Commission Regulation (EC) No 929/1999 of 29 April 1999 amending Regulation (EC) No 82/1999 imposing provisional anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of farmed Atlantic salmon originating in Norway with regard to certain exporters, imposing provisional anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of such salmon with regard to certain exporters, amending Decision 97/634/EC accepting undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping and anti-subsidies proceedings concerning imports of such salmon and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 772/1999 imposing definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of such salmon Council Directive 1999/29/EC of 22 April 1999 on the undesirable substances and products in animal nutrition
Date: 1999-04-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Norway, anti-dumping duty, aquaculture, export subsidy, import, sea fish

4. 5. 1999

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

L 115/13

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 929/1999

of 29 April 1999

amending Regulation (EC) No 82/1999 imposing provisional anti-dumping and
countervailing duties on imports of farmed Atlantic salmon originating in
Norway with regard to certain exporters, imposing provisional anti-dumping and
countervailing duties on imports of such salmon with regard to certain exporters,
amending Decision 97/634/EC accepting undertakings offered in connection
with the anti-dumping and anti-subsidies proceedings concerning imports of
such salmon and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 772/1999 imposing
definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of such salmon

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

(3)

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

On 26 September 1997, the Commission adopted
Decision 97/634/EC (6),
accepting undertakings
offered in connection with the two abovemen-
tioned proceedings from the exporters mentioned
in the Annex to the Decision and terminating the
investigations in their respect.

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of
22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports
from countries
the European
Community (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No
905/98 (2), and in particular Article 8 thereof,

not members

of

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of
6 October 1997 on protection against subsidised imports
from countries
the European
not members
Community (3), and in particular Article 13 thereof,

of

(4)

On the same day, the Council, by Regulations (EC)
No 1890/97 (7) and (EC) No 1891/97 (8) imposed
anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports
of farmed Atlantic salmon originating in Norway.
Imports of farmed Atlantic salmon exported by
companies from which an undertaking had been
accepted were exempted from that duty pursuant to
Article 1(2) of that Regulation.

After consulting the Advisory Committee,

(5)

Whereas:

The abovementioned Regulations set out the defin-
itive findings and conclusions on all aspects of the
investigations. The form of the duties having been
reviewed, Regulations (EC) No 1890/97 and (EC)
No 1891/97 were replaced by Regulation (EC) No
772/1999.

A. PREVIOUS PROCEDURE

(1)

(2)

On 31 August 1996, the Commission announced,
by two separate notices published in the Official
Journal of the European Communities, the initia-
tion of an anti-dumping proceeding (4) as well as an
anti-subsidy proceeding (5) in respect of imports of
farmed Atlantic salmon originating in Norway.

The Commission sought and verified all informa-
tion that it deemed necessary for the purpose of its
definitive findings. As a result of this examination,
it was established that definitive anti-dumping and
countervailing measures should be adopted in order
to eliminate the injurious effects of dumping and
subsidisation. All interested parties were informed
of the results of the investigation and were given
the opportunity to comment thereon.

(1) OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 128, 30.4.1998, p. 18.
(3) OJ L 288, 21.10.1997, p. 1.
(4) OJ C 253, 31.8.1996, p. 18.
(5) OJ C 253, 31.8.1996, p. 20.

B. PROVISIONAL MEASURES IMPOSED BY
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 82/
1999 (9)

(6)

The text of the undertakings provides that failure to
submit a quarterly report of all sales transactions to
the first unrelated customer in the Community
within a prescribed time limit (except in case of
force majeure), would be construed as a violation of
the undertaking, as would non-compliance with
the obligation to sell the different presentations of
the product concerned (i.e. gutted, head-on, etc.) on
the Community market at or above the minimum
prices foreseen in the undertaking.

(6) OJ L 267, 30.9.1997, p. 81.
(7) OJ L 267, 30.9.1997, p. 1, repealed by Council Regulation

(EC) No 772/1999 (OJ L 101, 16.4.1999, p. 1).

(8) OJ L 267, 30.9.1997, p. 19, repealed by Regulation (EC) No

772/1999.

(9) OJ L 8, 14.1.1999, p. 8.

