WRITTEN QUESTION P-2144/99 by Hiltrud Breyer (Verts/ALE) to the Commission. Inadequate checks on the transport of horses for slaughter.
Date: 1999-11-18
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Germany, Italy, animal welfare, application of EU law, equidae, transport of animals

18.7.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 203 E/107

In principle, investments in sheep farming may also be funded under Regulation (EC) No 950/97 of 20 May
1997 on improving the efficiency of agricultural structures (1), provided the conditions for investment aid
are complied with. Similarly, other structural aid may be granted as part of regional programmes under
Objectives 1 and 5(b). Such investment aid will continue to be granted under the new Council Regulation
(EC) No 1257/1999 of 17 May 1999 on support for rural development from the European Agricultural
Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) and amending and repealing certain regulations (2).

There is no specific subsidy scheme for wool. Since wool is not an agricultural product as defined in
Annex I (ex Annex II) of the EC Treaty, no EAGGF aid can be granted to wool producers.

Council Directive 93/119/EC of 21 December 1993 on the protection of animals at the time of slaughter
or killing (3)
lays down the minimum common standards in this area. The Directive permits kosher
slaughter of sheep and goats in a slaughterhouse, since Article 5(2) provides for a derogation from the
requirement that animals be stunned.

In the light of the information provided by the Honourable Member, the Commission will consider
whether a restriction on religious slaughter in the territory of a Member State is, in these circumstances,
compatible with the general rules of the EC Treaty. The Commission accepts that differences in national
legislation regarding the acceptability of ritual slaughter of animals may give rise to distortions of
competition. However, it should be assessed in a much wider context taking account of all the complex
factors involved. At present, the Commission is not satisfied that Community legislation in this field would
be appropriate.

(1) OJ L 142, 2.6.1997.
(2) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999.
(3) OJ L 340, 31.12.1993.

(2000/C 203 E/135)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1991/99

by Mogens Camre (UEN) to the Commission

(9 November 1999)

Subject: Transport of horses

On 11 October 1999, the German TV channel, ZDF, broadcast a programme produced by Manfred
Karremann about the transport of live horses from the Baltic States to Italy.

Horses are transported in lorries and spend 100 hours travelling in conditions that fly in the face of all
animal welfare principles.

Is the Commission aware of such transport operations, and can it intervene to put a stop to what is an
infringement of EU rules on the transport of animals?

(2000/C 203 E/136)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2144/99

by Hiltrud Breyer (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(18 November 1999)

Subject: Inadequate checks on the transport of horses for slaughter

Numerous shocking TV documentaries have been broadcast recently about the suffering experienced by
horses for slaughter when being transported from eastern Europe to Italy. Their suffering could at least be
reduced if appropriate checks were made at border crossings in Germany and Italy. In most cases, the
lorries carrying the animals have already been travelling for more than 24 hours. Moreover, existing
directives on the transport of animals are not being complied with in some Member States.

C 203 E/108

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

18.7.2000

1. Will the Commission agree to make sure that the authorities carrying out checks at the borders allow
consignments of horses to proceed only if the horses concerned have been unloaded, fed and watered and
given a 24-hour rest period?

Does it not also take the view that the lack of concern and the laxity on the part of Italian border

2.
officials in Gorizia is totally unacceptable?

3. When will the Commission take its responsibility for monitoring compliance with existing directives
seriously and increase the number of Food and Veterinary Office inspectors to twelve (from one), as called
for by the Agriculture Council in June 1995?

Joint answer
to Written Questions E-1991/99 and P-2144/99
given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(22 December 1999)

The Commission is aware of the problems in relation to animal welfare reported in the German television
broadcast. Reports by its veterinary inspectorate and complaints from various animal welfare organisations
also indicate that problems continue to exist in this domain.

When animals arrive at the frontier of the Community in a condition where they are clearly not fit for
further transport, it is however the Member State concerned which is obliged to take the necessary action
to protect the welfare of the animals involved by giving them proper care and attention with a sufficient
resting period.

Concerning the activities of the Commission, several veterinary inspection missions have been carried out
in Gorizia and Prosecco where the horses normally enter the territory of the Community. Following the
missions, detailed recommendations were submitted to the Italian authorities and some improvements
have been noted. Unfortunately recent complaints and the images shown by the German television indicate
that these improvements may not have been permanent.

The Commission is still in the process of recruiting inspection personnel and a number of new staff have
specific responsibilities for monitoring the implementation of animal welfare legislation which applies in
the Member States. The Commission is aware of the increasing importance attached to animal welfare by
consumers and will continue to ensure that, amongst its other responsibilities, animal welfare will be given
corresponding importance.

The Commission is reviewing the matter and will not hesitate to initiate the procedure provided in
Article 226 (ex-Article 169) EC Treaty, should this prove necessary.

The Commission believes that the most effective way to achieve a widespread improvement in animal
welfare standards is to work towards an international consensus on this issue. For this purpose, in the
World trade organisation negotiating round, the Commission will be trying to ensure that the issue of
animal welfare is addressed on a multilateral basis.

(2000/C 203 E/137)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1994/99

by Paul R(cid:252)big (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(9 November 1999)

Subject: Price marking obligation on the Internet

Intra-Austrian trade via the Internet is subject to the price marking law and the price indication Directive
which prescribe gross-price marking.

When individual traders sell over the Internet in different countries two questions immediately arise,
namely whether price marking should be gross ( which means taking into account the differing VAT rates)
or net, and the currency used.