Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament - Europe and Space: Turning to a new chapter
Date: 2000-09-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: communications systems, data transmission, environmental policy, satellite communications, telecommunications

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Brussels, 27.9.2000
COM(2000) 597 final

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Europe and Space: Turning to a new chapter

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Europe and Space: Turning to a new chapter

In 1999, European Ministers1,2 called on the European Commission and the Executive of the
European Space Agency to elaborate a coherent European Strategy for Space. The European
Parliament3 welcomed this initiative, emphasising the importance of introducing for the first
time a Community dimension in Europe’s political approach to space. The EU Council and
the ESA Council at Ministerial level thereby provided a basis for a joint consultation of all
interested parties concerned and enabled the preparation of a comprehensive document on a
strategy for space that can be subscribed to by European states, irrespective of whether they
are member of ESA or part of the Union.

Parts of our society have become critically dependent on the use of satellites and space-based
technologies. An autonomous and competitive capability to develop and manage space-based
infrastructures and to collect and use the information deriving from these systems is an
increasingly important asset for an enlarging and further integrating Union with a greater
political weight on the global scene.

Space-based information is going to be a significant element for success in the knowledge
economy of tomorrow. In the public sector, at the level of the Union, it is likely to play an
increasing role in the implementation of a wide range of EU policies such as for environment,
transport, telecommunications, culture, research, agriculture, fishery, regional development
and international relations.

Through the emergence of new markets for satellites and notably for downstream services and
user equipment there are also enhanced possibilities to generate revenues. The development of
these markets and the position of the European industry in them depend both on the
regulatory environment and the availability of the appropriate space infrastructure. In the face
of global competition, industry would benefit from the political and economic weight of the
Union in the development and the regulation of these markets.

Space presents a security dimension, which has thus far only been dealt with, at European
level, in the context of the WEU. The forthcoming integration of the WEU into the EU and
the new steps taken at the European Summit in Helsinki towards the development of a
Common European Security and Defence Policy (CESDP) are prompting the European Union
to take space capabilities into account, for instance in decision-making for the planning and
monitoring of the Petersberg Tasks4 (conflict prevention and crisis management).

this background and together with ESA,

Against
the Commission has mapped out a
comprehensive document on a European Strategy for Space. This Communication presents
this joint document on the strategy, which is built around three objectives:

1

2

3

4

Resolution ESA Council at Ministerial level, Brussels, 11 and 12 May 1999
2112th EU Council meeting – Research (Brussels, 2 December 1999)
EP Resolution, 18 May 2000 on the Communication of the Commission on the Commission working
document ‘Towards coherent European approach for space’ (SEC (1999)789 – C5-0336/1999 –
1999/2213(COS)).
Petersberg Declaration, WEU Council of Ministers, Bonn 19 June 1992.

2

• Strengthening the foundation for space activities: preserving independent and affordable
access to space, and ensuring a broad technology base with the industrial capability for
designing, manufacturing, and operating satellite systems and the associated ground
infrastructure.

• Enhancing scientific knowledge for a better understanding of our planet and its

atmosphere, the solar system and the Universe.

• Reaping the benefits for markets and society through a demand-driven exploitation of the
technical capabilities of the space community. This requires the involvement of end-users
from the planning phase until operational deployment in a constructive dialogue between
all parties concerned from the public and the private sector, at the national and at the
European level.

Thus far, space activities in Europe have been largely focussed on the first two objectives,
although the capabilities exist to meet all three, which are, overall, inseparable. The challenge
is to organise the various activities in different legal and institutional settings, but in a
coherent fashion. This challenge is notably present in realising a civil global navigation
satellite system, GALILEO5, and in building a strong enough political momentum to
streamline various satellite initiatives and projects in Europe and creating European-wide
opportunities for the use of satellites in Global Monitoring for Environment and Security -
GMES.

The strategy and the Commission’s role

The strategy as proposed in this communication is a further milestone in establishing a
coherent approach for space in Europe. It
intended as a detailed road map for
programming space activities in the coming years. It should rather provide a strong political
support for public and private actors to act in the field of space and a reference for their
individual and co-operative efforts for building a coherent and effective space infrastructure
with the associated services. It should also constitute a basis for consulting and mobilising
society at
large on the benefits that can be derived from space-based information and
knowledge.

is not

The strategy’s success will depend on its endorsement by all actors in Europe and on their
commitment, in particular that of Member States, to implement it and develop it further.

The Commission envisages taking an active role in the implementation of the strategy by:

• Establishing the right political and regulatory conditions for space activities, in line with

and in support of Community policies;

• Acting as an animator to catalyse joint research and development efforts of all actors in

line with the objectives of a European Research Area;

• Bringing together all actors and competencies around common political objectives in
projects of a European-wide interest. This role is articulated concretely in initiatives with a
Community dimension such as GALILEO and eventually a capacity for a Global
Monitoring for Environment and Security.

5

Galileo: involving Europe in a new generation of satellite navigation services. COM(1999) 54 final, 10
February 1999.

3

The Commission will further lead the development scenario for GALILEO in association with
ESA, Member States and industry. It will prepare the ground for a political initiative for
GMES that should result
in the definition of an information and monitoring system,
integrating observation satellites and responding to Europe’s policy needs.

Building on its achievements and its technical expertise, the European Space Agency will
remain the principal programming and funding agency through which Member States realise
joint research and development projects in the area of space.

The Commission is ready to enter a new operational relationship with ESA to work together
under their respective competencies for the implementation of this strategy. Therefore it is
envisaged that Commission and the ESA Executive continue to jointly develop the strategy
for space and issue a joint annual report on space .

