WRITTEN QUESTION E-0380/00 by Juan Ojeda Sanz (PPE-DE) to the Commission. Improvement of road infrastructures in the central and eastern European states.
Date: 2000-02-14
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Central and Eastern European countries, EU financing, quality standard, road building, road safety

C 374 E/62

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

28.12.2000

In view of the late designation of protected sites, as well as to ensure that the Commission is able to fulfil
its duties under Article 6 EC Treaty, all Member States were formally reminded by the Commission on
23 June 1999 of their obligation to guarantee the consistency of programmes and projects with both
directives.

In the meantime, the German L(cid:228)nder (cid:129) including Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania (cid:129) have announced
some protected sites and are preparing further notifications.

In view of the legal requirements, programming documents can only be approved if they contain a clear
commitment by the German authorities responsible for the relevant region that all possible negative
consequences for sites protected or to be protected under Natura 2000 will be properly assessed and
appropriate measures taken. In any case, the Commission will assess each plan or programme on its
individual content.

The Commission(cid:146)s objective is to promote the socio-economic development of the elegible areas in a way
that is consistent with the basic principles of sustainable development.

(1) OJ L 103, 25.4.1979.

(2000/C 374 E/072)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0378/00

by John McCartin (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(14 February 2000)

Subject: Review of EU sheepmeat regime

Can the Commission confirm whether it is carrying out a review of the current EU sheepmeat regime and
its effectiveness and indicate when it is likely to publish its conclusions on the subject?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(6 March 2000)

An evaluation study is presently being undertaken into the sheepmeat common market organisation. On
the basis of the findings of the study, which will be completed by about Easter, the Commission will draw
its own conclusions concerning any possible reform or modifications to the regime and, if appropriate,
present proposals to this effect later in the year.

(2000/C 374 E/073)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0380/00

by Juan Ojeda Sanz (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(14 February 2000)

Subject: Improvement of road infrastructures in the central and eastern European states

The considerable injections of funding provided to the so-called (cid:145)applicant states(cid:146) to the Union via various
European funding bodies (such as the EIB), and through the Union(cid:146)s budget line (the PHARE programme
and the ISPA instrument) should, together with the necessary investments each recipient government is
obliged to make, be used to put in place a road network that complies with the principle of (cid:145)interoper-
ability(cid:146) that is necessary to the effective establishment of a (cid:145)single market(cid:146).

28.12.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 374 E/63

it would appear that the use to which this Community funding is being put locally is not
However,
producing the desired results. What measures has the Commission put in place to ensure that road projects
and transport infrastructure improvement projects in these countries which are financed by Community
funding are carried out in accordance with the quality standards considered the norm in the European
Union?

Finally, does the Commission intend to make funding conditional upon a (cid:145)road safety impact assessment(cid:146)
for all projects deemed essential in the context of the enlarged Union?

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(27 March 2000)

Since the early 1990s the PHARE programme has spent almost € 1 000 million on investments in the
transport infrastructure of the beneficiary countries, thus contributing to the goals highlighted by the
Honourable Member. In the last few years this pre-accession aid increasingly mobilised substantial funds
and co-financing from the European Investment Bank (EIB) and international financial institutions (IFIs) as
well as from the candidate countries(cid:146) national budgets.

From this year and onwards the new Instrument for structural policies for pre-accession (ISPA) will
increase significantly the investment capacity under Community public funding. Until 2006 the annual
budget of € 1 040 million will be spent on equal terms on transport infrastructure and environmental
measures. As regards transport infrastructure, measures financed under ISPA should promote sustainable
mobility, and, in particular, aim at interconnection and interoperability of the national networks of the
acceding countries with the trans-European networks including the access to such networks.

In this context the process of selecting priority measures for developing a pan-European transport network
has been facilitated by the Transport infrastructure needs assessment (TINA) initiated by the Council in
1995 and carried out with the objective to identify a multi-modal transport network on the territory of the
acceding countries comprising road, rail, inland waterways, ports, terminals and airports. It consists of the
backbone network, which on the territory of the acceding countries is identical with the links and nodes of
the ten multi-modal pan-European transport corridors as endorsed at the third pan-European transport
conference in June 1997 in Helsinki, and of additional network components.

According to the Council Regulation (EC) No 1267/1999 of 21 June 1999 (1) establishing ISPA, measures
related to transport infrastructure shall contribute to the achievement of Community policies in the field of
transport and trans-European networks (Article 5 and Annex II). This requires transport projects of
common interest to be based on the criteria of Council and Parliament Decision No 1692/96/EC of
23 July 1996 (2) on guidelines for TEN-Transport and to comply with the relevant Community policies and
standards. For example, in assessing a road infrastructure project proposal the Commission will inter alia
examine to what extent the measure contributes to improving road safety, and whether it complies with
the above criteria and standards. Investment in traffic management systems aiming at improving traffic
safety will also qualify for ISPA funding.

In its annual report on Community assistance granted under ISPA the Commission will also provide
information on the assessment of the compatibility of ISPA operations with Community policies, including
those concerning transport.

(1) OJ L 161, 26.6.1999.
(2) OJ L 228, 9.9.1996.