Council Regulation (EC) No 469/2001 of 6 March 2001 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain electronic weighing scales originating in Singapore
Date: 2001-03-06
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Singapore, anti-dumping duty, electronic device, import, measuring equipment, originating product

9.3.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

L 67/37

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 469/2001

of 6 March 2001

imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain electronic weighing scales
originating in Singapore

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped
imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), and in particular Article 9 and
Article 11 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee,

Whereas:

A. PROCEDURE

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

1. Previous investigations involving Singapore

By Regulation (EEC) No 1103/93 (2) the Commission imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on
imports into the Community of certain electronic weighing scales originating in Singapore and the
Republic of Korea and falling within CN code ex 8423 81 50.

In October 1993, by Regulation (EEC) No 2887/93 (3), the Council imposed definitive anti-dumping
measures on imports of certain electronic weighing scales originating in Singapore and the Republic
of Korea. In 1995 the measures applicable to Singaporean exporting producers were modified by
Regulation (EC) No 2937/95 (4) which resulted in an increase in the level of the duties as it was
established that the Singaporean exporting producers had been absorbing the duties in place.

2. Recent investigations involving the product concerned

In April 1993, by Regulation (EEC) No 993/93 (5), the Council imposed definitive anti-dumping
measures on imports of certain electronic weighing scales originating in Japan. These measures are
also subject to a review which was opened in April 1998 (6).

On 16 September 1999, the Commission published a Notice in the Official Journal of the European
Communities (7), announcing the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding in accordance with Article
5 of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘basic Regulation’) regarding imports
into the Community of certain electronic weighing scales originating in the People's Republic of
China, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan. This investigation was concluded in November 2000, by
Council Regulation (EC) No 2605/2000 (8), which imposed definitive anti-dumping measures on
imports of certain electronic weighing scales originating in those countries.

3. Request for review

Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry of the anti-dumping measures in force on
imports of certain electronic weighing scales originating in Singapore and the Republic of Korea (9),
the Commission received a request to review the measures (applicable to Singapore only) pursuant to
Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.

The request was lodged on behalf of Community producers whose collective output constituted a
major proportion of the total Community production of the product concerned.

(1) OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2238/2000 (OJ L 257, 11.10.2000,

p. 2).

(2) OJ L 112, 6.5.1993, p. 20.
(3) OJ L 263, 22.10.1993, p. 1.
(4) OJ L 307, 20.12.1995, p. 30.
(5) OJ L 104, 29.4.1993, p. 4.
(6) OJ C 128, 25.4.1998, p. 11.
(7) OJ C 262, 16.9.1999, p. 8.
(8) OJ L 301, 30.11.2000, p. 42.
(9) OJ C 125, 23.4.1998, p. 3.

L 67/38

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

9.3.2001

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

(10)

(11)

The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in the
continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury to the Community industry. Having determined,
after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of a
review, the Commission initiated an investigation pursuant to Article 11(2) and 11(3) of the basic
Regulation (1). The opening of the Article 11(3) investigation by the Commission was based on the
allegation in the request that dumping margins had significantly increased since the previous
investigation and that the expiry of the measures would therefore result in increased dumping and
injury.

4. Investigation

The Commission officially advised the Community producers supporting the review request, the
exporting producers,
importers and a user association known to be concerned, as well as the
representatives of the exporting countries, and gave interested parties the opportunity to make their
views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limits set out in the Notice of
initiation of the review.

The Commission sent questionnaires to the parties known to be concerned and received replies from
two Community producers and one Singaporean exporting producer. The Commission also sent
questionnaires to importers and Eurocommerce, the association representing multiple and small
users in the Community. There was no formal response from either the importers, users or the user
association.

The Commission sought and verified all the information it deemed necessary for the purposes of
determining the likely continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury and the Community
interest. Verifications were carried out at the premises of the following companies:

Exporting producer:

— Teraoka Weigh System PTE Ltd, Singapore

Community producers:

— Bizerba GmbH & Co. KG, Balingen, Germany
— GEC Avery Ltd,

(a subsidiary of

the General Electric Company, plc), Birmingham, United

Kingdom

The investigation of continuation and recurrence of dumping covered the period from 1 October
1997 to 30 September 1998 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘investigation period’). The examination
of continuation and recurrence of injury covered the period from 1994 up to the end of the
investigation period (hereinafter called the ‘analysis period’).

