WRITTEN QUESTION E-2119/99 by Jaime Valdivielso de Cué (PPE-DE) to the Commission. Foreign affairs.
Date: 1999-11-22
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU programme, Russia, data protection, nuclear power station, technical cooperation

C 303 E/28

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

24.10.2000

including through an improved business impact assessment system and direct consultation of businesses.
In improving the regulatory impact assessment the Commission will, among other things, draw upon the
work of the Organisation for economic cooperation and development (OECD) on regulatory reform and
on examples of good practice from other countries. The unit will also consider existing practice in the
United States with a view to developing appropriate information tools in the Commission. The work
foreseen in the BEST action plan on improving employment and working conditions will also be taken
forward by both the Member States and the Commission.

The Commission will also consider the idea of a list of legislation containing exemptions for micro
enterprises. The existing business impact assessment already contains information on derogations and
thresholds for certain businesses, in particular small firms.

The Commission has noted the Parliament(cid:146)s call for the results of business impact assessments to be
published. These are already available as part of the COM-documentation and therefore available to the
public.

The Commission also manages two other initiatives designed to improve the quality of the regulatory
environment within which European businesses operate. The creation of the business test panel pilot
project was envisaged in the single market action plan. The panel is composed of European business
representatives which review proposed new Community legislation. Much of the panel(cid:146)s work concentrates
on identifying compliance costs and likely administrative burdens of proposed legislation. The novelty of
the approach lies in the direct feed-back from businesses. The test panel has so far been consulted three
times and its overall effectiveness will be evaluated in early 2000.

The SLIM initiative was launched in 1996 with the objective of identifying ways of simplifying internal
market legislation. Since then it has reviewed 14 different areas of legislation and SLIM teams (composed
of national experts and users) have issued a wide range of recommendations which include reducing costs
and administrative burdens arising from Community rules. The operation of the initiative is now being
examined by the Commission in order to strengthen its overall capacity to deliver recommendations and
proposals aimed at improving the implementation of internal market rules, simplifying procedures and
reducing costs and administrative burdens on businesses.

(2000/C 303 E/024)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2119/99

by Jaime Valdivielso de CuØ (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(22 November 1999)

Subject: Foreign affairs

The United States Government believes that the impact of the change to the year 2000 may cause
complications in some secondary security systems at Russian nuclear power stations. In order to prevent
possible disasters, the United States and Russia are cooperating on nuclear plant safety projects.

What specific programmes has the Commission launched in this field, given that Europe has even greater
cause than the United States to be concerned about ensuring the safety of these installations?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(3 January 2000)

The Commission is very aware of the implications of the year 2000 (Y2K) for nuclear plants in the New
Independent States (NIS) and Central and Eastern European Countries (CEEC). Despite constraints arising
from the lack of a mandate for the Community to take direct initiatives in this area, and the tight time-
scale, the Commission has, like the United States, made efforts to help Russia and surrounding countries
meet the challenges posed by the Y2K issue.

24.10.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 303 E/29

The Commission has channelled extensive support to those institutions which possess the requisite
technical experience and know-how (cid:129) the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA),
the World
Association of Nuclear Operators (WANO), the International Science and Technology Centre (ISTC) in
Moscow and the Science and Technology Centre in Ukraine (STCU).

The Commission instigated consideration of the Y2K issue at the TACIS on-site assistance meetings
organised by WANO in November 1998 and May 1999 and instructed on-site assistance contractors to
ensure the Y2K compliance of equipment delivered under Community programmes. Y2K instructions were
later incorporated into on-site assistance contracts.

A specific TACIS support project is being implemented by WANO, involving visits to designated nuclear
power plants in Ukraine and Russia. The organisation is reviewing the Y2K status of these plants and
supporting contingency planning efforts in co-ordination with IAEA.

The ISRC has established a special fund totalling 2 M$ to assist Russian and NIS institutions in solving
issues related to the Y2K problem, involving individuals and teams from the former weapon research
institutes. A number of project proposals have recently been approved. These projects, developed with the
participation of the Russian Ministry of atomic energy (Minatom) and the Russian Ministry of emergency
situations, will, among others, provide direct support to nine nuclear power plants and to the evaluation of
nuclear fuel cycle installations. Funding is directed to co-ordination within Minatom, equipment, software
and hardware upgrades and technical expertise. The STCU is undertaking similar efforts in Ukraine.

The Commission is also providing support to the Bulgarian, Slovakian and Russian nuclear regulatory
authorities.

In addition to practical advice and assistance, the Commission has endeavoured to raise awareness on the
Y2K issue. The Commission(cid:146)s Concert Group (consisting of the senior nuclear regulators of 25 Commun-
ity, CEEC and NIS countries) has discussed the issue on three occasions since June 1998. All CEEC and NIS
nuclear regulatory authorities now have action plans. The content of these plans and their state of progress
varies significantly. Some countries are as well prepared as their Community counterparts, while others are
significantly less advanced.

The G-24 Nuclear Safety Assistance Co-ordination (NUSAC) secretariat, hosted by the Commission, raised
the Y2K issue at its March 1999 meeting. This brought together CEEC and NIS countries and the donors of
nuclear safety assistance and considered the role of donor countries in assessing the Y2K compliance of
equipment which they had supplied.

Two workshops on essential infrastructures were organised by the Commission in April and September
1999. On 22 July 1999, a dedicated seminar on electricity grids was organised by the Commission.
Delegations from Eastern European countries attended the July and September meetings, during which the
issue of nuclear safety was discussed.

(2000/C 303 E/025)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2137/99

by Bart Staes (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(24 November 1999)

Subject: Ban on BADGE and BFDGE used as paints for tins

The Belgian federation has recently withdrawn from sale tins of sardines and tuna because of the possibly
harmful effect of the chemical paint used for coating the tins.