Report from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - Progress report on the follow-up to the conclusions of the Council on Tourism and Employment
Date: 2000-11-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU action, information policy, job creation, report, tourism policy

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Brussels, 07.11.2000
COM(2000) 696 final

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN
PARLIAMENT, THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE
COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Progress report on the follow-up to the conclusions of the Council
on Tourism and Employment

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN
PARLIAMENT, THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE
COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Progress report on the follow-up to the conclusions of the Council
on Tourism and Employment

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 3

II. Objectives and methodology........................................................................................... 4

1. General objectives.............................................................................................................. 4

2. Cooperation with the Member States.................................................................................. 4

3. Analysis of measures carried out under other policies with an impact on tourism ............... 5

4. Consultation of the socio-economic actors.......................................................................... 5

III.Results of the working groups........................................................................................ 6

1. Meetings ............................................................................................................................ 6

2. Interim reports.................................................................................................................... 6

3. Electronic platform............................................................................................................. 7

4. Main recommendations ...................................................................................................... 7

a) Cooperation between the various socio-economic actors in the creation of ..........................
networks ................................................................................................................................ 7

b) Awareness of the problems ................................................................................................ 8

c) Information ........................................................................................................................ 9

d) Monitoring and overview ................................................................................................... 9

e) Instruments for analysis and evaluation ............................................................................ 10

f) Support for businesses, particularly SMEs ........................................................................ 10

IV.Operational Conclusions............................................................................................... 11

2

I.

INTRODUCTION

the Council of Ministers adopted conclusions1 inviting the
On 21 June 1999,
Commission and the Member States to cooperate closely in order to maximise
tourism's contribution to growth and employment. The Council indicated a number
of specific fields and asked the Commission to report on the follow-up to be given to
its conclusions.

This progress report is the interim reply given by the Commission to the
Council.

The Council conclusions of 21 June 1999 are themselves an acknowledgement of
earlier work and, in particular, of the momentum which began in 1997 with the
recognition of the economic significance and potential of the tourism industry as a
factor in growth and employment.

In November 1997, a European conference on tourism and employment2 was held in
Luxembourg shortly before the Luxembourg European Council3 on Employment and
the Council of Tourism Ministers of 26 November 19974. The Council recognised
the benefits of a balanced, sustainable development of European tourism and called
for a follow-up to the results of the Luxembourg Conference. This led in 1998 to the
setting up of a High Level Group on Tourism and Employment and, subsequently, on
the basis of its recommendations5, which were widely approved, to a Commission
Communication on 28 April 19996. The strategy proposed by the Commission,
which consisted of increasing knowledge of the tourism sector and improving the use
of existing policies, was strongly supported by the Council1, the Parliament7, the
Economic and Social Committee8 and the Committee of the Regions9.

The purpose of this progress report is to inform the Council and the other institutions
of the methods used and the work undertaken under the aegis of the Commission to
follow up the conclusions of June 1999 and to allow consideration of the direction of
future work, as regards both subject and methodology.

The present report is also in line with a general movement to ensure support for and
cooperation with and between the Member States. This trend is reflected in particular
in the Vilamoura Conference10 organised by the Portuguese presidency and the
Ministerial Seminar to be held by the French presidency on 22 November 2000 in

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Conclusions of the Council of 21.6.1999 (Internal Market) on tourism and employment, press release.
Luxembourg Conference, Employment and Tourism: guidelines for action, 4-5.11.1997.
Luxembourg European Council, 21-22.11.1997.
Conclusions of the Council (Tourism), 26.11.1997.
European Tourism – New partnerships for jobs: conclusions and recommendations of the High Level
Group on Tourism and Employment, European Commission, October 1998.
Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and
Social Committee and the Committee of
for
Employment, COM(1999)205 final – OJ C 178-03 of 23.6.99.
Resolution of the European Parliament, 18.2.2000, A5-0030/2000.
Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee, 26.1.2000, CES 93/2000 – OJ 2000/C 75 of
15.3.2000, p.37.
Opinion of the Committee of the Regions, 15.6.2000, CdR 291/99 final.
Conference of the government authorities responsible for tourism, Vilamoura, Portugal, 11.5.2000.

the Regions on Enhancing Tourism's Potential

3

Lille. This report should be considered as a Commission contribution to the Lille
Seminar.

This report will also be included as a point of information for the Internal Market,
Consumers and Tourism Council of 30 November 2000.

II.

