Common Position (EC) No 2/2000 of 8 November 1999 adopted by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, with a view to adopting a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues
Date: 1999-11-08
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: environmental standard, harbour installation, maritime transport, pollution from ships, prevention of pollution, waste management

C 10/14

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

13.1.2000

COMMON POSITION (EC) No 1/2000

adopted by the Council on 8 November 1999

with a view to adopting Directive 2000/.../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on
port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues

(2000/C 10/02)

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF

THE
THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Com-
munity, and in particular Article 80(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social
Committee (2),

Having regard to the opinion of
Regions (3),

the Committee of

the

Acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article
251 of the Treaty (4),

Whereas:

(1) Community policy on the environment aims at a high
level of protection;
it is based on the precautionary
principle and the principles that the polluter should pay
and that preventive action should be taken;

(2) One important field of Community action in maritime
transport concerns the reduction of the pollution of the
seas; this can be achieved through compliance with
international conventions, codes and resolutions while
maintaining the freedom of navigation as provided for by
the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
and the freedom of providing services as provided for in
Community law;

(3) The Community is seriously concerned about the pol-
lution of the seas and coastlines of the Member States
caused by discharges of waste and cargo residues from
ships, and in particular about the implementation of the
International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution
from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978
relating thereto (Marpol 73/78) which regulates what

(1) OJ C 271, 31.8.1998, p. 79.
(2) OJ C 138,18.5.1999, p. 12.
(3) OJ C 198, 14.7.1999, p. 27.
(4) Opinion of the European Parliament of 11 February 1999 (OJ
C 150, 28.5.1999, p. 432), Council Common Position of 8
November 1999 and Decision of the European Parliament of …
(not yet published in the Official Journal).

wastes can be discharged from ships into the marine
environment and requires States Parties to ensure the
provision of adequate reception facilities in ports; all
Member States have ratified Marpol 73/78;

(4) The protection of

the marine environment can be
enhanced by reducing discharges into the sea of ship-
generated waste and cargo residues; this can be achieved
by improving the availability and use of reception
facilities and by improving the enforcement regime; in its
Resolution of 8 June 1993 on a common policy of safe
seas (5), the Council included among its priority actions
the development of availability and use of reception
facilities within the Community;

(5) Council Directive 95/21/EC of 19 June 1995 concerning
the enforcement, in respect of shipping using Community
ports and sailing in the waters under the jurisdiction of
the Member States, of international standards for ship
safety, pollution prevention and shipboard living and
working conditions (port State control) (6) provides that
ships posing an unreasonable threat of harm to the
marine environment may not proceed to sea;

(6)

(7)

Pollution of the seas by its very nature has transboundary
implications; in view of the subsidiarity principle, action
at Community level is the most effective way of ensuring
common environmental standards for ships and ports
throughout the Community;

In view of the proportionality principle, a directive is the
appropriate legal instrument, as it provides a framework
for the Member States’ uniform and compulsory appli-
cation of environmental standards, while leaving each
Member State the right to decide which implementation
tools best fit its internal system;

(5) OJ C 271, 7.10.1993, p. 1.
(6) OJ L 157, 7.7.1995, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Directive

98/42/EC (OJ L 184, 27.6.1998, p. 40).

13.1.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 10/15

(8) Consistency with existing regional agreements, such as
the 1974/1992 Convention on the Protection of the
Marine Environment in the Baltic Sea area, should be
ensured;

(9)

In the interest of improving pollution prevention and
avoiding distortion of competition, the environmental
requirements should apply to all ships, irrespective of the
flag they fly, and adequate reception facilities should be
made available in all ports of the Community;

ports instead of discharge into the sea;
this can be
facilitated by providing that all ships contribute to the
costs for the reception and handling of ship-generated
waste so as to reduce the economic incentives to discharge
into the sea; in view of the subsidiarity principle, the
Member States should, in accordance with their national
laws and current practices, retain the powers to establish
whether and in what proportion the fees related to
quantities actually delivered by the ship will be included
in the cost-recovery systems for using port reception
facilities; charges for using these facilities should be fair,
non-discriminatory and transparent;

(10) Adequate port reception facilities should meet the needs
of users, from the largest merchant ship to the smallest
the environment, without
recreational craft, and of
causing undue delay to the ships using them; the obli-
gation to ensure the availability of adequate port reception
facilities leaves the Member States with a high degree of
freedom to arrange the reception of waste in the most
suitable manner and permits them, inter alia, to provide
fixed reception installations or to appoint service pro-
viders bringing to the ports mobile units for the reception
of waste when needed; this obligation also implies the
other
all
obligation
accompanying arrangements necessary for the proper
and adequate use of these facilities;

provide

service

and/or

to

(11) Adequacy of facilities can be improved by up to date
waste reception and handling plans established in consul-
tation with the relevant parties;

