Common Position (EC) No 55/2000 of 8 December 2000 adopted by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, with a view to adopting a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the distribution of permits for heavy goods vehicles travelling in Switzerland
Date: 2000-12-08
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Switzerland, axle tax, carriage of goods, commercial vehicle, traffic regulations, transport licence

C 375/58

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

28.12.2000

COMMON POSITION (EC) No 55/2000

adopted by the Council on 8 December 2000

with a view to adopting Regulation (EC) No .../2000 of the European Parliament and of the
Council, of ..., on the distribution of permits for heavy goods vehicles travelling in Switzerland

(2000/C 375/05)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE
EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Com-
munity and, in particular, Article 71 thereof;

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social
Committee (2),

After consulting the Committee of the Regions,

Acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in
Article 251 of the Treaty (3),

Whereas:

(1)

(2)

The Swiss Federal Council decided, on 1 November
2000, to allow heavy goods vehicles of up to 34 tonnes
to travel on its territory from 1 January 2001 and to
open up the quotas, from the same date, for vehicles the
actual total
laden weight of which is more than 34
tonnes but not more than 40 tonnes and for empty and
light goods vehicles. That decision accompanied the
introduction of the RPLP (heavy traffic levy) on the Swiss
network.

That Decision is an autonomous measure taken by the
Swiss Confederation and, as a result,
it cannot be
deemed to be a provisional application of the Agreement
between the European Community and the Swiss Con-
federation on the carriage of goods and passengers by
rail and road signed on 21 June 1999. The conclusion
of that Agreement by the Community calls for the
simultaneous entry into force of the seven agreements
signed on the same date with the Swiss Confederation.

(1) OJ C 114, 27.4.1999, p. 4 and OJ C 248 E, 29.8.2000, p. 108.
(2) OJ C 329, 17.11.1999, p. 1.
(3) Opinion of the European Parliament of 15 December 1999 (OJ
C 296, 18.10.2000, p. 108), Council Common Position of
8 December 2000 and Decision of the European Parliament of ...
(not yet published in the Official Journal).

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

It is necessary to establish on a lasting basis rules
the
governing the distribution and management of
permits made available to the Community as from
1 January 2001.

For practical and organisational reasons,
the Com-
mission should be entrusted with the task of distributing
the permits to Member States.

To that end, an allocation method should be established.
Thereafter, Member States should share out the permits
allocated to them among transport undertakings with
reference to objective criteria.

In order to ensure the optimal use of permits, all
unallocated permits should be returned to the Com-
mission for redistribution.

The allocation of permits should be based on criteria
that take full account of existing freight transport flows
and genuine transport needs across the Alpine region.

It may prove necessary to revise the allocation of permits
on the basis of genuine traffic flows, while taking
account of relevant items of the method described in
Annex III. In carrying out such revision, the Commission
should be assisted by a Committee.

The measures necessary for the implementation of
this Regulation should be adopted in accordance with
Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying
down the procedures for the exercise of implementing
powers conferred on the Commission (4),

(4) OJ C 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.

28.12.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 375/59

HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 5

Article 1

This Regulation lays down the rules for the distribution of
permits allocated to the Community by Switzerland allowing
heavy goods vehicles of up to 34 tonnes to travel on its
territory as from 1 January 2001, opening up, from the same
date, the quotas for vehicles the actual total laden weight of
which is more than 34 tonnes but not more than 40 tonnes
and for empty and light goods vehicles and introducing the
RPLP (heavy traffic levy) on the Swiss network.

Article 2

For the purposes of this Regulation:

1.

2.

‘full-weight permit’ shall mean a permit to travel on Swiss
territory granted for goods vehicles the actual total laden
weight of which is more than 34 tonnes but not more
than 40 tonnes;

‘empty permit’ shall mean a permit to travel on Swiss
territory granted for goods vehicles that are empty or are
transporting light loads.

Article 3

The Commission shall allocate permits in accordance

1.
with paragraphs 2, 3 and 4.

Before 15 September each year, Member States shall transfer
to the Commission those permits which have not been
allocated to undertakings.

In accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 7, the
Commission shall allocate those permits to one or more
Member States in such a way as to ensure an optimal use
thereof.

Article 6

When the Commission makes its proposal for adjustment, it
shall take as a basis actual traffic flows during 2001, while
seeing to it that equal account is taken of criteria relating to
bilateral traffic operations and transit traffic operations. Should
the recalculation result in an allocation for any Member State
which differs substantially from that set out in Annexes I
and II, any amendments necessary to adapt Annexes I and II
shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down
in Article 7.

Article 7

1.

The Commission shall be assisted by a committee.

2. Where reference is made to this Article, Articles 5 and 7
of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the
provisions of Article 8 thereof.

The period laid down in Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC
shall be set at three months.

3.

The Committee shall adopt its rules of procedure.

The full-weight permits shall be distributed in accordance

2.
with Annex I.

Article 8

The empty permits shall be distributed in accordance

3.
with Annex II.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of
its
publication in the Official Journal of the European Communi-
ties.

The permits for each year shall be distributed before

4.
15 August of the preceding year.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly
applicable in all Member States.

Article 4

Done at ...

Member States shall distribute permits amongst the undertak-
ings established in their territory according to objective and
non-discriminatory criteria.

For the European Parliament

For the Council

The President

The President

C 375/60

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

28.12.2000

ANNEX I

SCALE FOR ALLOCATING ‘FULL-WEIGHT PERMITS’

The Commission shall allocate ‘full-weight permits’ to the Member States according to the following scale:

Member State

Belgium

Denmark

Germany

Greece

Spain

France

Ireland

Italy

Luxembourg

Netherlands

Austria

Portugal

Finland

Sweden

United Kingdom

Total

%

6,9

1,4

25

0,9

2

15

0,85

24

1,45

8,9

8

0,7

0,8

0,75

3,35

100

The total number of permits to be allocated will amount to 300 000 for 2001 and 2002 and to 400 000 for 2003
and 2004.

28.12.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 375/61

ANNEX II

SCALE FOR ALLOCATING ‘EMPTY PERMITS’

The Commission shall allocate ‘empty permits’ to the Member States according to the following scale:

Number of ‘empty permits’ available annually

Member State

2001-2004

Belgium

Denmark

Germany

Greece

Spain

France

Ireland

Italy

Luxembourg

Netherlands

Austria

Portugal

Finland

Sweden

United Kingdom

Total

14 067

1 310

50 612

5 285

1 500

16 126

220

93 012

3 130

21 517

2 183

192

867

381

9 598

220 000

C 375/62

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

28.12.2000

ANNEX III

METHODOLOGY FOR DETERMINING THE ALLOCATION OF PERMITS

Allocation of the permits determined in Annexes I and II will take place on the basis of the following methodology:

‘Full-weight permits’

Initially, each Member State will receive 1 500 permits.

Thereafter, the remaining permits will be allocated in equal parts on the basis of criteria relating to bilateral traffic
operations and transit traffic operations.

This result will be adjusted slightly to take account of the specific geographical situation of certain Member States.

Bilateral traffic

The allocation will take place on the basis of the shares of each Member State in bilateral transport to and from
Switzerland.

Transit traffic

The allocation will take place on the basis of the shares of heavy vehicles registered in the Member State concerned
in the total number of diverted kilometres in north-south and south-north trans-Alpine road traffic as a result of the
current weight restrictions in Switzerland.

Diverted mileage will be calculated as the difference between the actual distance of trans-Alpine journeys and the
shortest distance through Switzerland. The mileages through Switzerland will be adjusted by the addition of
60 kilometres to take into account border delays and road traffic conditions.

For those Member States where the above method leads to less than 200 permits, the allocation will be established
at a level of 200 permits.

‘Empty permits’

The ‘empty permits’ will be allocated on the basis of the shares of vehicles registered in the Member States in the
transit traffic through Switzerland of vehicles with a laden weight between 7,5 and 28 tonnes.