For this purpose the Commission and the ESA Executive will set up a joint task force. The
task force will also, among other tasks, reflect on a possible unified setting for Member States
in order to propose
to review the strategy and its implementation on a regular basis,
permanent arrangements before the end of next year. Furthermore, it will elaborate proposals
for framework arrangements for the management of joint projects and outline a coherent
approach with respect to candidate countries.

It is now for national, European Union and ESA decision-makers to provide guidance for an
effective implementation of the strategy and its further development. Together with ESA, the
respective Councils.
Commission is

looking forward to the discussions

in their

4

Joint Commission – ESA document on a European strategy for space

1.

Space today ____________________________________________________________ 6

2.

Tomorrow’s Europe _____________________________________________________ 7

3.

Space as a strategic component of our common future __________________________ 7

4. A strategy to meet needs and opportunities ___________________________________ 9

4.1.Strengthening the foundation ___________________________________________ 10

4.2.Enhancing scientific knowledge _________________________________________ 11

4.3.Reaping the benefits for markets and society _______________________________ 12

4.3.1.

Satellite communications __________________________________________ 12

4.3.2. GALILEO ______________________________________________________ 13

4.3.3. Monitoring for Environment and Security _____________________________ 14

4.3.4. Common European Security and Defence Policy aspects _________________ 16

5.

Implementation ________________________________________________________ 16

5.1.Working together ____________________________________________________ 16

5.2.Industrial aspects_____________________________________________________ 17

5.3.International aspects __________________________________________________ 18

5

1.

SPACE TODAY

Space is often seen as the last frontier of mankind’s curiosity; an area of pioneering
technology developments associated with science, exploration, defence and international
prestige. Today, satellite communication services and TV broadcasting, satellite navigation
and positioning and world-wide weather forecasts drawing on globally operated satellite
systems have become part of everyday life. Satellite applications and services for travel and
search and rescue, and verification of
land-use,
transport, environment monitoring,
international treaties are some examples that provide new motives for space activities.

Europe has built up a scientific and technological competence as well as a competitive
industry resulting in an impressive series of space missions and commercial successes. The
Ariane launcher has captured 50% of the commercial launch market and figures prominently
as a symbol for Europe in the world. The European Space Agency (ESA) has played a key
role in these successful developments.

€

Markets associated with satellites, launches and satellite services have developed and new
ones are emerging. Current estimates for the turnover in 2002, including derived services in
downstream markets, are
5-10 billion for
2 billion for commercial launches,
satellite navigation receivers and positioning services,
and
turnover in satellites and
40 billion. The total annual consolidated turnover of the European
launchers is estimated at
6 billion, directly providing highly qualified employment to
space industry is of the order of
40.000 people in Europe7.

0,5-2 billion for satellite imagery6. World-wide annual

60-100 billion for satellite telecommunications,

€

€

€

€

€

The space industry devotes a considerable portion of its effort to research and technological
development, which are integral parts of the industrial process. For the leading space-faring
nations of the world, the majority of turnover in launchers and satellites is publicly funded. In
particular, the contract volume from the US Department of Defence alone is three times
higher than the total public spending in Europe, and the total US public spending more than
five times higher. This provides the US industry with a driver for technology development,
generating a broad publicly funded technology base for which there is no equivalent in
Europe.

Against this background, European Ministers called on the Commission and the Executive of
ESA to work together on an updated approach to space and to elaborate a European strategy
for space. This request was supported by the European Parliament, which recognised the
importance of adding a new dimension to Europe’s effort by addressing space also in the
political context of the Union.

This strategy, to be endorsed by the EU Council, the European Parliament and the ESA
Council should open a new chapter in Europe’s approach to space, becoming the reference for
European space activities.

6

7

Figures compiled from various sources, i.e., State of the Space Industry, 1999 Report, Euroconsult, Eucosat
database 1999
Figures compiled from various sources, i.e., Euroconsult, Eurospace

6

2.

TOMORROW’S EUROPE

The EU has emerged as a world economic power facing the challenge of redefining its own
borders through enlargement, which will lead eventually to a Union of more than half a
billion people. In parallel Europe is confronted with globalisation and the need to preserve its
cultural identity, diversity and value systems.

As regards the challenge of globalisation, EU leaders made a strong commitment at the
European Council in Lisbon in March 2000. The EU's new strategic goal for the next decade
is to "become the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world",
thereby "regaining the conditions for full employment and to strengthen social cohesion".

Enlargement of the EU will reinforce Europe’s global influence and create the need to act as a
coherent force in world affairs. Through enlargement, the EU is not only creating a larger
common market, but is also increasing its political weight in foreign and security policy
affairs with twice the population of the US and four times that of Japan. The decision of the
in Helsinki8 to extend the number of candidate countries for EU
European Council
membership to 13, is an important change in the global strategic situation. An enlarged Union
will have to respond to growing expectations with respect to its Common Foreign and
Security Policy, in the interest both of Europeans themselves and of their partners.

At a time when public opinion is ever more sensitive to the impact of globalisation on the
environment, health, labour standards and cultural diversity, the EU is starting to work out the
political, economic and social dimensions of global security. With its model for regional
integration as a guarantee for peace, the Union is a positive factor for peace around the world.

To address the social and economic dimensions of this challenge, Europe has also to master
knowledge and technology. Research, technological development and education are principal
driving forces for competitiveness and employment. In a knowledge-based society, they are
more than ever the engines of progress and the foundations for economic and social stability.

Whereas European integration has for many years largely been an economic process, the
Union is now also engaged in a political process, with a growing awareness of the need to
project its model of society into a wider world.

As a consequence, the provision of the necessary instruments for economic development,
communications,
and
peacekeeping cannot be left to others. Europe has to engage in developing the content and the
rules for these instruments, to make them available to its own citizens and to the world, in full
and open co-operation with all possible partners.

and energy infrastructure,

environment

protection,

transport

3.

