WRITTEN QUESTION E-2810/99 by Cristiana Muscardini (UEN) to the Commission. Protocol on improved protection and respect for the welfare of animals.
Date: 2000-01-18
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: European convention, animal welfare, application of EU law

C 280 E/136

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

3.10.2000

However, fire-fighters are now questioning the desirability of visible, external, permanent identification
marks on LPG vehicles. Such labelling may have the unwanted effect of provoking acts of vandalism.
Moreover identification marks, on licence plates for example, become invisible in a fire. Fire-fighters prefer
a system of identification which is activated only in the event of fire and remains invisible until then.

Is there any European legislation on the need for these vehicles to be labelled?

If not, does the Commission consider that legislation should be introduced?

What is its view of this proposal for identification marks which are activated only in the event of fire?

Answer given by Mr Liikanen on behalf of the Commission

(8 February 2000)

The Commission thanks the Honourable Member for drawing its attention to the importance of protecting
fire-fighters against the dangers posed by vehicles fuelled with liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in the event of
a fire.

The Commission can confirm that Regulation 67 of the United Nations(cid:146) Economic Commission for Europe
lays down conditions for the safety and installation of LPG equipment. Under the Regulation, a relief valve
must be installed in the gas tank, which should remove the risk of explosion in the event of fire. The
Community is considering whether to accede to the Regulation, which would mean its obligatory
application by all the Member States. In that case, the Regulation would apply to the EC type-approval
of new, LPG-fuelled vehicles. Certain Member States have anticipated this.

With regard to vehicles fuelled with LPG already in service, the Commission can only encourage the
French authorities to look for a solution which would provide specific identification to protect fire-fighters
in the event of an accident involving an LPG-fuelled vehicle. Moreover, the Commission would be prepared
to support such initiative in the framework of Council Decision 1999/847/EC of 9 December 1999
establishing a Community action programme in the field of civil protection (1).

(1) OJ L 327, 21.12.1999.

(2000/C 280 E/148)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2810/99

by Cristiana Muscardini (UEN) to the Commission

(18 January 2000)

Subject: Protocol on improved protection and respect for the welfare of animals

In May 1999, the above, legally binding protocol entered into force. The protocol recognises that animals
are sentient beings and requires that the Community take their welfare needs in particular areas fully into
account.

1. What steps is the Commission taking to implement the protocol requirements?

Does the Commission intend to submit proposals on intensive pig farming, as required by Council

2.
Directive No 91/630 (1) which set a deadline of 1 October 1997?

3.
Does it intend to propose a gradual abolition of gestation crates for pregnant sows, in view of the
recommendations of the Scientific Veterinary Committee, according to which individual enclosures which
do not allow the sow to turn round easily should be banned?

3.10.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 280 E/137

Does it plan to propose a radical change in policy whereby trade in meat and carcasses would take

4.
the place of the long-distance transport of live farm animals?

In this regard, it should be noted that the protocol defines animals as sentient beings and not as goods.
Clearly, therefore, live animals should no longer be subject to Community rules on free trade in goods.

(1) OJ L 340, 11.12.1991, p. 33.

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(23 February 2000)

The Protocol in question recognises that animals are sentient beings and since its adoption the Com-
mission has focused increasingly on accommodating the animal protection dimension in its policies. In the
year 2000 it intends to present far-reaching proposals concerning animal welfare in the field of pig
breeding and animal transport.

Notably, it will present a proposal concerning the protection of pigs in intensive rearing systems with a
view to amending Council Directive 91/630/EEC of 19 November 1991 laying down minimum standards
for the protection of pigs.

The Commission(cid:146)s project may include provisions mandating the keeping of sows in groups and the
establishment of distinct areas in which they can behave naturally.

The Commission may propose applying these measures as soon as possible in the case of future holdings.
The time limit for imposing the rules on existing farms will be discussed by the experts, who will notably
have to consider the socio-economic consequences.

Community legislation on animal protection during transport is based on the results of scientific research
and practical experience, both of which indicate that, provided certain animal protection requirements are
met, the transport of animals is feasible.

However, Council Directive 91/628/EEC as amended by Directive 95/29/EEC of 29 June 1995 on the
protection of animals during transport (1) needs to be reappraised on the basis of more recent information.

The Standing Veterinary Committee recently appointed a working party to study certain difficulties in
applying this Directive.

It is possible that the Commission may draft an amendment to existing Community legislation during the
year 2000 on the basis of the working party(cid:146)s conclusions.

Besides, the Commission is preparing a project based on the opinion of the Scientific Committee on
Animal Welfare, laying down standards for the mechanical ventilation of animal transport vehicles. This
proposal is scheduled for the first half of the year 2000.

(1) OJ L 148, 30.6.1995.

(2000/C 280 E/149)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2815/99

by Jan Wiersma (PSE) to the Commission

(18 January 2000)

Subject: The question of the Roma

1.
In the context of enlargement the Commission is rightly giving priority to the question of better
treatment of the Roma in a number of applicant countries. Would the Commission state precisely which
problems need to be addressed?