1.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY

General objectives

There are three main objectives to the work undertaken to follow up the conclusions
of the Council of 21 June 1999:

–

–

–

to improve knowledge of the trends, needs, obstacles and limitations of the
European tourism sector,

to collect information and identify existing good practice, in order to ensure
access to it and the broadest possible dissemination, and

to improve the approaches and strategies developed in the framework of
existing policies and measures at national and Community levels.

2.

Cooperation with the Member States

In its conclusions of June 1999, the Council specifically called upon the Commission
and the Member States to cooperate closely. Since the task of the Tourism11
Advisory Committee is to facilitate exchanges of information, consultation and
cooperation on tourism,
this Committee was considered the most appropriate
structure through which to implement the Council's conclusions. It therefore acted as
the steering committee for all the work and as a reference point for the definition of
the field of application and range of questions to be dealt with and for the
organisation and evaluation of the work. It held three meetings for this purpose12. It
also set up four working groups to deal with the four topics specified by the Council
and for which remits had been defined.

Working Group A:

to facilitate the exchange and dissemination of information,
particularly through new technologies;

Working Group B:

to improve training in order to upgrade skills in the tourism
industry;

Working Group C:

to improve the quality of tourist products;

Working Group D:

promote

to
development in tourism.

environmental

protection

and

sustainable

The remits of the working groups, whilst different, have a similar structure:

11

12

Council Decision of 22.12.1986, OJ L 384 p. 52 of 31.12.1986.
On 25.10.1999, 1.2.2000 and 18-19.9.2000.

4

–

–

–

to identify needs and the actors involved (including suppliers and consumers)
and to define the concepts (e.g. quality and sustainability);

to identify the strategies and measures existing at different levels of public
authority (national, regional and local) and to assess the contribution of
Community policies and programmes;

to develop in particular the conclusions and recommendations concerning
cooperation between the authorities and the use of existing instruments at
national and Community levels.

3.

Analysis of measures carried out under other policies with an impact on tourism

The working groups have analysed the relevant policies, programmes, measures and
instruments at both national and Community level. They have identified their
positive effects, synergies, gaps and any subsequent work to be carried out
to
improve coordination and efficiently include the needs of tourism in the appropriate
policies, as recommended by the Council, the Parliament and the other institutions.
To do this, the other Directorates-General of the Commission and the appropriate
agencies13 were duly included in the work. The policies identified as being of
particular importance in this context were transport, employment, education, the
environment, consumers, the information society and regional policy.

4.

Consultation of the socio-economic actors

The Council also recommended consulting experts from the tourism sector. A
considerable amount of expertise is to be found among both operators and interested
organisations. The main actors consulted can be grouped as follows:

–

–

–

–

private, partly or entirely state-owned industry - covering all sectors, including
transport;

trades unions representing the various sectors;

interest groups; consumers’ associations and environmental non-

other
governmental organisations;

local and regional authorities.

The Commission has held a number of meetings to explain the process and to consult
European associations which represent the above categories, with the exception of
local and regional authorities. The Advisory Committee also met the representatives
of the associations so far consulted at an open meeting on 18 September 2000. Since
very few spontaneous comments and opinions, as initially requested, had been made,
access to all of the documents or draft documents existing at that time had been
opened to the above-mentioned groups of actors. In the days following this open
meeting more contributions, generally of good quality, were received: they have been
used in the final version of this interim report and in the summary of the reports of
the working groups.

13

The European Environment Agency (EEA) and the European Centre for the Development of Vocational
Training (CEDEFOP).

5

It appears to be essential to ensure greater, more active involvement of experts from
the socio-economic sectors and the civil society in the overall process. They should,
for instance, participate directly if necessary in the working groups where their
expertise can be used, and access to the electronic platform is clearly a necessity,
combined however with conditions which will ensure effectiveness and a
constructive contribution to the whole process.

The question is still open at this stage as to the ways and means by which local and
regional authorities can be consulted and involved in this process and in the work of
the working groups.

III.

RESULTS OF THE WORKING GROUPS

1.

Meetings

Each working group held three meetings between February and August 200014. The
objectives of the meetings were to draw up a common work plan, exchange
information on the key issues and on national practices and policies, determine
possible preliminary recommendations and to discuss an initial report on the work
accomplished.

The participants were nominated by the Member States on the basis of their relevant
expertise. About half of them are from the national authorities, a quarter from
industry and a quarter from tourist offices, semi-public bodies and scientific
institutions.

From the outset, all the Member States plus Norway nominated experts for at least
one working group (UK and NL) and the majority of them for three or four. Over the
course of time the Member States initially less represented have sought to increase
their participation, with the result that almost 100% representation has been achieved
in each working group.

As regards the operation of the working groups, the need for greater coordination
between them has been recognised, given the interaction between the topics
concerned.