The present review exceeded the period of 12 months within which it should normally have been
concluded pursuant to Article 11(5) of the basic Regulation, due to the complexity of the invest-
igation and in particular the impact of the euro-effect (see recital 39) on the investigation.

(12) All parties concerned were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it
was intended to recommend the maintenance of the existing measures. They were also granted a
period within which to make representations subsequent to these disclosures. The comments of the
parties were considered and, where appropriate, the findings have been modified accordingly.

B. PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT

1. The product concerned

(13)

The product concerned is the same as in the previous investigation, electronic weighing scales for use
in the retail trade (hereinafter referred to as ‘REWS’) which incorporate a digital display of the weight,
unit price and price to be paid (whether or not including a means of printing this data) falling within
CN code 8423 81 50. REWS have different types or levels of performance and technology. In this
respect, the industry defines three segments of REWS; low, mid and top ranges. These vary from
stand-alone REWS, without built-in printers to more sophisticated models with pre-set key systems
and the possibility of integration into computer-related control and management systems.

(1) OJ C 324, 22.10.1998, p. 4.

9.3.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

L 67/39

(14) Although the potential use of REWS can vary, there is no significant difference in the basic physical
and technical characteristics of the various types of REWS. In addition, the investigation has shown
that between these three segments there are no clear dividing lines, models in neighbouring segments
often being interchangeable.
In line with the results of the previous investigation, they have,
therefore, to be considered as one single product for the purposes of this investigation.

2. Like product

(15)

The investigation has shown that the various REWS produced in Singapore and sold on that market
have, despite differences in size, life span, voltage or design, the same basic technical and physical
characteristics as compared to the REWS exported from Singapore to the Community and accord-
ingly have to be considered as like products.

Likewise, apart from minor technical differences, the range of Community-produced REWS are
basically alike in all respects to the REWS exported from Singapore to the Community.

C. DUMPING AND LIKELIHOOD OF RECURRENCE OF DUMPING

1. Preliminary remarks

(16) As indicated above, this investigation is a combination of an expiry review based on Article 11(2) of
the basic Regulation and an interim review based on Article 11(3), the latter having been initiated to
examine the allegation that the injurious dumping had increased. The Commission decided not to
pursue this Article 11(3) review because the volumes sold on the Community market by the
exporting producers were low and there was insufficient evidence for a lasting change in circum-
stances to be established. The Commission's findings are, therefore, based on those established under
Article 11(2) relating to the likelihood of continuation and recurrence of injurious dumping should
the existing measures be removed.

(17) According to Eurostat some 449 REWS from Singapore were imported into the Community during
the investigation period as compared to 4 500 units in the previous investigation period on which
the measures subject to review are based.

(18)

The sole cooperating Singaporean producer, Teraoka Weigh System PTE Ltd, reported that it
exported 315 units to the Community. Reference to Eurostat indicates that this represents 70 % of
the exports to the Community which points to significant non-cooperation.

2. Likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping

(19)

In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the purpose of this type of review is to
determine whether, or not, the expiry of the measures would lead to a continuation or recurrence of
injurious dumping.

Likelihood of continuation of dumping

(20)

In examining whether there is a likelihood of continuation of dumping if measures were removed, it
is necessary to verify whether dumping exists at present and whether any such dumping is likely to
continue. In this respect, the findings as set out for the Article 11(3) review for the determination of
dumping apply.

Likelihood of recurrence of dumping

(21) As the findings on the likely continuation of any dumping cannot on their own be considered as
decisive on whether measures should be maintained or repealed, given that they were based on a low
volume of exports to the Community of a model which is gradually being phased out, the likelihood
of recurrence of dumping should measures be removed was also addressed. In this respect, there are
indicators which make a resumption of these imports to the Community in significant quantities

L 67/40

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

9.3.2001

likely. These increased sales would be likely to materialise from two sources: through the transfer of
production capacity, which is relatively mobile, from units related to Singaporean exporting produ-
cers in other third country markets back to Singapore; and through a switch in some of the sales
from numerous other third country markets to the Community to take advantage of the slightly
higher prices on the Community market. Moreover, the existence of measures in force against Japan
reinforces this likelihood.