SPACE AS A STRATEGIC COMPONENT OF OUR COMMON FUTURE

Global information and communications constitute the nervous system of the knowledge
society. Satellites, with their ability to cover and to connect virtually every point around the
world, are critical to the effective functioning of this neural network.

• Communications

to terrestrial
infrastructure for various services throughout the world and offer solutions for areas

economical alternatives

systems provide

satellite

8

European Council Helsinki, December 1999

7

without adequate terrestrial
infrastructure. Whereas borders may stop terrestrial
communications links, satellite systems provide the means to transfer information across
frontiers. They can therefore deliver pan-European or even global information services,
thus providing the possibility to co-operate effectively for the development of societies
within and outside Europe.

• Navigation and positioning satellite systems form an innovative and seamless global
infrastructure for travel and transport, associated services and a multitude of other sectors’
applications. They in fact provide highly accurate and reliable time signals, which will
become a global reference to synchronise networks for telecommunications, energy,
transport, financial transactions etc.

• Observation satellite systems deliver a continuous flow of near-real-time data about any
part of the globe, in compliance with international law. This is of vital importance for
meteorology and global change studies,
identifying environmental
problems at regional and global levels, agricultural monitoring, for early warning of crises
and for arms control. Here satellites are a unique source of information and can play a
pivotal role in EU decision-making for the planning and monitoring of the Petersberg
Tasks (conflict prevention and crisis management).

treaty verification,

Furthermore, space adds a new dimension to many fields of science and technology,
contributing to a better understanding of the world in which we live. Science in space has
become an integral part of scientific progress in modern society.

these instances, satellite-based services are of strategic value to Europe, where

In all
economic, societal and political factors are inseparably mixed:

•

•

•

a economic factor, because of the strong leverage effect of the space segment. Even when
business is big, the investment for space hardware contribution remains small in the total
value-chain of communications and information services – but
is nevertheless the
enabling part of the system.

it

a societal factor, when parts of society become critically dependent on their service such
as communications, navigation and positioning. This applies to the areas without adequate
terrestrial infrastructure, as well as to the densely populated regions of the globe.

a political factor for security as well as an instrument of global influence, since an
independent satellite capability ensures control over the use of the information gathered.

Satellite systems have also proven to be a strategic asset for exporting and promoting EU-
developed technologies. They have been instrumental, for example, in achieving the world-
wide success of the DVB (Digital Video Broadcasting) standard.

Dual-use (civilian-military) aspects of satellite systems have not so far figured highly on
Europe’s agenda. But through the Satellite Centre of the Western European Union (WEU),
Europe has gained some experience in dual-use. Integration of the WEU Satellite Centre in
the EU may open new avenues for shared utilisation.

There is no doubt
that satellite communications and information systems will play an
increasing role in the information- and knowledge-based society. To ensure freedom of
action, Europe must play a role in defining and shaping such systems, as well as in setting

8

rules and standards for the future. This will give a voice in determining how they are used,
and in stimulating social demands (e.g. for telemedicine, tele-education or tele-working).

Considering space as a whole reveals the commonality of the applied technologies and the
strong links between the various space-related activities. An effective space strategy should
therefore embrace the following elements:

•

•

•

•

•

independent and affordable access to space

a broad research and technology base with the industrial capability for designing,
manufacturing, and operating satellites systems

an adequate ground infrastructure

a regulatory framework for a harmonious development of the information society,
including aspects of frequency management and orbital slots

organised market access and an export control regime.

4.

A STRATEGY TO MEET NEEDS AND OPPORTUNITIES

Because of its strategic importance in the economic, societal and political dimensions and its
contribution to scientific progress, governments are steadily investing in space. This
investment has two major objectives, namely to fulfil governmental and political needs such
as defence, science or public services; and to develop the infrastructures of a modern society,
in turn stimulating new markets and services.

The progressive integration of satellite systems and services in our society has created
opportunities to generate revenues in markets for satellites and launch services. These
revenues are generated through a complex interplay between the policy maker - needing space
tools for political purposes, industry - manufacturing space systems for its customers, and
user equipment suppliers and service providers - for whom satellites are enabling instruments.

Significant turnovers in the downstream markets suggest that it is time for public authorities
to reduce their role. However, the strategic dimension and the dual-use aspects of space mean
that technology is not developed in a totally free market. Therefore, the further development
of the space sector today actually calls for a renewed public commitment and a continuing
role for public authorities – including national, multinational and intergovernmental
contributions, as well as the political commitment of the Union.

Nevertheless, considering the enhanced possibilities of return on investments, space must,
wherever possible, attract additional investments by stimulating the commitment of industry
and the private sector through public/private partnerships (PPPs). In the shift towards a
competitive, dynamic and knowledge-based economy, Europe must develop a way for the
different actors to work together and seize opportunities, which address the needs of markets
and society.

Opening new markets requires a constructive interaction between the partners within the
PPPs. This can only be initiated by establishing and nurturing a dialogue to elaborate the
strategic aspects of space-based communications, information systems and services in the
context of the information society.

9

All of these considerations lead to the conclusion that a comprehensive strategy for space
must pursue the following three objectives:

(1) strengthening the foundation,

(2) enhancing scientific knowledge, and

(3) reaping the benefits for markets and society.

These three objectives are inseparable and must be pursued together. The challenge for
Europe is to organise this in different legal and institutional settings but in a coherent fashion.

4.1.