2.

Interim reports

A rapporteur was appointed for each working group on the basis of voluntary
proposals by the Member States. Portugal proposed an expert for Working Group A
(information), Denmark for Working Group B (training), Spain for Working Group
C (quality) and France for Working Group D (environment and sustainable
development).

Interim reports have been drawn up by the rapporteurs on the basis of the meetings
held in a relatively short period of time. A large quantity of information has been
collected and lists of initial recommendations have been proposed. However, the
analyses and the setting of priorities have not yet been completed. Although the

14

Working Group A: 28.2, 4.4 and 18.7.2000, Working Group B: 23.2, 19.5 and 23.8.2000, Working
Group C: 6.3, 8.6 and 24.8.2000, Working Group D: 3.3, 25.5 and 11.7.2000.

6

summaries of the four interim reports have been rapidly reviewed by the Tourism
Advisory Committee, they must still be considered at this stage as provisional
documents, since they have not necessarily been unanimously approved in all
aspects. The summaries, which will be disseminated in parallel to this report for
information, should make it possible to make the next stage of work more efficient
and allow the rational determination of priorities and some innovation in the
recommendations to be proposed.

3.

Electronic platform

Since the beginning of the working groups' activities, the Commission has provided
an electronic communication platform known as CIRCA15. The objective was to
simplify exchanges between the members of the working groups and to create a
database with very wide access, containing all the documents related to the subjects
dealt with by the working groups and considered useful by the participants.

Experience has shown that this type of platform is useful as a single point of access
to a set of documents related to tourism. Today this database is accessible to around
120 users and contains several hundred documents.

As regards the use of and access to information, clear changes have taken place as
work has progressed. In the first stage, access was mainly related to the creation of
the contents (loading of documents) and the number of consultations was limited. In
the second phase and with the preparations for the third meeting, access to consult
documents gradually increased.

4.

Main recommendations

The preliminary suggestions of the working groups for a strategic approach to
measures by and in the European Union cover a broad field and involve many actors
in the tourism sector. The Commission considers it appropriate to ask the working
groups to give priority in future work to those suggestions requiring action at
European level or those which would have an impact on the implementation of other
European policies. However, added Community value also consists of ensuring the
success of measures taken at all levels, including the local level.

The intention here is not to make an exhaustive presentation of the recommendations
of the working groups nor to assess the recommendations. It is simply to highlight
the general subjects which have emerged from the working groups as a whole.

The main recommendations can be grouped as follows:

a)

Cooperation between the various socio-economic actors in the creation of networks

is considered extremely important

from developing
It
to be able to benefit
competitive, sustainable tourism, and in so doing involve all
the actors. Prior
identification of the very many actors involved in tourism revealed the need for

15

Communication and Information Centre Administrator : extra-net
tool developed by the IDA
programme (Interchange of Data between Administrations), which allows a group of users to share a
private space on the Internet for the purposes of information exchange and communication.

7

setting up partnerships, developing networks and promoting voluntary agreements
and codes of good practice.

Although Working Group A is not unfamiliar with this problem, since each category
of actors has its own, limited sources of information, the other working groups listed
this is a very clear priority. For instance, Working Group B (training) highlighted the
need for cooperation between training organisers and industry and between regional
and local
training structures and micro-enterprises. As regards quality, greater
emphasis should be placed on the voluntary implementation of quality standards. The
promotion of sustainable tourism would benefit from the creation of networks of all
the actors in order to develop exchanges of systems, methods and know-how. It
would also benefit from the adoption of codes of good practice by operators with the
aim, among other things, of reducing both the consumption of natural resources and
the pollution caused by tourist activity.

In addition, the different aspects of the balanced development of tourism should be
systematically linked at the level of all the actors: for instance, the link between
knowledge (studies, statistics, etc.) of the labour situation and training requirements,
or the application of quality procedures to the training systems, or the development
of special training for the implementation and monitoring of quality systems and the
conditions for sustainable tourism.

Similarly, quality cannot be achieved without using information society technologies
and the knowledge they provide, nor can it be achieved without respect for the
environment and the pursuit of sustainable development, and vice versa.

b)

Awareness of the problems

The second approach, which is encountered mainly in Working Groups B, C and D,
concerns raising the awareness of certain actors regarding very specific issues. These
include, for instance, the benefits of a qualified labour force, improved working
conditions, and investment in training in order to increase the competitiveness of
SMEs and to solve the critical problem of attracting and keeping qualified workers in
this sector. The quality of the service and the tourist product provided will ensure
that European tourism has the competitive edge. However, businesses, 99% of which
are SMEs, are considered to be insufficiently aware of this fact.