(22)

The exporting producer argued that it was unlikely to switch any production back to Singapore
which could then be sold to the Community, in particular the production of the units situated in the
Community. But, these units did not cooperate with this investigation and these arguments were
impossible to evaluate. In any event, the history of this product shows that production is very mobile
and can be changed at relatively short notice in reaction to events such as the imposition of
anti-dumping duties. For example, the units in the Community were set up after such duties were
imposed.

(23) As to the price into the Community of imports of the like product should they resume, there is good
reason to believe that these would be at dumped levels in particular given that a significant quantity
of Singaporean exports to other third country markets, which have no measures in force (such as
United States of America, Canada, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Republic of Korea, Israel and Thailand),
are made at dumped prices. If the prices charged to these other third country markets were also
charged on any sales to the Community dumping would also be taking place. This would still be the
case if prices were slightly higher to reflect the slightly higher prices presently prevailing in the
Community, as compared to these other third countries. Moreover, there is no indication that the
relatively high level of prices in Singapore is going to alter in the short term and it is therefore
considered reasonable to assume, taking due account of the dumping history for this product, that
any significant resumption of exports to the Community would be at prices below those in
Singapore.

(24)

The exporting producer argued that there was no evidence that the sales made to these other third
countries by the exporting producer were at dumped levels and in this respect produced calculations
for the exports of one model as well as the profit margins of this model to the Community. But, this
evidence failed to demonstrate the existence, or otherwise, of dumping on these sales, not least
because the information only concerned one model and the fact that profits on sales to the
Community are irrelevant.
In fact, the Commission's observations on dumping to these third
countries were derived from the information provided by the exporting producer, on all its sales to
third countries, and this showed a distinct pattern of dumping with export prices in general being
significantly lower than those charged in Singapore.

Determination of dumping under Article 11(3)

(25)

In accordance with the allegation in the review request that dumping margins would increase if
measures were removed, the investigation included a review of dumping for the investigation period.
In this context, only one exporting producer cooperated in the investigation and during the
investigation this party claimed that it was no longer dumping on its sales to the Community and
that the measures which apply to its exports should be removed.

(26) With respect to the allegation made by the exporting producer that dumping had disappeared and
that measures should be repealed, account was taken of the fact that measures were in force during
the investigation period and that, therefore, any calculation of dumping could be affected by the
existence of these measures, in particular in relation to the volume and prices of these imports to the
Community. During the period set for this investigation the quantity exported by the exporting
producer was 315 units. This was a much smaller quantity than the quantity exported during the
investigation period which led to the existing measures but this level, as such, was not considered
insufficient for a recalculation of a new dumping margin. However, most of these imports were
made to an importer in the Netherlands which did not cooperate in this investigation but which had
relations with the exporting producer which extended beyond a pure buyer and seller relationship.
The non-cooperation of this party did not permit a proper examination of whether this relationship
may have affected the prices of these exports in question.

(27) Moreover, the exporting producer reported the existence of a related party in the Community which
also did not cooperate in this investigation other than to submit some general information about its
activities. It was therefore not possible to establish with any certainty whether this company was
directly or indirectly involved in selling the like product in the Community.

9.3.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

L 67/41

(28)

(29)

(30)

(31)

(32)

(33)

In addition, the exporting producer based its claim of no dumping on a comparison of the export
prices of one model to the Community when compared to the prices of a newer version of that
model when sold in Singapore with the latter adjusted by over 20 % to take account of allegedly
higher production costs of the model sold in Singapore.

In any event, the exporting producer did not produce any evidence that these differences affected the
prices charged on the Singaporean market. For example, no evidence was given in relation to the
prices of the old and new models when the latter was introduced onto the market. Sales to third
countries, other than the Community, were examined to see whether these could provide a basis for
any adjustment and these showed that when the two models were sold on the same market there
was no clear pattern of prices which could confirm the claim. For some countries, prices of both
models were approximately the same, for some countries the ‘older’ version had the higher price and
for some countries the newer version had the higher price. An average comparison of the prices of
the two models to third countries showed that the newer version commanded a higher price of
about 6 %.

In these circumstances, it was observed that dumping would only disappear if the claimed adjust-
ment for differences in physical characteristics was granted whereas if it was not, or only granted to
the extent of the price difference for the two models concerned to third markets, significant dumping
would remain.

