Order of the Court of First Instance of 6 December 2000 in Joined Cases T-79/96, T-260/97 and T-117/98, Camar srl and Tico srl against the Commission of the European Communities and Council of the European Union (Failure to take measures)
Date: 2001-04-21
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), firm governed by commercial law, import licence, tariff quota, tropical fruit

C 118/36

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

21.4.2001

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 7 December 2000

in Case T-77/95 DEP Union française de l’express (Ufex)
and Others v Commission of the European Communi-
ties (1)

(Taxation of costs)

(2001/C 118/101)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-77/95 DEP: Union française de l’express (Ufex),
formerly Syndicat français de l’express international (SFEI),
established in Roissy-en-France, France, DHL International,
established in Roissy-en-France, Service CRIE, established in
Paris, France, and May Courier, established in Paris, represented
by E. Morgan de Rivery, of the Paris Bar, and J. Derenne, of the
Brussels and Paris Bars, with an address for service in
Luxembourg at the Chambers of A. Schmitt, 7 Val Sainte-
Croix, v Commission of the European Communities (Agents:
R. Lyal and J.-Y. Art) — application for taxation of the costs to
be reimbursed by the defendant to the applicants following
the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 May 2000 in
Case T-77/95 Ufex and Others v Commission [2000] ECR
II-0000 — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber),
composed of: A.W.H. Meij, President, R.M. Moura Ramos and
J. Pirrung,
Jung, Registrar, made an order on
7 December 2000, the operative part of which is as follows:

Judges; H.

The total amount of costs to be reimbursed by the Commission to the
applicants shall be fixed at BEF 4 500 000.

(1) OJ C 137 of 3.6.1995.

the European Union, defendant

T-260/97 and T-117/98, and Tico srl, established in Padua
(Italy), applicant in Case T-117/98, represented by W. Viscar-
dini Donà, M. Paolin and S. Donà, of the Padua Bar, with an
address for service in Luxembourg at
the Chambers of
E. Arendt, 8-10, Rue Mathias Hardt, the applicant in Case
T-79/96 supported by the Italian Republic (Agents: U. Leanza
and F. Quadri), against Commission of the European Com-
in Case
in Case T-79/96, E. de March,
munities (Agents:
T-260/97, H. van Vliet and A. Dal Ferro and,
in Case
T-117/98, F. Ruggeri Laderchi, H. van Vliet and A. Dal Ferro)
and Council of
in Case
T-260/97 (Agents: J.P. Hix and A. Tanca), supported by French
Republic (Agents: in Case T-79/96, C. de Salins and M. F. Pascal,
and, in Case T-260/97, K. Rispal-Bellanger and C. Vasak) —
application for, first, in Case T-79/96, a declaration that the
Commission unlawfully failed to take measures, on the basis
of Article 30 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 of
13 February 1993 on the common organisation of the market
in bananas (OJ 1993 L 47, p. 1), which would have enabled
the applicant
to obtain supplies of bananas from third
countries following the situation resulting from the civil
war in Somalia;
in Case T-260/97, for annulment of the
Commission’s decision of 17 July 1997 rejecting the applicant’s
request seeking, by virtue of Article 30 of that regulation,
transitional measures to allow the annual quantity allocated to
licences for bananas from non-
it
traditional ACP countries to be calculated in relation to the
quantities which it marketed during 1988, 1989 and 1990;
and, in Case T-117/98, for annulment of the Commission’s
decision of 23 April 1998 rejecting the applicants’ request for
an adjustment, pursuant to Article 16(3) of that regulation, of
the tariff quota for banana imports for the first half of 1998 in
order to take account of the consequences of the floods which
occurred in Somalia on and after 28 October 1997; and, in all
three cases, for compensation for the damage allegedly caused,
in Case T-79/96, by the Commission’s conduct, and allegedly
suffered, in Cases T-260/97 and T-117/98, as a result of the
Commission’s rejections of their requests, the Court of First
Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of: R.M. Moura Ramos,
President, V. Tiili and P. Mengozzi, Judges; Registrar: J. Palacio
Gonza´lez, Administrator, made an order on 6 December 2000
the operative part of which is as follows:

for obtaining import

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 6 December 2000

in Joined Cases T-79/96, T-260/97 and T-117/98, Camar
srl and Tico srl against the Commission of the European
Communities and Council of the European Union (1)

