WRITTEN QUESTION E-1774/99 by Hugues Martin (PPE-DE) to the Commission. Compliance with Community rules in the footwear sector.
Date: 1999-10-11
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU market, directive (EU), footwear industry, infringement procedure (EU), machinery, moonlighting, national implementing measure, protective equipment, restriction on competition, safety standard

8.8.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 225 E/19

In view of the delayed designation of protected sites, and in order to ensure that the Commission can fulfil
its obligations under the EC Treaty (Article 6 (cid:129) ex Article 3c) and Articles 12 and 41 (2) (b) of Council
Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the structural funds (3),
all Member States were reminded by letter of 23 June 1999 of their duty to ensure conformity of new
programmes and projects with the requirements of the Habitats and Birds directives. In the case of some
Member States, there remains a serious lack of information on protected sites which might jeopardise the
Commission(cid:146)s assessment whether programmes are in conformity with Community law as required by
Article 12 of Council Regulation (EC) 1260/1999.

In any case the Commission will assess each plan or programme as to its individual content related to the
requirements of
in the respective plan or
programme, give a firm commitment that any possible negative impact on sites protected or to be
protected under Natura 2000 will be properly assessed and appropriate measures taken.

the Habitats and Birds directives. Member States must

(1) OJ L 206, 22.7.1992.
(2) OJ L 103, 25.4.1979.
(3) OJ L 161, 26.6.1999.

(2000/C 225 E/020)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1774/99

by Hugues Martin (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(11 October 1999)

Subject: Compliance with Community rules in the footwear sector

Footwear manufacturers have drawn my attention to conditions of competition in this industry within the
EU.

These industrialists, mostly from small and medium-sized undertakings, complain about the failure of
competing companies in other EU Member States to comply with Community rules.

It appears that the authorities in these Member States do not enforce rules such as those requiring
machines to be brought into conformity with European standards or the prohibition on undeclared
employment.

Infringement of such rules causes unacceptable distortions of competition in the European internal market
within a sector which is also exposed to (cid:145)aggressive(cid:146) competition from outside the Community.

Will the Commission enlighten us on the subject and, if possible, indicate what measures it intends to take
to remedy the problem?

Answer given by Mr Liikanen on behalf of the Commission

(9 December 1999)

The Commission agrees that undeclared work is an important preoccupation for the social partners in
sectors such as footwear, textile and clothing. The 1999 Employment Guidelines, as adopted by the
Council (1), and the Commission proposals for the year 2000 (2) refer to the need to tackle the problem.
This issue is also under discussion by the social partners at European level within the framework of the
sectoral social dialogue on the basis of the Commission action plan concerning the competitiveness of the
textile and clothing industry (3). In particular, the social dialogue committee on footwear is examining the
undeclared work and health and safety issues such as machine safety.

All the Member States have sent the Commission their national measures implementing Council Directive
89/655/EEC of 30 November 1989 concerning the minimum safety and health requirements for the use of
work equipment by workers at work (4). The conformity of these national
implementing measures is
currently being analysed, and infringement proceedings have already been instituted against certain
Member States for failure to transpose the Directive properly. Council Directive 95/63/EC of 5 December

C 225 E/20

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

8.8.2000

1995 amending Directive 89/655/EEC (5) has yet to be transposed by one Member State. Accordingly, the
Commission has instituted infringement proceedings under Article 226 (formerly Article 169) of the
EC Treaty. The Commission has no knowledge of cases in which the national authorities might be failing
to meet their obligations in terms of monitoring the application of the national legislation transposing
these Directives.

New machinery placed on the market and brought into service to produce shoes is covered by Directive
98/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 on the approximation of the
laws of the Member States relating to machinery (6), which sets objectives. Two draft European standards
setting out the essential requirements are currently being drawn up: PrEN 12203 (Footwear, leather and
imitation leather goods manufacturing machines (cid:129) shoe and leather presses (cid:129) safety requirements) and
PrEN 12387 (Footwear,
leather and imitation leather goods manufacturing machines (cid:129) modular shoe
repair equipment (cid:129) safety requirements). Member States are required to ensure that all machinery placed
on the market and brought into service meets the requirements of the abovementioned Directive. The
Commission is unaware of any failures to meet this obligation.

The bringing into compliance of machinery already in service is covered by Directive 89/655/EEC, as
amended by Directive 95/63/EC.

(1) COM(98) 574 final.
(2) COM(1999) 441 final.
(3) COM(97) 454 final.
(4) OJ L 393, 30.12.1989.
(5) OJ L 335, 30.12.1995.
(6) OJ L 207, 23.7.1998.

(2000/C 225 E/021)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1781/99

by Mark Watts (PSE) to the Commission

(11 October 1999)

Subject: Maritime accident investigations

In the light of the recent collision in the Channel, and with a view to the improved safety of passengers at
sea, will the Commission ensure that independent accident investigation arrangements are introduced for
all maritime operations in the EU, similar to the arrangements for air accident investigation in the EU?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(10 November 1999)

A first Commission initiative aimed at introducing independent accident investigation arrangements has
resulted in the adoption of Council Directive 1999/35/EC of 29 April 1999 on a system of mandatory
surveys for the safe operation of regular ro-ro ferry and high-speed passenger craft services (1). This
Directive will provide any substantially interested Member State the legal right to participate, to co-operate
in, or where provided under the Internation maritime organization (IMO) code for the investigation of
marine casualties (2), to conduct any marine casualty or incident investigation involving a ro-ro ferry or
high-speed passenger craft.

The Commission acknowledged in the explanatory memorandum of its proposal for this Directive (3) that a
justified and legitimate involvement of Member States in marine casualty investigations should not be
limited to ro-ro ferries and high speed passenger craft only. The Commission considered the proposal as a
first step towards a more general application of the IMO code for the investigation of marine casualties
and announced that it would consider, in the light of the expertise gained with the application of this
Directive, how and which further steps would be necessary at Community level to ensure an effective
implementation of the IMO code in all maritime accidents and incidents occurring within waters falling
under the Community(cid:146)s concern.