(15) In order to avoid undue burden for the parties concerned,
ships engaged in scheduled traffic with frequent and
regular port calls may be exempted from certain obli-
gations deriving from this Directive where there is
sufficient evidence that there are arrangements to ensure
the delivery of the waste and the payment of fees;

(16) Cargo residues should be delivered to port reception
facilities in accordance with Marpol 73/78; Marpol 73/78
requires cargo residues to be delivered to port reception
facilities to the extent necessary to comply with the
tank-cleaning requirements; any fee for such delivery
should be paid by the user of the reception facility,
the user being normally specified in the contractual
arrangements between the parties involved or in other
local arrangements;

(12) The effectiveness of port reception facilities can be
improved by requiring ships to notify their need to use
reception facilities; such notification would also provide
information for effectively planned waste management;
waste from fishing vessels and recreational craft may be
handled by the port reception facilities without prior
notification;

(17) It is necessary to undertake targeted inspections in order
to verify compliance with this Directive; the number of
such inspections, as well as the penalties imposed, should
be sufficient to deter non-compliance with this Directive;
for reasons of efficiency and cost-effectiveness, such
inspections may be undertaken within the framework of
Directive 95/21/EC, when applicable;

(13) Discharges of ship-generated waste at sea can be reduced
by requiring all ships to deliver their waste to port
reception facilities before leaving the port; in order to
reconcile the interest of the smooth operation of maritime
transport with the protection of the environment, excep-
tions to this requirement should be possible taking into
account the sufficiency of the dedicated storage capacity
on board, the possibility of delivering at another port
without risk of discharge at sea and specific delivery
requirements adopted in accordance with international
law;

(14) In view of the ‘polluter pays’ principle, the costs of port
reception facilities, including the treatment and disposal
of ship-generated waste, should be covered by ships; in
the interest of protecting the environment, the fee system
should encourage the delivery of ship-generated waste to

(18) Member States should ensure a proper administrative
framework for the adequate functioning of the port
reception facilities; under Marpol 73/78, allegations of
inadequate port reception facilities should be transmitted
to the International Maritime Organisation (IMO); the
same information could be simultaneously transmitted to
the Commission for information purposes;

(19) An information system for the identification of polluting
or potentially polluting ships would facilitate the enforce-
ment of this Directive and would be helpful in evaluating
the implementation thereof;
the Sirenac information
system established under the Paris Memorandum of
Understanding on port State control provides a large
amount of the additional information needed for that
purpose;

C 10/16

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

13.1.2000

(20) It is necessary that a committee consisting of representa-
tives of the Member States assist the Commission in the
effective application of this Directive; since the measures
necessary for implementing this Directive are measures
of a general scope within the meaning of Article 2 of
Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying
down the procedures for the exercise of implementing
powers conferred on the Commission (1), such measures
should be adopted in accordance with the regulatory
procedure provided for in Article 5 of that Decision;

(21) Certain provisions of this Directive may, without broad-
ening its scope, be amended in accordance with that
procedure in order to take into account Community or
IMO measures which enter into force in the future so as
to ensure their harmonised implementation,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

Purpose

The purpose of this Directive is to reduce the discharges of
ship-generated waste and cargo residues into the sea, especially
illegal discharges, from ships using ports in the Community,
by improving the availability and use of port reception facilities
for ship-generated waste and cargo residues, thereby enhancing
the protection of the marine environment.

Article 2

Definitions

For the purpose of this Directive:

(a)

‘ship’ shall mean a seagoing vessel of any type whatsoever
operating in the marine environment and shall include
hydrofoil boats, air-cushion vehicles, submersibles and
floating craft;

(b) ‘Marpol 73/78’ shall mean the International Convention
for the Prevention of Pollution from ships, 1973, as
modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto, as in
force at the date of adoption of this Directive;

(c)

‘ship-generated waste’ shall mean all waste,
including
sewage, and residues other than cargo residues, which are
generated during the service of a ship and fall under the
scope of Annexes I,
IV and V to Marpol 73/78 and
cargo-associated waste as defined in the Guidelines for the
implementation of Annex V to Marpol 73/78;

(d) ‘cargo residues’ shall mean the remnants of any cargo
material on board in cargo holds or tanks which remain
after unloading procedures and cleaning operations are
completed and shall include loading/unloading excesses
and spillage;

(e)

(f)

‘port reception facilities’ shall mean any facility, which
floating or mobile and capable of receiving
is fixed,
ship-generated waste or cargo residues;

‘fishing vessel’ shall mean any ship equipped or used
commercially for catching fish or other living resources of
the sea;

(g) ‘recreational craft’ shall mean a ship of any type, regardless
of the means of propulsion, intended for sports or leisure
purposes;

(h) ‘port’ shall mean a place or a geographical area made up
of such improvement works and equipment as to permit,
principally, the reception of ships, including fishing vessels
and recreational craft.

