Case T-364/00: Action brought on 27 November 2000 by Sophie Van Weyenbergh against the Commission of the European Communities
Date: 2001-02-24
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), assistant, competition (EU), professional experience

C 61/16

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

24.2.2001

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and arguments are similar to those put
forward in Case T-357/00 Martı´nez Alarco´ n v Commission.

Action brought on 27 November 2000 by Luigia Dricot
against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-363/00)

(2001/C 61/31)

(Language of the case: French)

An action against the Commission of the European Communi-
ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
European Communities on 27 November 2000 by Luigia
Dricot, residing at Overijse (Belgium), represented by Carlos
Mourato, of the Brussels Bar.

Action brought on 27 November 2000 by Sophie Van
Weyenbergh against the Commission of the European
Communities

(Case T-364/00)

(2001/C 61/32)

(Language of the case: French)

An action against the Commission of the European Communi-
ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
European Communities on 27 November 2000 by Sophie Van
Weyenbergh, residing at Tervuren (Belgium), represented by
Carlos Mourato, of the Brussels Bar.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

— annul the decision dated 28 January 2000 of the selection
board in competition COM/TB/99, deciding not to admit
the applicant
to that competition, and the implicit
decision of the appointing authority dated 9 October
2000 giving a negative response to the complaint submit-
ted by the applicant;

— alternatively, order the defendant to pay to the applicant
the sum of BEF 2 941 667, subject to alteration during
the course of the proceedings, by way of compensation
for material and non-material damage;

— order the defendant to pay the costs.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

— annul the decisions dated 28 January 2000 and 24 Febru-
ary 2000 of
the selection board in competition
COM/TB/99, deciding not to admit the applicant to that
competition, and the implicit decision of the appointing
authority dated 28 August 2000 giving a negative
response to the complaint submitted by the applicant;

— alternatively, order the defendant to pay to the applicant
the sum of BEF 500 000, subject to alteration during the
course of the proceedings, by way of compensation for
material and non-material damage;

— order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and arguments are similar to those put
forward in Case T-357/00 Martı´nez Alarco´ n v Commission.

The pleas in law and arguments are similar to those put
forward in Case T-357/00 Martı´nez Alarco´ n v Commission.

Action brought on 30 November 2000 by Scott S.A.
against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-366/00)

(2001/C 61/33)

(Language of the case: English)

An action against the Commission of the European Communi-
ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
European Communities on 30 November 2000 by Scott S.A.,
a company registered in France, represented by Jeremy Lever
QC and George Peretz, Barristers and Robin Griffith, Solicitor
of Clifford Chance, London.