L 115/14

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

4. 5. 1999

(7)

(8)

(9)

For the second quarter of 1998, 10 Norwegian
companies either did not present a report within
the prescribed time limit (or did not submit any
report
and two Norwegian exporters
appeared to have sold the product concerned to the
Community market at a price which was below the
price foreseen in their undertakings.

all),

at

The Commission therefore had reason to believe
that these 12 companies had breached the terms of
their undertakings.

Consequently, the Commission, by Regulation (EC)
No 82/1999,
imposed provisional anti-dumping
and countervailing duties on imports of farmed
Atlantic Salmon falling within CN codes ex
0302 12 00, ex 0304 10 13, ex 0303 22 00 and ex
0304 20 13 originating in Norway and exported by
the 12 companies listed in the Annex to that Regu-
lation. By the same Regulation, the Commission
deleted the companies concerned from the Annex
to Decision 97/634/EC, which listed the com-
panies from which undertakings were accepted.

C. PROCEDURE FOLLOWING IMPOSITION OF

PROVISIONAL DUTIES

duties

received

(10) All 12 Norwegian companies subject to the provi-
sional
in writing
concerning the essential facts and considerations
on the basis of which these provisional duties were
imposed. They were also given an opportunity to
submit comments and request a hearing.

disclosure

(11) Within the time limit set in the provisional duty
the Norwegian companies
Regulation, nine of
concerned submitted comments
In
addition, comments were submitted by the Norwe-
gian Seafood Association on behalf of two of the
companies subject
to the provisional measures.
Following receipt of these written submissions, the
Commission sought and examined all information
it deemed necessary for the purpose of a definitive
determination on the apparent violations.

in writing.

(12) Of the 12 companies subject to the provisional
five requested (and were granted) a

measures,
hearing.

D. DEFINITIVE FINDINGS (cid:190) REPEAL OF
PROVISIONAL DUTIES FOR SIX COMPANIES

they had sent

(14) With regard to the 10 Norwegian exporters which
to the
submitted their quarterly report
either
Commission late, or did not submit a report at all,
two companies, Kr Kleiven & Co. AS and Scanfood
AS, claimed that
their quarterly
reports to the Commission by electronic mail
within the due time period. However, it was found
subsequently that this electronic mail contained an
incorrect
the Commission
service dealing with the monitoring of anti-
the
dumping undertakings, with the result
reports did not reach the department concerned.
The companies both claimed that they did not, as
usually happens with undelivered electronic mail,
receive a ‘mail-fail' message from, in this case, the
Commission’s electronic mail-failure service.

internal address

that

for

(15) Having examined the additional evidence put
forward by the companies subsequent to the im-
position of the provisional measures, the Commis-
sion is satisfied that the companies did indeed try
to send their reports within the prescribed dead-
line. After also investigating the matter further with
regard to the functioning of
its own electronic
the Commission considers
mail-failure system,
that, at the time of submission of their reports, Kr
Kleiven & Co. AS and Scanfood AS might not, for
temporary technical reasons, have received noti-
fication of non-receipt from its mail-server. Their
claim that they were unaware that the reports had
not been received by the competent Commission
department is therefore accepted and, accordingly,
definitive measures should not be imposed against
these two companies.

(16) Another company which failed to submit its quar-
terly report within the prescribed time limit,
Nor-Fa Food AS, claimed in mitigation that, whilst
preparing the report during the month following
the end of the quarter in question, it encountered
on two occasions serious technical problems with
regard to special computer diskettes used by
Norwegian companies for compiling the sales data
for the reports. These problems led to the final
preparation of the report being delayed and its
eventual despatch to the Commission to be after
the deadline for
in the Commission’s
offices.

receipt

Subsequent to the imposition of provisional meas-
ures, Nor-Fa Food AS also provided evidence from
the business consultancy firm which supplied the
diskettes confirming that the company had indeed
encountered problems initially with their use.

(13)

The oral and written comments submitted by the
interested parties were considered and, where
appropriate, taken into account in the definitive
findings.

(17)

The company also argued that it was, at that time, a
company newly admitted to the system of under-
takings and that the quarterly report in question
was the first one it had submitted to the Commis-
sion.

4. 5. 1999

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

L 115/15

(18) Having considered the matter further and after
examination of the new arguments and evidence
put forward, the Commission is now satisfied that
the company had genuine difficulties in fulfilling
it had been
its reporting obligations and that
confronted with circumstances which were beyond
its control. Accordingly, definitive measures should
not be imposed against Nor-Fa Food AS.