Thus, the relatively low volume of imports relating to only one model which is in the process of
being phased out and which had no equivalent model sold in Singapore, the non-participation in the
investigation of related or associated parties in the Community, at least to an extent which extends
beyond a normal buyer and seller relationship, leads to the conclusion that a reliable and lasting
dumping margin cannot be established for the investigation period.

For the same reasons, the claim that measures should be increased is rejected. Measures can only be
revised upwards or downwards on the basis of findings for the investigation period if these can be
considered reliable and lasting. In this respect, there was no reliable evidence which could justify an
increase in measures. In fact, the existence of measures appeared to be having a considerable impact
in preventing dumping in significant quantities.

For those exporting producers located in Singapore, which failed to cooperate with the investigation,
dumping was determined on the basis of the facts available in accordance with Article 18(1) of the
basic Regulation. In this respect, it is appropriate to consider that the most reasonable facts available
are those established for the previous investigation. A residual dumping margin was therefore
determined, by maintaining the previous residual margin of 31,0 %, expressed as a percentage of the
cif import price at the Community border.

Conclusion

(34)

The Article 11(2) review indicates that if measures were removed there would be a likelihood of
continuation and/or recurrence of dumping. The Article 11(3) review could not be pursued as such a
review is only justified where a lasting change in circumstances is shown.

D. SITUATION IN THE COMMUNITY REWS MARKET

1. Structure of the Community industry

(35)

Since the current anti-dumping measures were imposed on imports of REWS from Singapore in
1993, the Community industry has undergone a restructuring and consolidation programme in
order to maintain its competitiveness. A total of nine companies cooperated in the previous
investigation but following the restructuring process in the industry only five companies remained in
the investigation period. As mentioned at recital 8 two of these companies cooperated in the present
investigation. It has become evident during the investigation that other Community producers have
restructured along similar lines.

L 67/42

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

9.3.2001

(36)

(37)

The cooperating Community producers represent 39 % of Community production in the invest-
igation period, and thus qualify as a major proportion of the Community production. These
producers are referred to as ‘Community industry’ hereafter.
In addition two large companies
supported the review request but did not fully cooperate with the investigation. The representativity
of Community production supporting the complaint was, therefore, well

in excess of 50 %.

It should be noted that for the purposes of the above calculation of the representativity of
Community production, in accordance with Article 4(1)(a) and (2) of the basic Regulation, any
company operating in the Community related to exporting producers in countries found to be
dumping, was excluded from the definition of total Community production.

2. Consumption of REWS on the Community market

(38)

Consumption in the Community has been calculated using verified sales data provided by the
Community industry, figures in the review request (for sales of non-cooperating Community produ-
cers) and import volumes obtained via Eurostat. Consumption was as follows during the analysis
period:

Consumption of REWS in the Community

1994

174 448

1995

161 682

1996

172 314

1997

Investigation period

177 391

191 341

(units)

(39)

The increase in consumption in 1997 and the investigation period was mainly due to a one-off
increase in demand from retailers arising from the introduction of the euro (‘euro-effect’). From 1997
onwards, retailers realised more and more that they had to replace old REWS with euro-compliant
models of REWS. This created increased demand for REWS in the Community and the volume of
sales increased. This improved situation will be of short-term duration and sales volumes are
predicted to drop back to normal levels by 2000, fall further to well below normal levels from 2001
before returning to normal again by 2004.

(40) An alternative consumption figure was provided by the legal representatives of the exporting
producers in Singapore. This figure was an extrapolation largely based on one Member State using
1996 figures. The Commission considered,
the information from the sources
mentioned above was more accurate, complete and up to date.

therefore,

that

3. Imports concerned

Volume of imports

(41)

Based on information from Eurostat (using the dedicated TARIC code 8423 81 50 10), the REWS
imported from Singapore during the analysis period developed as follows:

Volume of imports

1994

Imports from Singapore

1 785

Market share

1,0 %

1995

3 776

2,3 %

1996

863

1997

987

0,5 %

0,6 %

(units)

Investigation
period

449

0,2 %

(42)

The fall in volume of imports in 1996 can largely be attributed to the raising of the duty rate
applicable to Teraoka Weigh System PTE Ltd following the anti-absorption review investigation
which resulted in the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 2937/95.

