WRITTEN QUESTION E-1246/00 by Bart Staes (Verts/ALE) to the Commission. Adjustment programmes for tax systems in Southern Africa.
Date: 2000-04-14
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Botswana, EU aid, Eswatini, Lesotho, Namibia, aid programme, tax reform

C 89 E/18

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

20.3.2001

On 1 March 2000 the Commission decided that the south of Italy satisfied the eligibility criteria for the
derogation in Article 87(3)(a) of the EC Treaty for the duration of the new regional aid map, i.e. until
31 December 2006.

In the case of the Structural Funds, the unemployment rate is one of the criteria used by the Commission
to apportion between the Member States the commitment appropriations allocated under Objectives 1
and 3 for the period 2000-06. The unemployment rate is also one of the criteria used by the Commission
to determine in each Member State concerned the population ceiling eligible for Objective 2.

(1) OJ C 74, 10.3.1998, and OJ C 334, 12.12.1995.
(2) OJ C 384, 10.12.1998.

(2001/C 89 E/016)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1246/00

by Bart Staes (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(14 April 2000)

Subject: Adjustment programmes for tax systems in Southern Africa

In order to cope with the financial consequences of the free trade agreement between the European Union
and South Africa, Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia and Swaziland will have to drastically reform their tax
systems. Together with South Africa, these four countries are in a customs union and are not allowed to
levy duties at their common frontiers. Accordingly, EU products are bought and sold (cid:129) via South Africa (cid:129)
duty-free, even though Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia and Swaziland are heavily dependent on customs
tariffs for their revenue. In its answer to written question E-2382/99 (1), the Commission announced its
willingness to help the countries in Southern Africa with the tax reforms needed to diversify their sources
of income.

Has the Commission already started programmes for advising the countries in question on the tax

1.
reforms needed to diversify their sources of income? If not, why not?

2. When will the programmes be started and by when must the adjustments be made?

3. What institutions and/or organisations are involved in the programmes?

4. What is the main thrust of the programmes with the countries in question?

5. What budget will be released for the programmes?

(1) OJ C 280 E, 3.10.2000, p. 36.

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(15 June 2000)

The Commission would like to repeat its assurance to the Honourable Member, following the answer to
the Honourable Member(cid:146)s Written Question E-765/00 (1), that the Community is ready to assist Botswana,
Lesotho, Namibia and Swaziland (BLNS) in implementing fiscal reform according to their own established
timetables and their own fixed priorities.

The Commission is currently assisting the BLNS countries, at their request, with the preparation of a
general support programme. The first phase will undertake analysis of adjustment issues arising from trade
liberalisation and prepare activities to take advantage of the new opportunities in addition to coping with
the necessary adjustment process. This phase is valued at € 6 million and is foreseen to be implemented
over a three year period from January 2001-December 2003. It could be set up as a BLNS wide or a South
facility, while its financing would come from a mix of European
African Customs Union (SACU)

20.3.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 89 E/19

development fund (EDF) regional funds and European programme for reconstruction and development in
South Africa (EPRD) resources and would thus be additional to national programme funding. South Africa
has already accepted to earmark € 3 million of the EPRD allocation of 2000. A second phase will involve
a package for assisting the private sector to enhance its competitiveness (through the introduction of new
techniques, improved management and work practices and retraining of labour) and the design, where
transitional budgetary support programmes within the context of coherent macro
appropriate, of
economic programmes. A third phase would focus on the implementation of such programmes.

Furthermore, a fiscal restructuring programme has been prepared at the request of Swaziland and will be
presented to the EDF committee in June 2000. The project will be implemented over a four year period at
a cost of 5,6 M€. The purpose of the project is to assist Swaziland in building up its capacity to formulate
and implement a sound and equitable fiscal policy within a continued stable macro-economic environ-
ment. The International monetary fund (IMF) has been involved in the preparation of this programme.

Botswana recently submitted a request for support for an intended fiscal reform programme with the
objective of enhancing government revenue. Its projected results will include the introduction of value
added tax and the improvement of the assessment and the collection of taxes and duties. It has been agreed
firstly concentrate on the recruiting of a revenue adviser
with Botswana that Community aid will
(July 2000) who will then assist with the design of a fiscal reform project.

(1) OJ C 46 E, 13.2.2001.

(2001/C 89 E/017)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1270/00

by Alejandro Cercas (PSE), Miguel Mart(cid:237)nez Mart(cid:237)nez (PSE),
Emilio MenØndez del Valle (PSE) and Mar(cid:237)a Sornosa Mart(cid:237)nez (PSE) to the Commission

(19 April 2000)

Subject: Internal competitions COM/TA/99, COM/TB/99 and COM/TC/99

On 2 December 1999 the Director-General of the Commission(cid:146)s Administration and Personnel department
decided to (cid:145)reopen(cid:146) the above three competitions until 22 December 1999, although the deadline for
applications laid down in the relevant notices of competition had expired at 4 p.m. on 30 July 1999, and
to postpone to a later date the written tests that were due to take place on 6/7 December 1999.

1. Would the Commission:

(cid:129) indicate why, disregarding the opinion of the selection boards, it decided to admit not only candidates
who, in the words of its decision of 2 December 1999, had not submitted all the documents required
in accordance with point XII of the notices of competition (cid:129) and thus had failed to comply with the
rules laid down by the Commission itself for those competitions (cid:129) but also new candidates who were
permitted to apply for the competitions in question between 2 and 22 December 1999, in other
words long after the officially published deadline?

(cid:129) provide the names and state the number of candidates, by competition category, who were permitted

by the selection boards to take part in the competition after 2 December 1999?

(cid:129) certify that the candidates whose applications were accepted after 2 December 1999 did not include
any persons who were related to Members of the Commission or members of Commissioners(cid:146) private
offices?

(cid:129) indicate the nature of the guarantees offered by the Administration to persuade the selection boards to

resume their duties after having tendered their resignation?