(19) A fourth company whose report was received late,
Norway Seafoods ASA, attempted to submit
its
report for the second quarter of 1998 by electronic
mail, but its electronic message was not accepted
by the Commission’s mail server because of its size.

(20)

Following the imposition of provisional measures,
the company argued that the Commission’s mail
server appears to have been faulty as the actual size
of
the
the message sent was nowhere near
maximum handling capacity of the mail server and
its message should have been received satisfactorily.

(21) As mentioned above with regard to Kr Kleiven &
the Commission has
Co. AS and Scanfood AS,
checked the functioning of its own electronic mail-
failure system at
the time when the quarterly
reports in question were due. It is considered that
Norway Seafoods ASA could not have reasonably
expected their report to be refused by the Commis-
sion’s mail server which, at the time, may not have
been fault-free. The claim of Norway Seafoods ASA
that it was confronted with a situation over which it
had no control is therefore accepted. Accordingly,
definitive measures should not be imposed against
this company.

(22)

exceptional

difficulties with regard

Following the imposition of provisional measures,
another company further elaborated on its claim
that
to
personnel caused its report to be sent late. The
further clarifications and explanations provided by
the company showed that it encountered difficul-
ties which were unforeseeable. Consequently,
definitive measures should not be imposed against
this company.

price for the quarter was higher and in conformity
with the minimum import price. Accordingly, the
provisional duties imposed against this company
should be repealed.

E. DEFINITIVE FINDINGS (cid:190) VIOLATION OF

UNDERTAKINGS BY SIX COMPANIES

(24) As concerns the five other companies which failed
to respect their obligations to report on time, none
of them have provided further satisfactory evidence
subsequent to final disclosure that circumstances
which were beyond their control had prevented
them from submitting their quarterly reports
within the due period.

(25) Accordingly,

definitive measures

should

be

imposed against these five companies.

(26)

come

The other company against which provisional
measures were imposed due to apparent violations
of the minimum import price, Brødrene Remo, did
not
forward with any explanations or
evidence which would have put in question the
provisional findings. It is therefore concluded that
definitive measures should also be imposed against
this company.

(27) All

the
the interested parties were informed of
essential facts and considerations on the basis of
which it was intended to either repeal the provi-
sional measures imposed against them and rein-
state them on the list of companies from which
undertakings are accepted, or confirm the with-
drawal of the Commission’s acceptance of their
undertaking and to recommend the imposition of
definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties
and the definitive collection of
the amounts
secured by way of provisional duties. The com-
panies were also granted a period within which to
make representations subsequent to this disclosure.
Comments received were taken into account where
appropriate.

(23) One of the two companies against which provi-
sional measures were imposed due to apparent
violations of
the minimum import price, SMP
Marine Produkter AS, provided calculations which
showed that
company had inadvertently
deducted from a sales transaction a certain amount
for customs duty which had in fact been paid by
the customer in the Community (and was not
therefore deductible as a direct selling expense).
Without this erroneous deduction, the average sales

the

(28)

In parallel to this Regulation, the Commission is
submitting a proposal for a Council Regulation
imposing definitive anti-dumping and counter-
vailing duties on farmed Atlantic salmon origin-
ating in Norway and exported by the remaining
seven companies which are subject to the provi-
sional duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 82/
1999, namely A Ovreskotnes AS, Alsvag Fiskepro-
dukter A/S, Brødrene Remo AS, Hitramat & Deli-
katesse AS, Seacom Nord AS and Stavanger Røkeri
AS.

L 115/16

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

4. 5. 1999

F. NEW VIOLATION CASES

(29) As mentioned above, all exporters from which
undertakings have been accepted are required to
submit a quarterly sales report within a prescribed
period to the Commission, and also to respect
minimum prices for the various presentations of
the product concerned. With regard to the third
quarter of 1998, a Norwegian exporter, Atlantic
Seafood A/S failed to comply with its obligation to
present a report within the prescribed time limit.
The company was informed of the consequences of
late reporting and, in particular, that should the
Commission have reasons to believe that its under-
taking is being violated, a provisional anti-dumping
and countervailing duty may be imposed pursuant
to Article 8(10) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 and
Article 13(10) of Regulation (EC) No 2026/97,
respectively.

(30)

The company was also invited to provide evidence
of any force majeure which caused the late submis-
sion of its report. However, no conclusive evidence
thereof has been provided.

(31) Also, whilst monitoring the reports relating to the
third quarter of 1998, it appeared that one exporter,
Myre Sjømat AS, had made sales to the Community
market below the minimum price foreseen in the
undertaking.

(32)

In order to determine the veracity and accuracy of
the information provided in the quarterly reports
furnished by exporters, on-the-spot verification
visits at the premises of selected companies are
performed by the Commission on a regular basis.
In this regard, a series of visits was made in
in Norway and
November 1998 to exporters
importers in the Community. Visits were also made
to Norwegian exporters in January 1999.

(33) One of the companies visited in Norway, Brødrene
Eilertsen AS, had submitted quarterly reports to the
Commission which purported to show that it had
made sales of the product covered by the under-
taking to customers in the Community in accord-
ance with the terms of the undertaking. The verifi-
cation revealed, however, that the company had not
bought and sold the products mentioned in its
reports but had, instead, simply issued invoices to
importers in the Community on behalf of another
Norwegian company, which had not offered an
undertaking to the Commission and for which it
acted as an agent.
Indeed, although Brødrene
Eilertsen AS issued export invoices and reported
these to the Commission as its own sales, payment
for the goods was made directly to the other
Norwegian company by
in the
Community.

the buyers

(34) Another Norwegian

company

sole customer

visited, Arne
Mathiesen AS, was found to have exported the
product concerned exclusively to an unrelated
importer
in the Community. However, Arne
Mathiesen AS sourced much of this salmon from a
Norwegian supplier which was related to Mathie-
sen’s
in the Community. With
regard to the exports sourced from this supplier,
the investigation showed that Arne Mathiesen AS
did not actually pay the supplier for the goods. As
concerns
these goods, whilst Arne
Mathiesen AS issued the export invoices, payment
for the goods thereon was made directly by the
Community importer to its related supplier in
Norway, and not to Arne Mathiesen AS. Instead of
receiving the full invoiced amount, Arne Mathiesen
received the difference between the supposed
purchase invoice and the amount appearing on the
export invoice.

‘resale' of

(35) Accordingly, neither Brødrene Eilertsen AS or
Arne Mathiesen AS can be considered as exporters
for the purposes of their undertakings as they do
not exercise any control over the actual price of the
goods. This also means that the price paid by the
customer in the Community to the Norwegian
supplier companies without an undertaking cannot
be monitored at all by the Commission.

(36)

is

therefore provisionally

It
concluded that
Brødrene Eilertsen AS and Arne Mathiesen AS
have made misleading declarations as to the iden-
tity of the exporter and the identity and nature of
the sales reported, which constitutes a breach of
their undertakings.

G. IMPOSITION OF PROVISIONAL MEASURES
VIOLATION

FOLLOWING

APPARENT
CASES

(37) Having regard to all the above, there are reasons to
the undertakings accepted by the
believe that
Commission from Atlantic Seafood AS, Myre
Sjømat AS, Brødrene Eilertsen AS and Arne
Mathiesen AS are being violated.

(38)

(39)

It is therefore considered imperative that, pending
further investigation of these apparent violations,
provisional duties be imposed against these com-
panies.

In accordance with Article 8(10) of Regulation (EC)
No 384/96 and Article 13(10) of Regulation (EC)
the anti-dumping and
No 2026/97,
countervailing duty respectively must be estab-
lished on the basis of the best information avail-
able.

the rate of

4. 5. 1999

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

L 115/17

(40)

In this regard, and in view of recital 107 of Regula-
tion (EC) No 1890/97 and recital 149 of Regulation
(EC) No 1891 /97 it is considered appropriate that
the provisional anti-dumping and countervailing
duty rates be set at the level and in the form
imposed by Regulation (EC) No 772/1999.

raised no objections. Pursuant to Article 2 of Regu-
lation (EC) No 772/1999 therefore, the Annex to
that Regulation should be amended to grant
exemption from payment of anti-dumping and
countervailing duties to this company.

H. FINAL CONSIDERATION CONCERNING

IMPOSITION OF PROVISIONAL DUTIES

(47)

(41)

In the interest of sound administration, a period
should be fixed in which interested parties may
make known their views in writing and request a
hearing.

(42)

(43)

(44)

(45)

(46)

I. NEW EXPORTER

imposition of definitive

Following the
anti-
dumping and countervailing duties, several com-
panies made themselves known to the Commission
claiming to be new exporters and offered under-
takings.

In this regard, one such company, Westmarine AS,
demonstrated that it had not exported the product
concerned to the Community during the invest-
igation period which led to the current anti-
dumping and countervailing duties. The company
also showed that it was not related to any of the
companies in Norway which are subject to the
anti-dumping and countervailing duties. Finally,
the company provided evidence that it had entered
into an irrevocable contractual obligation to export
a significant amount of the product concerned to
the Community.

exporting farmed Atlantic

The undertaking offered is identical in its terms to
those previously offered by other Norwegian
salmon
companies
originating in Norway and it is considered that
acceptance of
such an undertaking from this
exporter will be sufficient to remove the effects of
injurious dumping and subsidisation.

Since the exporter has agreed to provide the
Commission with regular and detailed information
on its exports to the Community, it is concluded
that the undertaking can be monitored effectively
by the Commission.

The undertaking offered by this company is there-
fore considered acceptable. The company has been
informed of the essential facts and considerations
upon which acceptance of the undertaking is based.
The Advisory Committee was consulted and has

J. CHANGE OF NAME

In addition, two other Norwegian exporters, Saga
Lax Nord AS and Hydro Seafood Sales AS, advised
the Commission that the names of the companies
had been changed to Prima Nor AS and Hydro
Seafood Norway AS respectively. The Commission
has therefore verified and confirmed that
there
were no changes to their corporate structures which
warranted a more detailed examination of
the
appropriateness of the companies maintaining their
undertakings. Accordingly,
these
companies should be amended in the Annex to
Decision 97/634/EC.

the name of

K. AMENDMENT OF

THE

ANNEX

TO

DECISION 97/634/EC

(48)

The Annex to Decision 97/634/EC accepting
undertakings in the context of the present anti-
dumping and anti-subsidies proceedings should be
amended to take account of the reinstatement of
the undertakings given by Kr Kleiven & Co. AS,
Misundfisk AS, Nor-Fa Food AS, Norway Seafoods
ASA, Scanfood AS and SMP Marine Produkter AS,
in respect of which the provisional duties should be
the undertaking accepted from West-
repealed,
marine AS and the changes of name to Prima Nor
AS and Hydro Seafood Norway AS.

(49)

For the sake of clarity, an updated version of this
Annex should be published, showing the exporters
whose undertakings remain in force.

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

imposed against

The provisional anti-dumping and countervailing
1.
duties
the following companies by
Regulation (EC) No 82/1999 in relation to farmed
(other than wild) Atlantic salmon originating in Norway
falling within CN codes ex 0302 12 00 (Taric code:
code:
0302 12 00* 19),
0304 10 13*19), ex 0303 22 00 (Taric code: 0303 22 00*19)
and ex 0304 20 13 (Taric code: 0304 20 13*19), are hereby
repealed:

0304 10 13

(Taric

ex

L 115/18

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

4. 5. 1999

UT No

Company name

Taric additional
code

80

98

126

153

168

191

Kr Kleiven & Co. AS

Midsundfisk AS

Norway Seafoods ASA

Scanfood AS

SMP Marine Produkter AS

Nor-Fa Food AS

8182

8202

8314

8264

8279

8102

2.
The Annex to Regulation (EC) No 82/1999 is
hereby replaced by Annex I to the present Regulation.

3.
Any amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-
dumping and countervailing duties imposed by Regula-
tion (EC) No 82/1999 from Kr Kleiven & Co. AS,
Misundfisk AS, Norway Seafoods ASA, Scanfood AS, SMP
Marine Produkter AS and Nor-Fa Food AS shall be
released.

Article 2

1.

(a) Provisional

ex

and

countervailing

anti-dumping
duties are hereby imposed on imports of farmed
(other than wild) Atlantic salmon falling within
code:
CN codes
code:
0302 12 00*19),
0304 10 13*19),
code:
0303 22 00*19) and ex 0304 20 13 (Taric code:
0304 20 13*19) originating in Norway and exported
by the companies listed in Annex II to the present
Regulation.