9.3.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

L 67/43

(43)

The sales of the cooperating Singaporean exporting producer on the Community market during the
investigation period involved only one model (hereinafter referred to as Model A) and were imported
during the analysis period in very low volumes as follows:

Volume of imports

Model A

1995

1

1996

487

1997

738

(units)

Investigation period

315

(44)

Teraoka Weigh System PTE Ltd submitted that the low market share of Singaporean imports was de
minimis. However, it should be noted that the de minimis provisions in the basic Regulation only
relate to proceedings involving new cases under Article 5 rather than Article 11 reviews of existing
measures. In addition, it should be expected that the existence of measures may have a decreasing
effect on import volumes from that country.

Price behaviour of exporting producers

(45)

In view of the significant lack of cooperation of the exporting producers, the Commission had to
assess which information was available to carry out an analysis of the pricing behaviour of the
exporting producers. In this respect it was not considered appropriate to use Eurostat information
because this gave no indication of the models involved. It was, therefore, considered most appro-
priate to use the information provided by the sole exporting producer which provided sales data for
the Community market. A comparison between the prices of representative models marketed by the
Community industry and the comparable model of the cooperating exporting producer was made on
the basis of sales, excluding anti-dumping duties, at the same level of trade (prices to dealers/impor-
ters) during the investigation period. No adjustment for quality difference had to be made because
the models used were identical in the perception of the buyer and were directly and fully compar-
able. Whilst it was deemed that these models provided a fair comparison, the low value of exports
sold by this exporting producer inevitably makes it difficult,
if not impossible, to draw clear
conclusions. On the basis of the limited number of transactions available however, significant price
undercutting was identified by the dumped imports concerned.

(46)

It should be pointed out here that misleading information was provided by the cooperating
exporting producer concerning the status of the major importer involved in the above calculation.
Initially the Commission services were informed that the importer was not related to the Singa-
porean exporter but at a later stage they were described as being ‘part of the Teraoka group’.
Although the importer did not cooperate with the investigation and its relationship with the
exporting producer could, therefore, not be conclusively determined, the Commission accepted the
import purchase prices as being unaffected by the possible relationship and used them as the best
source of information available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.

4. Situation of the Community industry

(47)

In accordance with Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation, the examination of the impact of the
dumped imports on the Community industry included an evaluation of all economic factors and
indices having a bearing on the state of the industry. However, certain factors are not dealt with in
detail below because they were found to be not relevant for the situation of the Community industry
in the course of this investigation. It should finally be noted that none of these factors necessarily
gives decisive guidance.

Production, utilisation of capacity and inventories

(48)

Production of all REWS fell over the period 1994 to 1996, but then increased in line with the
euro-effect as explained at recital 39. The capacity utilisation rate of the Community industry
increased by 13 % during the analysis period.

L 67/44

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

9.3.2001

Community industry production and capacity

Index: 1994 = 100

Volume
produced

all

REWS

Capacity (all REWS)

Capacity utilisation rate (all
REWS)

1994

100

100

100

1995

93

101

92

1996

95

98

98

1997

104

98

105

Investigation
period

102

90

113

It was considered that the level of inventories could not be considered to have any significant effect
on the situation of the Community industry because the Community industry used a production to
order system whereby stocks were almost non-existent.

Sales volume

(49)

Sales of total REWS units made by the Community industry on the Community market fell over the
period 1994 to 1996, but then increased in line with the euro-effect as explained at recital 39.

Sales volume in units

1994

100

1995

91

1996

94

1997

100

Investigation
period

103

Index: 1994 = 100

Sales
industry

of

Community

Sales turnover

(50)

The sales turnover of total REWS made by the Community industry on the Community market fell
over the period 1994 to 1997, but then increased in line with the euro-effect as explained at recital
39.

Sales turnover

1994

100

1995

93

1996

90

1997

85

Investigation
period

90

Index: 1994 = 100

Sales
industry

of

Community

Market share and growth

(51)

The market share of the Community industry fell by 3 percentage points from 1994 to the end of
the investigation period. Therefore, the Community industry could not benefit fully from the growth
of the market.

Price development

(52) An analysis of REWS pricing in the Community was made by reference to the sales prices of models
from each model range sold by the Community industry. The development of weighted average
prices for sales to unrelated customers during the analysis period was as follows:

Development of prices of REWS

Index: 1994 = 100

All REWS

1994

100

1995

103

1996

95

1997

83

(ECU/unit)

Investigation
period

87

9.3.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

L 67/45

Sales prices for all ranges decreased between 1994 and the investigation period by 13 %. This overall
average price reduction was consistent across all model ranges of REWS.

