WRITTEN QUESTION P-1301/00 by Ursula Stenzel (PPE-DE) to the Commission. Sapard and ISPA funds for Poland.
Date: 2000-04-12
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Poland, accession to the European Union, agricultural policy, pre-accession aid, rural development

C 89 E/24

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

20.3.2001

(2001/C 89 E/021)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1292/00

by Olle Schmidt (ELDR) to the Council

(27 April 2000)

Subject: UCITS (Undertakings for Collective Investments in Transferable Securities)

The market in various kinds of financial services has developed rapidly in recent years. It is therefore
important for modernisation of the relevant legislation to keep pace with these changes. Much still remains
to be done before there is a functioning internal market in this sector.

The European Parliament voted on the UCITS report, for which I was rapporteur, in February. What action
has the Portuguese Presidency taken to ensure progress is made on this issue? How much debate has taken
place on the subject, and what does the Council consider to be the biggest stumbling blocks? Can the
Council give any indication as to when it envisages adopting a common position?

Reply

(23 October 2000)

The Council is currently examining the two proposals, as amended by the Commission on 30 May 2000,
for a Directive amending Directive 85/611/EEC on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative
provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) and the
amendments proposed by the European Parliament in February 2000.

Several meetings have been organised within the Council to analyse the amendments proposed by the
European Parliament and the Commission(cid:146)s amended proposals. On 17 July the Council held a policy
debate on the proposals. Following that debate, the Council took the view that it was necessary to reach
political agreement in the course of October on the first Directive and called for rapid progress on the
second Directive with a view to reaching political agreement on the latter before 1 March 2001. At that
date it would be necessary to take stock of adoption of the first Directive.

(2001/C 89 E/022)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1301/00

by Ursula Stenzel (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(12 April 2000)

Subject: Sapard and ISPA funds for Poland

In recent weeks there have been signs of dissension between Poland and the EU, underlying which there
are no doubt specific problems, particularly regarding the release of Sapard and ISPA resources.

On the Polish side, it is said that the rural development and infrastructure items in the Polish budget are
blocked because the European Union has so far omitted to announce the rules governing the use of these
funds.

The Commission is blamed for the delay.

1. What is the real reason why Sapard and ISPA funds are still in the pipeline?

2. What measures need to be taken by the Polish authorities for the amounts concerned to be made
available?

20.3.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 89 E/25

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(15 May 2000)

The Sapard (Community support for pre-accession measures for agriculture and rural development) funds
cannot be released at least until the rural development plan has been approved. However, with the
envisaged decentralised system for implementation of the Sapard programme it is necessary also to
conclude bilateral agreements laying down obligations for both Poland and the Community. It is also
necessary for the agency charged with implementation of the Sapard programme and paying the Sapard
funds to be accredited and approved by the Commission. The draft rural development plan upon which
the programme is to be based was presented to the Commission on 6 April 2000. The Council Regulation
allows the Commission six months to approve this plan which must be scrutinised before it can be
accepted as a programme. Moreover, the agreements and the approval of the paying and implementing
agency are needed, not only for technical and legal reasons, but also to safeguard the Community(cid:146)s budget
resources.

Instrument for structural policies for pre-accession (ISPA) funds can only be committed to individual
projects which are submitted by Poland and approved by the Commission acting with the ISPA manage-
ment committee. Eleven environment projects were submitted to the Commission on 2 March 2000 and
one transport project on 24 March 2000. Once the projects have been assessed by the Commission to
ensure that they meet all the requirements set down in the Regulation, they will be presented to the ISPA
management committee for approval. Four meetings of the committee are scheduled for the examination
and approval of projects, the goal being to commit before the end of this year all ISPA funds available for
Poland, i.e. € 348 million. The first of these meetings of the ISPA management committee is scheduled for
6 June 2000 and three more meetings are scheduled in July 2000, August 2000 and November 2000.

The financial rules and procedures for ISPA were approved (with some minor exceptions) by the ISPA
management committee on 16 February 2000 and transmitted to the Polish authorities immediately
afterwards. The immediate priority at present is to close and prepare priority projects for submission to the
Commission. This does not require detailed knowledge of financial rules and procedures, most of which
will only become relevant when the first projects have been approved.

As regards the Sapard funds, the Polish authorities will need to respond to any questions that arise during
the process of approval of the rural development plan before it can be accepted as a programme. They will
also need to ratify the bilateral agreements and to complete work to establish the paying and implement-
ing agency.

The draft Commission regulation laying down detailed financial provisions for the decentralised manage-
ment of Sapard is currently put to the approval of Member States in the European agricultural guidance
and guarantee fund management committee. However, the Commission has started to inform the Polish
authorities systematically about work to be done, and has provided assistance to them under the Phare
programme since early 1999.

As regards ISPA, in order to make the funds productive, the Polish side needs to reinforce its implementa-
tion capacity in order to be in a position to produce well-prepared projects that meet the main strategic
priorities in the transport and environment sectors. The capacity to administer the projects financed under
ISPA also needs to be strengthened. In addition, the Commission(cid:146)s experience over the past year suggests
that stronger co-ordination is needed between the different parts of the Polish administration responsible
for the environment sector, especially between the Ministry of environment and the National fund for
environmental protection.

(2001/C 89 E/023)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1307/00

by Hanja Maij-Weggen (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(27 April 2000)

Subject: Slaughter of seals

Is the Commission aware that this year Canada has given authorisation for the killing of 275 000 harp
seals and 10 000 hooded seals?