Without prejudice to the definitions in points (c) and (d),
‘ship-generated waste’ and ‘cargo residues’ shall be considered
to be waste within the meaning of Article 1(a) of Council
Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 on waste (2).

Article 3

Scope

This Directive shall apply to:

(a) all ships, including fishing vessels and recreational craft,
irrespective of their flag, calling at, or operating within, a
port of a Member State, with the exception of any warship,
naval auxiliary or other ship owned or operated by a
State and used, for the time being, only on government
non-commercial service;

and

(b) all ports of the Member States normally visited by ships

falling under the scope of point (a).

Article 4

Port reception facilities

1. Member States shall ensure the availability of port
reception facilities adequate to meet the needs of the ships
normally using the port without causing undue delay to ships.

(1) OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.

(2) OJ L 194, 25.7.1975, p. 39. Directive as last amended by
Commission Decision 96/350/EC (OJ L 135, 6.6.1996, p. 32).

13.1.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 10/17

2.
To achieve adequacy, the reception facilities shall be
capable of receiving the types and quantities of ship-generated
waste and cargo residues from ships normally using that port,
taking into account the operational needs of the users of the
port, the size and the geographical location of the port, the
type of ships calling at that port and the exemptions provided
for under Article 9.

(b) as soon as the port of call is known, if this information is

available less than 24 hours prior to arrival;

or

(c) at the latest upon departure from the previous port, if the

duration of the voyage is less than 24 hours.

3. Member States shall establish procedures, in accordance
with those agreed by the International Maritime Organisation
(IMO), for reporting to the port State alleged inadequacies of
port reception facilities.

Member States may decide that the information will be notified
to the operator of the port reception facility, who will forward
it to the relevant authority.

Article 5

Waste reception and handling plans

An appropriate waste reception and handling plan shall
1.
following
be developed and implemented for each port
in particular with
consultations with the relevant parties,
port users or their representatives, having regard to the
requirements of Articles 4, 6, 7, 10 and 12. Detailed require-
ments for the development of such plans are set out in Annex I.

2.
The waste reception and handling plans referred to in
paragraph 1 may, where required for reasons of efficiency,
be developed in a regional context with the appropriate
involvement of each port, provided that the need for, and
availability of, reception facilities are specified for each individ-
ual port.

3. Member States shall evaluate and approve the waste
reception and handling plan, monitor its implementation and
ensure its re-approval at least every three years and after
significant changes in the operation of the port.

Article 6

Notification

2.
The information referred to in paragraph 1 shall be kept
on board at least until the next port of call and shall upon
request be made available to the Member States’ authorities.

Article 7

Delivery of ship-generated waste

1.
The master of a ship calling at a Community port shall,
before leaving the port, deliver all ship-generated waste to a
port reception facility.

2.
Notwithstanding paragraph 1, a ship may proceed to the
next port of call without delivering the ship-generated waste if
it follows from the information given in accordance with
Article 6 and Annex II, that there is sufficient dedicated storage
capacity for all ship-generated waste that has been accumulated
and will be accumulated during the intended voyage of the
ship until the port of delivery.

If there are good reasons to believe that adequate facilities are
not available at the intended port of delivery, or if this port is
unknown, and that there is therefore a risk that the waste will
be discharged at sea, the Member State shall take all necessary
measures to prevent marine pollution, if necessary by requiring
the ship to deliver its waste before departure from the port.

3.
Paragraph 2 shall apply without prejudice to more
stringent delivery requirements for ships adopted in accord-
ance with international law.

1.
The master of a ship, other than a fishing vessel or
recreational craft, bound for a port located in the Community
shall complete truly and accurately the form in Annex II and
notify that information to the authority or body designated for
this purpose by the Member State in which that port is located:

(a) at least 24 hours prior to arrival, if the port of call is

known;

or

Article 8

Fees for ship-generated waste

the costs of port
1. Member States shall ensure that
including the
reception facilities for ship-generated waste,
treatment and disposal of the waste, shall be covered through
the collection of a fee from ships.

C 10/18

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

13.1.2000

2.
The cost-recovery systems for using port reception
facilities shall provide no incentive for ships to discharge their
waste into the sea. To this end the following principles shall
apply:

(a) all ships calling at a port of a Member State shall contribute
to the costs referred to in paragraph 1, irrespective of
actual use of the facilities. Arrangements to this effect may
include incorporation of the fee in the port dues or a
separate standard waste fee. The fees may be differentiated
with respect to, inter alia, the category, type and size of the
ship;

(b) the part of the costs which is not covered by the fee
referred to in subparagraph (a), if any, shall be covered on
the basis of the types and quantities of ship-generated
waste actually delivered by the ship;

(c)

fees may be reduced if the ship’s environmental manage-
ment, design, equipment and operation are such that the
master of the ship can demonstrate that it produces
reduced quantities of ship-generated waste.

