WRITTEN QUESTION P-1915/99 by Chris Davies (ELDR) to the Commission. Establishment of Natura 2000.
Date: 1999-10-14
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: European Environment Agency, environmental protection, operation of the Institutions, terrestrial ecosystem

C 170 E/122

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

20.6.2000

As regards the amounts involved, the sum of € 4 098 268 was granted for the funding of relevant projects
in 1996; in 1997, the sum increased to € 4 927 598, and to € 5 290 358 in 1998. As for 1999, the sum
of € 6 468 272 has been earmarked for the funding of projects. The above-mentioned documents will
provide the Honourable Member with details of the funding granted for projects year by year.

Apart from the projects, the Commission has also funded other activities under the fourth programme.
Specifically,
it has provided the following sums for the preparation of the annual report on equal
opportunities for men and women: € 614 232 in 1996; € 558 197 in 1997; and €598 788 in 1998.
As regards the studies carried out, the Commission allocated € 902 014 in 1996, € 515 910 in 1997 and
€ 196 419 in 1998.

The use of
funding under the action programme on equal opportunities for men and women is
continuously monitored by the Commission. Each project must submit an interim and a final report
before any payments are made.

(2000/C 170 E/145)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1915/99

by Chris Davies (ELDR) to the Commission

(14 October 1999)

Subject: Establishment of Natura 2000

1. What is now the target date for the adoption of the list of sites of Community importance?

How does the Commission intend to ensure that an accurate assessment is made of proposals for

2.
sites submitted by Member States?

How many staff are employed at the Europe Topic Centre for Nature Conservation, and in what

3.
capacity?

4. What steps are taken to ensure that their information sources used by the Topic Centre to determine
the distribution of habitats and species in each Member State are both sufficiently comprehensive and up-
to-date to enable proper evaluation of Member States(cid:146) proposals?

Is the Commission confident that the resources available to the Topic Centre are sufficient to enable

5.
it to complete the tasks required of it to the highest standards?

6. Will the new Environment Commissioner undertake an evaluation of the Topic Centre to determine
whether it is able to complete the work required in the time available?

Answer given by Mrs Wallstr(cid:246)m on behalf of the Commission

(11 November 1999)

The Commission intends to adopt the lists of sites of Community importance for each of the six

1.
biogeographical regions as soon as possible.

However, the Member States have been late (cid:129) sometimes considerably so (cid:129) in communicating their
national lists of proposed sites, thus obliging the Commission to initiate legal proceedings against them.

The likely timetable for each biogeographical region is therefore as follows:

(cid:129) during 2000: Macaronesian region

(cid:129) late 2000: Alpine region

(cid:129) 2001: Atlantic, Boreal and Mediterranean regions

(cid:129) 2002: Continental region.

20.6.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 170 E/123

The Commission intends to hold scientific seminars for each of the biogeographical regions,

2.
conjunction with the European Topic Centre for Nature Conservation.

in

The procedure for these seminars and the lists of participants were adopted in consultation with the
Member States. The aim is to assess the national lists of sites on the basis of the best scientific information
available.

The Commission therefore relies on the scientific expertise available, but it should be noted that Council
Directives 79/0409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds (1) and 92/0043/EEC of
21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and wild fauna and flora (2) do not lay down
definitive statistical criteria for taking a decision on each individual site.

The European Topic Centre for Nature Conservation is part of the European Environment Agency.

3.
The Commission is not involved in recruitment to or the allocation of tasks within the Topic Centre.

According to the Commission(cid:146)s information, three people are working on the assessment of scientific data
for the Natura 2000 network within the Topic Centre(cid:146)s central team.

4.
The European Environment Agency is responsible for collecting scientific data. for its part, the
Commission sends the Topic Centre all the data in its possession: co-financed scientific studies, inventories
carried out in the context of Life-Nature projects, information provided by non-governmental organisations
(NGOs), etc., and urges the Member States to communicate all the data in their possession.

The Commission would point out that some Member States did not wish to communicate their national
inventories of sites containing natural habitats or species of Community interest or did not indicate all the
habitats or species that are in fact present in the sites proposed for Natura 2000.

5.
On several occasions the Commission has impressed upon the Agency and the Topic Centre(cid:146)s
Steering Committee the importance of scientific assessment for Natura 2000 and of strengthening the
Topic Centre(cid:146)s central team accordingly.

6.
The Agency(cid:146)s Management Board is responsible for evaluating the Topic Centre. The Commission,
which, like Parliament, has two representatives on the Board, would willingly take part in an evaluation of
the resources needed by the (cid:145)Nature(cid:146) Topic Centre.

(1) OJ L 103, 25.4.1979.
(2) OJ L 206, 22.7.1992.

(2000/C 170 E/146)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1916/99

by Wolfgang Kreissl-D(cid:246)rfler (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

Subject: EU Development aid programmes in Mozambique

(14 October 1999)

Could the Commission explain why EU development aid programmes in Mozambique were suspended for
a period of several months at the beginning of this year, which had the effect of endangering whole
programmes and diplomatic relations?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(9 November 1999)

The question must be based on a misunderstanding. The Commission has not taken any decision in 1999,
or indeed in recent years, to close, or otherwise suspend, development aid to Mozambique.