WRITTEN QUESTION E-1326/00 by Hiltrud Breyer (Verts/ALE) to the Commission. Pesticides affecting Spanish fruit and vegetables and the possibility of introducing an EU pesticides passport.
Date: 2000-04-27
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: consumer protection, food inspection, food safety, fruit, pesticide residue, traceability, vegetable

C 136 E/2

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

8.5.2001

(2001/C 136 E/002)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0545/00

by William Newton Dunn (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(28 February 2000)

Subject: British stamp duty discriminating against British businesses

Bearing in mind one of the principles of the treaties, i.e. that there must be no discrimination between
citizens of the European Union, is it legal for the British Government to levy stamp duty on individual
transactions in shares in British companies but to allow transactions in shares in non-British companies to
be exempt from stamp duty?

Supplementary answer
given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(14 September 2000)

Stamp duty reserve tax is governed by Part IV of the Finance Act 1986 (sections 86 and seq.). Under these
irrespective of the residence of the purchaser, to transfers of shares in British
rules it only applies,
companies or shares in relation to which a register is kept in the United Kingdom. This limitation of tax
jurisdiction is in line with the concept of territoriality, a general principle of international law. Moreover,
since stamp duty reserve tax is not harmonised at Community level, the United Kingdom is free to design
it according to its own preferences as long as the EC Treaty principles are respected, in particular that of
non-discrimination. The existence of a national tax which does not also exist in other Member States does
by its very nature charge predominantly residents and nationals of that Member State. However, this effect
does of course not constitute discrimination contrary to the EC Treaty.

(2001/C 136 E/003)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1326/00

by Hiltrud Breyer (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(27 April 2000)

Subject: Pesticides affecting Spanish fruit and vegetables and the possibility of introducing an EU pesticides

passport

In view of the high concentrations of pesticide residues on Spanish fruit and vegetables which have been
found in recent weeks, a reported by the German Association of Fruit Trade Enterprises ((cid:145)Der Spiegel(cid:146)
9/2000, p. 86), and with a view to introducing an EU pesticides passport in response to the need for
transparency for food safety, and in order to facilitated food checks, I should like to know:

1.

Is the Commission aware that for a number of weeks now Spanish paprika highly polluted with
pesticides have been supplied to Germany and that the permissible maximum concentration of the
anti-mite product Methiocarb has been exceeded?

If so, when did the Commission receive the relevant data and to what extent have the public been
informed?

2. What action does the Commission intend to take to comply with the need for transparency in food

safety?

3.

Since an increasingly broad spectrum of pesticides is being used, and food inspectors are not aware
that they have been used, the search for plant protective residues has proved ineffective and it is at
variance with the need for transparency in food safety. What action does the Commission envisage to
put an end to this unacceptable state of affairs?

8.5.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 136 E/3

4. Does the Commission see any possibility of introducing a Union-wide compulsory EU pesticides
passport on which the producer would note the use of different pesticides on the crops, thereby
facilitating effective food checks (since false declarations would render the producer liable to
prosecution)?

If not, what are the obstacles to a EU pesticides passport?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(23 June 2000)

The Commission has not been notified of excessive residues of Methiocarb. However, the Commission was
made aware through the rapid alert system for foodstuffs, that Spanish peppers containing excess residues
of methamidophos, of acephate and endosulfan were circulating in the Community at the end of 1999 and
early 2000. All information received was immediately transmitted to the official contact points in the
Member States for appropriate action.

In the white paper on food safety (1), the Commission reaffirmed its intention to apply full transparency in
all matters relating to food safety, in particular by extending the level of transparency already achieved by
making public scientific opinions, inspection reports, monitoring reports and similar documentation.

The Commission agrees that the functioning of the current system can be improved in line with the
proposals outlined in the white paper on food safety. The increased number of rapid alerts being issued is
linked to the increasing number of pesticides being set at the lower limit of analytical determination (zero)
rather than a lack of data on residues and the introduction of residue limits for products which were
previously unregulated. All plant protection products that are currently used in the Community are subject
to the stringent safety requirements of Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991, concerning the
placing of plant protection products on the market (2). Its provisions also include the need to have an
appropriate analytical method to detect residues before authorisations can be granted by Member States.
Increasingly these methods are multi-residue methods permitting the detection of a wide range of
pesticides. Given the availability, applicability and actual use of both multi-residue and specific analytical
methods by the regulatory authorities in the Member States, as well as the results of national and
Community-coordinated monitoring programmes for pesticides residues in cereals, fruit and vegetables,
the Commission does not agree that
the search for plant protection product residues has proved
ineffective. The lack of detection of residues is more likely to be an indication that residues are not
present rather than a failure of the methods. Consistent with its view of the need for transparency in food
safety, the results of the annual targeted Community-coordinated monitoring programmes for pesticides
residues in cereals, fruit and vegetables are published each year on the Internet by the Commission, as are
the reports of monitoring inspections made by its Food and Veterinary office.

The Commission has no plans at present to propose a Community-wide compulsory pesticide food
labelling passport. At present only two Member States have obligatory schemes providing for the recording
of pesticide use on the farm.

(1) COM(1999) 719 final.
(2) OJ L 230, 19.8.1991.

(2001/C 136 E/004)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1480/00

by Karl-Heinz Florenz (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(11 May 2000)

Subject: Scope of checks made hitherto on compliance with foodstuffs and animal-feed legislation

The EU Commission has, in connection with the White Paper on Food Safety, submitted a preoposal for a
directive that would require the percentages of all the components of compound-feed ingredients to be
declared.