Proposal for a Council Regulation further amending Regulation (EEC) No 3905/88 as regards definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of polyester yarn originating in Taiwan and Turkey
Date: 2000-09-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Taiwan, Türkiye, anti-dumping duty, plastics, textile fibre

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Brussels, 07.09.2000
COM(2000)530 final

Proposal for a

COUNCIL REGULATION

further amending Regulation (EEC) No 3905/88 as regards definitive anti-dumping
duties on imports of polyester yarn originating in Taiwan and Turkey

(presented by the Commission)

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

By Regulation (EEC) No 3905/88 the Council imposed definitive anti-dumping duties on
imports of polyester textured yarn originating in, inter alia, Taiwan. This Regulation was
amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1074/96.

The Commission services carried out an interim review investigation pursuant to Article 11(3)
of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 following a request
lodged by one Taiwanese
exporting producer of polyester textured yarn (LeaLea Enterprise Co., Ltd). The request
alleged that the exporting producer concerned was no longer dumping and that the anti-
dumping measure applicable to it should be repealed. The investigation was duly initiated in
May 1999.

The investigation showed that dumping by the company concerned has been eliminated. In
fact, practically all exports during the investigation period, i.e. 98,4% of total exports to the
EU, were considerably above the corresponding normal value when compared at ex-works
price level.

The investigation also showed that this development was not due to temporary changes but
should be considered as ongoing, the main reason being an increase in the production
efficiency of the company since 1997 due to the setting up of its own production facilities for
both polymers and partially oriented yarn. Thus, the company became a fully integrated
producer of polyester textured yarn. This new situation led to a considerable reduction in the
normal value of polyester textured yarn whilst export prices also increased. Both the reduction
in the normal value and the increase of export prices have applied for some time and are
therefore considered as lasting.

In the light of the foregoing, the Commission proposes that the Council adopt the attached
proposal for a Regulation which amends Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1074/96 so as to
repeal the anti-dumping duty of 12,9% imposed on polyester textured yarn produced and sold
for export to the EU by LeaLea Enterprise Co., Ltd.

2

Proposal for a

COUNCIL REGULATION

further amending Regulation (EEC) No 3905/88 as regards definitive anti-dumping
duties on imports of polyester yarn originating in Taiwan and Turkey

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection
against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community1, and in
particular Article 11(3) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal
Committee,

Whereas:

from the Commission after consulting the Advisory

(1)

(2)

(3)

A. EXISTING MEASURES

By Regulation (EEC) No 3905/882 which was further amended by Regulation (EC)
No 1074/963 the Council
imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of
polyester textured filament yarn originating in Taiwan and Turkey.

B. REQUEST FOR A REVIEW

A request for an interim review of Regulation (EC) No 1074/96 by which the Council
further amended Regulation (EEC) No 3905/88 was received from LeaLea Enterprise
Co., Ltd. ('LeaLea'), a Taiwanese exporting producer of the product concerned subject
to the anti-dumping measures in force.

This request pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (the 'basic
Regulation'), claimed a change in circumstances on the basis of which the measures in
force were established to justify the initiation of a review. According to the request, a
better production efficiency that led to a lasting drop in production costs reduced
LeaLea's normal value. At the same time, LeaLea's export prices have increased.
Lealea claimed that, therefore, the existing measures should be repealed insofar as
they apply to it.

1

2

3

OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p.1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 905/98 (OJ L 128,
30.4.1998, p. 18).
OJ L 347, 16.12.1988, p. 10
OJ L 141, 14.6.1996, p. 45

3

(4)

As the request contained sufficient prima facie evidence, the Commission, after having
consulted the Advisory Committee, decided to initiate an interim review4 of
Regulation (EC) No 1074/96.

(5)

This interim review was limited in scope to the examination of dumping of LeaLea.

C. PROCEDURE

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

The period of investigation of dumping covered the period from 1 April 1998 to
31 March 1999 (the 'investigation period').

