WRITTEN QUESTION P-1379/00 by Ari Vatanen (PPE-DE) to the Commission. Cross-border cooperation between the EU and Russia.
Date: 2000-04-27
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU aid, EU programme, Russia, cross-border cooperation, frontier region, regional policy

C 81 E/34

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

13.3.2001

(2001/C 81 E/039)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1379/00

by Ari Vatanen (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(27 April 2000)

Subject: Cross-border cooperation between the EU and Russia

The land border between the EU and Russia makes the world(cid:146)s widest gap in living standards. The
difference can be observed by comparing (cid:129) for example (cid:129) my home, which is 20 km from the present-
day border, with the house in which my mother was born, which found itself in Soviet Karelia nearly
60 years ago. The difference in the standard of living is like a time-bomb which will fall into our lap if the
Union does not invest a great deal of effort in cooperation in border areas and in ironing out the
differences between them. The EU(cid:146)s northern border areas are one of the most remote regions of the
Union, which it has a particular responsibility to develop under (Article 299(2)) of the founding Treaty.

Despite the seriousness of the problem, there are difficulties in implementing EU programmes in these
borders areas. The results of the Interreg II programme from 1992 to 1999 show that it has been
particularly complicated reconciling the Interreg programme with programmes relating to EU non member
countries (such as TACIS). The border area authorities themselves regard the main problem as being that
the Interreg programmes are project-based, with decision-making taking place at regional level, whereas
decisions on the TACIS CBC programme are taken in Brussels and it is not project-based.

To resolve the problem the EU and Russian border areas have established the Karelia Euregio to coordinate
border cooperation. The aim is that the Karelia Euregio would be an experimental project, in which the
Euregio administrative committee would take decisions at regional level affecting both programmes on a
project by project basis. The Karelia Euregio experiment would improve the impact of the EU programmes
in the EU(cid:146)s and Russia(cid:146)s border areas.

In his oral hearing before the European Parliament, Commissioner Barnier said he regarded the reconcilia-
tion of the Interreg and TACIS programmes as one of the Union(cid:146)s central regional policy objectives. Is this
the view of the Commission as a whole? How does the Commission propose to facilitate cross-border
cooperation between the EU and Russia? What attitude does the Commission intend to take to the
experiment proposed by the Karelia Euregio?

Answer given Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(6 June 2000)

As indicated in the communication (cid:145)Strategic Objectives 2000-2005(cid:146) (1) of March 2000, the Commission
attributes special importance to reinforcing co-operation with Russia.

From the point of view of the structural funds, this concern is reflected in Article 20 of the Council
Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999,
laying down general provisions on the Structural
Funds (2), which stipulates that due attention should be given to improved co-ordination between Interreg
and the TACIS programme.

In the Interreg III guidelines, the Commission emphasises that effective co-ordination and a consistency
between Interreg III and TACIS assistance have to be established, notably by way of elaborating operational
guidelines. In addition, Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 99/2000 of 29 December 1999 concerning
the provision of assistance to the partner States in Eastern Europe and Central Asia (3),
in relation to
TACIS, also makes particular reference to cross-border co-operation with Community border regions.
Consequently, the Commission is currently improving the basis for further co-ordination between Interreg
and TACIS, which should help facilitate co-operation between the Community and Russia.

13.3.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 81 E/35

As a result, existing co-ordination at project level will be complemented by a greater degree of coherence
at programming level and by the definition of objectives and co-operation areas. In the implementation of
Interreg III, the management of small projects promoting cross-border activities could be directly entrusted
to cross-border co-operation initiatives, such as Euregios.

In the light of these considerations, the Commission will take into account examples of co-operation
across borders, such as the Euregio Karelia.

(1) OJ C 81, 21.3.2000.
(2) OJ L 161, 26.6.1999.
(3) OJ L 12, 18.1.2000.

(2001/C 81 E/040)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1391/00

by Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou (PPE-DE) to the Council

(3 May 2000)

Subject: Immigration policy

Illegal immigration to Europe is increasingly taking the form of slave-trafficking, devaluing human dignity
and often costing lives.

Does the European Union bear any responsibility for this? As an area which receives immigrants, should
the European Union not develop a common immigration policy establishing clear and mutually acceptable
relations with the immigrants(cid:146) countries of origin, which will combat illegality and trafficking in human
beings, as well as illegal employment in the European Union? Will the countries applying for membership
participate in the process of drawing up and implementing these policies?

Reply

(29 September 2000)

The Council fully shares the view expressed by the Honourable Member with regard to illegal immigration
and its consequences.

In December 1998, the Council set up the High Level Working Group on Asylum and Migration with a
view to developing a cross-pillar, integrated approach in order to address the root causes of migration and
flight. The High Level Working Group was tasked with drawing up Action Plans for certain source
countries of asylum seekers and/or illegal migration. Action Plans for five countries (Afghanistan and the
region, Iraq, Morocco, Somalia and Sri Lanka) were adopted by the Council in October last year and
endorsed by Heads of State at the Tampere European Council.

The implementation of those Action Plans is currently under consideration by the High Level Working
Group which is called upon to address a report on such implementation to the European Council
in December 2000. It is clear that the Action Plans can not be imposed on the countries concerned, but
must be implemented in close cooperation with the authorities of those countries. The Tampere European
Council clearly recognised the need for a comprehensive approach to migration. In point 11 of the
conclusions of that Council such an approach should address (cid:145)political, human rights and development
issues in countries and regions of origin and transit. This requires combating poverty, improving living
conditions and job opportunities, preventing conflicts and consolidating democratic states and ensuring
respect for human rights, in particular rights of minorities, women and children. To that end, the Union as
well as Member States are invited to contribute, within their respective competence under the Treaties, to a
greater coherence of
the Union. Partnership with third countries
concerned will also be a key element for the success of such a policy, with a view to promoting co-
development.(cid:146)

internal and external policies of