In order to ensure that the fees are fair, transparent,
3.
non-discriminatory and reflect the costs of the facilities and
services made available and, where appropriate, used, the
amount of the fees and the basis on which they have been
calculated should be made clear for the port users.

Article 9

Exemptions

1. When ships are engaged in scheduled traffic with fre-
quent and regular port calls and there is sufficient evidence of
an arrangement to ensure the delivery of ship-generated waste
and payment of fees in a port along the ship’s route, Member
States of the ports involved may exempt these ships from the
obligations in Article 6, Article 7(1) and Article 8.

2. Member States shall inform the Commission of exemp-
tions grated in accordance with paragraph 1 on a regular basis,
at least once a year.

Article 11

Enforcement

1. Member States shall ensure that any ship may be subject
to an inspection in order to verify that it complies with Articles
7 and 10 and that a sufficient number of such inspections is
carried out.

For inspections concerning ships other than fishing

2.
vessels and recreational craft:

(a)

in selecting ships for inspection, Member States shall pay
particular attention to:

— ships which have not complied with the notification

requirements in Article 6,

— ships for which the examination of the information
provided by the master in accordance with Article 6
has revealed other grounds to believe that the ship
does not comply with this Directive;

(b) such inspection may be undertaken within the framework

of Directive 95/21/EC, when applicable;

(c)

if the relevant authority is not satisfied with the results of
this inspection, it shall ensure that the ship does not leave
the port until it has delivered its ship-generated waste and
cargo residues to a port reception facility in accordance
with Articles 7 and 10;

(d) when there is clear evidence that a ship has proceeded to
sea without having complied with Article 7 or 10, the
competent authority of the next port of call shall be
informed thereof and such a ship shall, without prejudice
to the application of the penalties referred to in Article 13,
not be permitted to leave that port until a more detailed
assessment of factors relating to the ship’s compliance
with this Directive, such as the accuracy of any information
provided in accordance with Article 6, has taken place.

3. Member States shall establish control procedures, to the
extent required, for fishing vessels and recreational craft to
ensure compliance with the applicable requirements of this
Directive.

Article 10

Delivery of cargo residues

Article 12

Accompanying measures

1. Member States shall:

The master of a ship calling at a Community port shall ensure
that cargo residues are delivered to a port reception facility in
accordance with the provisions of Marpol 73/78. Any fee for
delivery of cargo residues shall be paid by the user of the
reception facility.

(a) take all necessary measures to ensure that masters, pro-
viders of port reception facilities and other persons con-
the requirements
cerned are adequately informed of
addressed to them under this Directive and that they
comply with them;

13.1.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 10/19

(b) designate appropriate authorities or bodies for performing

functions under this Directive;

(c) make provision for cooperation between their relevant
authorities and commercial organisations to ensure the
effective implementation of this Directive;

(d) ensure that the information notified by masters in accord-

ance with Article 6 be appropriately examined;

(e) ensure that the formalities relating to the use of port
reception facilities are simple and expeditious in order to
create an incentive for the master to use port reception
facilities and to avoid undue delays to ships;

Article 14

Regulatory Committee

The Commission shall be assisted by the Committee set

1.
up pursuant to Article 12(1) of Directive 93/75/EEC (4).

2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, the regulatory
procedure provided for in Article 5 of Decision 1999/468/EC
shall apply, in compliance with the provisions of Article 8
thereof.

(f) ensure that the Commission is provided with a copy of the
allegations of inadequate port reception facilities referred
to in Article 4(3);

The period provided for in Article 5(6) of Decision

3.
1999/468/EC shall be fixed as three months.

(g) ensure that the treatment, recovery or disposal of ship-
generated waste and cargo residues shall be carried out in
accordance with Directive 75/442/EEC and other relevant
Community waste legislation, in particular Council Direc-
tive 75/439/EEC of 16 June 1975 on the disposal of waste
oils (1) and Council Directive 91/689/EEC of 12 December
1991 on hazardous waste (2).

Delivery of ship-generated waste and cargo residues shall
2.
be considered as release for free circulation within the meaning
of Article 79 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12
October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (3).
The customs authorities shall not require the lodging of a
summary declaration in accordance with Article 45 of the
Community Customs Code.

3. Member States and the Commission shall cooperate to
establish an appropriate information system to facilitate the
identification of ships which have not delivered their ship-
generated waste and cargo residues in accordance with this
Directive.

Article 13

Penalties

Member States shall lay down a system of penalties for the
breach of national provisions adopted pursuant to this Direc-
tive and shall take all the measures necessary to ensure that
those penalties are applied. The penalties thus provided shall
be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.

