WRITTEN QUESTION E-1877/99 by Daniela Raschhofer (NI) to the Commission. Expenditure on job creation.
Date: 1999-10-29
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Austria, EU Member State, EU employment policy, EU financing arrangements, access to EU information, job creation

C 203 E/78

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

18.7.2000

(2000/C 203 E/096)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1876/99

by Daniela Raschhofer (NI) to the Commission

(29 October 1999)

Subject: Support for the press

The Commission(cid:146)s reply of 22 December 1998 to Written Question E-2924/98 (1) failed to provide full and
satisfactory answers to my queries.

Would the Commission therefore answer the following supplementary questions:

1. What documents and information does the Commission draw on when deciding which media to

support?

2. What was the extent of financial support for Austrian media in 1997 and 1998?

3. Which Austrian media received financial support, and how much, in connection with which European

policy areas?

4. How does the Commission ascertain whether the press reports it helps to finance stimulate public

awareness in European matters, or contribute to forming public opinion?

(1) OJ C 289, 11.10.1999, p. 14.

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(5 January 2000)

1.
The representation of the Commission in Austria does not support the media by way of subsidy, but
buys advertisements or gives financial contributions for an extra number of copies, additional costs for
research or supplementary pages. Criteria for selection of media are the number of copies and the number
of readers, the credibility of the medium as well as the social profile of its readership. Furthermore, the
Commission aims to arrive at a well-balanced media-mix.

The Commission expenditure on Austrian media in 1997 was ATS 4,9 million, and in 1998 ATS 1,5

2.
million.

The Commission is sending direct to the Honourable Member and to the Parliament(cid:146)s Secretariat a

3.
table containing the information requested.

4.
Checking the results of a specific advertisement is hardly possible. Therefore, the Commission
concentrates, as explained above, on those media which are regarded by their readers as competent
information sources for this specific matter.

(2000/C 203 E/097)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1877/99

by Daniela Raschhofer (NI) to the Commission

(29 October 1999)

Subject: Expenditure on job creation

Since widely differing statistics are available concerning expenditure on the creation of jobs in the
European Union and the individual Member States, the questions set out below arise:

1. What is the annual expenditure in the European Union on the creation of new jobs under EU

programmes (ESF, etc.) or appropriate guidelines?

2. What is the expenditure in the Member States on the creation of new jobs under EU programmes

(ESF, etc.) or appropriate guidelines?

3. What statistics are available on this subject, and where can I obtain them?

18.7.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 203 E/79

4. What statistics are available, and what information must the Member States publish?

5. What information on this subject has the Commission received from Austria?

6. Are there studies on this subject? If so, which ones and where can I obtain them?

7. Are there specialists working on this subject? If so, which individuals and institutions are concerned,

and where can I find them?

8. What other projects are there for job creation, and what is their funding?

9. What other Commission activities are there relating to job creation?

10. Have there previously been questions on this subject? If so, may I have them and the answers to

them?

11. Is there EU experience showing that individual Member States have taken particularly promising
measures regarding job creation (best practice)? If so, which Member States have provided the most
positive examples?

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(20 December 1999)

The structural funds are the most important budgetary tool, at Community level, to support the Member
States in their initiatives to promote a more balanced regional development, assist them in their structural
restructuring and, hence promote strong job creation. The European social
in
particular, Member States(cid:146) initiatives to promote job creation, in a more indirect way, through facilitating
better and more flexible functioning of the labour markets in the Community.

fund (ESF) supports,

In 1994-1999, the main priorities for the ESF have been to combat long-term unemployment and
exclusion, to enhance professional skills and qualifications among potential job seekers, and to promote
equal opportunities in the access to the labour market. In the new programming period (2000-2006), the
ESF role has seen reinforced its role as the key instrument, at Community level, to support the employ-
ment strategy and so, will be addressed to support Member States in their implementation of their national
action plans for employment.

1. and 2.
The Commission can only provide figures on budgetary spending channelled through ESF-co-
funded programmes. In the current programming period (1994-1999), the total spending allocation for the
ESF amounted to some € 43 000 million over the six-year period. In the next programming period (2000-
2006), it is not yet possible to give final figures on allocations to ESF, for these depend on the final
national plans currently under discussion with the Member States, but the total should amount to not less
than € 56 000 million.

The Organisation for economic cooperation and development (OECD) employment outlook
3. and 4.
provides roughly comparable data on expenditure for labour market policies (active and passive measures)
as from 1993 and expressed as a percentage share of the gross domestic product (GDP). In recent years,
annual total expenditure on subsidised employment (public, non-profit and private sectors as well as
business start-ups) varies between Member States, ranging from 0,88 % of GDP in Ireland down to less
than 0,1 % in Greece, Luxembourg and Austria. Member States also begin to report on their spending for
active labour market policies in their national action plans as part of the Luxembourg process. In the new
programming period of the structural funds (2000-2006), the Member States will have to report on data
on spending on active labour market policies, to prove that additionality for objectives 2 and 3 is
respected. The Commission is developing a database on labour market policies covering all Member States.
Data will be available in 2001.

C 203 E/80

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

18.7.2000

Some examples for Austria, taken from the 10th annual report of the structural funds (1998),
5.
underline the important contribution to the target of job creation. In Burgenland, which is the only
Austrian region under objective 1, by the end of 1998 2 100 new jobs had been created and over
5 800 jobs had been saved by structural funds. In addition, over 6000 people underwent training instigated
by the ESF. More than 900 small undertakings benefited from aid for investment in small and medium
sized enterprises (SMEs) and around 1 700 new jobs were created. Under objective 2, the programme for
Styria anticipates the creation of more than 2 000 new jobs. In Lower Austria, some 800 new jobs are
projected and around 6 000 should be safeguarded. Under objective 3, more than 30 000 people took
part in the various measures and two thirds found jobs in the six months following their training.

6. to 9.
Job creation is part of the outcome sought in the interventions co-funded through structural
funds. But it is only partly addressed to support measures of direct job creation. It is, therefore, not
possible to provide figures on total impact of the funds on job creation. The Commission, the OECD and
academics have published some partial evaluation of the impact of different programmes on job creation
in the Member States. They often present sound evidence that the success of the programmes improves the
social situation of individuals and groups and contributes significantly to job creation.

There is no particular question that the Commisison would bring to the Honourable Member(cid:146)s

10.
attention on these matters.

All Member States have taken action in line with the employment guidelines since 1997, adapted to
11.
the specific characteristics of their labour markets. As regards direct job creation, the joint employment
reports of 1998 (1) and 1999 (2) illustrate some examples of best practice submitted by the Member States
where estimates of job creation impact are provided. At the beginning of 1999, the Commission launched
a peer-review examination, together with the Member States to assess more in depth such practices.
A report on the outcome of this examination will be presented in 2000. Also ESF publications have
presented cases of best practice developed under the Community initiative Employment.

(1)
(2)

SEC(98) 1688 final.
SEC(1999) 1386 final.

(2000/C 203 E/098)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1882/99

by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(29 October 1999)

Subject: Town planning in an area with high seismic activity

The Ministry for the Environment, Regional Planning and Public Works is pushing ahead with a town-
planning project in the community of Rio in the Prefecture of Achaia.

Geologists have expressed their concern about these plans, because the risk of earthquakes in the region is
one of the highest in Europe and there are many active fault lines.

Will the Commission say:

1.

Is the town-planning study being funded under the Community Support Framework?

2. Have the necessary micro-zone studies been carried out to ensure that anti-seismic building standards

are scrupulously respected?