WRITTEN QUESTION P-1990/99 by Xaver Mayer (PPE-DE) to the Commission. Situation of sheep farmers in the European Union.
Date: 1999-10-28
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Germany, agricultural guidance, application of EU law, common agricultural policy, livestock farming, restriction on competition, sheep, sheepmeat, slaughter of animals, wool

C 203 E/106

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

18.7.2000

(2000/C 203 E/133)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1988/99

by Antonio Tajani (PPE-DE) to the Council

(9 November 1999)

Subject: Allegations in the Mitrokhin papers about an Italian spy network working for the Soviet Union(cid:146)s

secret services

The Mitrokhin papers forwarded by the British Government have revealed that a dense spy network used
to operate in Italy employed by the secret services of a foreign State hostile to Italy and free Europe. It
used to monitor and put pressure on the institutions of the Italian State and even reached the highest
political and government levels.

What steps does the Council intend to take to shed light on this affair as swiftly as possible?

Will the Council bring pressure to bear on the Italian Government to ensure that all the information
needed to ascertain the truth is made known and, if necessary, call on the governments of other Member
States to supply any documentation connected with the revelations contained in the Mitrokhin papers?

Answer

(24 January 2000)

The Council has no competence to deal with the questions raised by the honourable Member of the
European Parliament.

(2000/C 203 E/134)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1990/99

by Xaver Mayer (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(28 October 1999)

Subject: Situation of sheep farmers in the European Union

The economic situation of sheep farming in the European Union has been characterised for some
1.
time by unsatisfactory earnings. This applies to earnings from meat production, but also, and particularly,
to those from wool production. Sheep stocks are steadily declining as a result.

(a) Does the Commission intend to take measures aimed at improving the earnings situation with regard

to meat and wool?

(b) Does the Commission regard it as necessary,

in particular, to promote wool as a renewable raw

material?

(c) What are the reasons for and against such promotion?

2.
Jewish ritual slaughter of sheep and lambs on a commercial basis is prohibited in Germany. Since
there is a considerable demand for such meat, however, animals are transported to neighbouring countries
and undergo such slaughter there. The resulting meat is transported back to Germany.

(a) Does the Commission take the view that the current ban in Germany on Jewish ritual slaughter

constitutes a distortion of competition?

(b) Should the regulations in this area be harmonised?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(17 November 1999)

It is true that the situation for sheep producers was particularly difficult in 1998, when the price for
sheepmeat fell to its lowest level since 1995. However, producers have been compensated for this loss in
revenue through the ewe premium, which is 50 % higher than in the 1997 marketing year. Furthermore, a
supplementary premium of € 6,64 per ewe is payable to producers in less-favoured areas.

18.7.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 203 E/107

In principle, investments in sheep farming may also be funded under Regulation (EC) No 950/97 of 20 May
1997 on improving the efficiency of agricultural structures (1), provided the conditions for investment aid
are complied with. Similarly, other structural aid may be granted as part of regional programmes under
Objectives 1 and 5(b). Such investment aid will continue to be granted under the new Council Regulation
(EC) No 1257/1999 of 17 May 1999 on support for rural development from the European Agricultural
Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) and amending and repealing certain regulations (2).

There is no specific subsidy scheme for wool. Since wool is not an agricultural product as defined in
Annex I (ex Annex II) of the EC Treaty, no EAGGF aid can be granted to wool producers.

Council Directive 93/119/EC of 21 December 1993 on the protection of animals at the time of slaughter
or killing (3)
lays down the minimum common standards in this area. The Directive permits kosher
slaughter of sheep and goats in a slaughterhouse, since Article 5(2) provides for a derogation from the
requirement that animals be stunned.

In the light of the information provided by the Honourable Member, the Commission will consider
whether a restriction on religious slaughter in the territory of a Member State is, in these circumstances,
compatible with the general rules of the EC Treaty. The Commission accepts that differences in national
legislation regarding the acceptability of ritual slaughter of animals may give rise to distortions of
competition. However, it should be assessed in a much wider context taking account of all the complex
factors involved. At present, the Commission is not satisfied that Community legislation in this field would
be appropriate.

(1) OJ L 142, 2.6.1997.
(2) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999.
(3) OJ L 340, 31.12.1993.

(2000/C 203 E/135)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1991/99

by Mogens Camre (UEN) to the Commission

(9 November 1999)

Subject: Transport of horses

On 11 October 1999, the German TV channel, ZDF, broadcast a programme produced by Manfred
Karremann about the transport of live horses from the Baltic States to Italy.

Horses are transported in lorries and spend 100 hours travelling in conditions that fly in the face of all
animal welfare principles.

Is the Commission aware of such transport operations, and can it intervene to put a stop to what is an
infringement of EU rules on the transport of animals?

(2000/C 203 E/136)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2144/99

by Hiltrud Breyer (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(18 November 1999)

Subject: Inadequate checks on the transport of horses for slaughter

Numerous shocking TV documentaries have been broadcast recently about the suffering experienced by
horses for slaughter when being transported from eastern Europe to Italy. Their suffering could at least be
reduced if appropriate checks were made at border crossings in Germany and Italy. In most cases, the
lorries carrying the animals have already been travelling for more than 24 hours. Moreover, existing
directives on the transport of animals are not being complied with in some Member States.