Profitability

(53)

The return on turnover of REWS as a whole rose from low positive levels in 1994 to over 10 % in
the investigation period. At the beginning of the analysis period, the return on turnover was
consistently below the rate considered necessary for the viability of the industry. The improved
figures for 1997 and the investigation period were due to the abovementioned euro effect which
gave a temporary boost to sales and, to a lesser extent, the effects of large scale restructuring carried
out by the industry as mentioned at recital 35. In addition the existence of anti-dumping measures
will also have had a positive effect.

Other performance related factors

(54) No detailed analysis was carried out on cash flow, ability to raise capital (or investments) and return
on investments because such an analysis would relate to the situation of the company as a whole.
The companies' other business lines represent more than 50 % of total company turnover and,
therefore, an overall analysis would not necessarily be representative for the product under consid-
eration.

As concerns the impact on the Community industry of the magnitude of the actual margin of
dumping, given the volume and the prices of the imports from the countries concerned, this impact
cannot be considered to be negligible.

Productivity, employment and wages

(55)

The table below shows that during the analysis period employment in the Community industry
decreased by 32 %.

Productivity per employee

Index: 1995 = 100

1995

1996

1997

Number of units produced

Number of employees

Productivity per employee

100

100

100

93

94

99

95

86

111

1998

104

75

138

Investigation
period

102

68

150

(56)

Productivity per employee increased by 50 % over the analysis period.

(57) No detailed analysis was carried out on wages given the importance of other business lines in the
overall companies' activities. Such an analysis would relate to the situation of the company as a
whole and not necessarily be representative for the product under consideration.

Conclusions on the situation of the Community industry

(58)

The Community industry has undergone a major restructuring programme and has improved
production and distribution techniques in order that it can benefit from the measures in place.
However, it has continued to suffer from pricing pressures, which has squeezed margins and has
resulted in a loss of market share and reductions in employment. Profitability improved over the
analysis period but, as mentioned at recital 39,
it was only at levels sufficient to maintain the
Community industry's viability, and this was mainly due to one-off benefits resulting from the euro
effect and profit levels are expected to revert to those realised during the main part of the analysis
period.

It is thus considered that the Community industry has not fully recovered from the negative situation
in which it was found in the previous investigation.

L 67/46

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

9.3.2001

E. LIKELIHOOD OF RECURRENCE OF INJURY

1. Analysis of the situation of the Singaporean exporting producers

(59)

The development of imports from Singapore is shown at recital 41. The application of increased
anti-dumping duties following the anti-absorption investigation which came into force in December
1995 will have affected the level of imports from that date.

(60) Although at volumes lower than before, Singaporean exporting producers have continued to sell on
the Community market, and it was submitted by the complaining industry that they have concen-
trated their sales in markets of certain Member States with specific models, rather than selling a full
range of models. This claim was examined by the Commission and it was clear from sales figures
submitted by the cooperating exporting producer, that certain markets were, indeed, being targeted
with specific models, where the exporters felt that they could compete, mainly on the basis of low
prices, without the large sales and distribution networks necessary for the Community industry.

The Community retail sector is dominated more and more by large supermarket chains which
negotiate annual purchase contracts for REWS. Therefore the REWS market is susceptible to price
pressure in the form of
low-priced offers to increase the downward pressure on prices. The
Commission considers, therefore, that low-priced offers involving imports from Singapore could
easily lead to a recurrence of injury should the anti-dumping measures in place be allowed to lapse.

The history of anti-dumping investigations involving this product has shown that production is
mobile. The view of the Commission is that, if measures on imports of the product concerned
expired, exports from Singapore would quickly regain their previous injurious levels and, in view of
the finding of this investigation that dumping has continued to occur, at dumped prices. This is
particularly pertinent here, where the main Singaporean producer is related to a producer in Japan;
i.e. also a country for which a likelihood of recurrence of injurious dumping has been found.

