WRITTEN QUESTION E-0210/00 by Daniel Varela Suanzes-Carpegna (PPE-DE) to the Commission. The Erika disaster and the fisheries sector.
Date: 2000-02-04
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU environmental policy, EU financing, coastal pollution, economic consequence, fishing industry, indemnification

28.12.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 374 E/35

In general the rules vary substantially between the countries of Europe. The United Kingdom requires
import permits to be obtained in advance while Sweden requires the dog to be identified by either a tattoo
or a microchip and Spain will not accept rabies vaccinations more than twelve months old.

This need to prepare everything in detail and in advance prevents the blind from travelling on impulse, so
what kind of freedom of movement are the blind left with?

Does the Commission have comprehensive information on the varying rules for the entry of guide dogs
into the countries of Europe?

Has it considered harmonising these rules so that the blind are also able to use the principle of free
movement between European countries?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(10 March 2000)

The Commission is aware of the problems caused by the existence of differing national rules governing the
movement of pets, more specifically guide dogs, between Member States. Unfortunately, previous attempts
by the Commission to harmonise veterinary requirements in this area proved unsuccessful.

After consulting a panel of independent scientists, the British Government recently abolished quarantine in
favour of an alternative,
less restrictive, system allowing owners to take their pets with them when
travelling between Member States, subject to certain conditions.

Visually impaired persons travelling with their dogs have been the first to benefit from these new rules.
Indeed, before the implementation of the new provision, the first animal to enter the United Kingdom
without having been quarantined was a guide dog.

In this new context, the Commission will shortly submit to the Council and Parliament a proposal for a
Regulation to harmonise veterinary requirements for the movement of pets. In particular, the Regulation
will offer a solution to the problems which are still facing visually impaired persons travelling within the
Community with their dogs.

(2000/C 374 E/042)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0210/00

by Daniel Varela Suanzes-Carpegna (PPE-DE) to the Commission

Subject: The (cid:145)Erika(cid:146) disaster and the fisheries sector

(4 February 2000)

The recent disaster involving the (cid:145)Erika(cid:146) oil tanker, flying a Maltese flag off the coast of Brittany, has
brought in its wake enormous and, in many cases, irreparable damage to the environment in general and
to the marine ecosystem and fisheries resources in particular.

One of the areas of the economy most severely affected, with major social repercussions, is the fisheries
and aquaculture sector.

Has the Commission evaluated the damage occasioned by the (cid:145)Erika(cid:146) disaster in the fisheries and
aquaculture sector?

Can it provide information on any such evaluation?

Should this information not yet be available, will the Commission undertake to submit it to Parliament(cid:146)s
Committee on Fisheries as soon as it is in possession of it?

C 374 E/36

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

28.12.2000

Can the Commission state what economic measures it intends to adopt to ensure financial compensation
for those affected in the fisheries and aquaculture sector?

Will extraordinary aid measures be adopted to alleviate the damage caused?

Can the Commission state what measures have been taken or will be taken with a view to effective action
to prevent maritime accidents in the transport of dangerous goods, and, in particular, to combat the risks
of oil slicks and to further research into means of containing them when they do occur?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(21 March 2000)

The French authorities are in the process of assessing the damage (cid:129) particularly to fisheries and
aquaculture (cid:129) caused by the accident involving the tanker (cid:145)Erika(cid:146). As soon as the assessment findings are
available, the Commission will pass them on to Parliament(cid:146)s fisheries committee.

Based on those findings and at France(cid:146)s request, the Commission will of course take the most appropriate
steps possible under current legislation to make good the damage to the fisheries sector resulting from this
oil disaster. Community part-financing will be available under the financial
instrument for fisheries
guidance (FIFG) and could be included in France(cid:146)s forthcoming single programming document (SPD) for
2000-2006 under Council Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999 of 17 December 1999 laying down the detailed
rules and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries sector (1). An FIFG
budget of € 225 million has been allocated to this programme, under which the Commission and the
French authorities will shortly be deciding on specific measures. Current Community legislation covering
fisheries and aquaculture does not provide for special aid measures, however.

Measures have also been taken (or are planned) with a view to dealing more effectively with accidents at
sea. Immediately on being informed of the accident involving the (cid:145)Erika(cid:146), the Commission mobilised the
Community(cid:146)s marine pollution task force. In the days which followed, a liaison officer was placed at the
French authorities(cid:146) disposal in order to facilitate coordination with European pollution-control vessels. At
the French authorities(cid:146) request, specific data were then gathered on the availability of bird-cleaning
equipment and floating barriers. As a result, 10 Member States and Norway provided France with over
26 km of floating barriers. Three experts from the Community task force were dispatched to the site to
help evaluate the numerous offers of services and equipment made to France for cleaning and restoration.
With a view to learning lessons for the future, in January the Commission coordinated a visit by specialist
European observers. Throughout the operation, the Commission regularly drew up news bulletins based on
documentation supplied by the French authorities and distributed these to the other Member States(cid:146)
authorities directly involved.

A Commission proposal for a Decision (2) will make it possible to cooperate more closely in the fight
against accidental marine pollution. Its final adoption by Parliament and the Council will create the
optimum conditions for managing crises such as that resulting from the shipwreck of the (cid:145)Erika(cid:146). With
specific regard to the (cid:145)Erika(cid:146), adopting the Decision should provide scope for a financial contribution to
help meet the cost of assessing and monitoring the oil slick(cid:146)s environmental impact.

As a result of the accident involving the (cid:145)Erika(cid:146), the Commission has decided to produce a communication
on tanker safety with a view to enhancing prevention. Legislative measures will be proposed with the aim
of making vessel inspections in ports more effective, tightening controls on classification companies and
increasing the use in Community waters of tankers which are more environment-friendly. The Commission
hopes that the communication, which it plans to present to Parliament and the Council in April 2000, will
provide the opportunity for this issue to be discussed in depth.

(1) OJ L 337, 30.12.1999.
(2) COM(1998) 769.