Strengthening the foundation

Space Technology

A broad technological base supported by technology and demonstration programmes is a
prerequisite for
the timely development of new services and the continuing global
competitiveness of Europe’s space industry. ‘Time to market’ and ‘driving the standards’ are
two key factors of success. Differences between the time cycles for technology development
and the speed of market evolution mean that space technologies must be defined and
developed in anticipation of the needs.

Considering the investment gap between the European space sector and its competitors in
space systems and terrestrial solutions, a strong and innovative approach to space technology
must be adopted. This needs to be based on a fruitful dialogue between technology providers
and users and, for instance, operators involved in the information society. In some cases,
in others, new services are driving
space technologies can drive new services – whilst
technologies. Such a dialogue should allow synchronising the time to market with the
different driving forces, so as to ensure coherence of the overall technology chain from space
to ground.

Thanks to ESA, EU and national research and technology development programmes a solid
technology base exists in European industry, research centres and academia. The efforts to
coordinate these programmes should be encouraged. Furthermore, the dialogue with the user
community should be reinforced to ensure that opportunities for new services are not missed,
taking into account Europe’s strengths – especially its world-leading position in mobile
communications, and the introduction of new mobile services and multimedia applications.

To that end,
implementation of three different but co-ordinated activities:

the technology development process

should be pursued through the

•

•

•

development of basic technologies, to be pursued essentially with public support;

early demonstration of developed technologies through pilot projects and validation
activities, in which the public sector and commercial operators jointly participate; and

development of applications and services to be driven by market considerations and user
demand.

These different types of technological activity will be developed taking into account the
different degrees of industrial involvement at each level as well as the specific role of SMEs
in the innovation process.

10

Access to space

Access to space is a prerequisite and an enabling factor for Europe to undertake projects and
develop services that rely on space assets. It must also remain affordable. European launchers
have to maintain a competitive position in the world market for launch services, which is
constantly and rapidly evolving.

The arrival of new launchers on the world scene requires a continuous adaptation of the
European offers. Maintaining the competitiveness of Ariane 5 is therefore a priority, notably
through improvements of the launcher aiming to decrease the specific launch cost. In the
medium term, adding European-manufactured small and medium launch vehicles should
complete the range of launch services. As a preparation for the future, timely development
and preparatory in-flight demonstrations should be undertaken for new systems that may be
required for longer term competition. Maintaining the European spaceport in Kourou at an
appropriate standard is inextricably linked with this.

The development of innovative technologies, new vehicles and stages and the associated
ground infrastructure will continue to require public support. The condition of affordability
for Europe also makes it necessary to pursue complementary private investments, whenever
there can be a return-on-investment in a reasonable timeframe.

4.2.

Enhancing scientific knowledge

Space systems provide unique means to explore the solar system and the universe, provide a
constant flow of readily comparable global data for the understanding of our planet and its
atmosphere, and give access to microgravity. They also are powerful and attractive stimulants
for the education of students and researchers in various technical fields, and are an integral
part of the instruments of the scientific community. Space science thus contributes also to
technological innovation, industrial competitiveness as well as education and training.

It is therefore important for Europe to pursue cutting-edge themes of space science, and
space-based contributions to the understanding of the climate and our planet:

•

•

the behaviour of our Sun and its influence on the Earth; the origins of the solar system and
the evolution of its planets including our own; the origin and evolution of stars, planetary
systems and Earth-like planets – including the possibility of discovering life on them; the
structure, evolution and destiny of the universe, and the fundamental laws that govern it,

and, of growing importance, the investigation of the phenomena of global change and all
major Earth-sciences themes: Earth’s interior, its physical climate, its geosphere/biosphere,
the atmosphere and the marine environment, and their impact on mankind.

including human space flight. It

is
Europe has acquired capabilities in all space areas,
participating as partner in the International Space Station (ISS), as a sensible alternative to
developing a complete space and ground infrastructure for human space flight through its own
means. It should now concentrate on optimising use of the ISS as a European research
infrastructure for all disciplines in space science – especially life and physical sciences,
applied research, technology development and validation – and as a powerful educational tool
and a test bed for the “next step” in human space exploration: the exploration of the solar
system.

11

The ESA programmes – Horizons 2000 for Space Science, Living Planet for Space-based
Earth Science – and the exploitation of the International Space Station, in particular for life-
and physical sciences are considered as the programmatic references for space-based science
activities in Europe. The activities are driven by scientists, and Member States put priorities
on the basis of well-organised peer reviews. The pre-eminent European scientific efforts can
be embraced in the European Research Area, following the European Parliament’s view that
the European Union must adopt a more balanced approach to space by strongly supporting
both the scientific and the practical use of space research.

4.3.

Reaping the benefits for markets and society

The important new element
in the strategy concerns the exploitation of the technical
capabilities of the space community with the objective of seizing market opportunities and
meeting the new demands of our society.

An optimal combination of space-based systems and conventional terrestrial infrastructure, as
well as the integration of future space-based information and communication systems and
services, creates new perspectives. Such advances are key assets for any political entity in the
modern world seeking to secure sustainable development.

Effective exploitation requires the involvement of end-users from the planning phase until
operational deployment. Again, its success will depend on a constructive dialogue between all
concerned parties from the public and the private sectors, at national and European level.

Satellite communications – involving sales of satellites, ground stations and transponder time,
communication services as well as the purchase of launches – constitute the largest single
source of revenues in the commercial space sector. In view of the clear prospects for a return
on investment, industry and private investors can be expected to identify opportunities and
make the strategic choices. Other satellite applications, with limited or very long-term
prospects of return on investment, require politically driven initiatives to federate the demand.
Here public authorities need to take the lead and seek the commitment of European industry.

Meteorology has developed as a concrete example of such approach. In weather forecasting
services the role of satellites is well established. The European contribution is achieved
through EUMETSAT, and is part of a truly global data service provision.