(1) OJ L 194, 25.7.1975, p. 23. Directive as last amended by Directive

91/692/EEC (OJ L 377, 31.12.1991, p. 48).

(2) OJ L 377, 31.12.1991, p. 20. Directive as last amended by

Article 15

Amendment procedure

The Annexes to this Directive, the definition in Article 2(b),
references to Community instruments and references to IMO
instruments may be amended in accordance with the pro-
cedure laid down in Article 14(2) in order to bring them into
line with Community or IMO measures which have entered
into force, in so far as such amendments do not broaden the
scope of this Directive.

Furthermore, the Annexes to this Directive may be amended
in accordance with that procedure when necessary to improve
the regime established by this Directive, in so far as such
amendments do not broaden the scope of this Directive.

Article 16

Implementation

1. Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations
and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this
Directive before ... (5) and forthwith inform the Commission
thereof.

However, as far as sewage as referred to in Article 2(c) is
concerned,
the implementation of this Directive shall be
suspended until 12 months after the entry into force of
Annex IV to Marpol 73/78.

Directive 94/31/EC (OJ L 168, 2.7.1994, p. 28).

(4) OJ L 247, 5.10.1993, p. 19. Directive as last amended by Directive

(3) OJ L 302, 19.10.1992, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by

98/74/EC (OJ L 276, 13.10.1998, p. 7).

Regulation (EC) No 955/1999 (OJ L 119, 7.5.1999, p. 1).

(5) 24 months following the date of entry into force of this Directive.

C 10/20

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

13.1.2000

2. When Member States adopt these measures, they shall
contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied
by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication.
The methods of making such a reference shall be laid down by
Member States.

Article 17

Evaluation

1. Member States shall submit to the Commission a status
report concerning the implementation of this Directive every
three years.

2.
The Commission shall submit an evaluation report on
the operation of the system as provided for in this Directive to
the European Parliament and the Council, on the basis of the
reports of the Member States as provided for in paragraph 1
together with proposals
concerning the
implementation of this Directive.

as necessary,

Article 18

Entry into force

This Directive shall enter into force on the day of its publication
in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Article 19

Addressees

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

Done at ...

For the European Parliament

For the Council

The President

The President

13.1.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 10/21

ANNEX I

REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE RECEPTION AND HANDLING PLANS IN PORTS

(as referred to in Article 5)

Plans shall cover all types of ship-generated waste and cargo residues originating from ships normally visiting the
port and shall be developed according to the size of the port and the types of ships calling at that port.

The following elements shall be addressed in the plans:

— an assessment of the need for port reception facilities, in light of the need of the ships normally visiting the port;

— a description of the type and capacity of port reception facilities;

— a detailed description of the procedures for the reception and collection of ship-generated waste and cargo

residues;

— a description of the charging system;

— procedures for reporting alleged inadequacies of port reception facilities;

— procedures for ongoing consultations with port users, waste contractors, terminal operators and other interested

parties;

and

— type and quantities of ship-generated waste and cargo residues received and handled.

In addition, the plans should include:

— a summary of relevant legislation and formalities for delivery;

— identification of a person or persons to be responsible for the implementation of the plan;

— a description of the pre-treatment equipment and processes in the port, if any;

— a description of methods of recording actual use of the port reception facilities;

— a description of methods of recording amounts of ship-generated and cargo residues received;

and

— a description of how the ship-generated waste and cargo residues are disposed of.

The procedures for reception, collection, storage, treatment and disposal should conform in all respects to an
environmental management scheme suitable for the progressive reduction of the environmental impact of these
activities. Such conformity is presumed if the procedures are in compliance with Council Regulation (EEC)
No 1836/93 of 29 June 1993 allowing voluntary participation by companies in the industrial sector in a Community
eco-management and audit scheme (1).

(1) OJ L 168, 10.7.1993, p. 1.

C 10/22

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

13.1.2000

Information to be made available to all port users:

— brief reference to fundamental importance of proper delivery of ship-generated waste and cargo residues;

— location of port reception facilities applicable to each berth with diagram/map;

— list of ship-generated waste and cargo residues normally dealt with;

— list of contact points, the operators and the services offered;

— description of procedures for delivery;

— description of charging system;

and

— procedures for reporting alleged inadequacies of port reception facilities.

13.1.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 10/23

ANNEX II

INFORMATION TO BE NOTIFIED BEFORE ENTRY INTO THE PORT OF ...

(Port of destination as referred to in Article 6 of Directive 2000/…/EC)

1. Name, call sign and, where appropriate, IMO identification number of the ship:

2. Flag State:

3. Estimated time of arrival (ETA):

4. Estimated time of departure (ETD):

5. Previous port of call:

6. Next port of call:

7. Last port and date when ship-generated waste was delivered:

8. Are you delivering

all

some

none

(*)

of your waste into port reception facilities?

