do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
2000/453/EC: Commission Decision of 11 July 2000 amending Decision 96/252/EC accepting undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of certain tube or pipe fittings, of iron or steel, originating in the People's Republic of China, Croatia and Thailand (notified under document number C(2000) 1957)
Date: 2000-07-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: China, Croatia, Thailand, anti-dumping legislation, anti-dumping measure, piping

21.7.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

L 182/25

II

(Acts whose publication is not obligatory)

COMMISSION

COMMISSION DECISION

of 11 July 2000

amending Decision 96/252/EC accepting undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping
proceeding concerning imports of certain tube or pipe fittings, of iron or steel, originating in the
People's Republic of China, Croatia and Thailand

(notified under document number C(2000) 1957)

(2000/453/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22
December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from
countries not members of the European Community (1), as
amended by Regulation (EC) No 905/98 (2), and in particular
Article 8(1) thereof,

Having regard to Commission Decision 96/252/EC (3) and in
particular Article 1 thereof,

After consulting the Advisory Committee,

Whereas:

A. PREVIOUS PROCEDURE

(1)

The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 584/96 imposed
definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of certain tube
or pipe fittings, of
iron or steel originating in the
People's Republic of China, Croatia and Thailand and by
Decision 96/252/EC accepted undertakings from certain
exporting producers. These undertakings concerned also
the Thai company Thai Benkan Co. Ltd.

B. PRESENT INVESTIGATION

(2)

The present investigation carried out in the framework
of an interim review requested by one Thai producer/
exporter Thai Benkan Co. Ltd, has led to a finding of no

dumping for the exporter concerned and has confirmed
the lasting nature of these changed circumstances (4).

Therefore, it is proposed to amend Article 1 of Decision
96/252/EC by deleting the reference to the undertaking
of Thai Benkan Co. Ltd Prapadaeng-Samutprakarn,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 1(b) of Decision 96/252/EC shall be amended as
follows.

The reference to Thai Benkan Co. Ltd, Prapadaeng-Samutpra-
karn shall be deleted.

Article 2

This amendment shall take effect on the day following publica-
tion of this Decision in the Official
the European
Communities.

Journal of

Done at Brussels, 11 July 2000.

For the Commission

Pascal LAMY

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 128, 30.4.1998, p. 18.
(3) OJ L 84, 3.4.1996, p. 46.

(4) See page 1 of this Official Journal.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1502/2000 of 11 July 2000 fixing the export refunds on poultrymeat
Date: 2000-07-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: export refund, poultrymeat, third country

L 172/12

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

12.7.2000

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1502/2000

of 11 July 2000

fixing the export refunds on poultrymeat

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75 of 29
October 1975 on the common organization of the market in
poultrymeat (1), as last amended by Commission Regulation
(EC) No 2916/95 (2), and in particular Article 8(3) thereof,

Whereas:

(1)

(2)

Article 8 of Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75 provides that
the difference between prices on the world market for
the products listed in Article 1(1) of that Regulation and
prices for those products within the Community may be
covered by an export refund.

It follows from applying these rules and criteria to the
present situation on the market in poultrymeat that the
refund should be fixed at an amount which would
permit Community participation in world trade and

would also take account of the nature of these exports
and their importance at the present time.

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in
accordance with the opinion of
the Management
Committee for Poultrymeat and Eggs,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The list of product codes for which, when they are exported,
the export refund referred to in Article 8 of Regulation (EEC)
No 2777/75 is granted, and the amount of that refund shall be
as shown in the Annex hereto.

This Regulation shall enter into force on 12 July 2000.

Article 2

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 July 2000.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 77.
(2) OJ L 305, 19.12.1995, p. 49.

12.7.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

L 172/13

to the Commission Regulation of 11 July 2000 fixing the export refunds on poultrymeat

ANNEX

Product code

Destination
of refund (1)

0105 11 11 9000
0105 11 19 9000
0105 11 91 9000
0105 11 99 9000
0105 12 00 9000
0105 19 20 9000

0207 12 10 9900

0207 12 90 9190

0207 12 90 9990

01
01
01
01
01
01

02
03
02
03
02
03

Amount
of refund

EUR/100 units

1,20
1,20
1,20
1,20
2,60
2,60

EUR/100 kg

27,00
27,00
27,00
27,00
27,00
27,00

(1) The destinations are as follows:

01 All, except for the United States of America,
02 Angola, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman, the United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Yemen, Lebanon, Iraq and Iran,
03 Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Ukraine.

NB: The product codes and the footnotes are defined in amended Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2339/00 by Stephen Hughes (PSE) to the Commission. Rules concerning dangerous dogs.
Date: 2000-07-11
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU statistics, competence of the Member States, domestic animal, physical aggression

C 81 E/188

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

13.3.2001

(2001/C 81 E/240)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2321/00

by Roy Perry (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(30 June 2000)

Subject: European funding

How much money has been paid from European Union funds to the benefit of projects in the County of
Hampshire, the City of Southampton, the City of Portsmouth and the County of the Isle of Wight over the
last four years giving a breakdown by fund, project, year and area?

Supplementary answer
given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(20 September 2000)

In view of the length of its answer, the Commission is sending it direct to the Honourable Member and to
Parliament(cid:146)s Secretariat.

(2001/C 81 E/241)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2339/00

by Stephen Hughes (PSE) to the Commission

(11 July 2000)

Subject: Rules concerning dangerous dogs

Does the Commission have statistics on the number of people attacked by dogs within the EU each year,
broken down by numbers of deaths and injuries and the ages of the victims?

Laws concerning the control of potentially dangerous dogs vary considerably from Member State to
Member State. Does the Commission consider it necessary to propose uniform minimum standards to
protect, in particular, children travelling within the EU?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(13 September 2000)

The Commission must inform the Honourable Member that it does not have statistics relating to the
number of accidents in the Community involving attacks by dogs.

There is no provision in the Commission(cid:146)s current work programme to propose legislation laying down
minimum Community standards to protect against aggressive dogs.

In the opinion of the Commission, it is up to the Member States, in line with the principle of subsidiarity,
to take any necessary measures; these must also respect the provisions of the EC Treaty.