WRITTEN QUESTION E-1576/99 by Alonso Puerta (GUE/NGL) and Laura González Álvarez (GUE/NGL) to the Commission. Regional Development Programme (RDP).
Date: 1999-09-01
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Structural Funds, interinstitutional cooperation (EU), operational programme, social dialogue

C 170 E/38

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

20.6.2000

(2000/C 170 E/039)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1574/99

by Alonso Puerta (GUE/NGL) and
Laura GonzÆlez `lvarez (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(1 September 1999)

Subject: Regional Development Programme (RDP)

What is the deadline for the submission to the European Union of Regional Development Programmes for
the period 2000-2006 by Member States with Objective 1 regions?

(2000/C 170 E/040)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1575/99

by Alonso Puerta (GUE/NGL) and
Laura GonzÆlez `lvarez (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(1 September 1999)

Subject: Regional Development Programme (RDP)

In view of the regional and local elections which coincide with the timetable for the preparation of the
various RDPs in Spain, does the Commission intend to extend the planned deadline for the subsmission of
RDPs for the period 2000-2006 so as to facilitate an institutional consensus and the consultation of the
social partners with regard to the RDPs?

Joint answer
to Written Questions E-1574/99 and E-1575/99
given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(11 October 1999)

The second subparagraph of Article 15(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999
laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds (1) states that the regional development plans must
be submitted, unless otherwise agreed with the Member State concerned, not later than four months after
the list of eligible Objective 1 regions has been drawn up. As the Commission adopted that list on 1 July
1999, the deadline for submitting the Objective 1 plans is 1 November 1999. At the Member State(cid:146)s
request and if the Commission agrees, this deadline can be extended to facilitate preparation of the plan.

(1) OJ L 162, 26.6.1999.

(2000/C 170 E/041)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1576/99

by Alonso Puerta (GUE/NGL) and
Laura GonzÆlez `lvarez (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(1 September 1999)

Subject: Regional Development Programme (RDP)

What is the position of the Commission with regard to RDPs for the period 2000-2006 submitted by
Member States with Objective 1 regions without the requisite political, institutional and social dialogue
having taken place?

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(11 October 1999)

In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 15(2) of Council Regulation (EC) 1260/1999 of
21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds (1), Member States submit their
regional development plans after consultation with the partners as defined in Article 8 of that Regulation
(regional and local authorities and other public authorities, economic and social partners, other relevant

20.6.2000

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 170 E/39

organisations). Each Member State decides its own arrangements for consulting the most representative
partners as designated by it. However, the Commission reserves the right to ask a Member State how it
went about consulting the partners and it must offer an account of how it did so under Article 16(1)(d) of
the Regulation. The Commission will make use of this option whenever necessary.

(1) OJ L 161, 26.6.1999.

(2000/C 170 E/042)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1581/99

by Glyn Ford (PSE) to the Commission

(1 September 1999)

Subject: Shellfish hygiene directive

Is the Commission aware of the impact of Directive 91/0492/EEC (1) on shellfishermen in waters classified
as Category C? Classification is determined by monitoring using E.Coli, a testing process which is not an
adequate indicator in the case of shellfish where the disease-causing organism is a virus and not a
bacterium. Furthermore, the application of the standard to mussels which are cooked and therefore pose
less threat to public health than oysters which are traditionally eaten raw is considered to be inappropriate.
The livelihoods of fishermen on the River Teign, which is on the border line between Categories B and C,
is threatened by the application of the standard to mussels. Will the Commission urgently review the
Directive so that the long tradition of shellfishing may survive?

(1) OJ L 268, 24.9.1991, p. 1.

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(5 November 1999)

The monitoring of production areas for the classification foreseen in Chapter I of the annex to Council
Directive 91/0492/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the
placing on the market of live bivalve molluscs is based on the total number of faecal coliforms or E coli.
This classification relates to production areas for live bivalve molluscs, and determines whether live bivalve
molluscs can be intended for direct human consumption or must be purified or relayed.

The microbiological criteria applicable to the production of commercially cooked mussels are established
by Commission Decision 93/0051/EEC of 15 December 1992 on the microbiological criteria applicable to
the production of cooked crustaceans and molluscan shellfish (1).

On the other hand the Commission, to ensure an effective monitoring system with regard to virus testing
and the establishment of standards for virological and bacteriological contamination, presented a proposal
for a Parliament and Council Decision on reference laboratories for monitoring bacteriological and viral
contamination of bivalve molluscs (2). The Parliament gave its opinion (3) and the Council adopted the
proposal, after changing the legal basis from Article 100a to Article 43 of the EC Treaty, on 29 April
1999, by Council Decision 1999/0313/EC of 29 April 1999 on reference laboratories for monitoring
bacteriological and viral contamination of bivalve molluscs (4).

The Commission is currently preparing a general revision of the Community legislation on food hygiene
including a revision of the legislation governing the production and placing on the market of products of
animal origin.

The River Teign has recent been designated under Council Directive 79/0923/EEC on the quality required
of shellfish waters. The protection afforded by this shellfish water quality designation should in time lead
to a reduction in pollution.

(1) OJ L 13, 21.1.1993.
(2) OJ C 267, 3.9.1997.
(3) OJ C 304, 6.10.1997.
(4) OJ L 120, 8.5.1999.