WRITTEN QUESTION E-2783/99 by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission. Shortcomings of public works in Greece.
Date: 2000-01-18
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Community support framework, Greece, product quality, public works

C 174 E/2

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

19.6.2001

No 1692/96/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 on Community guidelines for the
development of the Trans-European transport network (TEN-T) (2).

Greece has never submitted a proposal concerning the existing port of Patras under Community financial
aid in the field of TEN-T. However, the construction of a new port in Patras is underway and being co-
financed by both the Community support framework (CSF) for Greece during the 1994-1999 program-
ming period and the Community Initiative Interreg. This project, which will be completed with co-funding
from the CSF for the current 2000-2006 period, fully takes into account the required safety standards.

Concerning the safety aspect in Community ports, the Commission would refer the Honourable Member
to its answer to his Written Question E-2530/99 (3).

The Commission is prepared to ask the Greek government to make available the report resulting from the
investigation into the accident involving the ferry Superfast III, in accordance with the provisions of Article
12 (5) of the Council Directive mentioned above.

In general, projects involving ports which are carried out with Community co-funding should improve
efficiency and safety in the transport of passengers and goods, given that those projects have to comply
with the required safety standards.

(1) OJ L 138, 1.6.1999.
(2) OJ L 228, 9.9.1996 modified in OJ L 15 of 17.1.1997.
(3) OJ C 280 E, 3.10.2000.

(2001/C 174 E/002)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2783/99

by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(18 January 2000)

Subject: Shortcomings of public works in Greece

In its answer (P-2120/98) (1) to my question concerning compliance with quality standards in public works
in Greece (E-2592/98) (2), the Commission pointed out that the first ESPEL (special quality control council)
quarterly report found that problems of the kind mentioned do exist and stressed that it (cid:145)expects this
matter to make rapid progress and hopes that any financial, disciplinary, penal or other consequences for
those responsible will have a dissuasive effect in the future and will result in lasting improvements to the
situation as regards quality(cid:146). It also noted that, depending on their seriousness, the shortcomings suffered
by the projects would either have to be corrected by the contractors, or the costs involved would be
deducted from their payments, or else the projects would have to be rebuilt at the contractors(cid:146) own
expense.

Given that ESPEL recently forwarded to the services of the Ministry for Economic Affairs reports on 44
public works, of which it transpires that only four projects meet all the necessary standards:

1. Will the Commission say what progress has been made in each case in dealing with the shortcomings

mentioned in its answer, on which it expected (cid:145)rapid progress(cid:146) to be made?

2. What information does it have on further shortcomings and what measures does it intend to take?

(1) OJ C 135, 14.5.1999, p. 16.
(2) OJ C 31, 5.2.1999, p. 151.

19.6.2001

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 174 E/3

Supplementary answer
given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(5 January 2001)

According to the information received from the Greek authorities, between July 1998 and April 2000
ESPEL carried out 1 253 routine inspections of projects part-financed by Community Funds. The findings
show that 52 % of the projects are in order or have minor defects which the contractors will rectify
(project category 1); 45 % of the projects have major defects which do not have safety implications but
which will entail higher maintenance costs: these additional costs must be deducted from payments to the
contractors concerned (project category 2); 3 % of the projects have serious defects which cannot be
rectified: the contractors will have to redo these projects in full or in part and at their own expense
(project category 3).

In accordance with existing procedures, the Ministry of Economic Affairs (cid:129) as the managing authority for
the Community support framework (cid:129) sent the 1 122 individual reports drawn up by ESPEL in respect of
projects with quality defects to the public authorities managing the projects concerned, asking them to
take the action provided for by law.
In 198 cases, the Ministry of Economic Affairs instructed the
authorities managing the projects to require the contractors to set up and operate on-site test laboratories
in compliance with their contractual obligations. In 478 cases falling within project categories 2 and 3
referred to above, the Ministry of Economic Affairs submitted the files to the public works inspectorate.
Lastly, as provided for, the 30 cases falling within category 3 were sent direct to the public prosecutor(cid:146)s
office.

On 5 April 2000, the public works inspectorate called on 136 authorities concerned with the projects at
issue to submit a report on the measures taken in order to require the contractors to carry out the
necessary repairs or in order to impose penalties on them in accordance with the law.

According to the Greek authorities, on the basis of the reports available and depending on the various
cases, the following measures have been taken: financial penalties; price reductions; repair orders issued, in
some cases with complaints against the contractors; repairs carried out; responsibilities attributed for the
non-operation of on-site test laboratories; basic geological and other studies where these were not done;
additional quality controls.

The Greek authorities have also informed the Commission that the reports are still being examined and
that they will be published at a later date by the Joint Steering Committee on Public Works. The
Commission has taken note of the quality controls which the Greek Government has requested, and
welcomes this initiative. It would nevertheless like the files to be processed and monitored more quickly,
and will ask for detailed information on the practical action taken in each case (cid:129) i.e. the economic,
administrative or other penalties imposed.

The European Anti-Fraud Office also states that no communication has so far been received from the
Greek authorities on the basis of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1681/94 of 11 July 1994 concerning
irregularities and the recovery of sums wrongly paid in connection with the financing of the structural
policies and the organisation of an information system in this field (1).

(1) OJ L 178, 12.7.1994.

(2001/C 174 E/003)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0951/00

by Bart Staes (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(29 March 2000)

Subject: The Objective 2 region of Hainaut

The awarding of Objective 2 aid to the Walloon province of Hainaut is leading to the relocation of firms
which have been established for many years in the neighbouring province of Western Flanders. The
businesses operators in question acknowledge that the removal of their activities to Hainaut is entirely
dependent on their obtaining Objective 2 subsidies. If these business operators do not obtain any European
aid, they will keep their operations in Western Flanders. In order to be considered for such aid they have
to have their company headquarters in Hainaut.