0302 12 00
0304 10 13
0303 22 00

(Taric
(Taric
(Taric

ex
ex

(b) These duties shall not apply to wild Atlantic
salmon (Taric codes: 0302 12 00*11, 0304 10 13*11,
0303 22 00*11 and 0304 20 13*11). For the purpose
of this Regulation, wild salmon shall be that in
respect of which the competent authorities of the
Member States of landing are satisfied, by means of
to be
all
provided by interested parties, that it was caught at
sea.

and transport documents

customs

2.

(a) The rate of the countervailing duty applicable to
the net free-at-Community-frontier price, before
duty, shall be 3,8 % (Taric code: 8900).

(b) The rate of the anti-dumping duty applicable to
the net free-at-Community-frontier price, before
duty, shall be EUR 0,32 per kilogram net product
weight (Taric code: 8900). However, if the free-at-
Community-frontier price, including the counter-
vailing and anti-dumping duties, is less than the
relevant minimum price set out in paragraph 3, the
anti-dumping duty to be collected shall be the
difference between that minimum price and the
free-at-Community-frontier price,
including the
countervailing duty.

For

the purpose of paragraph 2,

the following
3.
minimum prices shall apply per kilogram net product
weight:

Presentation of salmon

Minimum
price
Euro/kg net
product
weight

Taric code

Whole fish, fresh or chilled

2,925

0302 12 00*21

Gutted,
chilled

Gutted,
chilled

head-on,

fresh

or

3,25

0302 12 00*22

headless,

fresh

or

3,65

0302 12 00*23

Other,
including ‘steaks'

fresh

or

chilled,

3,65

0302 12 00*29

Whole fish, frozen

2,925

0303 22 00*21

Gutted, head-on, frozen

Gutted, headless, frozen

3,25

3,65

0303 22 00*22

0303 22 00*23

Other, frozen, including ‘steaks'

3,65

0303 22 00*29

Whole fish fillets, more than
300 gr each, fresh or chilled

5,19

0304 10 13*21

fish fillets

Other
fillet
portions, 300 gr or less each,
fresh or chilled

or

6,55

0304 10 13*29

Whole fish fillets, more than
300 gr each, frozen

5,19

0304 20 13*21

fish fillets

fillet
Other
portions, weighing 300 gr or
less each, frozen

or

6,55

0304 20 13*29

Article 3

The following company shall be added to the Annex to
Regulation (EC) No 772/1999

UT No

Company name

Taric additional
code

192

Westmarine AS

8625

Article 4

The Annex to Decision 97/634/EC is hereby replaced by
Annex III hereto.

4. 5. 1999

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

L 115/19

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official
Journal of the European Communities.

Article 5

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member
States.

Done at Brussels, 29 April 1999.

For the Commission

Leon BRITTAN

Vice-President

L 115/20

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

4. 5. 1999

ANNEX I

List of companies subject to provisional anti-dumping and countervailing duties

Taric
additional
code

8095

8098

8128

8154

8270

8282

No

1

5

30

65

159

171

Company

A. Ovreskotnes A/S

Alsvag Fiskeprodukter A/S

Brødrene Remo A/S

Hitramat & Delikatesse AS

Seacom Nord AS

Stavanger Røkeri AS

ANNEX II

List of companies on which provisional duties are imposed by Article 2

UT No

Company

Taric additional
code

14

24

28

99

Arne Mathiesen A/S

Atlantic Seafood A/S

Brødrene Eilertsen A/S

Myre Sjømat AS

8112

8122

8126

8203

4. 5. 1999

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

L 115/21

ANNEX III

ANNEX TO DECISION 97/634/EC

List of the 110 companies from which undertakings are accepted, as updated on 5 May 1999

