WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3945/98 by Anita POLLACK Brownfield sites/contaminated land
Date: 1999-01-04
Institutions: European Parliament, POLLACK
Subjects: EU programme, Structural Funds, area management, competence of the Member States, industrial plot, land use, soil pollution, town and country planning

C 320/92

Official Journal of the European Communities

EN

6.11.1999

(1999/C 320/125)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3942/98

by Anita Pollack (PSE) to the Commission

(4 January 1999)

Subject: EMAS

At what stage is the revised sustainable management and audit scheme?

Answer given by Mrs Bjerregaard on behalf of the Commission

(4 February 1999)

On 30 October 1998, the Commission adopted a proposal for a Council Regulation allowing participation by
organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) (1) following a review of Council
Regulation (EEC) 1836/93 of 29 June 1993 allowing voluntary participation by companies in the industrial
sector in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (2).

The Community took the opportunity of this review pursuant to Article 20 of Regulation (EEC) 1836/93 to
carry out wide-ranging consultations with the various interested parties, in order to arrive at a balanced
proposal of benefit both to the environment and the organisations eligible to participate in EMAS.

Among the new features of this proposal, the extension of the scope of the Regulation to all economic
activities will increase coverage of environmental impacts, leading to an overall improvement in environ-
mental performance. Organisations such as financial institutions or local authorities will thus have an effective
tool at their disposal to manage their environmental effects, which can be just as significant as those
encountered in industry.

Care has also been taken to ensure that EMAS is compatible with the international standard ISO 14001,
compared with which, however, EMAS has added value.
In addition to the internal management of
environmental impacts in the framework of ISO 14001, EMAS requires organisations to improve their
environmental performance and to inform the outside world of the progress made via an environmental
statement validated by an independent party. This added value will enhance the registered organisations’
credibility, in particular vis-à-vis the inspection authorities and the public.

The new proposal also aims to encourage the participation of organisations irrespective of their size. It is
therefore planned to improve information to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), to define support
tools, to make verifiers more aware of the conditions under which SMEs operate and to encourage large firms
to support their small-business suppliers in implementing EMAS.

Finally, the organisations registered in compliance with EMAS may use a logo to advertise their voluntary
efforts to improve environmental performance. The conditions under which the logo may be used are
narrowly defined in order to maintain a balance between communication and credibility, and in particular to
avoid any confusion with a product label.

(1) OJ C 400, 22.12.1998.
(2) OJ L 168, 10.7.1993.

(1999/C 320/126)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3945/98

by Anita Pollack (PSE) to the Commission

(4 January 1999)

Subject: Brownfield sites/contaminated land

Has the Commission given any thought to the possibility of developing a market-based instrument to
encourage investment in or to support the development of brownfield sites?