The Commission officially advised the representatives of the exporting country of the
the parties directly concerned the
initiation of the interim review and gave all
opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing.

A submission was received from The International Rayon and Synthetic Fibres
Committee, i.e. the complainant in the original case.

The Commission services sent a questionnaire and received detailed information from
LeaLea as well as from one of its related companies.

(10)

The Commission services sought and verified all information they deemed necessary
for the purpose of a determination of dumping and carried out investigations at the
premises of the following companies:

- LeaLea Enterprise Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan

- Solelytex Industrial Corporation, Taipei, Taiwan, i.e. producer related to LeaLea.

(11)

The interested parties were informed of the facts and considerations on the basis of
which it was intended to recommend a further amendment of Regulation (EC) No
3905/88 and were given an opportunity to comment. No comment was received within
the deadline set for that purpose.

D. PRODUCT UNDER CONSIDERATION AND LIKE PRODUCT

1. Product under consideration

(12)

The product under consideration is the same as in the previous investigation, i.e.
polyester textured filament yarn ('PTY'). PTY is directly derived from partially
oriented polyester yarn, and is used in both the weaving and the knitting sectors to
make polyester or polyester/cotton fabrics. The product is currently classifiable within
CN code 5402 33 00. It should be noted, however, that the Council Regulation
imposing definitive measures refers to CN codes 5402 33 10 and 5402 33 90 which
were applicable for the product classification at the time the Regulation was published.

4

OJ C 143, 21.5.1999, p. 4

4

(13)

There are different types of PTY, depending on the weight ('denier'), the number of
filaments and the lustre. There are also different qualities, depending on the efficiency
of the production process. However, no significant differences exist
in the basic
characteristics and uses of the different types and qualities of PTY. All types of PTY
have been and are considered as one product for the purposes of this investigation.

2. Like product

(14) As in the previous investigation, this investigation has shown that the PTY produced
in Taiwan by LeaLea and sold on the Taiwanese market or exported to the Community
has the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and the same uses, and
therefore, is to be considered a like product within the meaning of Article 1 (4) of the
basic Regulation.

E. DUMPING CALCULATION

1. Normal value

(15) As far as the determination of normal value is concerned, it was first established
whether LeaLea’s total domestic sales of the like product were representative in
comparison with its total export sales to the Community. In accordance with Article
2(2) of the basic Regulation this was found to be the case since the domestic sales
volume of LeaLea was at least 5% of its total sales volume to the Community.

(16)

(17)

(18)

For each of the types sold by LeaLea on its domestic market and found to be directly
comparable to the types exported to the Community,
it was examined whether
domestic sales were sufficiently representative for the purposes of Article 2(2) of the
basic Regulation. This was considered to be the case when, during the investigation
period, the total domestic sales volume of a type represented 5% or more of the total
sales volume of the same type exported to the Community.

For the 10 product types meeting the 5% test, an examination was also made as to
whether the domestic sales of each type could be regarded as having been made in the
ordinary course of trade, by establishing the proportion of sales to independent
customers of the type in question not made at a loss. In cases where sales of a type not
made at a loss represented more than 80% of the total domestic sales volume of that
type, normal value was based on a weighted average price of all domestic sales made
during the investigation period (i.e. four types). In cases where the volume of sales of
a type not made at a loss represented at least 10%, but not more than 80% of the total
domestic sales volume of that type, normal value was based on a weighted average
price of the sales not made at a loss only (i.e. five types).

For the product types where the volume of domestic sales was lower than 5% of the
volume exported to the Community (i.e. four types), or where the volume of domestic
sales not made at a loss was less than 10% (i.e. one type), domestic sales of these
product types were considered insufficient within the meaning of Article 2(2) of the
basic Regulation. For these types, normal value was constructed on the basis of the
costs of manufacturing incurred by LeaLea for the exported product type in question
plus a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative costs ('SG&A') and
profits in accordance with Article 2(3) and (6) of the basic Regulation. The SG&A
were based on LeaLea's domestic sales of the like product. The profit margin was

5

based on LeaLea's domestic sales of the like product made in the ordinary course of
trade.

