WRITTEN QUESTION E-0626/00 by Erik Meijer (GUE/NGL) to the Council. Kosovo: the right of the Serb minority to move to safe areas with a Serb majority.
Date: 2000-03-02
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Kosovo, Serbia, common foreign and security policy, rights of minorities

C 374 E/122

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

28.12.2000

(2000/C 374 E/144)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0624/00

by Avril Doyle (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(3 March 2000)

Subject: Asylum levels and moves towards a common asylum and immigration policy

Would the Commission provide a summary of the overall level of asylum-seekers entering the EU over the
last year, comment on the trend in levels of asylum-seekers into the EU over the past five years, list the
level of asylum seekers per capita, per Member State, and comment on recent developments in forging a
common asylum and immigration policy.

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(13 April 2000)

The recent developments in forging a common asylum and immigration policy include Title IV of the new
EC Treaty which entered into force on 1 May 1999; the presidency conclusions of the special European
Council in Tampere of 15-16 October 1999, and in particular points 3, 4 and 10 to 27; and in particular
Commission initiatives such as towards (cid:145)Common standards on asylum procedures(cid:146) a Commission working
document dated 3 March 1999 (1), a proposal for a Council regulation concerning the establishment of
(cid:145)Eurodac(cid:146) for the comparison of the fingerprints of applicants for asylum and certain other aliens, 26 May
1999 (2), a proposal for a Council directive on the right to family reunification, 1 December 1999 (3), and a
proposal for a Council decision creating a European refugee fund, 14 December 1999 (4). Finally there is
the (cid:145)scoreboard(cid:146) to review progress on the creation of an area of freedom, security and justice in the Union,
presented by the Commission to the Council and the Parliament.

Two tables illustrating asylum applications are sent direct to the Honourable Member and to Parliament(cid:146)s
Secretariat.

(1) SEC(1999) 271 final.
(2) COM(1999) 260 final.
(3) COM(1999) 638 final.
(4) COM(1999) 686 final.

(2000/C 374 E/145)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0626/00

by Erik Meijer (GUE/NGL) to the Council

(2 March 2000)

Subject: Kosovo: the right of the Serb minority to move to safe areas with a Serb majority

1.
Is the Council aware that, since the establishment of the new authority in 1999, many of the
remaining members of the Serb minority still living in Kosovo have no longer been able to travel freely
within Kosovo and move (temporarily or permanently) to areas under the authority of the Government of
Serbia or Montenegro, both because this section of the population is viewed with contempt by the
Albanian majority, who were discriminated against between 1987 and 1999, and because there is
inadequate manpower to provide military or police escorts to allow them to travel safely?

2.
Can the Council confirm that in part of the town of Orahovac in Kosovo the Serb population now
finds itself in a situation strongly reminiscent of that in the former (cid:145)safe haven(cid:146) of Srebrenica in Bosnia-
Herzegovina, i.e. that the people living there have become isolated from the surrounding area because it is
populated by a different ethnic group who would like to see the back of the surrounded minority?

28.12.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 374 E/123

How will the Council ensure that the Serb zone of Orahovac does not ultimately meet a fate similar
3.
to that of the (cid:145)safe haven(cid:146) of Srebrenica, with the Dutch troops stationed there proving incapable of
preventing the ethnic group which dominates the surrounding area from seizing the zone, after which its
population would be forced to leave or even killed?

4.
How will the Council ensure that all residents of the Serb zone of Orahovac and other isolated areas
who for safety reasons decide of their own volition to leave their present area of residence permanently
and move to areas which are under the control of the Government of Serbia or Montenegro or possibly,
after reaching agreement on the subject with the Albanian majority, to the area to the north of the town
of Kosovska Mitrovica, which has a long-standing Serb majority and borders on Serbia?

Reply

(25 May 2000)

The Council remains seriously preoccupied by the situation of the Serbs and of other ethnic and religious
minorities in Kosovo and is appalled by the continuing high level of interethnic violence. The renewed
outbreak of hostilities in Mitrovica is just the latest example of how difficult it is to overcome the hatred
and distrust built up during decades. This situation could easily have serious repercussions in other cities in
Kosovo, including Orahovac.

The Council has repeatedly expressed its commitment to the objective of a democratic and multi-ethnic
Kosovo in accordance with UNSCR 1244, including the unhindered and safe return of all refugees. UNSCR
1244 in all its aspects thus remains the basis for EU policy. The Council has furthermore reiterated on
numerous occasions its strong condemnation of all acts of violence, harassment and intolerance and has
made it clear to the Kosovo leadership that EU assistance would depend on credible efforts towards
interethnic reconciliation.

The Honourable Member is certainly aware of the fact that the Council has not a direct role in the security
side of implementation of UNSCR 1244: to this end and on the basis of a UN mandate, NATO has
established a 50 000 troops security presence in the region. This force (KFOR) was created precisely to
ensure a safe environment and security of minorities, in order to encourage the return of all refugees and
displaced persons in the region. EU countries are currently providing 80 % of KFOR, and involved Member
States have recently decided to increase their contingents.

To help combat interethnic violence and to create a secure environment necessary to keep the non-
Albanian Kosovars from leaving the province and to motivate those who have already left to return, the
EU is also supporting UNMIK(cid:146)s efforts in building up the Kosovo Civilian Police force. In response to
appeals by Mr Kouchner and by SG/HR Solana, Member States have made, in March 2000, extraordinary
efforts in order to strengthen UNMIK police force with 320 extra policemen.

Taking into account the extremely difficult situation under which KFOR and the UN civil police have to
operate, the Council feels that they have already achieved very substantial progress towards the aims
spelled out in UNSCR 1244.

In order to deal with the current situation in Kosovo, the Council has also been giving strong support to
the establishment of the UN administration (UNMIK) by contributing to its budget and by fully taking
charge of UNMIK(cid:146)s Fourth Pillar which deals with reconstruction and economic rehabilitation.

The Council also supports the decision by UNSG Special Representative Kouchner to set up a Joint Interim
Administrative Council which should involve all ethnic groups progressively in the administration of
Kosovo. So far, the Kosovo Serbs have refused to participate in this and other similar bodies. The EU has
called on the Kosovo Serbs to re-consider their boycott in order to contribute to building a multi-ethnic
Kosovo and securing a place for themselves in the emerging administrative structures.