WRITTEN QUESTION No. 885/99 by Marie-Paule KESTELIJN- SIERENS Transposition by Belgium of Directive 93/89/EEC on the application by Member States of taxes on certain vehicles used for the carriage of goods by road
Date: 1999-04-08
Institutions: European Parliament, KESTELIJN-SIERENS
Subjects: Belgium, charges for use of infrastructure, commercial vehicle, national implementing measure, road network, road traffic, toll, vehicle tax

C 370/136

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

21.12.1999

At the present time, the Community has not acted in the field of airport safety and the Commission
4.
cannot therefore speculate on what is safe or not in the vicinity of airports. It can only refer to current
international standards and recommended practices established by the International civil aviation organisa-
tion (ICAO) of which all Member States are members

5.
The scope of Council Regulation (EEC) 3922/91 of 16 December 1991 on the harmonization of
technical requirements and administrative procedures in the field of aviation could indeed cover airport
operations since its first article refers to organisations and personnel involved in the operation of aircraft.
It could therefore constitute an appropriate basis to legislate in this field. Bearing in mind however the
previous comments on ICAO standards and recommended practices and the principle of subsidiarity, it has
not been felt necessary up to now for the Community to act in this field.

(1999/C 370/191)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0885/99

by Marie-Paule Kestelijn-Sierens (ELDR) to the Commission

(8 April 1999)

Subject: Transposition by Belgium of Directive 93/89/EEC on the application by Member States of taxes on

certain vehicles used for the carriage of goods by road

By Royal Decree of 21 October 1997, Belgium implemented Directive 93/89/EEC (1), laying down that the
euro vignette would be required in Belgium, inter alia, for the N8 road from Courtrai to Coxyde via Ypres,
a road which is classified as a secondary road in the Flanders Structural Plan.

Is it permitted under the Directive referred to above for a Member State to require a euro vignette for a
road it regards as a secondary road?

(1) OJ L 279, 12.11.1993, p. 32.

Answer given by Mr Kinnock on behalf of the Commission

(7 May 1999)

Article 7.d third sub-paragraph of Council Directive 93/89/EEC of 25 October 1993 on the application by
Member States of taxes on certain vehicles used for the carriage of goods by road and tolls and charges for
the use of certain infrastructures, stipulates that after consultations with the Commission, in accordance
with a specific procedure, Member States may impose user charges (i.e. the Eurovignette) also on users of
other sections of the primary road network particularly where there are safety reasons for doing so.

Making use of this provision the Belgian government entered into consultations with the Commission
regarding the extension of the road network, where the Eurovignette is levied, to include all N-roads
(‘routes nationales’).

After examination of the Belgian request the Commission concluded in its opinion of 15 February 1996
that a large-scale extension of the Eurovignette network as proposed by the Belgian Government is not
justified. However the Commission found reasonable the extension of the application of the Eurovignette
on a limited number of N-roads (17) where a shift of heavy goods traffic could be expected if they
remained outside the Eurovignette network. According to the Commission’s opinion such a transfer of
traffic onto these N-roads, combined with certain of their features, could lead to higher safety risks.

Therefore, to prevent such an occurrence and help maintain the road safety level throughout the Belgian
territory the Commission agreed to the levying of the Eurovignette on these 17 N-roads (additionally to
the motorways) which include the road N 8 Brussel-Ninove-Oudenaarde-Kortrijk-Ieper-Koksijde.