Chamber), composed of: B. Vesterdorf, President,
and M. Vilaras and N.J. Forwood, Judges; B. Pastor, Principal
Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on
15 November 2000, in which it:

1. Annuls the decision of the European Parliament rejecting the
application by the applicant and appointing Ms W. to the post
of Deputy Head of the French Translation Division, as referred
to in Vacancy Notice No 8503;

2. Orders the European Parliament to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 6 of 8.1.2000.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 31 January 2001

in Case T-331/99: Mitsubishi HiTec Paper Bielefeld GmbH
v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade
marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

(Community trade mark — Word mark Giroform — Absol-
ute grounds for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of
Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Descriptive character)

(2001/C 134/44)

(Language of the case: German)

In Case T-331/99: Mitsubishi HiTec Paper Bielefeld GmbH,
formerly Stora Carbonless Paper GmbH, established in Bielefeld
(Germany), represented by U. Ulrich, Rechtsanwalt, Düsseldorf,
with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Office de
Brevets Ernest T. Freylinger, 234 Route d’Arlon, against Office
for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade marks and
Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: E. Joly, P. von Kapff, and A. von
Mühlendahl) — application for annulment of the decision of
the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in
the Internal Market (Trade marks and Designs) of 8 September
1999 in Case R 175/1999-3 refusing registration of the word
‘Giroform’ as a Community trade mark — the Court of First
Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of: V. Tiili, President,
Judges; G. Herzig,
R.M. Moura Ramos and P. Mengozzi,
Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on
31 January 2001, in which it: