WRITTEN QUESTION P-1918/99 by Francesco Turchi (UEN) to the Commission. Russia.
Date: 1999-10-14
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing arrangements, EU programme, Russia, economic cooperation

24.10.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 303 E/19

(2000/C 303 E/016)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1918/99

by Francesco Turchi (UEN) to the Commission

(14 October 1999)

Subject: Russia

If it is true that over EUR 1 000 million have been given each year to Russia via the Tacis programme, in
the light of the current scandals involving the Russian government can the Commission say what
procedures have been put in place to monitor the granting of this aid and to check whether the aid is
actually being used for humanitarian purposes?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(16 November 1999)

Tacis has provided € 1 200 million to Russia over the period 1991 to 1998. The budget of the 1999
action programme for Russia is € 99,5 million. Tacis does not provide humanitarian assistance. The Tacis
programme provides grant finance for policy advice, technical assistance, studies and training and other
measures to support the process of transformation to market economies and democratic societies. Full
details of the 1998 Tacis programme can be found in the 1998 annual report, which was recently
published.

All programmes and projects funded under Tacis are subject to monitoring, evaluation and audit procedure
to be carried out, on the spot if necessary by the relevant Commission services and the Court of auditors.

The External relations common service (SCR), created in July 1998, included for the first time, an audit
unit specifically dedicated to the audit of all external aid operations. In the context of aid provided to
Russia under the Tacis programme, the unit has already launched a series of audits designed to improve
control over the aid concerned, and to ensure that Community funds are properly used in accordance with
the terms and conditions of the appropriate financing agreement. So far, these efforts have focussed on
those activities where the need for rigorous audits is considered to be the most urgent. These include:
audits of the programmes and contracts under which technical assistance is rendered to the nuclear safety
industries in countries such as Russia; measures to initiate a series of audits to control aid provided under
the programme of food aid to Russia and contracts and programmes under Tacis where the Commission
has been made aware of potential problems in the financial control and management of Community funds.

Further measures to increase the degree of control over Community funds to Russia are underway, such as
those to conclude a number of framework contracts under which it will be possible to respond with
greater rapidity and flexibility to future requests for audits. Such a facility will enable the scope of audit
activities to be enhanced to control a larger amount of the external aid channelled to Russia.

Should analysis of these audits reveal any suspicion of irregularities or possible fraud, OLAF will be
informed immediately.

Evaluations have also been carried out of Tacis programmes. The SCR Internet site http://europa.eu.int/
comm/scr/evaluation/index.htm (evaluation section) includes the full texts of all such evaluations carried
out for the past three years.
In addition, the current food aid programme and the overall country
programme are both subject to major evaluation at present.

These evaluations analyse,
in relation to their set objectives and the needs of the Tacis beneficiary
countries, how Tacis actions met the criteria of relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustain-
ability.

C 303 E/20

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

24.10.2000

The Community(cid:146)s humanitarian aid programmes are managed by the Commission. Its programmes are
implemented in co-operation with professional humanitarian agencies, such as specialised United Nations
agencies, European non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and the Red Cross movement. The Com-
mission has recently opened a technical office in Moscow in order to advise partners directly in the field.

In general, the Commission shares the cautious assessment of the reliability of distribution systems in the
Russian Federation. In fact, this is one of the major reasons why the size of the Commission activities in
this country has remained relatively modest (adequate monitoring possibilities being one of the essential
criteria when it decides on a project proposal).

(2000/C 303 E/017)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1941/99

by Isidoro SÆnchez Garc(cid:237)a (ELDR) to the Commission

(4 November 1999)

Subject: Trans European and Energy networks and the ultraperipheral regions

It is a simple fact that the ultra-peripheral regions are, to all intents and purposes, excluded from access to
the current Trans-European and Energy Network Guidelines. These regions are very severely disadvantaged
by their remoteness and the scattered nature of their territories, and they merit special treatment.

Does the Commission intend to develop a specific transport and energy policy to meet the needs of these
regions, guaranteeing them not merely access as such to the trans-European networks, but a level of access
appropriate to the major problems from which they suffer?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(26 November 1999)

The need to link island, landlocked and peripheral regions to the central regions of the Community is laid
down in the EC Treaty within the framework of Community action on trans-European networks.

Therefore, both in the transport infrastructures sector and the energy sector, the particular characteristics
of these regions have already been included in the guidelines. The fact that ultra-peripheral regions are,
geographically speaking, so far away obviously makes it almost impossible to physically interconnect these
regions to networks at the centre of Europe.

However, in the Community guidelines for developing the trans-European transport network (Decision
No 1692/96/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 (1)), the need to guarantee access to
and the linking of ultra-peripheral regions is more specifically taken into account in port and airport
networks based on how fragmented and far away these territories are.

The Community guidelines for trans-European energy networks (Decision No 1254/96/EC of the Parlia-
ment and of the Council of 5 June 1996 (2)) provide, among their priorities, for the interconnection of
isolated electricity networks (for example, by underwater links between islands or towards another closer
network) and for the introduction of natural gas into new regions (for example, from an LNG reception
terminal.

Development schemes aimed at ultra-peripheral regions at Community level are not limited only to trans-
European networks. The Structural Funds (e.g., the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the
European Social Fund,
the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund and the Financial
Instrument
for Fisheries Guidance) make a considerable contribution in the form of multi-annual
development programmes under Objective 1 (regions lagging behind in their development) and certain
Community initiatives (essentially REGIS).