GALILEO, currently in its definition phase, is an example of a concrete project that should
provide Europe with a civil global navigation satellite system. As yet Europe has to seek a
coherent approach for observation needs, and ideas are taking shape around an initiative for
Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES). This initiative covers aspects of
the global environment and civil security, while at the same time offering possibilities to meet
requirements that will originate from Europe’s Common Foreign and Security Policy.

4.3.1.

Satellite communications

With the emergence of strong and successful EU operators in the telecommunications and
fixed, mobile and broadcasting
information technology sector, covering a range of
applications,
identifying and defining
commercial market opportunities in the development of space-based infrastructure.

industry itself has assumed responsibility for

Building on their position, operators and industry are today actively preparing the systems
needed to compete in new markets being opened by the very fast growth of Internet-based

12

applications. These developments will provide broadband Internet access and interactive
services through enhanced satellite broadcasting systems.

However, the success of the satellite sector is fragile. After the strong consolidation wave that
the space industry has experienced world-wide over the past decade, only a handful of
satellite manufacturers remain active and capable of delivering complete “turnkey systems”.
For satellite operators the choice of suppliers is therefore limited, and might also be affected,
as far as export licence regimes are concerned by political decisions taken outside Europe. In
that context, achieving sustainable competition in the commercial marketplace requires a
strong European industry – which, in turn, demands a clear European commitment on the part
of all actors to streamline R&D activities in this field.

to

facilitate

Even if satellite communications have a commercial market orientation, Europe should
continue
Indeed,
social/collaborative policies in the EU (education, health, regional development, collaboration
with third countries, e-Europe) may constitute frameworks where satellite communications
can actively contribute to the targeted objectives.

downstream applications.

development

the

of

Also, satellite communications is facing fierce competition from terrestrial services in
commercial applications. While the full liberalisation of telecommunications markets in the
Union has provided opportunities for the deployment of alternative technologies, satellite
systems are by nature trans-national and require a strongly harmonised European licensing
regime in order to benefit from regulatory incentives. There may thus be a need for a
harmonised European approach to the role and place of satellite communication services vis à
vis those provided through terrestrial network infrastructures. The Commission initiative
towards an improvement of the spectrum policy framework in Europe should be seen as a step
in this direction9.

Furthermore, there is a need for monitoring the full implementation of the WTO (World
Trade Organisation) agreement on basic telecommunication services (including the reference
paper on these services). In upcoming negotiations –such as GATS 2000 – there will be
opportunities for achieving more commitments on satellite services and to ask for third
countries to remove existing Most Favoured Nation (MFN) exemptions in these areas.

At the Community level, the Satellite Action Plan10 implemented in close co-operation with
satellite communication operators provides a framework for these and other questions.

4.3.2. GALILEO

Building on experience gained within EGNOS11 for the development of an augmentation
system for GPS and GLONASS, Europe has recognised the importance of having a global
navigation satellite system conceived as a civil system, and has launched the definition phase
of GALILEO.

GALILEO plays a crucial role in the creation of an integrated European system, securing
including transport, timing,
adequate performance and economic value in various areas,
energy and telecommunications. It will be used in all modes of transportation for navigation,

9

10

11

Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and the Council on a Regulatory Framework for
Radio Spectrum Policy in the European Community COM (2000)407, 12 July 2000
EU Action Plan:Satellite communications in the Information Society, COM(97)91 final, 5 March 1997
EGNOS: the European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service

13

and fleet-management,

traffic-
infomobility
applications. The enhanced performance of GALILEO compared with current systems, in
terms of its superior technical and operational parameters, is a major asset. It will provide
Europe with sovereignty in safety-critical applications and telematic infrastructure.

emergency and

surveillance,

tracking,

GALILEO brings together the European political determination and financial commitment. It
offers an opportunity to mobilise the private sector through Public Private Partnerships,
combining the policy and regulatory roles of the Commission and the technical and
programmatic skills of ESA with the commitment of the space industry and service providers.
The challenge now is to substantiate the economic and strategic case in an international
context.

A crucial element in the successful completion of the definition phase shall require the
agreement on the setting up of a single public-sector entity that can assume organisational
responsabilities. In addition, organisational and institutional framework of GALILEO Public
Private Partnerships will be set up so as to allow the roles of the public sector and the private
sector to evolve over time to protect their respective interests. This framework is expected to
associate the public sector, private investors and users, in order to guarantee an economically
viable infrastructure and at the same time deliver a protected service to the consumer.

Special attention is paid to international co-operation,
in particular to the potential of
collaboration with the Russian Federation, which can contribute frequency sharing and
extensive expertise in this domain. Similarly, the USA has much to offer in terms of co-
operation on frequency sharing, experience, standardisation, but also stimulating competition.
Various other countries have expressed an interest in participating in GALILEO, an open
system in a European framework.

GALILEO, as a civil infrastructure, does raise security questions associated with making a
global navigation satellite system available to the world. These concerns will be addressed
during the definition and validation phase.

4.3.3. Monitoring for Environment and Security

In the past decade Europe has shown leadership in the fields of environment and sustainable
development. With the approach of the 10th anniversary of the Rio Conference,
the
Community is now committed12 to establishing a strategy integrating the concept of
sustainable development across all areas of EU policy. At the same time, the growing
importance of an EU Common Foreign and Security Policy has led to a focus on the interplay
between the human dimension of environmental policy and the broad issues of European
security, both in a geopolitical context and in terms of the wellbeing of individual citizens.

“Environment and Security” embraces a broad framework of policy concerns and a wide
spectrum of environmental effects, both at European and global level, calling for co-operation
within an integrated and coherent response framework. The additional responsibilities of a
larger Europe in the global context will create a need to develop an independent capacity
supporting regional environmental and security policies. For this purpose, Europe can build
on the experience gained in various settings, in order to devise a structured approach to the
collection, analysis and dissemination of data. Another question is the establishment of a
policy for coherent information pooling and management.

12

European Council conclusion environment and sustainable development. Helsinki European Council,
10-11 December 1999.

14

Space-based information provides a powerful platform to develop monitoring of both
environment and security concerns and to support analysis of individual issues and their inter-
relationships. A number of competing and complementary space-systems initiatives, which
could be configured to provide monitoring and information services, are in the definition
phase.

A Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES) initiative should provide the
common link between Europe’s political requirements on the one hand, and the advanced
technical and operational capabilities provided by observation satellites on the other. The
definition of European environmental and security information requirements within the broad
scope of GMES could create a strong enough political momentum to streamline various–
ESA, national, bi-lateral – satellite initiatives and projects in Europe. At the same time it will
be necessary to identify gaps and to mobilise resources for new initiatives related to the
exploitation of space-based information and establish a move towards effective co-ordination
and an overall coherent plan of action.

Preparatory activities within GMES have brought together representatives of the Commission,
ESA, national space agencies, Eumetsat and industry with the aim to establish a rationale for
acquiring independent access to space-based information. This can only come about through
co-operation between all European actors, addressing:

•

•

•

political aspects driven by environment, security and research policies, but also including
input
relations, humanitarian aid and
development of third countries;

from EU policies for enlargement, external

technical aspects – which will involve seeking a common orientation on issues related to
the identification of information products on the environment, collection of space-based
information processing and distribution, and ensuring the appropriate satellite
data,
infrastructure;

institutional/organisational aspects to examine the possibilities of task sharing between the
players in Europe and in the international arena, including economic aspects regarding the
opportunities offered by a public/private partnership.

Three concrete themes for initiating the practical aspects of the development of such an
initiative have been identified:

•

•

•

global change,

environmental stress, and

natural and man-made disasters.

The framework embraces both the information needs of horizontal thematic concerns (e.g.
water), and policy concerns (e.g. security in terms of the general welfare of the European
citizens.

The complexity of the issue calls for a concrete initiative, building on the preparatory
activities, to bring all actors together to ensure that Europe develops a coherent approach to
space-based observation. In the initial phase this joint effort should establish a portfolio of
information products and a comprehensive overview of space system initiatives. It should also
examine the question of a common mechanism for data and information pooling.

15

These actions should benefit from the full support of existing programmatic tools of the
Commission and ESA and include the active participation of Member States. They should
rapidly lead to the formulation of concrete proposals as part of a European action plan.

4.3.4. Common European Security and Defence Policy aspects

The European Council in Helsinki constitutes a major step in the development of the new
Common European Security and Defence Policy (CESDP). The formation of a rapid reaction
force under the EU’s political responsibility has led to the creation of new decision-making
structures and calls for an optimisation of Europe’s intelligence assets.

To meet the CESDP objectives, the EU should be able to call on a range of military (initially
established by the WEU) and civil (established by the EU) means for intelligence gathering
and crisis management. The exploitation of dual-use possibilities and the consolidation of
Member State plans for communications, intelligence gathering and observation satellites
could provide significant benefits. By establishing a focused and policy-driven framework for
co-ordinating relevant research and development efforts, GMES can contribute to providing
Europe with coherent global observation and monitoring capabilities.

With the forthcoming integration of the WEU, its Satellite Centre is due to be transferred to
the European Union. It will be a true asset provided the Centre maintains the dual nature of its
tasks and its capacity for civilian services. The Centre may also be called upon to perform
new tasks and to participate in genuine intelligence work for the purpose of applying the
space-related aspects of the CESDP on the basis of arrangements, which remain to be defined.

5.

IMPLEMENTATION

5.1.

Working together

Over the years the European Space Agency, governed by its Convention, has progressively
developed its relationship with the European Commission. Now working with the
Commission on a European Strategy for Space, it is becoming Europe’s Space Agency in a
wider sense, with a socio-economic dimension that will require it to take up additional tasks.

It is imperative, therefore, that the Commission and ESA develop an appropriate operational
arrangement for working together on the implementation of this strategy. Indeed, there is a
need for formal links between the Union and ESA, which would allow a straightforward
implementation of common activities. Although ad-hoc solutions (Tri-partite
practical
Agreement13 and the joint GALILEO Programme Office14) allow the pursuit of common
projects, a more sustainable path should be established for implementing a common European
strategy.

13

14

A formal agreement based on former article 228 of the EC Treaty was concluded 18.6.1998 between the
European Community, ESA and EUROCONTROL for the development of the European contribution to
a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) (Council decision of 18.6.1998, OJ L 194 of 10.7.98, p.
15). This arrangement made possible the juxtaposition of respective contributions in view of having a
single European programme
The GPO represent a temporary structure aiming at consolidating results of respective industrial
activities required for the definition of Galileo. It was jointly established on the 4th of May 2000 by the
Commission and the Executive of ESA

16

Today, the European Strategy for Space features two projects that differ from traditional
space projects: the global navigation satellite system GALILEO and an information collection
and processing infrastructure for Global Monitoring for Environment and Security. While it is
important to preserve and adapt ESA’s current flexibility and know-how in space activities,
the implementation of these projects requires it to assume further responsibilities.