In addition to the above point regarding production movements, figures obtained from the cooper-
ating exporting producer were unclear in respect of capacity utilisation. We were informed that
capacity utilisation was 63 % of the nameplate production and over 100 % of the attainable
production levels in the investigation period. The Commission concluded, however, that the mobility
of production and the ease of setting up new facilities meant that production and exports could be
increased should measures lapse.

The major exporting producer submitted that production facilities had now been established in the
Community, which meant that it was unlikely that exports from Singapore to the Community would
increase if measures lapsed. However, these production units failed to cooperate with the invest-
igation. It was clear from the limited amount of information supplied that a very small range of
models were being produced in the Community and the Commission services concluded that, in
order to offer a more complete range, that imports would be attracted in from Singapore. Indeed,
should measures be allowed to lapse, it was possible that production in Europe would be moved
back to Singapore.

It should also be noted that the major exporting producer also sells at low prices on other markets
(the United States of America, Canada, Israel, the Republic of Korea, Indonesia and Malaysia). For a
total volume of sales of 665 units to these countries, sales prices (excluding duties) were around 9 %
lower than prices of the same model on the Community market. This clearly suggests that the
Community market would be very attractive to Singaporean exporting producers in the absence of
anti-dumping measures.

(61)

(62)

(63)

(64)

(65)

If measures lapsed, these prices would remain low and at dumped levels, and the imports would
exert pressure on the Community market due to the increased volumes which would probably
become involved due to the increased attractiveness of the market.

9.3.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

L 67/47

2. Analysis of the situation of the Community industry

(66) During the investigation period, the Community industry was enjoying a boost in sales volume
caused by the euro effect, but as explained at recital 39, this will not be a permanent phenomenon.
Given the potential for low-priced dumped imports from Singapore should measures be repealed, it
can be expected that prices and the Community industry's market share will be eroded further.

(67)

Sales prices have declined on average by 13,3 % during the period 1994 to the investigation period
and it is expected that this trend will continue as the Community industry attempts to maintain its
market share.

3. Conclusion on recurrence of injury

(68)

(69)

In the light of the findings at recitals 59 to 67, it is concluded that the expiry of the measures on
these imports is likely to lead to a recurrence of injury as defined by the various indicators used in
Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation. In reaching this conclusion, the Commission has taken into
account the fact that the Community market for REWS is susceptible to price pressure as it is
dominated by large users.

The Commission has taken into account the conclusion that production facilities can be transferred
with relative ease between countries which increases available capacity, and recitals 59 to 65 explain
the continuing attractiveness of the Community market to Singaporean exporting producers as
compared to some of its third country markets.

(70)

The expiry of the measures, therefore, would be likely to lead to a recurrence of injury to the
Community industry, eventually putting at risk the viability of Community production.

F. COMMUNITY INTEREST

1. General considerations

(71)

(72)

In accordance with Article 21 of the basic Regulation it was examined whether a prolongation of the
anti-dumping duties would be against the interest of the Community as a whole. The determination
of Community interest was based on an appreciation of all the various interests such as, the
Community industry, the importers and traders and the users of the product concerned. In order to
assess the likely impact of a continuation of the measures, the Commission requested information
from all

interested parties mentioned above.

It should be recalled that, in the previous investigation, the adoption of measures was considered not
to be against the interest of the Community. Furthermore, the present investigation is a review, thus
analysing a situation in which anti-dumping measures are in place. Consequently, the timing and
nature of the present investigation has allowed an assessment of any negative impact on the parties
concerned by the anti-dumping measures imposed.

(73)

The Commission also considered the effects of anti-dumping duties on REWS imported from
Singapore in relation to the specific interests of the Community industry and other interested parties
including professional end-users.

2. Interests of the Community industry

(74)

In view of the continuing weak economic situation of the Community industry, especially in terms
of inadequate profitability (at the beginning of the analysis period and in terms of medium term
outlook), employment and market share, the Commission considers that, in the absence of measures
against injurious dumping, the situation of the Community industry is certain to deteriorate. The
previous review investigation involving REWS from Singapore expected that certain Community
producers would probably cease production of REWS, and that there might be a reduction in
employment levels, given the level of losses incurred by certain producers at that time. Although
measures were maintained in 1993, the reduction in employment did in fact happen, the companies
continuing presence on the Community market being due to a consolidation process involving
mergers/acquisitions.