Similarly, the development of demand towards a type of tourism which takes better
account of the environment and sustainable development could be encouraged and
enhanced by increased awareness on the part of operators, local people and tourists.

Various awareness-raising tools are available. However, the Commission considers
that although awareness-raising campaigns can probably be carried out better at
national or local levels by non-governmental organisations, the development of
labels, charters, tourist operator guides and assessment aids can greatly promote
awareness.

Working Group D in particular proposed the drawing up of an Agenda 21 for
European tourism. This could be studied and, if there was agreement, the European
Union could adopt and promote it. It also mentioned the implementation of local
Agendas 21.

8

c)

Information

Information needs have been expressed by all the working groups, not just the one
strictly responsible for analysing and structuring such needs. Specific requests for
information were made regarding, for instance, employment, the need for skilled
workers and training requirements. Working Group D repeated the type of essential
general information that should be included in the objectives of Working Group A.

Several working groups stressed the importance of the impact and use of information
society technologies in the field of tourism and mentioned the initiatives already
carried out by the Commission,
in particular the Structural Funds and the IST
programme of the Fifth Framework Programme. A special sector has been set up
dedicated to R&D activities concerning the synergies between tourism and the
information technologies. It was recommended that a special new working group be
set up for this.

Working Group A recommended the development of a Web portal, providing users
with access to many sites, databases and studies from the public and private sectors,
and allowing access at least by subject and by country. These recommendations for
the pooling of existing information or information in the course of creation (e.g. list
of documentation on national tourism policies and documentation centres) and the
simplification of access by creating a common portal, are entirely in line with the
priority of improving coordination between national and European authorities.
Implementation of this recommendation would contribute to creating a more
homogeneous image and would facilitate access to all documents on tourism.

More details about the information available and the service to be offered by this
common portal are required. This could be done by means of a study (drawing up of
a list of relevant documents and documentation centres) along with a more detailed
specification by the Working Group (services to be offered by the portal).

Working Group A recommended the creation of a tourism satellite account (this was
also mentioned by other working groups). The aim of this is to offer decision-makers
and industry an overall picture of the economic importance of tourism, thus enabling
to be compared with other sectors of the economy. The recommendation of
it
creating a tourism satellite account at European level would be a step towards a
better understanding of the importance of the tourism sector and its impact on the
economy as a whole. This approach would make an important contribution towards
better understanding the parameters influencing the sector's growth and its impact,
particularly on employment. This recommendation, which the Commission fully
supports, would however first
involve the harmonised use of national satellite
accounts which already exist in some Member States.

d)

Monitoring and overview

The increase in skills and the search for quality, both in employment and in the
various tourist services and destinations, are constant processes which require regular
monitoring. The same approach also applies, of course, to the pursuit of sustainable
tourism. The working groups have mentioned the need for regular assessments of the
situation and the impact of the measures taken, both by the Community and by
businesses with the support of the Structural Funds.

9

Working Group B envisaged the establishing of a forum or permanent observatory at
EU level, presided over by the Commission and with the participation and active
coordination of Member States, international organisations and experts from socio-
economic groups and other interested parties. Working Group C highlighted the need
to encourage the use of indicators which are essential for the implementation of
effective monitoring. Working Group D recommended the creation of information
instruments for each country.

e)

Instruments for analysis and evaluation

The need for measurement and for models for certain sensitive phenomena in the
sector has emerged. Research on the definition of the parameters for yardsticks and
evaluation systems, both regarding the state of a given variable and the effect of
measures taken to improve it, is a priority. This should in particular lead to the design
of adequate quality indicators both for destinations and for businesses, sustainability
the various components (including transport) and performance
indicators for
indicators (e.g. for environmental management, quality systems, training and the
development of human resources).

Priority should also be given to developing methods, such as for training and
teaching which take into consideration the present and future needs of SMEs,
European methods for comparative quality assessment and methods for determining
the capacity of a destination in order to control regional impact. Working Group C
should continue its work on defining quality systems and their application and clarify
needs in this sector.

Comparative assessments could then be carried out which may lead to innovative
solutions.

The development of these tools (indicators, methods and systems) and the use of
benchmarking techniques and research into the factors and conditions relating to
innovation are entirely in line with the Commission's current enterprise policy.

f)

Support for businesses, particularly SMEs

The working groups revealed problems relating to the identification by micro-
enterprises of sources of financing and access to these sources, the nature of the
assistance SMEs require, and increasing the use of the Structural Funds.

