WRITTEN QUESTION E-2779/99 by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission. Assistance for MISKO company workers forced to relocate.
Date: 2000-01-18
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Community support framework, European Works Council, Greece, fight against unemployment, labour law, reassignment, transfer of businesses, worker consultation, worker information

3.7.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 187 E/1

I

(Information)

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

WRITTEN QUESTIONS WITH ANSWER

(2001/C 187 E/001)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2778/99

by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(18 January 2000)

Subject: Failure to maintain current job levels at a subsidised plant owned by pasta-producer MISKO

MISKO, the pasta-producing subsidiary of the Italian company Barilla, has received funding under Greek
development law 1892/90 to set up a new production plant at Thiva on condition that it maintains the
present number of 275 permanent jobs. Before completing construction of the new plant, the company
closed down its pasta factory in Patras, compelling the current workforce either to resign or agree to being
transferred to other company plants. However, the company has not informed those workers who agree to
a transfer of the exact place or starting-date of their employment, the type of work, level of pay or the cost
of relocating. It did not even inform them of where they would be employed after the closure of the Patras
factory (cid:129) which occurred on 10 September 1999 (cid:129) until the new plant was opened at Thiva.

Since the company(cid:146)s decision to close down the Patras factory is in breach of the requirement to maintain
the present number of jobs and was taken without prior consultation of the workers, which is expressly
prescribed by Directive 94/45 (1), will the Commission say:

1. whether it will check that the company has complied with the condition of maintaining the present

number of jobs in receiving subsidies for its new plant, and

2. whether it will examine whether there has been compliance with the provisions laid down in Directive
94/45 concerning the obligation to inform, consult and negotiate with the workers, and the
participation of the MISKO workers(cid:146) union in the European Works Council of Barilla, MISKO(cid:146)s parent
company?

(1) OJ L 254, 30.9.1994, p. 64.

(2001/C 187 E/002)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2779/99

by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

Subject: Assistance for MISKO company workers forced to relocate

(18 January 2000)

MISKO, the pasta-producing subsidiary of the Italian company Barilla, has received funding under Greek
development law 1892/90 to set up a new production plant at Thiva on condition that it maintains the
present number of 275 permanent jobs. Before completing construction of the new plant, the company

C 187 E/2

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

3.7.2001

closed down its pasta factory in Patras, compelling the current workforce either to resign or agree to being
transferred to other company plants. The workers who agree to be transferred, however, are faced with an
expensive relocation bill and they are therefore forced to leave their jobs and run the risk of remaining
unemployed.

Is it possible to assist these workers to cover the expense of their enforced relocation? Which programmes
and procedures may be used to provide such assistance?

Supplementary joint answer
to Written Questions E-2778/99 and E-2779/99
given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(23 February 2001)

Under Council Directive 94/45/EC of 22 September 1994 on the establishment of a European Works
Council or a procedure in Community-scale undertakings and Community-scale groups of undertakings for
the purposes of informing and consulting employees (1), the central management of the undertaking or
group of undertakings at Community level is responsible for putting in place the necessary conditions and
resources for setting up a works council or a transnational information and consultation procedure for
employees. It can either do this on its own initiative or at the written request of at least 100 employees
from at least two different Member States.

In other words, the Directive does not stipulate that these mechanisms should be created automatically; it
merely grants employees the right to call for such mechanisms to be set up.

Having submitted an initial request of this kind, a special negotiating body will be set up;
it will be
composed of representatives of employees from all the undertakings and organisations which are members
of the group of undertakings. The representatives should be elected or appointed according to criteria
relating to geographic distribution and proportional representation according to the number of employees
in each Member State.

The main task of this special negotiating body is to negotiate and conclude an agreement with the central
management on the setting up and mode of operation of a European works council or of an alternative
information and consultation procedure.

According to the information supplied to the Commission, it would appear that a European works council
has not yet been established for Barilla. Negotiations are currently under way and it would seem that these
are likely to result in an agreement being signed in the near future.

Finally, it should be noted that as regards collective redundancies and the acquired rights of employees in
the event of transfers of undertakings, covered by Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the
approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies (2), and Council
Directive 77/187/EEC of 14 February 1977 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States
relating to the safeguarding of employees(cid:146) rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or
parts of businesses (3), amended by Council Directive 98/50/EC of 29 June 1998 (4) respectively, the
Community provisions applicable in this case are transposed by national law.

Co-funding of comprehensive measures to prevent and combat unemployment, particularly as regards
companies undergoing restructuring, could be considered under the European Social Fund (ESF). This
could be done as part of the Operational Programme (OP) of the 3rd Community Support Framework for
Greece, which is currently being drawn up, particularly the (cid:145)Employment Promotion and Continuing
Training(cid:146) OP. In this event, the Greek authorities should devise and submit a relevant integrated plan in
accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1262/1999 of the Parliament and of the Council of 21 June 1999 on
the European Social Fund (5) and the rules on State aid.

(1) OJ L 254, 30.9.1994.
(2) OJ L 225, 12.8.1998.
(3) OJ L 61, 5.3.1977.
(4) OJ L 201, 17.7.1998.
(5) OJ L 161, 26.6.1999.