2. Export price

(19)

Since all export sales of the product under consideration were made directly to
independent customers in the Community,
the export price was established in
accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, on the basis of prices paid or
payable.

3. Comparison

(20)

The comparison was made on an ex-factory basis and at the same level of trade. For
the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison, account was taken, in accordance with
Article 2 (10) of the basic Regulation, of differences in factors which were claimed
and demonstrated to affect prices and price comparability,
transport costs,
insurance costs, handling, loading and ancillary costs, credit costs and commissions.

i.e.

4. Dumping margin

(21)

The comparison was made between the weighted average adjusted normal value per
product type and the weighted average net ex-works export price for the same product
type, in accordance with Article 2 (11) of the basic Regulation.

(22)

The comparison as described above showed the existence of a de minimis dumping for
LeaLea (i.e. a dumping margin of 0,3%).

(23)

(24)

(25)

(26)

F. LASTING NATURE OF CHANGED CIRCUMSTANCES

In accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation,
it was also examined
whether the changed circumstances could reasonably be said to be of a lasting nature.
In this respect, it was found that LeaLea's output had considerably increased as
compared to the original investigation period (i.e. 1 July 1993 until 30 June 1994) due
to the setting up in 1997 of its own production facilities for both polymers and
partially oriented yarn. The use of partially oriented yarn produced in-house led to a
significant drop in production costs and a related fall in domestic prices of PTY which,
together with an increase in export prices, can, at least partly, be considered as a
lasting change.

G. CONCLUSION

The investigation found that dumping during the investigation period has been reduced
to a de minimis level due to a fall in the normal value and an increase in export prices.
These changes are considered to be of a lasting nature. This is particularly the case in
respect of the reduction in the normal value, which is due to a better production
efficiency that led to a lasting drop in production costs.

In the light of the foregoing, the Council considers that the measures currently in force
for LeaLea should be repealed.

Since the repeal of the measures concerns only LeaLea, and not Taiwan as a whole,
LeaLea remains subject to the proceeding and may be reinvestigated in any subsequent
review carried out for Taiwan pursuant to Article 11 of the basic Regulation,

6

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 3 of Regulation N° 1074/96 shall read as follows:

Article 1

<<Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 3905/88 shall be replaced by the following:

"Article 2

1. A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of polyester textured filament
yarn (PTY) falling within CN code 5402 33 00 originating in Taiwan and Turkey.

2. The rate of the duty applicable to the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, before customs
clearance, shall be as follows:

Country

Manufacturer

Rate of duty

Additional
Taric code

Taiwan

Nan-Ya Plastics Corporation, Taipei

10,6%

Shingkong Synthetic Fibres Corp., Taipei

Zig Sheng Ind. Co., Ltd., Taipei

Far Eastern Textiles Ltd., Taipei

Chung Shing Textile Co., Ltd., Taipei

Tuntex Distinct. Corp., Taipei

Hsin Pao Textile Co., Ltd., Taipei

LeaLea Enterprise Co., Ltd., Taipei

Others

Turkey

7%

7%

6,6%

5,5%

0%

0%

0%

16,1%

Sasa-Artificial and Synthetic Fibres Inc.,
Adana

8,7%

Nergis-Tekstil Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S.,
Bursa

8,3%

Korteks-Mensucat Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S.,
Bursa

7,6%

8162

8163

8163

8894

8161

8160

8160

8160

8164

8166

8167

8892

Others

15,2%

8170

7

3. Unless otherwise specified,
apply.">>

the provisions in force concerning customs duties shall

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official
Journal of the European Communities.

Article 2

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels,

For the Council
The President

8