Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on 'The role of local and regional authorities in tourism development and the impact of European Union measures in the sphere of tourism'
Date: 1999-06-03
Institutions: European Committee of the Regions
Subjects: EU aid, development policy, local government, regional government, tourism policy

13.10.1999

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 293/33

Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on ‘The role of local and regional authorities in tourism
development and the impact of European Union measures in the sphere of tourism’

(1999/C 293/08)

THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS,

having regard to the decision taken by its bureau on 13 May 1998, under the fourth paragraphe of
Article 198c of the Treaty establishing the European Community, to deliver an opinion on ‘The role of
local and regional authorities in tourism development and the impact of European Union measures in the
sphere of tourism’;

having regard to the draft opinion (CdR 157/98 rev. 1) adopted by Commission 5 on 26 January 1999
(rapporteur: Mr Lazaridis),

adopted the following opinion at its 29th plenary session (meeting of 3 June ).

1.

Introduction

1.1.
At first glance, the role of local and regional authorities
in tourism development may appear to have little bearing on
the impact of EU measures in the sphere of tourism. It is the
first aspect with which we are mainly concerned and which
we must consider, analyse and ultimately place and promote
— through actions and not just words — in the Community
framework.

1.2.
EU interest in tourism was first expressed officially in
1986 with the setting up of the Advisory Committee on
Tourism, comprising representatives from the competent
government bodies of the Member States of what was then the
EEC and representatives from sectoral associations at European
level. The task of the committee was to advise the European
Commission, notably Directorate-General XXIII, which has a
unit dealing with tourism. It was considered necessary to set
up this body owing to the enormous economic importance of
tourism in most of the Member States and for Europe as a
whole, despite the fact that tourism is not mentioned anywhere
in the founding treaty of the EEC as an area of Community
competence. Appropriately, the Commission itself recently
linked tourism with culture and the environment
in the
context of its policy to promote territorial employment pacts
(Commission seminar on culture, the environment, tourism
and employment in Viareggio on 2-3 October 1997, see
Annex 1).

tourists and earned US$ 167 156 million, or 76,7 % of total
tourist revenues in Europe. In 1997, 11 Member States were
among the top 20 world tourist destinations in terms of
number of visitors and 12 Member States were among the top
revenue-earners. Twelve Member States are also among the
20 countries with the highest world expenditure on tourism,
since Europe is both a huge source market and a huge
destination market for tourism. Thus the European Union
clearly has a very important tourism industry on the demand
and supply sides, with equally important economic and social
implications, an industry that should be considered of crucial
significance first for the EEC, and now for the EU. In addition
to the direct impact of tourism on job creation, which is
analysed in detail above, we must not ov erlook its contribution
to social cohesion, not just in the Member States, but also in
countries outside the EU. Free movement of tourists leads to
exchanges of experience and information on cultural tra-
ditions, as well as bringing people closer together.

2. Contribution of local and regional authorities to the

development of tourism in the EU

A quick glance at the figures shows us that in 1997 Europe
(including the Community) registered 360 816 million tourist
arrivals from outside its borders, and that
is still the
world’s top tourist destination (among the continents or wider
geographical entities), with 58,8 % of total global arrivals and
49,2 % of global revenues from tourism. The European
Community received 247 951 million, or 68,7 %, of these

it

2.1.
Tourism and products of the tourism industry are
directly connected to the natural and man-made environment,
and thus to the geography of the area where they are provided.
Moreover, the environment itself is an important asset for
cities and regions, which can be harnessed in a context
of sustainable tourism. Tourism is therefore of immediate
relevance to regions and localities, which is why the regional
and local authorities of the Member States originally acquired
a role in tourism development.

C 293/34

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

13.10.1999

2.2.
‘Tourism products’ can be defined as an unbroken
chain of infrastructure and services provided by public (local
and regional) authorities that starts with transporting the
tourist by some means to a destination, and is affected by the
quality of the road network and private or public transport
systems, the water supply and sewage systems, environment
(natural and urban), specific tourist amenities, quality of life in
tourist areas, accessibility and planning of archaeological sites
and monuments, organisation of cultural and recreational
activities, provision of tourist information, and accurate pro-
motion of tourist areas at home and abroad. As well as
enriching ‘tourism products’ through regional cultural pro-
grammes, cultural development can contribute to local and
regional economic vitality in the following ways: a) by creating
jobs in the culture industry or the cultural heritage sphere, b)
increasing the attractiveness of a region for potential investors,
and c) promoting the social integration of marginalised groups
(cf. European Commission paper on culture as a regional
resource), d)encouraging relations with regions sharing com-
mon characteristics or cultural traits, through the creation of
cultural networks, and e) contributing to the conservation and
restoration of the regional heritage.

Tourism involves a wide spectrum of anticipatory and
2.3.
regulatory activities — programmes and services — that have
already been undertaken to a large extent by regional and local
authorities, thanks to the general principles and trends within
the EU towards decentralisation, as well as a range of
non-specific EU funding programmes. These activities and
measures must be incorporated into integrated tourism devel-
opment strategies — in conjunction with culture, education,
employment, the environment, infrastructure and spatial plan-
ning — to help the private sector and increase the investment
appeal of regions and cities, creating an environment con-
ducive to smooth cooperation and coordinated business
measures between the public and private sectors. Their know-
ledge of local matters means that local authorities have an
important role to play in coordinating tourism management
activities.

The EU and the Member States must help local and regional
authorities to put their activities on a professional footing and
organise viable programmes which really meet current and
future needs and so create sustainable employment.

Some regions are regularly represented at major tourist
2.4.
exhibitions in other countries and produce many specialised
tourist publications (in paper and electronic form); these are
regions that, with the help of EU funding and programmes,
have made appropriate decisions on tourist infrastructure
projects to promote and enhance their tourism products.

2.5. We can also see local and regional authorities that are
mustering not just national resources but also, and most

importantly, resources from the private sector, which they are
involving, as part of a clear and specific partnership — in their
efforts to promote the tourism products available. In this way,
local and regional authorities are trying to find partners — e.g.
businessmen, restaurant and café owners, even taxi drivers —
among people who make their living from tourism, and to
create specific tourism development programmes, making
improvements to local tourism products and correcting their
weaknesses.

2.6.
Some local and regional authorities have drawn up a
tourism development plan for their areas with the aim of
taking stock, mobilising local players and laying down broad
policy lines in the sphere of tourism. Local and regional
authorities have put much effort into developing local infra-
structure (beach facilities, cultural centres,
town squares,
signposting, organising inspections, etc.), and have also done
business directly and indirectly in the tourism sector, with
significant economic successes.

These activities are carried out with the help of the

2.7.
following strategies:

funding available to the regions from national and
2.7.1.
Community budgets (which the regions have full responsibility
for allocating);

2.7.2.

special taxes;

2.7.3.

national institutional support structures;

2.7.4.
powers and incentives in the sphere of tourism.

national legislation that provides for policy-making

3. Aims and objectives of local and regional authorities’

activities

3.1.
As the linchpins of development in the sphere of
tourism, local and regional authorities can make a positive
contribution by:

Facilitating links between private operators in the
3.1.1.
tourism industry so as to optimise coordination of their
activities.

3.1.2.
Promoting communication between the social part-
ners so that results can be achieved through joint action and
coordination. Since they operate at local
local and
regional authorities can ensure optimum tailoring of tourism
products, making the necessary environmental, cultural and
other measures consistent with the type of tourism that is
being developed in the region (summer, winter, sports, etc.).

level,

13.10.1999

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 293/35

Within the framework of territorial employment pacts, which
emphasise tourism and cultural development, this bottom-up
policy can produce qualitative and quantitative improvements
in the tourism sector (cf. the large number of pilot pacts for
the Community’s regions approved by the Commission that
include tourism measures, Annex 2). Cooperation between
local and regional authorities and the private tourism sector is
therefore essential as it will lead to more appropriate use of
the potential resources of the locality or region.

3.1.6.
The intangible, multidisciplinary and innovative
aspects of many tourism activities prevents them being
adequately understood and interpreted by many social and
economic players; this makes it impossible to create a coherent
competitive environment. Europe’s regions must therefore
make an effort to understand tourism in order to organise this
sector that is vulnerable and fragile, but at the same time
dynamic and promising.

3.1.3.
Being constantly in touch with local and regional
issues, local and regional authorities receive immediate feed-
back on the impact of measures, and can therefore monitor
more directly and effectively and develop flexible action
programmes. Where there is no proper decentralisation, their
current lack of power often slows or stymies achievement of
the desired results. The greater their institutional dependence
on central authorities, the more they refuse to take on those
bodies’ tasks because they are aware of their lack of power.
The lack of proper decentralisation to the regional and local
level slows or stymies these activities.

3.1.7.
At the stage of land-use planning and management,
local and regional authorities, as well as central government,
must remember that they have to be able to satisfy not just the
local population, but also all visitors and tourists, thus helping
to make land use sustainable and well-balanced.

3.2.
Inadequate interregional communication at national
and European level creates a situation of imperfect compe-
tition, resulting in distortions and causing effort and resources
to be wasted in trying to achieve objectives.

Private companies also need to review their business behaviour,
moving towards a more extensive,
intelligent use of the
environment in which they are located, using all potential
public resources to enhance and improve their range of
tourism products; this would boost employment policies,
economies and related products. In short, they should attempt
to boost all aspects of the regions and localities through
tourism.

In certain cases, the fact that it is easy to formulate
3.3.
subjective goals distorts the development of tourism, not just
at national level but also at regional, and even local, level.
Well-balanced local and regional tourism development must
not only prevent changes and distortion in the specific features
of a locality or region, but must enhance these features, since
both local people and visitors are demanding more and more
distinctive characteristics.

The more responsibility local and regional authorities
3.1.4.
have for many of tourism’s ‘production processes’, the more
tourism will develop. These authorities need to be involved
not only in monitoring processes, but also in the on-going
processes of development, innovation and competitiveness in
tourism. This higher level of commitment must also include
the immediate acquisition of technical skills and know-how by
those responsible for tourism in the regional and local
authorities.

3.4.
The fact that local and regional authorities’ understand-
ing of the technical aspects of tourism is still limited, and that
national and international institutions are unable to provide
them with the necessary technical support,
is slowing the
development and promotion of tourism products. There is a
need for regions and localities to be encouraged to see their
own distinct tourism goals within the framework of national
or European strategies, in order that these different goals can
be integrated thereby maximising their impact.

3.1.5.
The lack of any proper or strategic interregional
communication often creates an inability to exploit oppor-
tunities for mutual cooperation that would be of benefit to
tourism in the regions involved. Our tourism network needs
to fulfil the following two requirements: an individual remit
for each region and direct cooperation with other regions for
mutual benefit.

3.5.
Local authorities nevertheless provide substantial
financial resources for tourism development. New technologies
in particular can be used to improve the promotion and
development of areas across national and European frontiers.
Local and regional authorities must also endeavour to counter
the negative effects of tourism often caused by concentrating
tourist development too much in one place, because this type
of development further exacerbates regional problems such as
crime, which makes residents less secure, as well as the

C 293/36

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

13.10.1999

degeneration of local features and undermining of distinctive
local resources. Local and regional authorities must counter
the adverse impact of many tourism activities, although they
also need to improve services that make it possible to reconcile
ordinary life in cities and regions, with the presence and
passage of tourists.

other Member States are calling for more Community interest
and intervention (because they believe that there are distortions
in the functioning of the tourism market, e.g. excessive power
of tour operators).

This problem is often exacerbated in the declining traditional
European seaside resorts and similar destinations where failure
to invest and adapt to structural change in holiday trends has
infrastructure, rising
resulted in a degeneration of resort
unemployment, low average earnings and increasing levels of
crime and urban deprivation. Local and regional authorities
must therefore endeavour to implement with the help of
national and European authorities regeneration plans that aim
to provide more stable employment in modern tourism growth
markets and outside the tourism sector.

The European Union has therefore not yet managed to
4.3.
introduce a Community tourism policy in a treaty revision, a
deficit that we feel needs to be rectified as soon as possible.
The European Union should therefore be enabled, as part of
its remit, to provide appropriate support for the tourism
policy pursued by Member States and by regional and local
authorities. Bearing in mind that Community policies are being
formulated in areas that have implications for tourism — e.g.
consumer protection, environmental protection and transport
— sufficient account should be taken of the justified concerns
of the European tourism industry so as to ensure competi-
tiveness on the international tourism market.

3.6.
To take steps to ensure that the tourist policy of the
regional and local administrations is transversal and that it
requires the various tiers of authority to coordinate their
activities in order to produce a multiplier effect for actions
which, instead of being segmented by area, would be inter-
linked in order to achieve the same objectives.

4. Current Community action: strengths and weaknesses

4.1.
Obviously there are at present wide variations in the
degree of development of tourism both between and within
Member States, and neither local nor regional authorities have
become sufficiently aware that tourism, as a complementary
product, must be more energetically promoted if convergence
criteria are to be met. However, at the moment Member States’
interest in tourism is not equally great from a social and
economic point of view; differences exist, and it is clear that
there are differences as to whether they favour more or less
Community intervention. A crucial difference tends to be the
level of demand in each country, since demand and supply
sides involve quite contradictory interests.

4.2.
Certain Member States probably do not want Com-
munity intervention — regulatory or otherwise — in their
tourism markets, on the grounds that a totally free market
functions perfectly; it may be that they do not wish more
Community funds to be allocated to the tourism sector in the
Member States than are already being provided through the
structural funds. Thus these countries have reservations, in the
sense that they would like to restrict Community intervention
(reflecting the current trend in the EU), or on financial grounds,
fearing that new funding will be requested. At the same time,

In particular, attention should be paid to the fact that spatial
development action and initiatives do not regard tourism as a
priority issue. Tourism policy becomes, as we have seen, a
specific compartment of more general actions and policies.

4.4.
Tourism is thus often required to bear costs and adapt
to conditions that have no relation to its needs and practical
potential, when Community legislation is implemented as
prescribed by other Community policies. Moreover, the lack
of a clear and distinct tourism policy is distorting the social
dialogue: a typical example is the fact that the European
confederation linking the different tourism sectors is not an
equal partner in the social dialogue, but is represented by the
trade and industry confederation (which speaks for a part of
the economy whose situation and needs are quite different), to
which it acts as ‘special adviser’.

The lack of a tourism policy is also making it impossible to
define jointly goals and measures specific to tourism, e.g. the
objective of social
justice, while satisfying the legitimate
expectations of the general public regarding the right to
holidays and leisure for everybody.

4.5.
Increased cooperation on tourism policy between the
Member States and regions could be necessary, especially
considering that the slice of the international tourist ‘cake’
taken by Europe’s tourism industry is steadily diminishing
owing to the high cost of holidays and competition from
distant (exotic) destinations. The Member States and regions,
who are the relevant players in Community tourism policy,
should step up their efforts to formulate and implement an
appropriate and consistent strategy for maintaining its position
in the international market. A glance at the statistics shows us
that within one decade (1988-1997), the European Com-
munity’s share in tourist arrivals in the continent as a whole
fell from 74 % to 68,7 % and its share in revenues from 82,9 %
to 76,7 %.

13.10.1999

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 293/37

Furthermore, given the economic and social importance of
tourism for the coming years and recent forecasts of the World
Tourism Organisation (WTO) that international tourism will
triple over the next 20 years, there is an urgent need to:

— strengthen the competitiveness of tourism in Europe,
focusing on tourism development in priority land-use
planning areas;

— improve systems of development planning and manage-

ment of the most popular locations.

The EU has hitherto focused on certain areas, such as
4.6.
keeping uniform statistics,
improving skills transfer in the
sphere of tourism, protection of the tourist as a consumer,
promotion of the cultural heritage (achieved by associating
tourism with cultural assets), sustainable tourism, etc. Efforts
are now being made to develop and promote the potential of
tourism as a high-employment sector, as a source of jobs, in a
Europe scourged by unemployment, especially among young
people and women. To this end, a committee with representa-
tives from the tourism sector has been set up which has
presented its conclusions regarding Community action. The
small team in the European Commission is consequently
running study and information programmes, e.g. on the
development of tourism in cities and their historic centres, and
on introducing the euro in the tourism sector. (The main
conclusions of the High Level Group are that the contribution
of tourism to growth and employment requires greater political
recognition at all levels, and that this should lead to positive
action which will reinforce the potential of
the tourism
industry to bring further and sustainable growth. Besides, the
greater integration of tourism preoccupations and priorities
into the development and implementation of Community
programmes and policies presents a unique opportunity for
the Community to contribute to greater competitiveness of
the European industry. EU action in the tourism sector must
be better attuned and backed by improved coordination of
measures, e.g. budgetary measures,
taken by the various
Commission Directorates. Also the development of effective
consultation and cooperation among the parties concerned at
local, regional, national and European levels is an essential
prerequisite to maximising the contribution of tourism to
growth.).

environment is also reflected in people’s holiday plans: increas-
ingly, quality — including environmental conditions — and
personal safety are crucial
factors in tourists’ choice of
destination. All branches of the tourist industry and public
authorities in the main destination areas must address the
problems associated with the impact of tourist activities on
resources. The environmental impact of major projects must
be routinely assessed. On the positive side, there is the question
of how tourism can help to preserve the wealth of human,
natural and cultural resources.

is an ideal

4.8.
This direct link between tourism, cultural heritage and
the environment is widely recognised. Given that tourism
depends on these resources and that they are seen as vital
elements in the production and marketing of leisure activities,
it
testing ground for pursuing and applying
the principle of sustainable development. The main aim of
Community action in this sphere is to encourage a ‘virtuous
circle’ that will help to lead the relationship between the
economy and the environment in the sphere of tourism
towards long-term sustainability.

Despite the laudable efforts of the tourist industry and
4.9.
various public and private organisations and individuals in
tourism planning and management, there is still room for
coordinated projects that would enable those involved to look
more systematically at measures being implemented in various
Member States and regions with the aim of identifying and
promoting better practice. Efforts should also be made to
inform tourists and businesses involved in tourism about the
state of the environment and of cultural sites in tourist
destinations, and to encourage them also to participate in
environment-friendly treatment of sensitive resources.

Moreover, tourism services should be teamed up with the local
craft
industry and artistic/cultural offerings. These could
provide a real springboard for spatial development.

Now, more than ever before, there is an awareness of
4.7.
how important it is to use non-renewable resources respon-
sibly and to ensure that resources are passed on to future
generations. According to a 1996 Eurobarometer survey, 98 %
of Europe’s population believe that protecting the environment
and combating pollution should be priorities for the Union,
and a majority (82 %) consider these problems to be urgent
and to necessitate immediate action. This awareness of the

4.10.
Improving the quality of the natural and man-made
environment is crucially important to the success of tourist
destinations and the tourism industry, and is a basic prerequi-
site for achieving sustainable tourism. However, within the
single European space where free movement of people is
allowed, concern for the security of all citizens (including
tourists) must prompt the legal and security authorities of all
the Member States to improve their cooperation in order to
prevent and combat organised crime, different forms of abuse
and ill treatment, crimes against children, racism, xenophobia,
drug trafficking, terrorism, etc.

C 293/38

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

13.10.1999

4.11. When the relevant Community policies and measures
were implemented in 1995/1996, a persistent effort was made
to incorporate the principle of sustainability into measures
and practices for tourism development. It should be noted that
tourism is one of the five basic sectors identified by the
Commission where the principle of sustainability is to be
applied in other policy areas. After this policy had been
evaluated, Community action focused on standardising exist-
ing measures and introducing selected new legislative and
financial measures relating specifically to tourism develop-
ment.

5. Proposals

5.1.
The members of the Committee, given their proximity
to the real problems of tourism and their role in managing
these problems at local level, must address them as part of
their remit and give an example to the other EU bodies.

4.12.
It is a known fact that tourism benefits greatly from
the EU structural funds, Community initiatives and other
special Community programmes. For example,
it receives
funding for accommodation, special tourist infrastructures and
specific promotional activities under the second Community
Support Framework, under initiatives such as Interreg II,
Leader II, and LIFE Tourism is also supported by the structural
funds, through large-scale general infrastructure projects to
build major road routes and harbours, modernise the railway
network, etc. A comprehensive analysis of progress made
towards achieving economic and social cohesion and the
means by which the various types of assistance offered by the
Community have promoted this goal is presented in the first
report on economic and social cohesion, which was approved
by the Commission in 1996. This report gives examples of
measures relating to tourism that are funded by the Com-
munity. Although there is no doubt that Community measures
designed to promote tourism have made an important contri-
bution to economic and social cohesion,
it is difficult to
ascertain more precisely the impact of these measures. It is
very difficult to evaluate accurately the effects of the structural
policies, particularly over a relatively short period of time.
Evaluating the way measures affect tourism is even more
difficult, since tourism embraces a broad range of economic
activities of varying scope.

4.13.
Tourism is increasingly proving to be a sector in
which skilled and permanent jobs are created, and also as
relevant to land-use planning in the sense that it is an industry
whose workforce cannot be relocated, a sector made up of
job-creating SMEs established over a wide area. Tourism
development in less-developed regions can enable such areas
to catch up in social and economic terms and to improve
land-use equilibrium by capitalising on their particular features
and assets.

These attributes warrant the recognition of tourism at Euro-
pean level so that the resources are provided to meet the
challenges faced.

5.2.

The Committee of the Regions believes that:

the efforts of local and regional authorities to achieve sustain-
able development will be particularly boosted if:

the EU ensures that consideration is also given to
5.2.1.
the needs of the tourist sector when formulating Community
policies which also have an effect on tourism such as its
consumer protection, environment and transport policies. In
particular, care should be taken to ensure that the market
operates freely, that monopolies and oligopolies are prevented
from developing and that Member States gear their national
policies towards the need for free movement of people and
capital.

Local and regional authorities should be more actively involved
in forging and implementing policies affecting the tourism
sector. This would require initiating a consultation procedure
on the objectives sought, and coordination of future action
relevant to the sector, within the framework of the process of
financial reforms under way in the EU (Agenda 2000 and the
framework programme for culture 2000).

5.2.2.
the EU promotes decentralisation, so that local and
regional authorities have equal economic power with respect
to development, in particular tourism development, especially
as regards schemes to revive crafts activities that draw on local
traditions.

The EU must guarantee the efficient use of resources; it must
not support isolated measures with no clear Community added
value; preferably, it must focus efforts on boosting measures
involving cooperation between local and regional authorities,
particularly when these have a transnational dimension, or
when they may have a significant impact on the tourist sector
as a whole.

5.2.3.
the European Union pursues independent funding
programmes and in so doing transfers responsibility for
long-term deployment of these funds to local and regional
authorities, thereby enhancing the role of those authorities
who would take over these functions, or who already perform
them;

13.10.1999

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 293/39

5.2.4.
The Member States are urged to earmark a pro-
portion of Structural Fund aid for tourism under the relevant
development plans and programmes, in order to strengthen
(a) direct EU cooperation with local and regional authorities
and (b) interregional, transnational and cross-border cooper-
ation on the further development of tourism.

it is made easier for Community funded pro-
5.2.4. a
grammes to dovetail — within the confines of permitted
levels of state aid — with national funding systems for the
development of enterprise and jobs in the tourism sector;

an improvement

in training and the reciprocal
5.2.5.
recognition of qualification by increasing excellency in the
training of professionals and thereby consolidating high-
quality tourism is supported;

the impact on employment is taken greater account
5.2.6.
of in distributing aid and priority is given to ‘year-round’
employment;

5.2.7.
Cooperation between regions is promoted to make
better use of tourist potential from other countries. It would

Brussels, 3 June 1999.

be particularly useful to create transnational networks for the
exchange of technical know-how and joint promotion of
tourist packages,
and experience,
traditional products
especially between regional and local authorities, by encour-
aging the creation of regional tourist routes and fostering
action by the Council of European Municipalities and Regions
and the Assembly of European Regions as well as that of
sectoral and geographic networks set up by regional and local
authorities. It would also be extremely useful to set up a
uniform system of statistics and quality assessment.

5.2.8. What is needed now in Europe is economic and
social convergence, favourable development conditions for
national, regional and local economies, and the provision of
jobs. Tourism is undeniably an economic, social, cultural
and environmental growth sector, which contributes to job
creation. The EU must therefore foster cooperation between
the public and private sectors, acknowledging the leading role
of local and regional authorities in such interactions to achieve
integrated tourism management objectives by disseminating
examples of best practice in this area.

The President

of the Committee of the Regions

Manfred DAMMEYER

APPENDIX I

to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions

List of pilot territorial employment pacts

The tourist and cultural schemes are being operated in the underlined regions in the table

(Source: DG XVI)

Liste des promoteurs techniques hommes des pactes territoriaux pour l’emploi

Lan-
gue

Régions/Zones

Organisme

Fonction

Nom

Prénom

Sexe

Rue

Pays

Code
postal

Ville

Téléphone

Télécopieur

E-Mail

EN

Abruzzi: Sangro Aventino

FR

Alentejo

FR

Alsace Molsheim

Segreteria Tecnica del Patto Coord
c/O Consorzio Mario Negri
Sud

Commissao de Coordenançao Coordenador
da Regiao do Alentejo

du

Mission
bassin
locale
d’emploi de Molsheim Schir-
meck

Trivilino

Raffaele

M Santa Maria Imbaro

Lopez Figueira

Francisco

M Estrada das Piscinas, 193

Miecaze

Philippe

M 1 chemin de Dorlisheim

I

P

F

66030

Santa Maria Imbaro

0039/0872/570223

0039/0872/570226

patto@comns.mnegri.it

7000

Evora

351/066740300

351/066/26562

67120 Molsheim Schirmeck

33/3/88488651

33/3/88488632

psilva@ccr-
alt.pt//lopes.figueira@ccr-alt.pt

pacte.territorial.molscheim@
wanadoo.fr

F

112, rue Decatis Ematis Maiou

EL

66100

Drama

301/521/26614

301/521/32722

aned@dias.gr

EN

EN

Anatoliki Makedonia Drama

Coordinateur local

Diamanti

Andalucia: Bahia de Cadiz

Bahia de Cadiz

Chacartegui Chopi-
tea

Smaro

Fidel

M Plaza de San Juan de Dios
Edificio Amaya, 3 Planta

FR

Aquitaine: Périgord noir

Pays du Périgord Noir Mairie
de Sarlat Espace économique
emploi

EN

Asturias: Cuencas Mineras de Comarcas Mineras del Princi-
Asturias

pado de Asturias

Sr.

Drilhole

Patrice

M Place Marc Busson

Blanco

Maria Teresa

M Plaza de Espana, no 1-3 Planta

E

F

E

11005

Cadiz

34/95/6290660

34/95/6272114

mancobahia@tsai.es

24200

Sarlat

33/5/53315604

33/5/53315634
33/5/53315604

e3.sarlat.europe@perigord.tm.fr

33007 Oviedo

34/98/510.64.01

34/98/510.64.12

EN

Barnsley

Barnsley MBC (Yorkshire)

McAvan

Lynda

F

Town Hall Barnsley

UK S702TA Barnsley, South York-
shire

44/1226773446

44/1226773449

EN

Bayern: Amberg-Sulzbach

EN

Berlin: Neukölln

IMU-Institut
schung und Urbanistik e.V.

für Medienfor- Dr.

Wirtschaft
Neukölln e.V.

und Arbeit

in

EN

EN

EN

EN

Berlin: Neukölln

gsub GmbH

Birmingham and Solihull

Economic Development De-
partment

Bornholm

Bornholm

Borough of St Helens

EN

Bremen

Chief Executives Dept. St He-
lens MBC

für Arbeit der Freien

Senat
Hansestadt Bremen

Sträter

Aster

Wunsch

Cocker

Toudal

Hawkins

Detlev

M Hermann-Linggstr. 10

Reiner

M Oranienstrasse 65

Gabriele

F

Oranienburger Strasse 65

D

D

D

M Birmingham CC PO Box 2470 UK
Baskerville House Broad Street

80336 München

49/89/544126-0

49/89/544126-11

imu-muenchen@t-online.de

10117

Berlin

4930283085-29/22/0

4930283085-10/55

Reiner.Aster@t-online.de

10117

Berlin

49/30/283085-42

49/30/283085-10

B12NF

Birmingham

44/121/303.49.57

44/121/303.30.76

jcocker@eddbirm.co.uk

M Ullasvej 23

DK

3700

Ronne

45/56959400 Ext2203

45/56957967

FFMTO@BORA DK

M Victoria Square

UK WA10IPH St Helens

44/1744/456.066

44/1744/456.889

Jim

Mikkel

John

Henschen

Joerg

M Contrescarpe 73

D

28195

Bremen

49/421/361 6003

49/421/361-2072

henschen@unibremen.de

FR

EN

EN

Bruxelles Capitale

ORBEM

Campania: Agro Nocerino Sar- Presidenza della Provincia di Coord
Salerno
nese

Campania: Area Nord Est Na- Castello Baronale del Comune Coord
poli

di Acerra (NA)

Rauis

Vaccaro

Isabelle

F

bd. Anspach 65

Guglielmo

M Via Roma

Versace

Silvio

M Castello Baronale

B

I

I

1000

Bruxelles

84123

Salerno

80011

Acerra (NA)

32/2/505.77.05

39/089 253424/
0039 335 - 6246179

0039/081/8857999/
0039 081 5219133

irauis@orbem.be

39/089 253638

gvaccaro@microsys.it

0039 081 8857799

argon@mclink.it

C
2
9
3
/
4
0

E
N

O

f
f
i
c
i
a
l

J
o
u
r
n
a
l

o
f

t
h
e

E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n

C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s

.

1
3
1
0
1
9
9
9

.

Lan-
gue

Régions/Zones

Organisme

Fonction

Nom

Prénom

Sexe

Rue

Pays

Code
postal

Ville

Téléphone

Télécopieur

E-Mail

EN

Castilla y Leon: Cuencas Mine-
ras de Palencia de

Junta de Castilla y Leon

EN

Cataluna: Valles occidental

Conseil Comarcal del Vallès
Occidental

Sr.

Romera Hernandez

Aurora

F

Junta de Castilla y Leo´n Direc-
cio´n General

Gonzalez

Olga

M Carretera N-150, km 14.5

FR

Centro: Marinha Grande

Caˆmara Municipal da Marinha
Grande

President

Orfao

Alvaro

M Caˆmara Municipal da Marinha

Grande

FR

Centro: Marinha Grande

Câmara Municipal da Marinha Vereador
Grande

Constâncio Santos

Armando

M Câmara Municipal da Marinha

Grande

EN

Ceuta

Procesa

Fernandes

Nicolas

M Calle Teniente Olmo no 2-3a

Dujeux

Joël

M 43, rue Pasteur Immeuble CISE

Planta

E

E

P

P

E

F

47001

Valladolid

34/983 41 41 00

34/983 41 45 17

aurora.romera@svf.dgtr.cict.
jcyl.es

08200

Sabadell

34/93/727.35.34

34/93/727.19.69

promoeco@@ccvoc.org

2430

Marinha Grande

351/44/5703300

351/44/567154

2430

Marinha Grande

351/44/502.051

351/44/502.051

pte.mgrande@telepac.pt

Ceuta

34956515171

34/956.51.16.27

08320

Vireux-Molhain

33/3/24426766

33/3/24426768

cbeadepp@wanadoo.fr

FR

Champagne-Ardenne:
des Ardennes

EN

Dublin Territorial
ment Pact

Pointe Association de développement
économique du Pays de la
Pointe CBE du Pays de la Pointe
des Ardennes

Employ- Dublin Regional Authority

FR

Dudelange: CLE

Commune de Dudelange

EN

Dundalk/Drogheda

Dundalk Employment Part-
nership

Doyle

Wolff

Gerard

M North Great George’s street

IRL

Dublin 1

353/1/8788900

353/18788711

dra@itw.ie

Eliette

F

Administration communale de
Dudelange BP 73

L

3401

Dudelange

352/516121/204

352/5161121/205

addudel@pt.lu

Mulholland

Mark

M Partnership Court, Park Street

IRL

Co Louth, Dundalk

353/42/30288

353/42/30552

partnership@dep.ie

EN

EN

Dytiki Ellada: Achaïa

Dytiki Makedonia: Kozani-
Florina

Coordinateur local

Voukelatos

Coordinateur
pour Kozani

local Tziouvaras

Stathis

Christos

M Aratou 20

M 45, rue Delfon

EL

EL

26221

Patras

546 41

Salonique

003094 255059

3061 621 340

voukelatos@pat.forthnet.gr

30/31/868757
30/31/868758
003094 510800

30/31/868756

eurosyn@hol.gr

EN

East Midlands

Derby, Nottingham, Leicester

Rampton

James

M Derby City Council, The Coun- UK DEI 2FS

St Derby

44/1332/258 455

44/1332/256 222

cil House Cooperation

james.rampton@derby-city-
council.gov.uk

EN

Emilia/Toscana/Umbria: Apen- Comunita Montana Val Tiberi- Coord
nino centrale

na Toscana

EN

Flevoland

Provinciaal Bestuur Provincie
Flevoland

EN

EN

Hamburg

Johan Daniel Lawaetz Stiftung

Haringey and North London

Tasias

Fackeldey

Kuhlmann

Shellard

Llias

Jop

Mathias

Chris

M Via San Giuseppe, 32

I

52037

Sansepolcro (AR)

0039 0575 7301/
0039 335 374023

0039 0575 730201

leade2r-gubbio@krenet.it

M Postbus 135

NL 8200 AC Lelystad

31/320-286747

31/320-286747

provincie@Flevoland.nl

M Neumühlen 16-20

D

22763

Hamburg

49/40/3984120

49/40/3975483

mk@lawaetz.de

M Civic Centre

UK N224LE

London Borough of
Haringey

44/181/862.29.37

44/181/862.29.46

haringey.online@leevalley.co.uk

EN

Isku lisalmen Seudun

EN

Itae-Lappi

Isku lisalmen Seudun kumppa-
nuus

kuntayhtymä/Itae-Lapin
Kumppanuusprojekti

Niininmäki

Pekka

M PI 99 Riistakatu 5,3.krs

FIN 74101

lisalmi

358/17/8301/650

358/17/8301/471

pekka.niinimaki@iisalmi.fi

Mustajärvi

Markus

M Kuumanienmenkatu 2

FIN 98100

Kemijärvi

358/16/878 434/
GSM 358/40/5932 834

358/16/878 291

markus.mustajarvi@kemijarvi.fi

.

1
3
1
0
1
9
9
9

.

E
N

O

f
f
i
c
i
a
l

J
o
u
r
n
a
l

o
f

t
h
e

E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n

C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s

C
2
9
3
/
4
1

Lan-
gue

Régions/Zones

Organisme

Fonction

Nom

Prénom

Sexe

Rue

Pays

Code
postal

Ville

Téléphone

Télécopieur

E-Mail

EN

Jömtland

Kommunförbundet i Jämtland

From

Gun

F

Box 3123

EN

Kalmar Län

Regionförbundet i Kalmar län

Niklasson

Ingemar

M Regional Council of Kalmar

Box 762

S

S

83103 O¨ stersund

46/63-144610

46/63-143064

39127

Kalmar

46/480-448364

46/480-54654

gun.from@komforb.oster-
sund.se

ingemar.niklasson@kalmar.
regionforbund.se

EN

Kemi

Kemin Kumppanuusprojekti

Vaittinen

Antti

M Valtakatu 11-13

FIN 94100

Kemi

EN

Kentriki Makedonia Imathia

Coordinateur local

Rossakis

Dimitri

M 45 rue M. Alexandro

EL

54641

Salonique

358/16/259 123
GSM 358/400-96 27 97

30/94/668820
30/331/23708

358/16/259 125

antti.vaittinen@Kemi.fi

30/331/20271

EN

FR

EN

Lahti

Kronjylland

TemPact Kronjylland

La Réunion: Les Hauts

Commissariat à
l’Aménage-
ment des Hauts de la Réunion

Lahden Seudun Kumppanuus

FR

Languedoc-Roussillon: Hérault Conseil Général de l’Hérault —
Direction de l’action économi-
que et emploi — Hôtel du
Département

EN

Limburg

Provinciaal Bestuur Provincie
Limburg

dhr.

Andreasen

Grosset

Tayo Lill

Isabelle

M Odinsgade 4

F

10, rue de Nice

DK

8900

Randers

45/8915/1278

45/8640/7214

tempact@randers.dk

F

97400

Saint-Denis de la Ré-
union

262/904750

262/413889

cah.reunion@datargouv.fr

Riihikorpi

Eva

M Vapaudenkatu 9 C 3

FIN 15110

Lahti

358/3/7520/530
358/3/7520/538
GSM 358/50/514 7792

358/3/7520/602

eva.riihikorpi@iskump.pp.fi

Pastoret

Georges

M 1000 rue d’Alco

F

34080 Montpellier Cedex 04

33/4/67/67/6040

33/4/67/67/6007

economic@cg.34.fr

Eggen

W.H.M.

M Postbus 5700

NL 6202 MA MA Maastricht

31/43/3897863

31/43/3897107

egf@prv.limburg.nl

EN

Limerick City

Paul Partnership Limerick

McCarthy

Elmarie

F

Unit 19, The Tait Centre, Do-
minic Street

IRL

Limerick

353/61/419388

353/61/418098

limtep@lol.ie

Limousin: Ussel

CBE D’Ussel — Mairie

FR

EN

Lohja

EN Mecklenburg-Vorpommern:

Gustrow

EN Melilla

EN Molise: Matese

Lohjanseudun
usprojekti

kumppanu-

WfG Güstrow mbH/Förderve-
rein Region Güstrow e.V.

Ciudad Autonoma de Melilla

F.A.I. Azienda Speciale della Coord.
Camera di Commerciodi Cam-
pobasso

Niedersachsen: Braunschweig- Berufsbildungs- und Beschäfti- Dr.
Peine

des

gungsgesellschaft
Landkreis Peine mbH

EN

EN

FR

Bourgès

Linnapuomi

Laurent

Pekka

M 26, avenue Marmontel

F

19200

Ussel

33/5/55725878

33/5/55722118

cbeussel@internet19.fr

M Kauppakatu 6

FIN 08100

Lohja

358/19/369 1853
GSM 0500/707910

358/19/3691860

pekka.linnapuomi@lohja.fi

Treichel

Manfred

M Rövertannen 12

D

18273

Güstrow

49/3843/219140

49/3843/219141

aktiv@twfg.de

Sua´rez Guillén

Zollo

Juan José

Marco

M Plaza de Espana, no 1

M Piazza della Vittoria n. 14

E

I

52001 Melilla

34/95/2699158

34/95/2699160

86100

Campobasso

0039/0874/471202

0039/0874/418144

faicb@tin.it

Wysocki

Gerhard

M Woltorfer Strasse 57-59

D

31224

Peine

49/5171/7791-37

49/5171/7791-50

GW@bbg-Peine.de

Noord-Brabant

Provincie Noord Brabant

dhr

Nord-Pas de Calais: Roubaix

Comité de Bassin d’emploi CBE
Roubaix-Tourcoing-Vallée de
la Lys

Overbeek

Vanhuysse

H.

Eric

M Postbus 90151

M 88, rue du Haze

NL 5200 MC’s Hertogenbosch

31/73/681 2613

31/73/681 2217

bra pact@pt.net

F

59200

Tourcoing

33/3/20241100

33/3/20704816

CBERTVL59@aol.com

C
2
9
3
/
4
2

E
N

O

f
f
i
c
i
a
l

J
o
u
r
n
a
l

o
f

t
h
e

E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n

C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s

.

1
3
1
0
1
9
9
9

.

Lan-
gue

Régions/Zones

Organisme

Fonction

Nom

Prénom

Sexe

Rue

Pays

Code
postal

Ville

Téléphone

Télécopieur

E-Mail

FR

Norde: Vale do Sousa

Associaçao de Municipios do Dra
Vale do Sousa

Brandao

Eduarda

F

F

Praça D. Antonio Meireles

Herner Strasse 10

P

D

4620

Lousada

351/55/810700/8

351/55810709

valsousa@mail telepac.pt

45699

Herten

49/2366/1098-15

49/2366/1098-24

claudia-temps@ela-online.de

Claudia

EN

Nordrhein Westfalen: réseau de Emscher-Lippe-Agentur
trois pactes pour Ruhrgebiet

EN

North Wales

EN

Northern Ireland

North Wales Economic Forum
Welsh Development Agency
Unit 7

Adelaide House Training and
Employment Agency

EN

FR

Øresund

Pays de Loire Saint-Herblain

Øresundskomiteen

PLIE Saint-Herblain-
Couédron-Indre

FR

Picardie: Pays de Valois

EN

Puglia: Nord Barese

FR

Rhône-Alpes: Albertville

EN

Sachsen: Chemnitz

EN

EN

Sachsen Anhalt: Zeitz

Sachsen: Chemnitz

EN

Salzburg

Communauté de Communes
du Pays de Valois

Castello Svevo di Barletta c/o Coord.
Assessorato Cultura

Comité de Bassin d’Emploi de
l’Arrondissement d’Albertville

Stiftung Innovation und Arbeit Dr.
Sachsen

Chemnitzer Wirtschafstförde-
rungs-und Entwicklungsgesell-
schaft: Regionalagentur Ma-
schinenbau

Amt der Salzburger Landesre-
gierung. Abt. 15

Associazione
dustriali della

Coord.

Sicilia: Alto Belice Corleonese

Sicilia: Calatino Sud Simeto

Comune Di Caltagirone (CT)

Coord.

Sicilia: Catania Zona Sud

Comune di Catania

Coord.

EN

EN

EN

EN

Sønderjyllands

EN

South Tyneside

AF Sønderjylland Regional Of-
fice

Development Services Dept.
South Tyneside MBC

Temps

Royles

Boye

Mothes

Savarin

Meurig

M St Asaph Business Park

UK LL17 OLJ St Asaph. North Wales

44/1745586247

44/1745586259

nweconomic.forum@dwa.
co.uk//nwales-tep@wda.co.uk

Rogan

Gerry

M Enterprise House W.I.N. Busi- UK BT 28FD Belfast

44/1232 257650

44/1232 257646

ness Park — Canal Quay
Newry BT35 6PH

M Holbergsgade 14

DK

1057

København

45/33121222

45/33120722

Niels

Romain

M 368, Boulevard Marcel Paul

Erik

M Mairie de Nanteuil le Haudouin

Daluiso

Emmanuele

M Piazza Castello

Delclos

Richter

Beret

Krischer

Marie-Claude

F

85 rue Jean-Baptiste Mathias
BP 180

Gerhard

M Bertolt-Brecht-Allee 24

Rainhilde

F

Altmarkt 1

Thomas

M Elsasser Strasse 7

F

F

I

F

D

D

D

44806

Saint-Herblain

33/2/40920263

33/2/40920258

rmothes@oceanet.fr

60440

Nanteuil-Le-Haudouin

33/344/88.05.09

33/3/44877596

com.valois@wanadoo.fr

70051

Barletta (BA)

39/0883/578601/05

39/0883/578604

daluiso@ulysse.it / infotep@
ulysse.it

73276

Albertville

33/04/79328925

33/04/79370059

cbealb@icor.fr

1309

Dresden

49/351/31992200

49/351/31992215

stiftung-ias@t-online.de

06712

Zeitz

49/3441/83-289

49/3441/83-373

wifoe-22@t-online.de

09120

Chemnitz

49/371/5605219

49/371/5605216

ra—mb—ias@t-online.de

Tischler

Peter

M Postfach 527

A

5010

Salzburg

43/662/8042-3786

43/662/8042-3808

peter.tischler@landsbg.gv.at

Faraone

Garavini

Bonura

Kristiansen

Pietro

Roberto

Harald

Rikke

M Via Sciuti 180

M Piazza Municipio, 5

M Palazzo degli Elefanti

I

I

I

I

9170

Oristano

0039/0783/303517
ou 19

0039/0783/73544

pattoris@tin.it

90144

Palermo

39/091/349 306

39/091/6262007

pto.alto.belice@mbox.infcom.it

95041

Caltagirone (CT)

0039/0933 41259

0039/0933 26622

Maria Samperi@casasturzo.it

95100

Catania

0039/095/7423329

0039/095/313152

h.bonura@ctonline.it

M Kometcentret Kometvej 26

DK

6230

Rødekro

45/74694788

45/74694722

pagt-rk@po.ia.dk

Magee

Ciara

F

Town Hall, Westoe Road

UK NE332RL South Shields

44/191/427/1717

44/191/427/7171

ciara.magee@s-tyneside-
mbc.gov.uk

EN

Sardegna: Oristano

Provincia di Oristano

In-

de Seneen

Cristina

F

Via Brunelleschi n. 26

.

1
3
1
0
1
9
9
9

.

E
N

O

f
f
i
c
i
a
l

J
o
u
r
n
a
l

o
f

t
h
e

E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n

C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s

C
2
9
3
/
4
3

Lan-
gue

Régions/Zones

Organisme

Fonction

Nom

Prénom

Sexe

Rue

Pays

Code
postal

Ville

Téléphone

Télécopieur

E-Mail

EN

Sterea Ellada: Viotia

Sterea Ellada: Viotia

EN

Stockholm del av

Stockholm Kommun/stad

Coordinateur local

Christakakis

Karatzalis

Strand

Stavros

Loucas

Lars

M 74 rue Karajanopoulou

M 15 rue Spiridonos

M St Erik’s Management Consul-

tants City Hall

EN

Strömstad

Strömstads Kommun

Stahlbrandt

Kerstin

F

Bergsgatan 23

EL

EL

S

S

32100

Livadia

32100

Livadia

3094620599

3094570430

3026134217

30 261 21 414

10535

Stockholm

46/850829821

46/850829829

45290

Strömstad

46/5261900

46 526 19 110

lars.strand@stadshuset.
stockholm.se

kerstin.stahlbrandt@stromstad.
se

EN

Tampere

Tampere-Pirkkalan Kumppa-
nuusprojekti

Luukinen

Matti

M PL 487 Aleksis Kivenkatu 10 E FIN 33101

Tampere

2.krs

EN

Thessalie: Magnesia

Coordinateur local

Markogiannopoulos Nicolas

M 27, rue Metamorfoseos

EL

38333

Volos

EN

Turun seutu

Abonet Turun seudun kump-
panuushanke

Kirkkola

Antti

M Yliopsistonkatu 24 A 14

FIN 20100

Turku

358/3/219 6243
GSM 358/50/5669/883
GSM 358/40/5661/245

30/94/227/132
30/421/33/411-12

358/22/627/528
GSM 358/50/5590/528

358/3/219 6382

matti.luukinen@tt.tampere.fi

30/421/23/439

topsa@anem.gr

358/22/62/75/15

antti.kirkkola@turku.fi

Tyrol: Imst, Landeck, Reutte

Main coordinator

Gohm

Tyrol: Imst, Landeck, Reutte

Verein IRI

EN

EN

Viborg

EN

Viborg

EN

Vlaanderen: Halle-Vilvoorde

EN

Vlaanderen: Tongeren

EN

Vorarlberg

Viborg Amt, Erhvervs-og Ar-
bejdsmarkedsafdelingen

Viborg Amt. Erhvervs-og Ar-
bejdsmarkedsafdelingen

Subregionaal
comité Halle-Vilvoorde

tewerkstellings- Coordinator

Subregionaal
comité Limburg

tewerkstellings- Coordinator

Arbeitsmarktservice
berg

Vorarl-

EN

Värmland

Värmlandsradet

FR Wallonie: Hainaut
Charleroi, Soignies)

(Mons, ASBL Cellule F.S.E. ,WT.C.

FR Wallonie: Ouest Brabant

Centre d’Entreprises et d’Inno- Administrateur
vation

Conseiller

EN West Cornwall (Cornwall and

Devon)

EN West Scotland

Scotland Europa

Mayr

Theut

Maes

Hug

Helleqvist

Miroir

Parez

Bawden

Russell

EN Western Areas of Athens

Coordinatrice locale
pour Attique

Loukina

Siegfried

Anette

M Schentensteig 1a

F

Ing. Ballerstrasse 1

Hans Chr.

M Skottenborg 26

A

A

DK

6500

6460

8800

Landeck

Imst

Viborg

0043 5442 677804

0043 5442 6444053 wktla1@tirol.wk.or.at

0043 5412 66101

0043 5442 66101

verein.Iri@tirol.com

45/87271700

45/86626862

crbgv@vibamt.dk

Vestergaad

Gitte

Decrick

Annemie

F

F

Toekomststraat 36-38

Skottenborg 27

DK

8801

Viborg

45/87271700

45/86626862

crbgv@vibamt.dk

Patrick

M Overhaem, 37

Claus

Björn

M Rheinstrasse 32

M Länsstyrelsen

Geraldine

F

Rue Hamoir, 3 Bte 1

Léon-Philippe

M Centre ID avenue Léon Cham-

pagne 3 bte 6

B

B

A

S

B

B

1800

Vilvoorde

32/2/257.0333

32/2/252.45.94

TWP.Halle-
Vilvoorde@village.uunet.be

3700

Tongeren

012/241160

12241162

TEP.maes.patrick@skynet.be

6900

Bregenz

43/5574/691-271

43/5574/691-200

claus.hug@800.ams.or.at

65186

Karlstad

46/54-19 75 42

46/54-19 73 00

björn.hellqvist@s.lst.se

7100

La Louvière

064/214192

064/214298

pactehainaut.GM@skynet.be

1480

Saintes

322/390/92/72

322/390/93/86

id.bw@skynet.be

W.M.

Laurie

Georgie

M Rural Partnership Ltd

UK TR140AB Rosewarne Camborne

44/1209716674

44/1209612215

wmbawden@aol.com

Cornwall

Strathclyde European Partners- UK G24DL Glasgow
hip, 94 Elmbank Street, Stra-
tclyde House 6

44/131 244 06 92

44/131 244 0718

9, Alopekis st.

EL

10675

Athens

30/1/7219323

30/1/3228778

nll@itel.gr

F

F

C
2
9
3
/
4
4

E
N

O

f
f
i
c
i
a
l

J
o
u
r
n
a
l

o
f

t
h
e

E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n

C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s

.

1
3
1
0
1
9
9
9

.

Lan-
gue

Régions/Zones

Organisme

Fonction

Nom

Prénom

Sexe

Rue

Pays

Code
postal

Ville

Téléphone

Télécopieur

E-Mail

EN Western Areas of Attique-

Pireus

EN Westmeath Area

EN Wien

EN

Westmeath TEP Partnership/
Westmeath
Community
Development Limited

WAFF

Coordinatrice pour Kikiri
le Pirée

Angeliki

F

12, rue Elispontou

EL

162 32

Vironas

30/94/746/024
30/93/447/628

30/1/324 12 37

Monaghan

Ciara

M Presentation House, Harbour

IRL

Westmeath

353/44/48571

353/44/48441

TEP@westco.iol.ie

Street,

Winkelbauer

Coordinateur
pour Florina

local Tabakis

Elisabeth

Georges

F

Nordbahnstrasse 36/1/4

M Tripotamos

A

EL

1020 Wien

53100

Florina

00431 21748 315

00431 217 48 333

elisabeth—winkelbauer@waff.at

30/385/23/666
30/385/26/626

30/385/41/571

Loukina

Georgie

125-127 rue Kifissias

EL

11524

Athens

.

1
3
1
0
1
9
9
9

.

E
N

O

f
f
i
c
i
a
l

J
o
u
r
n
a
l

o
f

t
h
e

E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n

C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s

C
2
9
3
/
4
5

C 293/46

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

13.10.1999

APPENDIX II

to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions

TABLEAU No 1

Nombre d’emplois culturels directs dans les pays de l’Union Européenne

Pays

Ensemble

Spectacle vivant

Patrimoine
et Enseignt.

Cinéma
et Audiovisuel

Autres Ind.
Culturelles

Métiers d’art

Allemagne
Autriche
Belgique
Danemark
Espagne
Finlande
France
Grèce
Irlande
Italie
Luxembourg
Pays-Bas
Portugal
R.U.
Suède

1 065 000

100 000

80 000

44 354
26 000
249 000
33 000
434 500

28 950
345 000

113 672
33 544
421 720
63 657

12 400

42 400
9 060
160 000

6 150
104 000

35 000
12 000
90 100
33 000

10 970
2 900
20 000
8 560
59 000

1 500
36 413

15 961
4 000
71 000
3 500

75 000
3 681
7 590
5 303
38 600
7 025
27 000
8847
3 500
87 000
747
16 111
6 544
91 000
10 907

170 000

450 000

6 485

6 909

72 000
1 971
38 500

1 800
34 000

22 500
2 500
20 200
3 500

72 000
6 950
150 000

16 000
83 000

21 000
8 500
25 000
10 000

Total

2 858 397

604 110

313 804

388 855

373 456

849 359

NB: Le chiffre de la rubrique «ensemble» ne correspond pas nécessairement à la somme des différentes catégories car les origines statistiques peuvent être différentes

pour un même pays.

Nombre d’emplois culturels directs dans les pays de l’Union Européenne, sans les métiers d’art

TABLEAU No 2

Pays

Ensemble

Spectacle vivant

Patrimoine
et Enseignt.

Cinéma
et Audiovisuel

Autres Ind.
Culturelles

Métiers d’art

Allemagne
Autriche
Belgique
Danemark
Espagne
Finlande
France
Grèce
Irlande
Italie
Luxembourg
Pays-Bas
Portugal
R.U.
Suède

615 000

100 000

80 000

37 445
26 000
177 000
26 050
284 500

12 950
262 000

92 672
25 044
396 720
53 657

12 400

42 400
9 060
160 000

6 150
104 000

35 000
12 000
90 100
33 000

10 970
2 900
20 000
8 560
59 000

1 500
36 413

15 961
4 000
71 000
3 500

75 000
3 681
7 590
5 303
38 600
7 025
27 000
8 847
3 500
87 000
747
16 111
6 544
91 000
10 907

170 000

6 485

72 000
1 971
38 500

1 800
34 000

22 500
2 500
20 200
3 500

Total

2 015 038

604 110

313 804

388 855

373 456

—

—

—
—
—

—
—

—
—
—
—

—

NB: Le chiffre de la rubrique «ensemble» ne correspond pas nécessairement à la somme des différentes catégories car les origines statistiques peuvent être différentes

pour un même pays.

13.10.1999

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 293/47

Nombre d’emplois culturels directs dans les pays de l’Union Européenne en % de la population active

TABLEAU No 3

Pays

Ensemble

Spectacle vivant

Patrimoine
et Enseignt.

Cinéma
et Audiovisuel

Autres Ind.
Culturelles

Métiers d’art

Allemagne

Belgique

Danemark

Espagne

Finlande

France

Grèce

Irlande

Italie

Luxembourg

Pays-Bas

Portugal

Royaume-Uni

Suède

2,8

1,16

1,1

1,8

1,46

1,9

2,6

1,53

1,57

0,72

1,52

1,54

0,263

0,32

0,3

0,40

0,63

0,5

0,46

0,48

0,26

0,32

0,79

0,210

0,28

0,12

0,14

0,37

0,23

0,13

0,16

0,22

0,08

0,25

0,14

0,19

0,19

0,22

0,27

0,31

0,11

8 847

0,31

0,38

747

0,24

0,14

0,32

0,24

0,44

0,17

0,52

0,08

0,15

0,16

0,15

0,31

0,05

0,08

0,08

1,18

0,18

0,52

0,30

0,59

1,4

0,38

0,29

0,18

0,10

0,24

NB: Le chiffre de la rubrique «ensemble» ne correspond pas nécessairement à la somme des différentes catégories car les origines statistiques peuvent être différentes

pour un même pays.

Nombre d’emplois culturels directs dans les pays de l’Union Européenne en % de la population active, métiers d’art exclus

TABLEAU No 4

Pays

Ensemble

Spectacle vivant

Patrimoine
et Enseignt.

Cinéma
et Audiovisuel

Autres Ind.
Culturelles

Métiers d’art

Allemagne

Belgique

Danemark

Espagne

Finlande

France

Grèce

Irlande

Italie

Luxembourg

Pays-Bas

Portugal

Royaume-Uni

Suède

1,56

0,91

1,1

1,10

1,09

1,13

0,90

1,16

1,29

0,52

1,44

1,36

0,25

0,30

0,26

0,37

0,63

0,41

0,46

0,49

0,24

0,32

0,83

0,20

0,26

0,12

0,12

0,35

0,23

0,10

0,16

0,22

0,08

0,25

0,08

0,19

0,18

0,22

0,23

0,29

0,11

0,27

0,38

0,23

0,13

0,32

0,27

0,43

0,15

0,44

0,08

0,17

0,12

0,15

0,30

0,05

0,08

0,08

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

NB: Le chiffre de la rubrique «ensemble» ne correspond pas nécessairement à la somme des différentes catégories car les origines statistiques peuvent être différentes

pour un même pays.

Source 1,2,3,4: X. Greffe, «L’emploi culturel en Europe», Rapport pour la DG V, janvier 1997, Bruxelles.