WRITTEN QUESTION E-0948/00 by Laura González Álvarez (GUE/NGL) to the Commission. Closure of the Ferrazo hydrocarbon storage facilities and relocation away from the Ría de Arosa (Galicia, Spain).
Date: 2000-03-29
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU environmental policy, Galicia, Spain, storage of hydrocarbons, transfer of businesses

20.2.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 53 E/45

(2001/C 53 E/051)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0948/00

by Laura GonzÆlez `lvarez (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(29 March 2000)

Subject: Closure of the Ferrazo hydrocarbon storage facilities and relocation away from the R(cid:237)a de Arosa

(Galicia, Spain)

The R(cid:237)a de Arosa is the most important of all the Galician r(cid:237)as in terms of the natural environment and the
employment it provides. Covering 250 km2 and with 75 km of coastline, it contains nine estuaries, large
wetland areas and diverse underwater ecosystems, and is home to an abundance of flora and fauna and
three protected natural sites covering a fifth of its surface area. This exceptional natural setting has
industry and tourism
facilitated the development of significant socio-economic activity in the marine,
sectors. These primary sectors generate € 730 million annually and provide 26 000 jobs directly, and also
sustain employment in trade, construction and services throughout the whole coastal area. They will play a
key role in the future socio-economic development of the R(cid:237)a de Arosa and of Galicia as a whole.

The location of the Ferrazo hydrocarbon storage tanks at Villagarc(cid:237)a de Arosa is incompatible with the
protection of the natural and socio-economic environment of the R(cid:237)a de Arosa, and constitutes a threat to
the safety of residents.

Could the Commission intervene with the Spanish authorities if the hydrocarbon tanks proved incompa-
tible with Council Directive 92/43/EEC (1) on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and
flora, Council Directive 85/337/EEC (2) on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private
projects on the environment and the Ramsar Convention on the protection of wetlands? Could the
Commission press for the facilities to be moved to a lower-risk location away from the R(cid:237)a de Arosa and a
ban on the transportation of hydrocarbons within the r(cid:237)a, as called for by various political groupings and
the Plataforma en defensa da R(cid:237)a de Arousa? In accordance with Council Directive 90/313/EEC (3)on the
freedom of access to information on the environment, could the Commission oblige the competent
Spanish authorities to provide the information that the above association requested, but was refused?

(1) OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7.
(2) OJ L 175, 5.7.1985, p. 40.
(3) OJ L 158, 23.6.1990, p. 56.

Answer given by Mrs Wallstr(cid:246)m on behalf of the Commission

(8 May 2000)

Article 2 of Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain
public and private projects on the environment stipulates that, before consent is given, projects likely to
have significant effects on the environment by virtue inter alia of their nature, size or location must be
made subject to an assessment with regard to their effects. This applies to the projects listed in Annexes I
and II to the Directive.

Annex II(6)(d) refers to storage facilities for petroleum, petrochemical and chemical products. Article 4(2)
requires projects of the classes listed in Annex II to be made subject to an assessment where Member States
consider that their characteristics so require.

As for Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild
fauna and flora, Article 6 stipulates that any plan or project not directly connected with or necessary to the
management of a site but likely to have a significant effect thereon, either individually or in combination
with other plans or projects, must be subject to appropriate assessment of its implications for the site in
view of the site(cid:146)s conservation objectives.
In the light of the conclusions of the assessment of the
implications for the site, the competent national authorities must agree to the plan or project only after
having ascertained that it will not adversely affect the integrity of the site concerned and, if appropriate,
after having obtained the opinion of the general public.

C 53 E/46

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

20.2.2001

Unlike other Directives, Council Directive 90/313/EEC of 7 June 1990 on the freedom of access to
information on the environment provides the option (in Article 4) of seeking a judicial or administrative
review of a public authority(cid:146)s decision to refuse a request for access to information on the environment, in
accordance with the relevant national legal system. Directive 90/313/EEC was transposed into Spanish law
by Law 38/1995 of 13 December 1995, amended by Law 55/1999 of 29 December 1999, introducing
national appeal procedures.

The Commission would point out that, in the light of Written Question P-0790/00 by Mrs MiguØlez
Ramos (1), Written Question E-0804/00 by Mr Nogueira RomÆn (1) and the current Written Question on
the same subject, it has launched an own-initiative investigation, registered as No B-2000/2076. Accord-
ingly, it has approached the Spanish authorities for information on the abovementioned facilities.

In any event, the Commission will, as Guardian of the Treaties, take the necessary steps to ensure that
Community law is observed in this instance.

(1) OJ C 374 E, 28.12.2000, p. 155.

(2001/C 53 E/052)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0957/00

by Jorge HernÆndez Mollar (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(29 March 2000)

Subject: Promotion of the ALFA (Latin America Academic Training) programme

The purpose of the ALFA programme is to encourage exchanges between universities in the EU and their
counterparts in eighteen Latin American countries, over a six-year period.

To be eligible for financial support under this programme, the universities interested in participating are
asked to group themselves into (cid:145)ALFA networks(cid:146), i.e. networks of universities consisting of at least six
institutions (three from the EU, three from Latin America), from different countries.

Can the Commission state what provisions it has included in this programme to ensure that universities
potentially interested in taking part are able to engage in contacts (meetings and preliminary encounters)
enabling them to become familiar with each other and define a framework for their cooperation, in the
priority areas referred to in the invitation under the ALFA programme?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(28 April 2000)

ALFA(cid:146)s first phase, besides its specific aims, has been an experience during which higher education
institutions from both continents have developed mutual knowledge and during which 2918 joint project
proposals have been presented to the Commission. These proposals by university networks represent the
involvement of 511 Latin American institutions and 704 European institutions. As for projects approved
during the first phase, 808 networks of institutions have developed or are still developing joint projects
(a total of 373 Latin American and 530 European).

In the current ALFA phase, the technical assistance office of the programme assists the institutions
potentially interested in taking part in the programme in the search for partners and at the same time all
the requests regarding this search are published in the Internet page:
(http://alfa-program.com).

Furthermore ALFA networks that do not have experience in organising student mobility can request
financing for the preparation of joint mobility projects (within the sub-programme B, (cid:145)pre-projects(cid:146)).

In addition, it may be noted that at the moment the Commission is receiving an average of 40 requests a
day for information about the programme, of which more than half are requests from institutions that
already have identified their networks.