In particular, Working Group B stressed the need to take into account the role of
local and regional authorities, and the setting up of training structures and networks
open to the participation of everybody involved,
to improve the
competitiveness of micro-enterprises.

in order

SMEs have the most difficulty using the tools available. Technical help was therefore
identified as a need with regard to the implementation of benchmarking methods and
quality systems, impact studies on the environment and labels.

Working Group D laid particular emphasis on the fact that seasonal cutbacks in the
tourism industry were essential in order to increase the competitiveness of tourism
businesses. It advocated giving SMEs a greater role in the decision-making process
and the setting up of marketing networks. It also raised the problem of the growing

10

IV.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

concentration of tourist businesses and recommended studying how tourism could
contribute to the protection of tourist sites.

OPERATIONAL CONCLUSIONS

The working groups have created a system of cooperation confirmed by the Tourism
Advisory Committee. This cooperation can work only if it is a continuous process
rooted in the structures set up in 2000 and further developed as set out below.
Synergy and its corollary, the elimination of overlapping work between the working
groups, must be sought more systematically. Meetings must be supported by constant
contact between the participants through a network. It is therefore recommended
that the working groups extend this work until 2001, as planned, in order to
produce a final consolidated report in autumn 2001 with a view to achieving a
unified approach to Community and national activities affecting tourism.

The four subjects dealt with by the working groups must continue to be studied
in greater depth and efforts must be made to identify priorities on the basis of those
already highlighted in the interim reports, in the information summaries and in
Chapter III of this report.

The importance of the question of transport has been stressed. It cuts across several
of the subjects studied. It is proposed that it should be dealt with mainly by the
Working Group dealing with environmental protection and the development of
sustainable tourism.

The question of the impact and use of information technologies in tourism has
proved to be one which goes beyond the subject of exchanging and disseminating
economic and statistical information and requires, among other things, different
experts. It is therefore proposed that a new working group be set up to deal with the
impact of information and communication technologies on tourism.

It is proposed that each working group should include a reasonable number of
experts from the relevant socio-economic groups and interested organisations so
that each is balanced and manageable whilst having increased expertise and
remaining fully efficient. Depending on the specific topics covered by each working
group, professionals from the industry and experts from trade unions and other
interest groups will be called upon to participate in limited numbers according to
their recognised expertise.

Voluntary contributions by experts not able to participate at meetings of the working
groups will be welcomed through the use of the electronic platform. This platform
will be accessible to the socio-economic actors and to local and regional authorities
under arrangements to be determined according to their involvement in the process.

the work of the five working groups
Alongside the priorities identified for
summarised in paragraphs III and IV.2 of this report, the Commission considers it
appropriate to initiate contact, in 2001, with the authorities and the tourist industriy
trade associations of the applicant countries, in order to begin periodic discussions on
national policies, good practice and Community measures with an impact on tourism
activity. The participation of representatives from these authorities and trade
associations at another open meeting of the Tourism Advisory Committee in 2001

11

will provide a real opportunity to prepare for the future accession of these countries
to the European Union.

6.

Again in the international field, in 2001, the Commission will:

–

–

–

–

increase EU-Mediterranean cooperation on tourism;

intensify the GATS negotiations on tourism;

draft the tourism section of the EU position for the meeting of the Commission
on Sustainable Development, known as Rio + 10, which will take place in
2002;

increase cooperation with the main international tourism organisations, such as
the OECD and the World Tourism Organisation (WTO).

Finally, before the end of this year, the Commission will publish its periodic report
on Community activities concerning tourism, which will cover the years 1997-1999.
Through the studies already in progress, it will reinforce the on-going analysis of the
markets, structures and trends of the tourism industry in the European Union and the
rest of the world, so that a more thorough assessment can be made of the impact of
any initiative taken under the various Community policies which might affect the
competitiveness of EU tourist businesses.

To conclude, with all these initiatives, the Commission is hoping to be able to
present, at the end of 2001 and in close cooperation with the Member States, the EU
tourism industry and the other parties concerned, a full analysis of national policies,
best practice and Community measures which have a positive effect on European
tourist activity. This should make it possible to identify, in close consultation with all
the parties concerned, the measures that could usefully be taken by the Member
States (including the regional and/or local authorities), industry and if necessary the
Community institutions, in order to increase the competitiveness of the EU tourism
industry and its contribution to the creation of jobs and sustainable development.

the Ministerial
The Commission calls upon the government representatives at
Seminar at Lille on 22 November and at
the Internal Market, Consumers and
Tourism Council of 30 November and the other EU institutions concerned (the
European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the
Regions) to support the on-going initiatives - and those proposed above - in order to
encourage the actors involved in this process by giving them clear political support.

7.

8.

9.

12