9. Type and amount of waste and residues to be delivered and/or remaining on board, and percentage of maximum storage capacity:

If delivering all waste, complete second column as appropriate.

If delivering some or no waste, complete all columns.

Type

Waste to be
delivered
m3

Maximum dedicated
storage capacity
m3

Amount of waste
retained on board
m3

Port at which
remaining waste will
be delivered

Estimated amount
of waste to be
generated between
notification and
next port of call
m3

1. Waste oils

Sludge

Bilge water

Others (specify)

(*) Tick appropriate box.

C 10/24

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

13.1.2000

Type

Waste to be
delivered
m3

Maximum dedicated
storage capacity
m3

Amount of waste
retained on board
m3

Port at which
remaining waste will
be delivered

Estimated amount
of waste to be
generated between
notification and
next port of call
m3

2. Garbage

Food waste

Plastic

Other

3. Cargo-associated waste (*)

(specify)

4. Cargo residues (*)

(specify)

(*) May be estimates.

Notes:

1. This information may be used for port State control and other inspection purposes.

2. Member States will determine which bodies will receive copies of this notification.

3. This form is to be completed unless the ship is covered by an exemption in accordance with Article 9 of Directive 2000/.../EC.

I confirm that:

— the above details are accurate and correct

and

— there is sufficient dedicated onboard capacity to store all waste generated between notification and the next port at which waste will be

delivered.

Date …

Time …

Signature …

13.1.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 10/25

STATEMENT OF THE COUNCIL’S REASONS

I.

INTRODUCTION

The Commission submitted to the Council, on 20 July 1998, its proposal for a European Parliament
and Council Directive on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues (1). The
Commission amended its proposal on 20 April 1999(2). The Commission proposal, which is based
upon Article 80(2) of the Treaty, is subject to the codecision procedure.

The European Parliament delivered its opinion in the first reading on 11 February 1999 (3) and
confirmed it in the framework of the codecision procedure on 16 September 1999.

The Economic and Social Commitee issued its opinion on 24 March 1999 (4).

The Committee of the Regions issued its opinion on 11 March 1999 (5).

On 8 November 1999, the Council adopted its common position in accordance with Article 251(2)
of the Treaty (former Article 189b).

II. OBJECTIVES

The objective of the Directive under consideration is to enhance the protection of the marine
environment by reducing the discharges of ship-generated waste and cargo residues into the sea
through the improvement of the availability and use of port reception facilities.

The draft Directive also aims at ensuring a harmonised implementation of the Marpol 73/78
Convention(6), which, inter alia, obliges ports to ensure the provision of oil, noxious liquid substances
and garbage reception facilities adequate to meet the needs of ships using them, without causing
undue delays to ships.

III. SUMMARY OF THE COMMON POSITION

The common position contains the following key elements:

(a) each Community port shall ensure the availability of adequate waste reception facilities for ships
normally calling at that port. A description of the needs and the details of the facilities shall be
laid down in a waste reception and handling plan, which could take into account the regional
context;

(b) all ships calling at a Community port must deliver their ship-generated waste at that port unless
they have enough dedicated storage capacity for the waste to be delivered at a subsequent port;

(c) the cost of the port reception facilities shall be covered through the collection of fees from ships.
The cost-recovery system shall not encourage the discharge of waste into the sea. It shall consist
of a fixed non-special fee component and, on an optional basis, a variable fee relating to the
amount and type of waste actually delivered;

(d) the Member States shall implement the Directive 24 months after its publication in the Official
Journal. They shall provide a proper administrative framework for its enforcement and its
monitoring.

(1) OJ C 271, 31.8.1998, p. 79.
(2) OJ C 148, 28.5.1999, p. 7.
(3) OJ C 150, 28.5.1999, p. 432.
(4) OJ C 138, 18.5.1999, p. 12.
(5) OJ C 198, 14.7.1999, p. 27.
(6) International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships 1973, and the Protocol of 1978 related

thereto.

C 10/26

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

13.1.2000

IV. MOTIVATION OF THE COUNCIL

During its examination of the Commission proposal, the Council built upon the opinion of the
other Community institutions, in particular the European Parliament. The Council was concerned
the marine
about reaching a generally acceptable equilibrium between the protection of
environment, the smooth operation of maritime transport and the local conditions of each port.
The following points are particularly relevant in that respect:

(a) Regarding the provision of adequate port reception facilities, the Council feels that the facilities
should be able to cope with the particular local conditions they are confronted with. The text, as
amended by the Council, states that the Member States’ responsibility is to ensure the availability
of facilities (i.e. fixed or mobile installations), that the capacity facilities must take into account
the quantities of waste normally delivered, the operational needs of the users, the geographical
location of the port (lack of space for large installations may make delivery at larger neighbouring
ports necessary) and the exemptions in Article 9 (as exempted ships may reduce the need for
waste reception facilities).

(b) The common position gives the Member States the flexibility of establishing the waste reception
and handling plans in a regional context and following consultations with the relevant parties so
that resources could be allocated in a most cost-effective way.

(c) Regarding the waste delivery regime, the text tries to smooth the operation of ships and to reduce
the administrative burden on ports by providing that the ship will be able to leave the port
without a case by case authorisation if, subject to control under Article 11(2), the availability of
sufficient storage capacity clearly appears from the form in Annex II to the Directive. At the same
time, the text was made more severe from the point of view of the protection of the marine
environment. Whereas the Commission proposal permitted ships not to deliver their waste if
there is sufficient storage capacity for the waste during the intended voyage of the ship, Article 7
of the common position adds that the ship must have sufficient dedicated storage capacity for the
waste kept on board and for the waste that will be generated until the intended port of delivery of
the waste. Moreover, the common position adds that the port State has to intervene if the
intended port of delivery is not known or has no adequate reception facilities so that there is a
risk of discharge at sea.

(d) The fee system (Article 8) was amended in order to allow the Member States to give due
consideration to their local maritime traditions while ensuring that these traditions do not conflict
with the protection of the environment.

The common position strives to strike a balance between the non-special fee and the direct fee
principles and enables the Member States and ports to adapt the fee structure to their particular
conditions while providing no incentive for ships to discharge their waste at sea. On the one
hand, the common position imposes on all ships a fixed contribution to cover the cost of the port
reception facilities irrespective of the actual use of those facilities. On the other hand, it opens the
possibility to adjust the relative importance of the mandatory non-special and optional direct fee
components in relation to the other characteristics of the port fees, the port’s facilities or other
aspects in such a way that the fees would still encourage the delivery of waste to ports instead of
discharge into the sea.

This approach would however be subject to a public Council and Commission statement whereby
the Commission would submit a proposal to amend the Directive if the variety of cost recovery
systems would have adverse effects on the marine environment or the waste flow patterns.

13.1.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 10/27

V. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

(a) The Council introduced a better consideration of international conventions:

— the common position provides that the delivery requirements of the Directive do not
prejudge more stringent delivery requirements adopted in accordance with international law
(Article 7(3)). This allows the Member States concerned to implement regional conventions
such as the Convention on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea area to
which the Community is a party (1), without going as far as extending the application of those
regional conventions to the Community as a whole;

— being of the opinion that sewage should be covered as soon as Annex IV to Marpol on sewage
has entered into force, the Council completed Article 16 in the sense that the Directive will
automatically apply to sewage 12 months after entry into force of that Annex without any
further time-consuming measures being necessary.

(b) The Council aimed at avoiding any administrative burden that would be out of proportion to the

aims being pursued:

— concerning Article 6(1), the common position maintains the Commission proposal’s option
for Member States to choose the authority or body to whom the ship should notify its
intention to deliver its waste. It adds that, if the Member State designates the operator of the
facility, the latter should pass on the information to the relevant authority;

— it is specified that the information must be kept on board until the next port of call

(Article 6(2);

— in Article 9(2), the common position stipulates that the Commission should only be regularly

informed of the exemptions;

— the Member States and the Commission agreed to cooperate in establishing common criteria

for identifying environmentally friendly ships benefiting form reduced fees.

(c) The Council took into account the specific characteristics of certain types of ships:

— The Member States agreed to make upon adoption of the Directive a public statement, the
wording of which is drawn form Marpol Article 3(3), according to which they will take
measures to ensure that ships which are exempted from the scope of the Directive, such as
warships or other ships enjoying State immunity, will act in a manner consistent, in so far as
is reasonable and practicable, with this Directive.

— The Council amended Articles 3 and 11 of the Commission proposal with a view to clarifying
that the Directive and its general enforcement provision also apply to fishing vessels and
recreational craft. Moreover, the Council shared the Commission’s proposal that these vessels
should not be subject to the notification requirements, the priority inspections in case of
absent or suspicious notification, the port State control and the detention at the next port of
call as described in Article 6 and in Article 11(2): fishing vessels usually call exclusively at the
same home ports, which know their schedules, are routinely prepared to receiving their waste
without prior notification each time they return form the sea and have specific control
instruments for fishing vessels. Moreover, Directive 95/21/EC on port State control does not
apply to fishing vessels and recreational craft. As indicated in Article 11(3), other types of
inspection and control need therefore to be established by the Member States.

It is also to be noted that so-called fish factory vessels which are not engaged in catching fish
are not to be considered fishing vessels under the draft Directive and will therefore be subject
to all prior notification and enforcement requirements of Articles 6 and 11.

(1) OJ L 73, 16.3.1994, pp. 1 and 19.