28.12.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 375/63

STATEMENT OF THE COUNCIL’S REASONS

I.

INTRODUCTION

On 26 February 1999, the Commission submitted to the Council a proposal for a Regulation on the
distribution of permits for heavy goods vehicles travelling in Switzerland (1); the proposal is designed
to distribute among the Member States permits which Switzerland has granted the Community
under the Agreement between the Swiss Federation and the European Community on the transport
of goods by rail and road.

The Economic and Social Committee delivered its Opinion on 22 September 1999 (2).

The European Parliament delivered its Opinion on first reading under the co-decision procedure on
15 December 1999 (3).

The Commission submitted an amended proposal on 2 March 2000 (4).

On 12 December 2000, the Council adopted its common position in accordance with Article 251
of the Treaty.

II.

ANALYSIS OF THE COMMON POSITION

Since the Commission submitted its amended proposal in March 2000, the Council’s discussions on
the matter have been informed by a concern to abide fully by the outcome of the European
Parliament’s first reading, including the amendments tabled by the Parliament, which the Commission
took on board in its amended proposal. However, in establishing its common position the Council
has found itself obliged to take account of a number of factors and developments which have arisen
in the intervening period.

The initial Commission proposal was presented as an act implementing one of the agreements
between the European Communities and the Swiss Federation, viz. the Agreement on the transport
of goods by rail and road. However, owing to the fact that ratification procedures on one of the
agreements in the package of seven signed with Switzerland are still under way in some Member
States, these agreements, including the road traffic agreement on the transport of goods by rail and
road, have not yet entered into force and are not likely to do so for some months yet. In this
connection, it will be remembered that the seven agreements with Switzerland were negotiated as a
package and were intended to be concluded and to enter into force on the same day. This principle
is established in Article 58 of the road traffic agreement.

In the meantime the Swiss Federal Council decided, on 1 November 2000, to allow heavy goods
vehicles of up to 34 tonnes to travel on its roads from 1 January 2001 and to open up quotas, from
the same date, for vehicles between 34 and 40 tonnes and for vehicles that are empty or transporting
light loads. That decision by the Swiss authorities accompanies the introduction of the RPLP (heavy
traffic levy) on the Swiss network.

(1) OJ C 114, 27.4.1999, p. 4.
(2) OJ C 329, 17.11.1999, p. 1.
(3) OJ C 296, 18.10.2000, p. 108.
(4) OJ C 248 E, 29.8.2000, p. 108.

C 375/64

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

28.12.2000

Given this last development, the adoption of the Regulation has thus become very urgent, if
Community hauliers are not be deprived of the benefits of the Swiss decision. Nevertheless, given
that the seven agreements form a package, the Council did not want the decision to be regarded as
advance implementation of the road traffic agreement. This concern is reflected in the structure of
the text. The Council has therefore made a number of amendments, as compared with the outcome
of the European Parliament’s first reading, notably in order to uncouple the Regulation from the
road traffic agreement. Then, in drawing up the allocation scales, it took account of the latest
statistics, keeping to the methodology in the Commission proposal but adjusting it slightly to reflect
the specific geographical position of certain Member States. It felt it would be useful to include a
review clause on the basis of real flows after one year. The Council also took into account the
deadline proposed by the Parliament for re-allocating unused permits.

III. AMENDMENTS

The Council has adopted all the amendments tabled by the European Parliament. However, with due
regard for the rights and prerogatives of the European Parliament laid down in Article 7, particularly
paragraph 3 thereof, of the Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the
procedures for the exercise of the implementing powers conferred on the Commission (OJ C 184,
17.7.1999, p. 23), it has used the wording agreed with the European Parliament since adoption of
the Socrates Programme (see Art. 7 of the draft Regulation).

The Council has amended the Commission proposal notably in order to uncouple it from the road
traffic agreement signed with Switzerland. It has accordingly inserted new recitals 1 and 2 and
amended Articles 1, 2 and 8 — likewise for the purpose of ‘uncoupling’. Lastly, the Council has
provided for a review mechanism after one year in Article 6 of the draft Regulation.