(Failure to take measures)

(2001/C 118/102)

(Language of the case: Italian)

In Joined Cases T-79/96, T-260/97 and T-117/98, Camar srl,
established in Florence (Italy), applicant in Cases T-79/96,

1)

2)

3)

4)

The Commission is ordered to bear its own costs, as well as
those incurred by Camar in Case T-79/96 R.

The Commission is ordered to bear its own costs in Case
T-260/97 R and 90 % of those incurred by Camar in the
same case.

The Council shall bear its own costs in Case T-260/97 R.

Camar shall bear 10 % of the costs it incurred in Case
T-260/97 R.

21.4.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 118/37

5)

6)

The Italian Republic and the French Republic shall bear their
own costs in Case T-79/96 R.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

The French Republic
T-260/97 R.

shall bear

its own costs

in Case

of 15 December 2000

(1) OJ C 233 of 10.8.1996, C 357 of 22.11.1997 and C 327 of

24.10.1998.

in Case T-113/99: The Galileo Company and Galileo
International LLC v Council of the European Union (1)

(Action for annulment — Admissibility — Person individu-
ally concerned)

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 27 November 200

in Case T-78/99 (92): Sonia Marion Elder and Robert Dale
Elder v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Taxation of costs — Indispensable expenses incurred for
the purposes of the proceedings — Litigation insurance)

(2001/C 118/103)

(Language of the case: English)

In Case T-78/99 (92): Sonia Marion Elder and Robert Dale
Elder, residing in Dundee, United Kingdom, represented by
S. Crosby, Solicitor, 42 Rue du Taciturne, Brussels (Belgium)
against Commission of the European Communities (Agents:
U. Wölker and X. Lewis) — application for taxation of the
costs to be reimbursed by the defendant to the applicants
pursuant to the order for removal from the register made by
the Court of First Instance on 13 October 1999 (Case T-78/99
Elder v Commission, not published in the ECR) — the Court
of First Instance (First Chamber), composed of: B. Vesterdorf,
President, N.J. Forwood and M. Vilaras,
Jung,
Registrar, has given an order on 27 November 2000, the
operative part of which is as follows:

Judges; H.

(2001/C 118/104)

(Language of the case: English)

In Case T-113/99: The Galileo Company, established in
Swindon, Wiltshire, United Kingdom, and Galileo International
LLC, established in Rosemount,
Illinois, United States of
America, represented by R. Plender QC and S. Masters,
Barrister, instructed by K. Holmes and D. Austin, Solicitors,
with an address for service in Luxembourg at the offices
of Elvinger, Hoss and Prussen, 2 Place Winston Churchill,
supported by Amadeus Global Travel Distribution SA, estab-
lished in Madrid, Spain, represented by M. Caballero Clavijo,
of the Madrid Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg
at the offices of Elvinger, Hoss and Prussen, 2 Place Winston
Churchill, against Council of the European Union (Agents:
A. Lopes Sabino and M. Bishop), supported by Commission of
the European Communities (Agent: F. Benyon) — application
for partial annulment of Article 1(7)(b) of Council Regulation
(EC) No 323/1999 of 8 February 1999 amending Council
Regulation (EEC) No 2299/89 on a code of conduct for
computerised reservation systems (CRS) (OJ 1999 L 40, p. 1)
— the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed
of: A.W.H. Meij, President, A. Potocki and J. Pirrung, Judges;
H. Jung, Registrar, has given an order on 15 December 2000,
the operative part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

3.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

The applicants shall bear their own costs and pay those of the
defendant.

The interveners shall bear their own costs.

The application for taxation of costs is dismissed.

(1) OJ C 174 of 19.6.1999.

(1) OJ C 226 of 7.8.1999.