C 10/28

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

13.1.2000

(d) The Council sought an adequate enforcement of the Directive:

— For ships that infringed against the Directive, the common position maintains, in Article 11,
the proposed penalties of Article 13 and the assessment of the ships’ record of compliance,
while adding that the ship will not be permitted to leave port pending that assessment. The
common position also deletes the prohibition to load or unload a ship as this would unduly
affect the cargo owners, as well as the ‘more detailed inspections’ under the port State control
Directive as these are solely related to safety.

— The common position deletes Article 12(1)(g) on compensation for unduly delayed ships as it
could interfere with the extensive legislation on contractual and civil liability existing in all
Member States.

(e) The Council took great care to improve the technical quality and legal clarity of the provisions:

— the recitals were updated and streamlined; repetitions of the articles were avoided;

— the drafting of the definitions of ship, port reception facility and port was improved (see

Article 2);

— Article 14 was adapted to take into account the provisions of Council Decision 1999/468/EC
of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers
conferred on the Commission (1);

— the presentation of the form in Annex II was improved.

VI. AMENDMENTS BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

1. The Council followed, in substance, 11 of 18 amendments by the European Parliament, very

often in the form suggested in the Commission’s amended proposal:

— Amendment 1 on recital 5 (new recital 8) relating to Helcom was adopted in the form of the

Commisson’s amended proposal.

— Amendments 3 and 16 concerning environmentally friendly ships were accepted through the
statement referred to under V(b), fourth indent. The Council could not however agree to
setting up an intricate administrative system for classifying individual ships.

— Amendment 4 on evaluation of the Directive was inserted in recital 19 of the common

position.

— Amendment 5 on exempted ships was accepted through the statement referred to under V(c)

first indent above.

— Amendment 6 on the approval of the waste reception plans was inserted into Article 5(2).

— Amendment 9 on fees was accepted as a statement by the Council and the Commission (see

IV(d)).

(1) OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.

13.1.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 10/29

— Amendment 12 on inspections was accepted in Article 11(2)(d) (see V(d), first indent).

— Amendment 14 (Helsinki Convention) was accepted through the modification of Article 7(3)

mentioned under V(a), first indent.

— Amendment 17 was accepted through the postponed application of the Directive to sewage
(Article 16(1)) and through a more detailed drafting of Article 4 concerning waste reception
facilities (see V(a), second indent).

— Amendment 18 was accepted in the technically improved form proposed by the Commission.

2. The Council did not adopt the following amendments:

(a) Amendment 2 to recital 15 (recital 12 of the common position). Amendment 7 (first part) to Article

6(1). Amendment 13 to Article 11(4) (new Article 11(3))

The Council feels that the characteristics of fishing vessels are such that they should escape
the notification duties and special enforcement requirements set out in Articles 6 and 11(2)
(see V(c), second indent).

(b) Amendment 7, second part (Article 6(1)): Spreading of notifications

The Council prefers, with a view to reducing the administrative burden, to maintain the
option of informing either the port authorities or another relevant body, while providing for
an exchange of information between them (see V(b), first indent).

(c) Amendment 8 to Article 8: The fees for ship-generated waste

In considering this Article, the Council had to reconcile different concerns. As explained under
IV(d), Member States are requested to fix the fixed-fee element of the waste-reception fees at
such a level that it would still, taking into account other characteristics of the port, encourage
the delivery of waste in the port.

(d) Amendment 10 for a new Article 9(2a): Waste disposal arrangements with third countries

The Council considers that inserting in the Directive a commitment to establish a common
policy for waste-disposal arrangements with third countries, although desirable, would require
further and careful study of the application of the Directive in practice. The Council
nevertheless inserted in Article 7(2) a provision that Member States have to intervene (e.g. by
requiring delivery of all waste remaining on board) if there are good reasons to believe that
ships intend to deliver their waste in ports having no adequate reception facilities. Since
Community ports will in principle be endowed with adequate facilities, such provision mainly
concerns third country ports.

(e) Amendment 11: The percentage of ships to be inspected (Article 11(1))

The Council feels that adding the requirement of 25 % inspections would place too great a
burden upon the authorities of the port State. In addition, the Council considers that the
Commission’s proposal already contains adequate safeguards by providing for a sufficient
number of inspections, for specific inspections in case of suspicion and for inspections under
Directive 95/21/EC which already provides that 25 % of the ships entering a port should be
inspected.

C 10/30

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

13.1.2000

(f) Amendment 15: The details of the information system (Article 12(3))

The Council is of the opinion that the details of the information system should not be
specified in the Directive as they can be best worked out at expert level in the framework of
the cooperation between the Member States and the Commission in implementing the
Directive.

VII. CONCLUSION

In its common position, the Council attempted to reach a generally acceptable equilibrium between
the protection of the marine environment, the smooth operation of maritime transport and the local
conditions of each port. In doing so, the Council took carefully into account the opinions of the
different Community institutions.