These must embrace the possibility to deal with a European initiative financed from multiple-
sources and executed in different frameworks and institutional settings. The pursuit of
common objectives in these projects will obviously require the establishment of a clear
operational framework to allow ESA to act, in addition to its activities as a space agency for
its Member States, as the implementing agency for the development and procurement of the
space segment and ground segments associated with such initiatives.The Commission and
ESA are ready to enter a new operational relationship to work together under their respective
competencies for the implementation of this strategy. Therefore it is envisaged that the
Commission and the ESA Executive continue to develop the strategy for space jointly,
monitor its implementation and issue a joint annual report on space.

For this purpose the Commission and the ESA Executive will set up a joint task force.
Amongst others the task force will stimulate the reflection on a possible unified setting for
Member States to review the strategy and its implementation on a regular basis, in order to
propose permanent arrangements before the end of next year. Furthermore, it will elaborate
proposals for framework arrangements for the management of joint projects and outline a
coherent approach with respect to candidate countries.

At the technical level the research and technical centres of ESA and of national space
agencies play a key role in implementing the strategy. These centres have contributed to the
European space successes and have experience and know-how that will enable the use of
European resources to be optimised. This will be imperative in establishing ways of working
together and co-ordinating and distributing the work involved in space programmes.

The development of the new role for ESA will benefit from the establishment of closer
relations between the space agencies in their capacity to elaborate and implement space
programmes. This new relationship is under discussion between ESA and the national space
agencies.

The ESA Council’s decision to work towards a “Network of Technical Centres” to enhance
the effectiveness of the space research centres in Europe is a significant step. The progressive
approach is illustrated by the start-up in 2000, of two pilot networks of centres (for flight
operations and for project reviews). The objective is to have all functions of the technical
centres integrated into relevant networks by 2003 at the latest.

The right balance of activities and responsibilities between the different centres will permit
fruitful and dynamic exchanges of know-how and optimised use of European resources,
equipment and facilities. Pursuance of this approach is of particular importance for future
developments of GALILEO, GMES. In the context of its initiative “Towards a European
Research Area” the Commission can, where appropriate, play an active role and assist with
the creation and the implementation of networks for projects and initiatives adopted in the EU
framework.

17

5.2.

Industrial aspects

As a strategic asset for Europe, the space industry requires a political approach. Through the
creation of large space companies, European industry is consolidating to face the challenge of
the US industrial giants in this sector, confirming the need to unify Europe’s political
approach to space.

To accompany the evolution from the build-up of industrial capability into its consolidation,
which is necessary to succeed in global competition, it will be important to foster a sustained
dialogue between policy makers and industry building upon existing successful fora.

This dialogue should increase awareness of industry’s priorities and preoccupations while
helping to ensure a proper balance between the respective interests of system integrators,
operators, larger suppliers, SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises) and downstream
added-value industry. A wide range of policies, including competition rules, are of direct
relevance in this context.

SMEs require special attention, as they play a key role in fostering innovation. Their low-cost
structures and market-oriented behaviour is necessary to capitalise quickly on market
opportunities and to compete effectively. They could benefit from a co-ordinated action
between the ESA technology transfer programmes and the Community programmes for
innovation.

In view of the multiple-source financing, the principles of procurement will have to be
outlined to ensure that the rules of the sources are respected and that the overall procedures
are consistent and coherent.

Public Private Partnerships as part of an industrial approach

The enhanced opportunities to recover investments in space give rise to a growing demand for
greater private investment in space-related projects, mainly during their deployment and
operational phases.

In this respect, the PPP provides one model that can help in committing the public sector as
well as the complete industrial chain to an operational project. GALILEO is Europe’s
pioneering example, from which similar constructions may be developed for information
systems and services based on observation satellites in the context of GMES.

The arrangements for Public Private Partnerships in projects for the deployment of large
infrastructures based on satellite applications go well beyond financial commitments. Indeed,
the partnership concerns the establishment of both the economic and the political bases for the
projects. A commitment on the public side might include the adaptation of the regulatory
environment, such that it allows investors and industrial partners to facilitate the generation of
return on their investments (e.g. signal encryption required to have a robust/guaranteed signal
shall justify a charging mechanism for the commercial use of the system).

5.3.

International aspects

Space activities with their global dimension develop in a context with a wealth of
international issues, such as:

•

co-operative scientific space missions,

18

•

•

international

aspects of
trade (“fair competition”) and market access through the
regulatory environment (WTO, export control, licensing, allocations of frequencies and
orbital slots within the ITU)

co-ordination of a European position with respect to the United Nations.

Europe has to show coherence vis à vis third countries. The European Union provides a
political framework for co-operative activities, notably for strategic activities like GALILEO
and eventually GMES. It is already effective in various other areas of European activity, such
as the harmonisation of telecommunications.

The association of Canada to ESA, the EU-Russia Dialogue on Space 15and the longstanding
co-operation with the USA in space science and the International Space Station are specific
examples of special relations with third countries that need to be reflected in determining the
most efficient way to embrace space in the EU policies for international co-operation.

15

Under article 67 of the Partnership and Co-operation Agreement with EU support of space R&D in
Russia via the ISTC International Science and Technology Center, established by treaty signed 27.11.92
by EU, J, RF, US, see also Council Regulation (CEE) 3955/92 (OJ L 409, 31.12.92), and Euratom
Regulation CEE-2053/93 (OJ L 187/11 29.07.93).

19

FINANCIAL STATEMENT

1.

TITLE OF OPERATION

Communication from the Commission: “Europe and Space:
chapter”.

turning to a new

2.

BUDGET HEADING(S) INVOLVED

B6-1, B6-2 JRC specific RTD Programme (staff and specific EC credits).

3.

LEGAL BASIS

Council Decision 1999/174/CE of 25.01.1999 (JRC Specific RDT Programme).

4.

4.1

DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION

General objective

The Communication proposes an outline of a strategy for space built around three
objectives:

1.- Strengthening the foundation for space activities preserving independent and
affordable access to space, and ensuring a broad technology base.

