WRITTEN QUESTION E-0872/00 by Alejandro Agag Longo (PPE-DE) to the Commission. Internet in schools.
Date: 2000-03-22
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: European social policy, Internet, access to information, educational institution, free service, medical centre, medical institution, telephone charges, universal service, university

20.2.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 53 E/35

The Commission agrees with the Honourable Member that for effective competition to develop on
3.
the internal electricity market it is of crucial importance that commercially sensitive business information
is kept secret. That is why the provision in Article 9 of the directive is of eminent importance. The
Commission will ensure that this provision is properly implemented by Member States and also will apply
the competition rules should abuse of dominant position be revealed.

(2001/C 53 E/038)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0867/00

by Michael Cashman (PSE) to the Commission

(16 March 2000)

Subject: Charter vessels in Greek waters

I understand that Greece has a derogation from Council Regulation (EEC) No 3577/92 (1), under Article 6,
paragraph 3, until 1 January 2004.

Does this mean that Greece has the right to allow charter vessels in Greek waters only if they are
registered in Greece (carry a Greek flag) and the skipper is Greek?

(1) OJ L 364, 12.12.1992, p. 7.

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(10 April 2000)

Greece enjoys a temporary exemption from the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3577/92 of
7 December 1992 applying the principle of freedom to provide services to maritime transport within
Member States (maritime cabotage) until 1 January 2004 for two maritime cabotage sectors which are that
of regular passenger and ferry services and that of services provided with vessels of less than 650 gross
tonnage (gt) in island cabotage.

This means that the Greek authorities may reserve such services to Greek registered vessels, flying the
Greek flag. Charter vessels of less than 650 gt registered in other Member States and flying other Member
States(cid:146) flags may, therefore, be excluded from Greek island cabotage until the above mentioned date.

As regards the requirement that the captain has Greek nationality, the Commission is of the view that this
is not incompatible with Community law. Indeed, taking into account the fact that the captain of the ship
exercises aboard it sovereign powers (concerning, for example,
investigation of crimes committed on
board, respect of discipline as well as powers in relation to the civil status of passengers), the Commission
considers that this post is covered by the derogation of Article 39(3) (ex Article 48) of the EC Treaty
(cf. Commission observations in case Commission/France, C-334/94 (judgement of 7 March 1996)).

(2001/C 53 E/039)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0872/00

by Alejandro Agag Longo (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(22 March 2000)

Subject: Internet in schools

On 28 February this year the Commission sent the President of the Council its contribution with a view to
the forthcoming Lisbon Summit on reform and employment. It mentions, as one of its priorities, that all
schools should have access to the Internet by 2001.

C 53 E/36

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

20.2.2001

Does the Commission consider reasonably priced access to the Internet to be feasible, as a universal
service, for the Member States?

Similarly, a number of countries have mooted the idea of
for schools,
universities, hospitals and other healthcare structures, in order to prevent the different levels of income
in the Union from creating a (cid:145)two-speed Europe(cid:146) as far as the information society is concerned. What is its
opinion on this matter?

free access to the Internet

Answer given by Mr Liikanen on behalf of the Commission

(25 May 2000)

In its eEurope Initiative (1) the Commission set the target that all European schools should have access to
Internet and multimedia resources by the end of 2001. It is a priority for the Commission to ensure that
all citizens have the opportunity to be part of the emerging information society.

The Commission policy to encourage Member States to connect schools to the Internet should be
distinguished from the concept of universal service as it
is understood in the telecommunications
legislation (2). This legislation requires the authorities in Member States to place obligations on network
operators to ensure that a defined minimum set of services of specified quality are available to all,
independent of their geographical location, at an affordable price.

The current definition of universal service includes the provision of voice telephony, fax and voice band
data transmission via modems, i.e. access to the Internet.

Internet access to schools, however, is not included in the current scope of universal service. Nevertheless,
the current Community legislative framework (3) allows special tariffs to be provided for well-defined
groups of users, such as schools. In many Member States incumbent operators have already developed
special tariffs for Internet access to schools. These special
(usage) tariffs should not serve to distort
competition and operators should not abuse their dominant position through predatory pricing. National
regulatory authorities have been involved in making sure that competing operators or service providers
also have the opportunity to provide these special offers.

Furthermore, the Member States are free to impose obligations outside the scope of universal service to
provide further services at national level, but the Member States cannot oblige market players to contribute
to the provision of such services. Such services, for example Internet access for schools, can be financed
from public budgets, as long as they are in compliance with the competition law.

The Commission encourages the Member States to equip schools, hospitals and libraries with computers
and Internet access, particularly in the context of the interventions of the structural funds for the period
2000-2006. These investments indeed are necessary to ensure that the information society is socially
inclusive.

(1) COM(1999) 687.
(2) The Voice telephony directive (Directive 98/10/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 1998 on the
application of open network provision (ONP) to voice telephony and on universal service for telecommunications in
a competitive environment (cid:129) OJ L 101, 1.4.1998) and Interconnection directive (Directive 97/33/EC of the
Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 1997 on interconnection in telecommunications with regard to ensuring
universal service and interoperability through application of the principles of open network provision (ONP) (cid:129) OJ L
199, 26.7.1997).

(3) The Voice telephony directive requires transparency and cost orientation (in the case of significant market power
for tariffs and allow for the provision of special
(or discounted) tariff schemes. The Interconnection directive
(Article 5 and Annex III) states what is included in universal service and what can potentially be recovered or
financed by universal funds where a net cost is demonstrated.