UT No

Company name

TARIC
additional code

3

7

8

11

13

15

16

17

20

21

22

23

26

27

31

32

33

35

36

39

41

42

43

44

46

47

48

50

51

52

53

Agnefest Seafood

Aqua Export A/S

Aqua Partner A/S

Arctic Group International

Artic Superior A/S

A/S Aalesundfisk

A/S Austevoll Fiskeindustri

A/S Keco

A/S Refsnes Fiskeindustri

A/S West Fish Ltd

Astor A/S

Atlantic King Stranda A/S

Borkowski & Rosnes A/S

Brødrene Aasjord A/S

Christiansen Partner A/S

Clipper Seafood A/S

Coast Seafood A/S

Dafjord Laks A/S

Delfa Norge A/S

Domstein Salmon A/S

Ecco Fisk & Delikatesse

Edvard Johnsen A/S

Eurolaks AS

Euronor AS

Fiskeforsyningen AS

Fjord Aqua Group AS

Fjord Trading Ltd. AS

Fossen AS

Fresh Atlantic AS

Fresh Marine Company AS

Fryseriet AS

8325

8100

8101

8109

8111

8113

8114

8115

8118

8119

8120

8121

8124

8125

8129

8130

8131

8133

8134

8136

8138

8139

8140

8141

8143

8144

8145

8147

8148

8149

8150

L 115/22

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

4. 5. 1999

UT No

Company name

TARIC
additional code

58

60

61

62

66

67

72

75

76

77

79

80

82

83

85

87

92

93

96

98

100

101

104

105

107

108

111

112

113

114

115

116

119

120

121

122

123

124

126

Grieg Seafood AS

Haafa fisk AS

Hallvard Lerøy AS

Herøy Filetfabrikk AS

Hydro Seafood Norway AS

Hydrotech-gruppen AS

Inter Sea AS

Janas AS

Joh. H. Pettersen AS

Johan J. Helland AS

Karsten J. Ellingsen AS

Kr Kleiven & Co. AS

Labeyrie Norge AS

Lafjord Group AS

Leica Fiskeprodukter

Lofoten Seafood Export AS

Marine Seafood AS

Marstein Seafood AS

Memo Food AS

Midsundfisk AS

Naco Trading AS

Namdal Salmon AS

Nerg(cid:134)rd AS

Nils Williksen AS

Nisja Trading AS

Nor-Food AS

Nordic Group ASA

Nordreisa Laks AS

Norexport AS

Norfi Produkter AS

Norfood Group AS

Norfra Eksport AS

Norsk Akvakultur AS

Norsk Sjømat AS

Northern Seafood AS

Nortrade AS

Norway Royal Salmon Sales AS

Norway Royal Salmon AS

Norway Seafoods ASA

8300

8302

8303

8304

8159

8428

8174

8177

8178

8179

8181

8182

8184

8185

8187

8188

8196

8197

8200

8202

8206

8207

8210

8211

8213

8214

8217

8218

8223

8227

8228

8229

8232

8233

8307

8308

8309

8312

8314

4. 5. 1999

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

L 115/23

UT No

Company name

TARIC
additional code

128

130

134

137

140

141

142

144

145

146

147

148

151

153

154

155

156

157

158

160

161

162

164

165

167

168

172

174

175

176

178

180

182

183

187

188

189

190

191

192

Norwell AS

Nova Sea AS

Ok-Fish Kvalheim AS

Pan Fish Sales AS

Polar Seafood Norway AS

Prilam Norv(cid:138)ge AS

Pundslett Fisk

Rolf Olsen Seafood AS

Ryfisk AS

Rørvik Fisk- og fiskematforretning AS

Saga Lax Norge AS

Prima Nor AS

Sangoltgruppa AS

Scanfood AS

Sea Eagle Group AS

Sea Star International AS

Sea-Bell AS

Seaco AS

Seacom AS

Seafood Farmers of Norway Ltd AS

Seanor AS

Sekkingstad AS

Sirena Norway AS

Kinn Salmon AS

SL Fjordgruppen AS

SMP Marine Produkter AS

Stjernelaks AS

Stolt Sea Farm AS

Storm Company AS

Superior AS

Terra Seafood AS

Timar Seafood AS

Torris Products Ltd. AS

Troll Salmon AS

Vie de France Norway AS

Vikenco AS

Wannebo International AS

West Fish Norwegian Salmon AS

Nor-Fa Food AS

Westmarine AS

8316

8235

8239

8242

8247

8248

8251

8254

8256

8257

8258

8259

8262

8264

8265

8266

8267

8268

8269

8271

8272

8273

8275

8276

8278

8279

8283

8285

8286

8287

8289

8294

8298

8317

8321

8322

8323

8324

8102

8625