L 67/48

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

9.3.2001

(75) Any further shrinking or deterioration of the Community industry would have negative implications
for employment and investment in the industry itself, with knock-on effects, both on the industry's
suppliers and on the related sectors of production within the Community industry. Indeed, the
technologies of REWS and a whole range of other products are related. Examples of these are other
types of electronic scales (such as industrial scales) and appliances used in the retail sector (such as
slicing machines). Any loss of technological know-how in the REWS products will mean a global
loss of competitiveness in these related sectors.

(76)

In addition, the investigation has demonstrated that the Community industry has made every effort
to meet the competition from Singapore and other countries. Examples of such steps are:

(a) A progression towards greater consolidation (fewer companies).

(b) The closure of excess capacity.

(c) Greater use of modern production techniques (e.g. production to order, increased mechanisation

and computerisation).

(d) Improvements in productivity.

(e) Reducing costs by contracting out the manufacturing of some components, and

(f) Investing in new model ranges.

(77)

Community producers have,
therefore, shown a willingness and determination to maintain a
competitive presence on the Community market and are capable of benefiting from the defence from
unfair trade afforded by anti-dumping measures.

(78)

(79)

(80)

(81)

(82)

3. Interests of other parties

The Commission sought the cooperation of a body representing the interests of retail outlets,
including multiple users of the product concerned (supermarkets), in order to identify if there was
any significant impact on any users.

The Commission was notified informally by this body that there was to be no response from retail
users. Indeed, no other interested parties made themselves known. This lack of cooperation is no
doubt due to the very small proportion of users' total costs represented by REWS. The impact of
maintaining measures, in what is a highly competitive market, can be assumed to be negligible.

The Commission also sought the views of importers in the Community but no replies were received
to our questionnaire. It is evident that the removal of measures would enable importers to reduce
sales prices and increase margins. However, in view of the findings on dumping and injury above,
this increase in profitability would be due solely to continued dumping.

4. Conclusion

The low level of cooperation by users and importers clearly makes it difficult to draw conclusions on
the impact in these sectors.
It was concluded, however, that the impact would be negligible,
particularly for the retail sector where the proportion of costs represented by REWS is very small.

It should be recalled, however, that there is a likelihood of recurrence of material injury to the
Community industry, which has made great efforts to remain competitive. The Community industry
is temporarily benefiting from the introduction of the euro. However, if measures lapsed, and in view
of the diminishing effect of the euro, it is likely that the Community industry will deteriorate in the
future and threaten the viability of the entire Community production.

(83) On the basis of the above the Commission finds that there are no compelling reasons of Community

interest against the maintenance of the anti-dumping measures.

9.3.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

L 67/49

G. DEFINITIVE MEASURES

(84)

It will be recalled that the current review was opened under both Article 11(2) and Article 11(3) of
the basic Regulation. The opening under Article 11(3) was initiated to investigate an allegation by
the Community industry that circumstances had changed and that the expiry of the measures would
result in increased dumping. In this case, the Commission decided not to pursue this Article 11(3)
review for the reasons explained at recital 16. The Commission's findings are, therefore, based on
those established under Article 11(2) relating to the likelihood of continuation and recurrence of
injurious dumping should the existing measures be removed.

(85) As it was concluded that the removal of measures would be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of injurious dumping under Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the following anti-
dumping duties should be imposed:

Tereoka Weigh System PTE Ltd
All non-cooperators

15,4 %
31,0 %

(86)

For the reasons explained at recital 11 concerning the duration of the investigation, it is considered
appropriate that the duration of the measures should be limited to four years,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of electronic weighing scales for use in
the retail trade which incorporate a digital display of the weight, unit price and price to be paid (whether or
not including a means of printing these data), currently classifiable within CN code ex 8423 81 50 (TARIC
code 8423 81 50 10 and originating in Singapore.

The duty, calculated on the basis of the net, free-at-Community-frontier price of the product, before

2.
duty, shall be:

31,0 % (TARIC additional code 8704), with the exception for electronic weighing scales produced by the
company listed below, to which the following rate shall apply:

Tereoka Weigh System PTE Ltd
(TARIC additional code 8703).

15,4 %

3.

Unless otherwise specified, the provisions in force concerning customs duties shall apply.

The anti-dumping duties shall be imposed for a period of four years from the date of entry into force of
this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the
European Communities.

Article 3

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 March 2001.

For the Council

The President

I. THALÉN