2.- Enhancing scientific knowledge for a better understanding of our planet and its
atmosphere, the solar system and the Universe.

3.- Reaping the benefits for markets and society through a demand-driven
exploitation of the space capabilities.

two
The national and European space agencies successfully pursue the first
objectives. The new element in this strategy is the third objective, which introduces
for the first time the EU dimension in space, with EU policies as driving forces.

4.2

Period covered and arrangements for renewal

This communication envisages setting up a joint task force with ESA. This Task
force should deliver its output before December 2001.

20

5.

5.1

5.2

5.3

CLASSIFICATION OF EXPENDITURE OR REVENUE

Compulsory/Non-compulsory expenditure

Differentiated/Non-differentiated appropriations

Type of revenue involved

6.

TYPE OF EXPENDITURE OR REVENUE

Credits destinés à la couverture des dépenses de personnel relatives aux agents
prévus pour l’exécution des activités du CCR.

7.

7.1

FINANCIAL IMPACT

Method of calculating total cost of operation (relation between individual and
total costs)

The task force will use the existing staff resources of the JRC Space co-ordination
Unit (1A, 1B, 1C and 3 END) and will not require any additional staff. The tasks of
the Unit are very similar to the one proposed and are only widening the scope of its
activities. ESA will cover participation by its own resources.

7.2

Itemised breakdown of cost

Commitment appropriations EUR million (at current prices)

Breakdown

Staff Cost

Missions

Studies

Total

2000

2001

2002

Total

pm

pm

pm

pm

pm

60

100

160

pm

pm

pm

pm

pm

60

100

160

The annual breakdown of financing is provisional, and will depend on the evolution
of the Task Force. The work should begin end of December.

8.

FRAUD PREVENTION MEASURES

The fraud prevention measures contained in each of the instruments that are
proposed to finance the different operations will apply. These include inspections,
reporting, monitoring and evaluation.

21

9.

9.1

ELEMENTS OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS

Specific and quantified objectives; target population

The Commission envisages taking an active role in the implementation of the
strategy by:

• Establishing the right political and regulatory conditions for space activities, in

line with and in support of Community policies;

• Acting as an animator to catalyze joint research and development efforts of all

actors in line with the objectives of a European Research Area;

• Bringing together all actors and competencies around common political objectives in
projects of a European-wide interest. This role is articulated concretely in initiatives with a
Community dimension such as GALILEO and eventually a capacity for Global Monitoring
for Environment and Security.

The Commission is ready to enter a new operational relationship with ESA to work
together under their respective competencies for the implementation of this strategy.
Therefore it is envisaged that Commission and the ESA Executive continue to jointly
develop the strategy for space and issue a joint annual report on space.

For this purpose the Commission and the ESA Executive will set up a joint task
force. The task force will also, among other tasks, reflect on a possible unified setting
for Member States to review the strategy and its implementation on a regular basis,
to propose permanent arrangements before the end of next year.
in order
the
Furthermore,
management of joint projects and outline a coherent approach with respect
to
candidate countries.

it will elaborate proposals for

framework arrangements for

9.2

Grounds for the operation

In 1999, European Ministers called on the European Commission and the Executive
of the European Space Agency to elaborate a coherent European Strategy for Space.
The European Parliament welcomed this initiative, emphasizing the importance of
introducing for the first time a Community dimension in Europe’s political approach
to space.

The EU Council and the ESA Council at Ministerial level thereby provided a basis
for a joint consultation of all interested parties concerned and enabled the preparation
of a comprehensive document on a strategy for space that can be subscribed to by
European states, irrespective of whether they are member of ESA or part of the
Union.

Parts of our society have become critically dependent on the use of satellites and
space-based technologies. An autonomous and competitive capability to develop and
manage space-based infrastructures and to collect and use the information deriving
from these systems is an increasingly important asset for an enlarging and further
integrating Union with a greater political weight on the global scene.

Space-based information is going to be a significant element for success in the
knowledge economy of tomorrow. In the public sector, at the level of the Union, it is

22

likely to play an increasing role in the implementation of a wide range of EU policies
research,
such as
agriculture, fishery, regional development and international relations.

telecommunications,

environment,

transport,

culture,

for

Through the emergence of new markets for satellites and notably for downstream
services and user equipment
there are also enhanced possibilities to generate
revenues. The development of these markets and the position of the European
industry in them depend both on the regulatory environment and the availability of
the appropriate space infrastructure. In the face of global competition, industry would
benefit from the political and economic weight of the Union in the development and
the regulation of these markets.

Space presents a security dimension, which has thus far only been dealt with, at
European level, in the context of the WEU. The forthcoming integration of the WEU
into the EU and the new steps taken at the European Summit in Helsinki towards the
development of a Common European Security and Defence Policy (CESDP) are
prompting the European Union to take space capabilities into account, for instance in
decision-making for the planning and monitoring of the Petersberg Tasks (conflict
prevention and crisis management).

9.3

Monitoring and evaluation of the operation

The operation will be monitored and evaluated on the basis of the following criteria:

– annual report on the progress in the implementation of the strategy with ESA

– proposal for permanent arrangement for a unified setting for Member States to

review the strategy and its implementation on a regular basis

The organisational structure put forward is designed to ensure the cost-effective
management of the project including effective monitoring and evaluation.

Performance indicators selected

* output indicators (measurement of resources employed)

* impact indicators (measurement of performance against objectives)

– Details and frequency of planned evaluations

– Assessment of the results obtained (where the operation is to be continued or

renewed).

10.

ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE (SECTION III, PART A OF THE BUDGET)

Not applicable. There will be no expenses on Part A of the Budget.

23