do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1324/2000 of 22 June 2000 fixing the maximum export refund on oats in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1897/1999
Date: 2000-06-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: award of contract, export refund, oats

23.6.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

L 149/19

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1324/2000

of 22 June 2000

fixing the maximum export refund on oats in connection with the invitation to tender issued in
Regulation (EC) No 1897/1999

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30
June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in
cereals (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1253/
1999 (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of
29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the
application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the
granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be
taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3),
as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2513/98 (4),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1897/1999
of 2 September 1999 on a special intervention measure for
cereals in Finland and Sweden (5), as last amended by Regula-
tion (EC) No 2482/1999 (6), and in particular Article 8 thereof,

Whereas:

(1)

(2)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of
oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from
Finland or Sweden to all third countries was opened
pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1897/1999.

Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1897/1999 provides
that the Commission may, on the basis of the tenders
notified, in accordance with the procedure laid down in

Article 23 of Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92, decide to fix
a maximum export refund taking account of the criteria
referred to in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95.
In that case a contract is awarded to any tenderer whose
bid is equal to or lower than the maximum refund.

The application of the abovementioned criteria to the
current market situation for the cereal in question results
in the maximum export refund being fixed at
the
amount specified in Article 1.

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in
the Management
accordance with the opinion of
Committee for Cereals,

(3)

(4)

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified from 16 to 22 June 2000, pursuant to the
invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1897/1999,
the maximum refund on exportation of oats
shall be
EUR 44,90/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 23 June 2000.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 June 2000.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 181, 1.7.1992, p. 21.
(2) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 18.
(3) OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7.
(4) OJ L 313, 21.11.1998, p. 16.
(5) OJ L 233, 3.9.1999, p. 10.
(6) OJ L 303, 26.11.1999, p. 3.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1320/2000 of 22 June 2000 determining the extent to which applications in the beef and veal sector for import rights lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 980/2000 may be accepted
Date: 2000-06-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: CCT duties, beef, import, quantitative restriction, tariff quota

L 149/10

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

23.6.2000

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1320/2000

of 22 June 2000

determining the extent to which applications in the beef and veal sector for import rights lodged
pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 980/2000 may be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 980/2000 of
11 May 2000 opening and providing for the administration of
a tariff quota for meat of bovine animals, frozen, falling within
CN code 0202 and products
falling within CN code
0206 29 91 (from 1 July 2000 to 30 June 2001) (1), and in
particular Article 5 thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 980/2000 provides in particular for the
quantities reserved for traditional importers to be allocated in
proportion to their imports during the period 1 July 1997 to
31 March 2000 under Regulation (EC) No 1042/97 (2), as
amended by Regulation (EC) No 260/98 (3), Regulation (EC) No
1142/98 (4) and Regulation (EC) No 995/1999 (5). In the other
cases the quantities applied for exceed the quantities available
under Article 2(2) of that Regulation. Therefore, the quantities

applied for should be reduced on a proportional basis in
accordance with Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 980/2000,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Every application for the right to import lodged in accordance
with Regulation (EC) No 980/2000 shall be granted to the
following extent:

(a) 273,620 kg/t imported during the period 1 July 1997 to
31 March 2000 under Regulations (EC) No 1042/97, (EC)
No 1142/98 and (EC) No 995/1999 for importers as
defined in Article 2(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 980/2000;

(b) 6,287 tonnes per application in the case of operators as
defined in Article 2(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 980/2000.

This Regulation shall enter into force on 23 June 2000.

Article 2

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 June 2000.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 113, 12.5.2000, p. 27.
(2) OJ L 152, 11.6.1997, p. 2.
(3) OJ L 25, 31.1.1998, p. 42.
(4) OJ L 159, 3.6.1998, p. 11.
(5) OJ L 122, 12.5.1999, p. 3.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2020/00 by Gerhard Hager (NI) to the Council. Progress with regard to the Corpus Juris.
Date: 2000-06-22
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: corpus juris (EU)

C 89 E/130

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

20.3.2001

Answer given by Mr Liikanen on behalf of the Commission

(28 July 2000)

There is a printing error in the Dutch version of Annex I to Commission Directive 93/46/EEC published in
the Official Journal of the European Communities. The error is only in the name of the substance, but the
CN Code is correct. Council Directive 92/109/EEC had already classified 3,4 Methylenedioxyphenile
propane-2-one (CN Code: 2932 90 77) in the list of Category 1 substances, and in the amendment to
this Directive the substance in question continued to figure in this category. Thus the substance is still
classified and its illicit use is monitored under Directive 92/109/EEC.

Any criminal proceedings are a matter for the national authorities and result
implementing measures adopted as part of the transposition of the said Directives into national
The Commission has no information on possible convictions referred to by the honourable Member.

from the national
law.

The Commission has requested that a correction be published in the Official Journal.

(2001/C 89 E/141)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2020/00

by Gerhard Hager (NI) to the Council

(22 June 2000)

Subject: Progress with regard to the Corpus Juris

Concerning a proposal for a Council directive on combating fraud and forgeries in connection with non-
cash transactions, the Commission has adopted a new approach to the harmonisation of the Member
States(cid:146) legal systems. The objective is no longer to achieve textual uniformity regarding the definition of
criminal offences in all Member States but simply to achieve a precise definition of the result to be
achieved in each of the Member States. The projected catalogue of European law has clearly been
abandoned.

In view of this:

1. What progress has been made with the Corpus Juris project?

2. What have been the costs of this project?

3. Does the Council consider that there is any point in continuing with the project in view of the new

regulatory approach referred to above?

Reply

(23 October 2000)

The Council has not been seized with any initiative relating to (cid:145)Corpus Juris(cid:146) and cannot therefore answer
the questions of the Honourable Member of the European Parliament.

(2001/C 89 E/142)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2023/00

by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(21 June 2000)

Subject: Delays in making payments from subprogramme 1.3 (cid:145)School Libraries(cid:146) under the second CSF

(cid:145)Education and Basic Training(cid:146) programme

A year ago, the 60-member Book Selection Committee completed the list of books which it had selected
for school library collections, a measure which is receiving funding from the (cid:145)Education and Basic Training(cid:146)